[Bug target/53448] [avr] ignoring __attribute__((aligned(2)))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53448 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/51345] [avr] Devices with 8-bit SP need their own multilib(s)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51345 --- Comment #8 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-05-31 17:32:48 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Thu May 31 17:32:42 2012 New Revision: 188070 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188070 Log: PR target/51345 * config/avr/avr.opt (-msp

[Bug target/46261] avr-gcc: Segfaults when compiled with the -mint8 option

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46261 --- Comment #22 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-06-04 09:48:37 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Mon Jun 4 09:48:34 2012 New Revision: 188172 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188172 Log: PR target/46261 * config/avr/avr-stdint.h

[Bug target/46261] avr-gcc: Segfaults when compiled with the -mint8 option

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46261 --- Comment #23 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-06-04 09:51:05 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Mon Jun 4 09:51:00 2012 New Revision: 188173 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188173 Log: Backport from 2012-06-04 mainline r188172

[Bug target/46261] avr-gcc: Segfaults when compiled with the -mint8 option

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46261 --- Comment #24 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-06-04 09:53:14 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Mon Jun 4 09:53:04 2012 New Revision: 188174 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188174 Log: Backport from 2012-06-04 mainline r188172

[Bug target/46261] avr-gcc: Segfaults when compiled with the -mint8 option

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46261 --- Comment #25 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-06-04 09:55:44 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Mon Jun 4 09:55:35 2012 New Revision: 188175 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188175 Log: Backport from 2012-06-04 mainline r188172

[Bug target/46261] avr-gcc: Segfaults when compiled with the -mint8 option

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46261 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug rtl-optimization/53595] New: Code size increase of +10% between two 4.7.1 snapshot

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53595 Bug #: 53595 Summary: Code size increase of +10% between two 4.7.1 snapshot Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/53595] Code size increase of +10% between two 4.7.1 snapshot

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53595 --- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-06-06 19:54:34 UTC --- Created attachment 27570 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27570 ira dump of older version (good)

[Bug rtl-optimization/53595] Code size increase of +10% between two 4.7.1 snapshot

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53595 --- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-06-06 19:55:49 UTC --- Created attachment 27571 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27571 ira dump of newer version (+10%)

[Bug rtl-optimization/53595] Code size increase of +10% between two 4.7.1 snapshot

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53595 --- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-06-06 19:56:57 UTC --- Created attachment 27572 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27572 reload dump of older version (good)

[Bug rtl-optimization/53595] Code size increase of +10% between two 4.7.1 snapshot

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53595 --- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-06-06 19:58:10 UTC --- Created attachment 27573 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27573 reload dump of newer version (+10%)

[Bug rtl-optimization/53595] Code size increase of +10% between two 4.7.1 snapshot

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53595 --- Comment #6 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-06-06 20:05:02 UTC --- And here is the first part of the diff of the reload dumps that shows that something weird is going on: --- bresenham-i-1.198r.reloadWed Jun 6 19:59:24 2012 +++ bresenham-i-2.

[Bug rtl-optimization/53595] Code size increase of +10% between two 4.7.1 snapshot

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53595 --- Comment #7 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-06-06 20:12:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > That's not very narrow interval. Please bisect what affected it (or what > affected it most). The only changes to 4_7-branch in the IRA/reload area was

[Bug target/46261] avr-gcc: Segfaults when compiled with the -mint8 option

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46261 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.1

[Bug rtl-optimization/53595] Code size increase of +10% between two 4.7.1 snapshot

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53595 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Target||avr Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/53595] Code size increase of +10% between two 4.7.1 snapshot

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53595 --- Comment #9 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-06-07 13:27:33 UTC --- Created attachment 27576 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27576 pr53595.diff And here is a tentative patch: Let HARD_REGNO_CALL_PART_CLOBBERED return false if H

[Bug rtl-optimization/53595] Code size increase of +10% between two 4.7.1 snapshot

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53595 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #27576|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug other/53615] New: Buffer overflow in the compiler?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53615 Bug #: 53615 Summary: Buffer overflow in the compiler? Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug other/53615] Buffer overflow in the compiler?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53615 --- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-06-08 16:48:22 UTC --- Created attachment 27588 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27588 wek.c And here is the source file wek.c Compiled with the above options yields: $ avr-gcc -c we

[Bug other/53615] Buffer overflow in the compiler?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53615 --- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-06-08 16:52:54 UTC --- Note: In attachment 27588 the long version is commented out. You have to remove the comment and the second CODE32 like so: #define CODE32 \ "out %2, %C1\n\tmovw r30, %1\n\telpm

[Bug rtl-optimization/53595] Code size increase of +10% between two 4.7.1 snapshot

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53595 --- Comment #11 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-06-08 17:04:41 UTC --- FYI, the patch attachment 27568 also resolves the strange error described in PR53615, at least for the test case given there.

[Bug target/53256] [avr] Attribute 'interrupt' shall override attribute 'signal'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53256 --- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-06-08 22:42:27 UTC --- See also the following AVR-LibC bug report: http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/index.php?26734

[Bug rtl-optimization/53595] Code size increase of +10% between two 4.7.1 snapshot

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53595 --- Comment #12 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-06-28 13:53:59 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Thu Jun 28 13:53:51 2012 New Revision: 189049 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189049 Log: PR 53595 * config/avr/avr.c (avr_hard_reg

[Bug rtl-optimization/53595] Code size increase of +10% between two 4.7.1 snapshot

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53595 --- Comment #13 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-06-28 13:58:37 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Thu Jun 28 13:58:32 2012 New Revision: 189050 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189050 Log: Backport from 2012-06-28 mainline r189049

[Bug other/53595] Code size increase of +10% between two 4.7.1 snapshot

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53595 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ra Status|NEW

[Bug other/53923] New: ICE: RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'debug_expr' in rhs_regno, at rtl.h:1091

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53923 Bug #: 53923 Summary: ICE: RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'debug_expr' in rhs_regno, at rtl.h:1091 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Stat

[Bug other/53923] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'debug_expr' in rhs_regno, at rtl.h:1091

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53923 --- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-07-11 09:27:26 UTC --- Created attachment 27773 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27773 libgcc2-mulsc3.c: preprocessed bit of libgcc2.c compile with avr-gcc libgcc2-mulsc3.c -c -mmcu=

[Bug other/53923] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'debug_expr' in rhs_regno, at rtl.h:1091

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53923 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/53923] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'debug_expr' in rhs_regno, at rtl.h:1091

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53923 --- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-07-11 10:03:49 UTC --- avr.c already contains code to work around problems from DCE, instead of DCE working out proper solutions to cover AVR, see PR50063 Something goes wrong in df-problems.c:dead_debu

[Bug other/53925] New: dbgcnt.c:dbg_cnt_set_limit_by_index emits diagnostic via fprintf (stderr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53925 Bug #: 53925 Summary: dbgcnt.c:dbg_cnt_set_limit_by_index emits diagnostic via fprintf (stderr Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONF

[Bug target/53935] New: [avr][c++] missing warning for non-const data in progmem

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53935 Bug #: 53935 Summary: [avr][c++] missing warning for non-const data in progmem Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/53935] [avr][c++] missing warning for non-const data in progmem

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53935 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug other/54030] make install does not honor --program-prefix/--program-suffix for 'gcc' (AVR build)

other) | Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2012-07-26 CC||gjl at gcc dot gnu.org, ||mikestump at comcast dot

[Bug other/53923] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'debug_expr' in rhs_regno, at rtl.h:1091

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53923 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added CC||richard.sandiford at linaro

[Bug other/53615] Buffer overflow in the compiler?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53615 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/53615] Buffer overflow in the compiler?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53615 --- Comment #7 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-08-02 16:45:24 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > You should run the compiler under Valgrind and see whether it complains. I never built the compiler with valgrind support. Is the a comprehensible docum

[Bug other/50925] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression][avr] ICE at spill_failure, at reload1.c:2118

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50925 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2012-02-17 00:00:00 |2012-08-02 0:00 --- Comment #24 from G

[Bug other/50925] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression][avr] ICE at spill_failure, at reload1.c:2118

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50925 --- Comment #25 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-08-02 17:34:40 UTC --- (In reply to comment #24) > The kook isn't even called once... My bad... The hook IS called, but it does not help with this bug.

[Bug rtl-optimization/52543] lower-subreg.c: code bloat of 300%-400% for multi-word memory splits

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52543 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug rtl-optimization/52543] lower-subreg.c: code bloat of 300%-400% for multi-word memory splits

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52543 --- Comment #11 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-08-02 18:37:18 UTC --- Created attachment 27928 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27928 /local/gnu/patches/pr52543-undo-185605.diff Just for reference: Here is the patch that undoes th

[Bug rtl-optimization/52543] lower-subreg.c: code bloat of 300%-400% for multi-word memory splits

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52543 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug other/53615] Buffer overflow in the compiler?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53615 --- Comment #8 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-08-03 16:03:09 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > You should run the compiler under Valgrind and see whether it complains. I now configured with --enable-checking=valgrind Valgrind is 3.3.1 GCC is 4.7.1

[Bug other/53615] Buffer overflow in the compiler?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53615 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-checking Status|WAITIN

[Bug rtl-optimization/51374] [avr] insn combine reorders volatile memory accesses

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51374 --- Comment #9 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-02-01 11:35:37 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Wed Feb 1 11:35:34 2012 New Revision: 183796 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183796 Log: gcc/ PR rtl-optimization/51374 * combine.c

[Bug rtl-optimization/51374] [avr] insn combine reorders volatile memory accesses

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51374 --- Comment #10 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-02-01 12:40:26 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Wed Feb 1 12:40:23 2012 New Revision: 183797 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183797 Log: gcc/ Backport from mainline r183796 PR rt

[Bug rtl-optimization/51374] [avr] insn combine reorders volatile memory accesses

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51374 --- Comment #11 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-02-01 12:46:42 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Wed Feb 1 12:46:39 2012 New Revision: 183798 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183798 Log: PR rtl-optimization/51374 * gcc.target/av

[Bug rtl-optimization/51374] [avr] insn combine reorders volatile memory accesses

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51374 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/52113] [4.7 regression][lower-subreg.c] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2123

||gjl at gcc dot gnu.org Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Summary|[4.7 regression][avr] ICE: |[4.7 |in extract_insn, at |regression][lower-subreg.c] |recog.c:2123|ICE: in extract_insn, at

[Bug other/52115] New: ICE: verify_ssa failed (missing definition for SSA_NAME)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52115 Bug #: 52115 Summary: ICE: verify_ssa failed (missing definition for SSA_NAME) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug other/52115] ICE: verify_ssa failed (missing definition for SSA_NAME)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52115 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/52113] [4.7 regression][lower-subreg.c] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2123

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52113 --- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-02-04 01:14:53 UTC --- Thanks. For the testcase, omit -mmcu=. That option is set by board.exp during testsuite: -/* { dg-options "-O1" } */ +/* { dg-options "-O1 -mmcu=atmega64" } */

[Bug target/38342] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] __attribute__((__progmem__)) not propagated from typedef to data

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38342 --- Comment #13 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-02-06 13:55:09 UTC --- For avr-libc users, please f'up to http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?33716

[Bug target/46779] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression][avr] wrong code generation for values held in R28/R29

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46779 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dhowells at redhat dot com --- Comment

[Bug target/51445] g++ sometimes miscompiles code for the avr target

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51445 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gjl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/52261] New: [avr] Add support for AVR Xmega cores

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52261 Bug #: 52261 Summary: [avr] Add support for AVR Xmega cores Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priorit

[Bug target/52261] [avr] Add support for AVR Xmega cores

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52261 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/52261] [avr] Add support for AVR Xmega cores

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52261 --- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-02-15 13:16:01 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Wed Feb 15 13:15:56 2012 New Revision: 184269 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184269 Log: libgcc/ PR target/52261 * config/avr/lib1f

[Bug other/52278] New: [avr] inefficient register allocation for SUBREGs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52278 Bug #: 52278 Summary: [avr] inefficient register allocation for SUBREGs Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimizati

[Bug other/52278] [avr] inefficient register allocation for SUBREGs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52278 --- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-02-16 14:00:59 UTC --- Created attachment 26677 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26677 add.c

[Bug other/52278] [avr] inefficient register allocation for SUBREGs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52278 --- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-02-16 14:06:43 UTC --- Created attachment 26680 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26680 add.c.198r.reload

[Bug other/52278] [avr] inefficient register allocation for SUBREGs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52278 --- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-02-16 14:04:02 UTC --- Created attachment 26679 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26679 add.c.197r.ira

[Bug other/52278] [avr] inefficient register allocation for SUBREGs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52278 --- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-02-16 14:03:05 UTC --- Created attachment 26678 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26678 add.s Assembler output with -c -mmcu=avr4 -Os -save-temps -dp -da To see reasonable code, add -f

[Bug rtl-optimization/52148] [4.7 regression] ICE: in spill_failure, at reload1.c:2120

||2012-02-17 CC||gjl at gcc dot gnu.org Ever Confirmed|0 |1

[Bug rtl-optimization/52148] [4.7 regression] ICE: in spill_failure, at reload1.c:2120

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52148 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||FIXME --- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann

[Bug target/52305] New: [avr] ICE in avr_print_operand: unknown mode (const_double)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52305 Bug #: 52305 Summary: [avr] ICE in avr_print_operand: unknown mode (const_double) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/52305] [avr] ICE in avr_print_operand: unknown mode (const_double)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52305 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/51782] -ftree-sra: Missing address-space information leads to wrong

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51782 --- Comment #18 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-02-19 09:31:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #17) > Created attachment 26695 [details] > Untested proposed fix > > This untested patch fixes the issue for me on a cross-compiler. It > would be great if

[Bug target/52261] [avr] Add support for AVR Xmega cores

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52261 --- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-02-20 11:17:58 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > Could you add support for the few new devices with USB Support aswell? example > Xmega32A4U. I am not sure if that would help much because there is no su

[Bug rtl-optimization/50063] [4.6/4.7 Regression] DSE: wrong code for gcc.dg/torture/pta-ptrarith-3.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50063 --- Comment #19 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-02-20 13:41:39 UTC --- FYI, after updating to SVN 184386 (2012-02-20) I see 14 new FAILs in the avr test suite; all of which can be cured with -fno-dse: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20020215-1.c executio

[Bug tree-optimization/51782] -ftree-sra: Missing address-space information leads to wrong

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51782 --- Comment #22 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-02-21 09:56:08 UTC --- btw, what's the right component for the PR? tree-optimization? middle-end?

[Bug middle-end/51782] -ftree-sra: Missing address-space information leads to wrong

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51782 --- Comment #26 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-02-21 11:54:36 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Tue Feb 21 11:54:27 2012 New Revision: 184434 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184434 Log: PR middle-end/51782 * gcc.target/avr/tort

[Bug rtl-optimization/50063] [4.6/4.7 Regression] DSE: wrong code for gcc.dg/torture/pta-ptrarith-3.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50063 --- Comment #21 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-02-22 09:25:48 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Wed Feb 22 09:25:35 2012 New Revision: 184461 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184461 Log: PR rtl-optimization/50063 * config/avr/av

[Bug target/18145] Do not emit __do_copy_data or __do_clear_bss if .data or .bss is empty.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18145 --- Comment #6 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-02-22 14:14:03 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Wed Feb 22 14:13:48 2012 New Revision: 184481 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184481 Log: PR target/18145 * config/avr/avr.c (avr_as

[Bug target/52261] [avr] Add support for AVR Xmega cores

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52261 --- Comment #6 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-02-23 19:26:06 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Thu Feb 23 19:26:00 2012 New Revision: 184522 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184522 Log: PR target/52261 * config/avr/lib1funcs.S (

[Bug target/52261] [avr] Add support for AVR Xmega cores

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52261 --- Comment #7 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-02-24 16:26:46 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Fri Feb 24 16:26:35 2012 New Revision: 184559 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184559 Log: PR target/52261 * config/avr/avr.c (avr_ou

[Bug other/50925] [4.7 Regression][avr] ICE at spill_failure, at reload1.c:2118

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50925 --- Comment #19 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-02-27 20:42:39 UTC --- Created attachment 26765 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26765 spill.c - another reduced test Here is yet another different and simplified test case. With tha

[Bug other/50925] [4.7 Regression][avr] ICE at spill_failure, at reload1.c:2118

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50925 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2011-11-04 00:00:00 |2012-02-17 0:00 Known to work|4.6

[Bug target/49868] Implement named address space to place/access data in flash memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49868 --- Comment #16 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-02-28 08:44:14 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Tue Feb 28 08:44:08 2012 New Revision: 184614 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184614 Log: PR target/49868 PR target/52261 * doc

[Bug target/52261] [avr] Add support for AVR Xmega cores

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52261 --- Comment #8 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-02-28 08:44:15 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Tue Feb 28 08:44:08 2012 New Revision: 184614 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184614 Log: PR target/49868 PR target/52261 * doc/

[Bug rtl-optimization/52148] [4.7 regression] ICE: in spill_failure, at reload1.c:2120

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52148 --- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-02-28 08:51:42 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Tue Feb 28 08:51:39 2012 New Revision: 184615 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184615 Log: PR target/52148 * config/avr/avr.md (movme

[Bug rtl-optimization/52148] [4.7 regression] ICE: in spill_failure, at reload1.c:2120

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52148 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug other/52278] [avr] inefficient register allocation for SUBREGs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52278 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/52261] [avr] Add support for AVR Xmega cores

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52261 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/52417] New: [4.7 Regression] Infinite recursion in DSE/alias.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52417 Bug #: 52417 Summary: [4.7 Regression] Infinite recursion in DSE/alias.c Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: compile-time-hog

[Bug rtl-optimization/52417] [4.7 Regression] Infinite recursion in DSE/alias.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52417 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/52417] [4.7 Regression] Infinite recursion in DSE/alias.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52417 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/49939] [avr] Skip 2-word instructions if applicable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49939 --- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-02-29 09:50:24 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Wed Feb 29 09:50:19 2012 New Revision: 184656 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184656 Log: PR target/49939 * config/avr/avr.h (ASM_SP

[Bug debug/52001] [4.7 Regression] Huge compile-time regression with var-tracking

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52001 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7

[Bug other/52443] New: ICE: verify_gimple failed: invalid types in nop conversion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52443 Bug #: 52443 Summary: ICE: verify_gimple failed: invalid types in nop conversion Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug other/52443] ICE: verify_gimple failed: invalid types in nop conversion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52443 --- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-02-29 22:11:16 UTC --- Created attachment 26793 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26793 ice-memx.c: C source

[Bug other/52443] ICE: verify_gimple failed: invalid types in nop conversion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52443 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/52443] ICE: verify_gimple failed: invalid types in nop conversion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52443 --- Comment #8 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-03-01 13:36:08 UTC --- Yes, thanks. It works now :-)

[Bug rtl-optimization/52417] [4.7 Regression] Infinite recursion in DSE/alias.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52417 --- Comment #7 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-03-01 16:54:58 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > This patch is ok for trunk if it passes testing, please get it in before > tomorrow noon UTC. Thanks. The avr test suite passes fine with the patch :-)

[Bug target/52461] New: [avr] XMEGA+EBI: RAMPZ clobbered while reading from flash

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52461 Bug #: 52461 Summary: [avr] XMEGA+EBI: RAMPZ clobbered while reading from flash Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/52461] [avr] XMEGA+EBI: RAMPZ clobbered while reading from flash

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52461 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug target/52461] [avr] XMEGA+EBI: RAMPZ clobbered while reading from flash

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52461 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fbi.sr at gmx dot de Target Mileston

[Bug target/26882] [AVR][C++] ICE when using template function with memory attributes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26882 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Target|avr-unknown-none|avr-* Priority|P3

[Bug target/44940] XMEGA RAMPZ Initialization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44940 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/52461] [avr] XMEGA+EBI: RAMPZ clobbered while reading from flash

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52461 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added CC||darkdragon2000 at hotmail

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >