[Bug fortran/113793] malloc abort on character allocate with source argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113793 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot gnu

[Bug fortran/95682] [11/12 Regression] Default assignment fails with allocatable array of deferred-length strings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95682 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||13.2.1, 14.0 Summa

[Bug fortran/114739] [14 Regression] ice in gfc_find_derived_types, at fortran/symbol.cc:2458

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114739 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code,

[Bug fortran/114467] f951: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114467 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to thomas from comment #3) > (In reply to anlauf from comment #1) > > Can you attached a self-contained reproducer? > > > > The traceback looks familiar. Are you by chance using an ass

[Bug fortran/113793] malloc abort on character allocate with source argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113793 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0 Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/114739] [14 Regression] ice in gfc_find_derived_types, at fortran/symbol.cc:2458

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114739 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Reduced testcase: program main implicit complex(z) z2%re = 1. z2%im = 2. end

[Bug fortran/114739] [14 Regression] ice in gfc_find_derived_types, at fortran/symbol.cc:2458

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114739 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/103471] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in gfc_typenode_for_spec, at fortran/trans-types.c:1114

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103471 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug fortran/114781] Error in ALLOCATE with MOLD=

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114781 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-04-19 C

[Bug fortran/54389] [F2003/F2008 difference] PURE functions and pointer dummy arguments / DECL_PURE_P issue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54389 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #7 from a

[Bug fortran/102597] ICE in gfc_get_extern_function_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:2243 since r8-3365-gb89a63b916340ef2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102597 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||10.5.0, 11.4.1, 12.3.1

[Bug fortran/103496] [F2018][TS29113] C_SIZEOF – rejects now valid args with 'must be an interoperable data entity'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103496 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNC

[Bug fortran/114827] Valgrind reports errors with class(*) assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114827 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/114815] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault - on creating type with len parameter and dependent on it character array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114815 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/102620] [12 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_array_span, at fortran/trans-array.c:865 since r12-1233-gd514626ee2566c68

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102620 --- Comment #10 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #9) > (In reply to anlauf from comment #8) > > I get the same behavior at r13-8559 as 14-mainline. There seems to be > > another commit that fixed it indepe

[Bug fortran/102620] [12 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_array_span, at fortran/trans-array.c:865 since r12-1233-gd514626ee2566c68

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102620 --- Comment #12 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #11) > It would be splendid if you would backport the patch. In the last week or > so, I have built up quite a list of backports to do, which I will attend t

[Bug fortran/102620] [12 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_array_span, at fortran/trans-array.c:865 since r12-1233-gd514626ee2566c68

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102620 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAI

[Bug fortran/114827] Valgrind reports errors with class(*) assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114827 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug fortran/114827] Valgrind reports errors with class(*) assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114827 --- Comment #8 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 58056 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58056&action=edit Patch part 2. This part fixes the array case. Needs further testing.

[Bug fortran/114874] New: [14/15 Regression] ICE with select type, type is (character(*)), and substring

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114874 Bug ID: 114874 Summary: [14/15 Regression] ICE with select type, type is (character(*)), and substring Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug fortran/114874] [14/15 Regression] ICE with select type, type is (character(*)), and substring

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114874 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||10.5.0, 11.4.1, 12.3.1,

[Bug fortran/114874] [14/15 Regression] ICE with select type, type is (character(*)), and substring

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114874 --- Comment #1 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #0) > The following code fails for me with latest 14-branch/15-release candidate: Oops, I meant: 14-release candidate/15-mainline after branching...

[Bug fortran/114827] Valgrind reports errors with class(*) assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114827 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #58048|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug fortran/114827] Valgrind reports errors with class(*) assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114827 --- Comment #11 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Submitted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2024-April/060464.html

[Bug fortran/114859] [14/15 Regression] Seeing new segmentation fault in same_type_as since r14-9752

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114859 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code --- Comment #17 f

[Bug fortran/114874] [14/15 Regression] ICE with select type, type is (character(*)), and substring

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114874 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- The dump-fortran-original shows the following difference between 13 and 14: @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ code: ASSIGN p:c 'abc' - BLOCK + SELECT TYPE symtree: '__tmp_CHARACTER_0_1'|| symbol:

[Bug fortran/114874] [14/15 Regression] ICE with select type, type is (character(*)), and substring

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114874 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/114922] fsyntax-only need the modules

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114922 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|U

[Bug fortran/86100] Spurious error with -fcheck=bounds and allocatable class(*) array components

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86100 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/86100] Spurious error with -fcheck=bounds and allocatable class(*) array components

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86100 --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- The code fragment in comment#2 was added in r7-3760-g92c5266bbd5378.

[Bug fortran/115039] New: Statement function with inquiry refs rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115039 Bug ID: 115039 Summary: Statement function with inquiry refs rejected Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fo

[Bug fortran/115039] Statement function with inquiry refs rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115039 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Keywords|

[Bug fortran/115039] Statement function with inquiry refs rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115039 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot gnu

[Bug fortran/115072] Memory leak with unlimited polymorphic function result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115072 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Memory link with unlimited |Memory leak with unlimited

[Bug fortran/115070] [13/14/15 Regression] ICE using IEEE_ARITHMETIC in a derived type method with class, intent(out)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115070 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||12.3.1 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/115070] [13/14/15 Regression] ICE using IEEE_ARITHMETIC in a derived type method with class, intent(out)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115070 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Replacing the scalar argument 'obs' by something with rank > 0 avoids the ICE, but then assumed-rank is not accepted with intent(out). Another bug...

[Bug fortran/86100] Spurious error with -fcheck=bounds and allocatable class(*) array components

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86100 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot gnu.

[Bug fortran/106317] deferred-length character array pointer in derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106317 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status

[Bug fortran/67740] Wrong association status of allocatable character pointer in derived types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67740 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clange001 at gmail dot com --

[Bug fortran/115107] f951: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault 0xcf878f crash_signal toplev.cc:314

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107 --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- The traceback is essentially identical to that in pr114467. Can you please try the 14-release like the other reporter, or the upcoming 13.3 release next week?

[Bug fortran/115107] f951: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault 0xcf878f crash_signal toplev.cc:314

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107 --- Comment #7 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Natalie Perlin from comment #6) > (In reply to anlauf from comment #3) > > The traceback is essentially identical to that in pr114467. > > > > Can you please try the 14-release like

[Bug fortran/115039] Statement function with inquiry refs rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115039 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.4 Status|UNCO

[Bug fortran/110415] (Re)allocation on assignment to allocatable polymorphic variable from allocatable polymorphic function result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110415 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug fortran/114827] Valgrind reports errors with class(*) assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114827 --- Comment #14 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Backporting to 13-branch requires backporting of r14-5931-gb247e917ff1332, see pr110415.

[Bug fortran/115107] f951: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault 0xcf878f crash_signal toplev.cc:314

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107 --- Comment #14 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Natalie Perlin from comment #9) > All rebuilt, gnu/14.1.0 with openmpi/4.1.6, revised configuration of the > software stack (spack-stack). Still the same error with > [-Wimplicit-fu

[Bug fortran/115193] using indices with character type within a select type causes ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115193 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status

[Bug fortran/114874] [14/15 Regression] ICE with select type, type is (character(*)), and substring

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114874 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ryan.mulhall at noaa dot gov

[Bug fortran/110415] (Re)allocation on assignment to allocatable polymorphic variable from allocatable polymorphic function result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110415 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.4 --- Comment #8 from anl

[Bug fortran/114827] Valgrind reports errors with class(*) assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114827 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/103368] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:15668 since r12-4464-g017665f63047ce47

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103368 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug fortran/103368] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:15668 since r12-4464-g017665f63047ce47

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103368 --- Comment #9 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com from comment #8) > I simply copied all the associated functions in trans-expr.cc from mainline > and plonked them in 13-branch. That's why I said that I

[Bug fortran/86100] Spurious error with -fcheck=bounds and allocatable class(*) array components

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86100 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug fortran/27766] [meta-bug] -fbounds-check related bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27766 Bug 27766 depends on bug 86100, which changed state. Bug 86100 Summary: Spurious error with -fcheck=bounds and allocatable class(*) array components https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86100 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/93635] Get ICE instead of error message if user incorrectly equivalences allocateable variables that are in a NAMELIST group

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93635 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/115107] f951: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault 0xcf878f crash_signal toplev.cc:314

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107 --- Comment #16 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Natalie Perlin from comment #15) > Quick update: > > Software stack and model build with gnu/13.3.0 was clear from all previous > issues! So issue with the gnu/13.x.0 compiler coul

[Bug fortran/102619] [11/12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_descriptor_dtype, at fortran/trans-array.c:215 since r9-6493-g0e3088806577e805

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102619 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug fortran/102619] [11/12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_descriptor_dtype, at fortran/trans-array.c:215 since r9-6493-g0e3088806577e805

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102619 --- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 58302 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58302&action=edit Partial patch This change prevents the ICE and leads to a correct shape of the function result for

[Bug fortran/115260] Corruption of derived type data when array temporarys of type occur

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115260 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||9.5.0 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/103139] [12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2573 since r12-4464-g017665f63047ce47

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103139 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||11.4.1, 12.3.1, 13.3.0

[Bug fortran/104130] [12/13 Regression] ICE in gfc_add_class_array_ref, at fortran/class.c:274 since r12-4467-g64f9623765da3306

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104130 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||12.3.1, 13.3.0 Known to

[Bug fortran/115315] [PDT] valgrind error in gfc_simplify_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115315 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/83865] ICE in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:1567

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83865 --- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- The ICE is fixed by: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-stmt.cc b/gcc/fortran/trans-stmt.cc index 9b497d6bdc6..605107b5168 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/trans-stmt.cc +++ b/gcc/fortran/trans-stmt.cc @@ -64

[Bug fortran/83865] ICE in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:1567

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83865 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot gnu.

[Bug fortran/115260] Corruption of derived type data when array temporarys of type occur

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115260 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 58346 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58346&action=edit Reduced testcase Reduced for subsequent analysis.

[Bug fortran/115260] Corruption of derived type data when array temporarys of type occur

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115260 --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #2) > Created attachment 58346 [details] > Reduced testcase > > Reduced for subsequent analysis. Further datapoint: replacing the dummy argument type(field_

[Bug fortran/114019] allocation with source of deferred character length entity

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114019 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/115390] Bogus -Wuninitialized warning when using CHARACTER(*) argument in BIND(C) function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115390 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Slightly rewritten (we only need the interface of foo): module test implicit none interface subroutine foo(s) character(*), intent(in) :: s end subroutine foo end interface

[Bug fortran/107141] ICE: Segmentation fault (in contains_struct_check)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107141 --- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to David Binderman from comment #5) > Bit more detail from valgrind: > > /Lower/derived-type-finalization.f90 > ==687074== Invalid read of size 8 > ==687074==at 0x856D97: gfc_class_

[Bug fortran/115348] [13/14/15 Regression] -fcheck=recursion issue with intent(out) derived type argument without components with default value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115348 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to fail|

[Bug fortran/115401] valgrind error in gfc_class_len_get

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115401 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-06-09 Ever confirme

[Bug fortran/104351] ICE in gfc_generate_initializer, at fortran/expr.cc:5140

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104351 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot gnu

[Bug fortran/111783] 'exit' intrinsic should be marked as noreturn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111783 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug fortran/111783] 'exit' intrinsic should be marked as noreturn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111783 --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #2) > This leaves ABORT and EXIT to deal with. Speaking to myself: subroutine s1() call exit(1) stop 98 end subroutine s2() call abort stop 99 end Here

[Bug fortran/86120] ICE caused by unassociated pointer in SIZE intrinsic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86120 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|

[Bug fortran/66969] Internal compiler error, segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66969 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||simon.kluepfel at gmail dot co

[Bug libfortran/83282] missing comma in format changes output

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83282 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2017-12-05 00:00:00 |2023-10-12 CC

[Bug fortran/104351] ICE in gfc_generate_initializer, at fortran/expr.cc:5140

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104351 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0 Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/66969] Internal compiler error, segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66969 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/111837] [8/9/10/11/12/13/14 Regression] Out of bounds access with optimization inside io-implied-do-control

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111837 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/111837] [8/9/10/11/12/13/14 Regression] Out of bounds access with optimization inside io-implied-do-control

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111837 --- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Lightly tested, probably obvious patch: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/frontend-passes.cc b/gcc/fortran/frontend-passes.cc index 136a292807d..536884b13f0 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/frontend-passes.cc +++

[Bug fortran/111837] [8/9/10/11/12/13/14 Regression] Out of bounds access with optimization inside io-implied-do-control

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111837 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot gnu

[Bug fortran/111851] f951: Segmentation fault at gfc_delete_symtree

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111851 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords|

[Bug fortran/111837] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Out of bounds access with optimization inside io-implied-do-control

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111837 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASS

[Bug fortran/30409] [fortran] missed optimization with pure function arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30409 --- Comment #8 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- The suggested optimization needs to take into account that the evaluation of the temporary expression might trap, or that allocatable variables are not allocated, etc. The trap etc. would not occu

[Bug fortran/104131] ICE in gfc_conv_array_ref, at fortran/trans-array.c:3810

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104131 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||12.1.0 Known to fail|

[Bug fortran/104131] ICE in gfc_conv_array_ref, at fortran/trans-array.c:3810

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104131 --- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- The coarray cases in comment#2 will be rejected with: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/openmp.cc b/gcc/fortran/openmp.cc index 1cc65d7fa49..08081dacde4 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/openmp.cc +++ b/gcc/fortra

[Bug fortran/30409] [fortran] missed optimization with pure function arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30409 --- Comment #11 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to kargl from comment #10) > (In reply to anlauf from comment #8) > I'm not sure what you are worried about here. If one has > >do i = 1, n > ... = expression1(..., 1/y) >

[Bug fortran/104625] ICE in fixup_array_ref, at fortran/resolve.cc:9275 since r10-2912-g70570ec192745095

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104625 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ice-on-valid-code

[Bug fortran/104625] ICE in fixup_array_ref, at fortran/resolve.cc:9275 since r10-2912-g70570ec192745095

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104625 --- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #4) > Created attachment 56192 [details] > Fix for this PR I was thinking of something along these lines, but was wondering: a) there could be multiple nest

[Bug fortran/104649] ICE in gfc_match_formal_arglist, at fortran/decl.cc:6733 since r6-1958-g4668d6f9c00d4767

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104649 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug fortran/104131] ICE in gfc_conv_array_ref, at fortran/trans-array.c:3810

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104131 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug fortran/104625] ICE in fixup_array_ref, at fortran/resolve.cc:9275 since r10-2912-g70570ec192745095

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104625 --- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Steve Lionel of Intel confirmed that the code is valid, and that if X is polymorphic, so is (X): community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/SELECT-TYPE-statement-and-parenthesized-selector/m-p

[Bug fortran/104649] ICE in gfc_match_formal_arglist, at fortran/decl.cc:6733 since r6-1958-g4668d6f9c00d4767

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104649 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|

[Bug fortran/104649] ICE in gfc_match_formal_arglist, at fortran/decl.cc:6733 since r6-1958-g4668d6f9c00d4767

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104649 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASS

[Bug fortran/104555] ICE in gfc_compare_derived_types, at fortran/interface.cc:628 since r10-2912-g70570ec192745095

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104555 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug fortran/111291] ASAN error: heap-use-after-free gcc/fortran/parse.cc:359 in decode_statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111291 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery Last reconf

[Bug fortran/97045] A wrong column is selected when addressing individual elements of unlimited polymorphic dummy argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97045 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||10.5.0 Known to work|

[Bug fortran/92887] [F2008] Passing nullified/disassociated pointer or unalloc allocatable to OPTIONAL + VALUE dummy fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92887 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot gnu.

[Bug fortran/97245] ASSOCIATED intrinsic does not recognize a pointer variable the second time it is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97245 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ASSOCIATE intrinsic does|ASSOCIATED intrinsic does

[Bug fortran/97245] ASSOCIATED intrinsic does not recognize a pointer variable the second time it is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97245 --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Potential fix: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/match.cc b/gcc/fortran/match.cc index f848e52be4c..9e3571d3dbe 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/match.cc +++ b/gcc/fortran/match.cc @@ -5064,6 +5064,7 @@ gfc_match_

<    14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   >