https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103789
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78054
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101762
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101762
--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 52108
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52108&action=edit
Improved patch
The previous patch was too strict. The attached version does a much better
job, but
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101762
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103898
--- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Started most likely with commit r12-3897 by Tobias.
Interestingly, the ICE occurs only for a rank-1 array, but not for rank-2 or
for assumed-rank.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77667
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77667
--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #3)
> The following patch seems to work:
... and regtests ok.
It is not really pretty, though, and does not help with apparently related PRs,
such as PR50410.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103914
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Stat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103782
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95879
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103931
--- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 52138
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52138&action=edit
Somewhat reduced reproducer
The issue can be reproduced with a few less modules
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103942
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2)
> Started with r11-6928-g4225af228b5d52e8 and was fixed on master with
> r12-1005-gfe03f4fc9548b3fd.
Backporting r12-1005 (see pr100551) fixes the segfa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103942
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Build||2022-01-07 0:00
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83079
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103777
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Status|ASSI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83079
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
gnu.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103985
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Can you try gcc-11 or gcc-12?
There were some fixes for asynchronous I/O (pr100352) touching the locking
mechanism.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67804
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67804
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
gnu.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103782
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102332
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99256
--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #3)
Even simpler fix, as intrinsics do not accept alternate return specifiers:
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/intrinsic.c b/gcc/fortran/intrinsic.c
index a7ecdb401ef..4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99256
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77667
--- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Seems fixed on mainline for gcc-12.
Most likely fix: r12-6557 for pr67804.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79685
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85150
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85150
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101762
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||weeks at iastate dot edu
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77667
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67804
--- Comment #7 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 77667 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103942
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10 Regression] invalid |[9 Regression] invalid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103692
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103692
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95372
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #4 from a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103475
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #2 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104127
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104128
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104127
--- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
We die here:
(gdb) l 7244
7239case EXPR_ARRAY:
7240
7241 /* This is somewhat brutal. The expression for the first
7242 element of the array is evaluated and assigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104127
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Tentative patch:
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/simplify.cc b/gcc/fortran/simplify.cc
index 3881370d947..366b00c28dd 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/simplify.cc
+++ b/gcc/fortran/simplify.cc
@@ -8162,7 +8162,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104128
--- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Tentative, semi-obvious patch:
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/target-memory.cc b/gcc/fortran/target-memory.cc
index 361907b0e51..7ce7d736629 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/target-memory.cc
+++ b/gcc/fortran/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104127
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103692
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104128
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104128
--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #3)
> with TRANSFER between different integer kinds. E.g.
oops, that should read: character kinds
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104128
--- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The issue in comment#3 is likely unrelated to TRANSFER:
program p
implicit none
! integer, parameter :: k = 1
integer, parameter :: k = 4
character(kind=k,len=2), parameter :: z = k_"FG"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104128
--- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The remaining issues in this PR seem to be related to inconsistencies
between expr->representation.string and expr->value.character.string
that occur for non-default character kind that are create
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104128
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103782
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104211
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104212
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104212
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59104
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
L
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100275
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67804
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gs...@t-online.de
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67804
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33056
Bug 33056 depends on bug 67804, which changed state.
Bug 67804 Summary: ICE on data initialization of type(character) with wrong data
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67804
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101762
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.4
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104227
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104227
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84784
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84784
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #2)
> Another reduced testcase:
>
> ! { dg-do run }
> ! { dg-options "-fdefault-integer-8" }
> ! { dg-require-effective-target fortran_integer_16 }
>
> if (runt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84784
--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
OK, the following fixes the ICE:
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.cc b/gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.cc
index fccf0a9b229..d5564f659f8 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.cc
+++ b/gcc/f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104212
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104227
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84784
--- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2022-January/057478.html
This fixes
gfortran.dg/team_change_1.f90
gfortran.dg/team_number_1.f90
gfortran.dg/popcnt_poppar_2.F90 (-m64, not supported w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84787
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84784
--- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 84787 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32770
Bug 32770 depends on bug 84787, which changed state.
Bug 84787 Summary: ICEs: in decompose, at wide-int.h:933 with -default-integer-8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84787
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83700
Bug 83700 depends on bug 84787, which changed state.
Bug 84787 Summary: ICEs: in decompose, at wide-int.h:933 with -default-integer-8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84787
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84784
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #8 from a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104128
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101135
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101135
--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 52311
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52311&action=edit
Patch that regtests ok.
The patch suggested by the reporter is rather close to this one.
We need t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101135
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83079
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target Milestone|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104127
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE |[9 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104127
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101135
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
--- Comment #6 from anla
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104311
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-01-31
Statu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104309
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104331
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-02-01
C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104331
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104311
--- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #2)
> We could limit the size of the resulting array constructor, using e.g.
> flag_max_array_constructor.
Sample patch:
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/simplify.cc b/g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104311
--- Comment #7 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #6)
> (In reply to anlauf from comment #2)
> > We could limit the size of the resulting array constructor, using e.g.
> > flag_max_array_constructor.
>
> Sample p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104311
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104331
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100196
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91728
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100196
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66193
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104311
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66193
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
gnu.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104382
--- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
crayftn 11 & 12 output:
destructor4(complicated) 2*2.
destructor5 (simple2) 5
destructor5 (simple2) 6
destructor2(simple) 2*1
destructor4(complicated) 4., 5.
destructor5 (simple2) -1
dest
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93482
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77693
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
gnu.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104211
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104573
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104573
--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #3)
> I'm not sure. I don't use CLASSes, so only know a bit
> about them. If I check F18:7.5.6, I find
>
> C786 (R753) A final-subroutine-name shall be th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104573
--- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The patch in comment#2 regtests ok.
I've been thinking a little to find cases where there should be a difference
to the patch in comment#1, but did not succeed so far. At least not with
minor va
701 - 800 of 2218 matches
Mail list logo