[Bug target/48084] [x32] internal compiler error: in copy_to_mode_reg, at explow.c:630

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48084 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2011-03-12 02:23:35 UTC --- Another one: [hjl@gnu-6 ilp32-31]$ cat m.i void _mm_monitor (void const * __P, unsigned int __E, unsigned int __H) { __builtin_ia32_monitor (__P, __E, __H); } [hjl@gnu-6 ilp32-31]$ /expo

[Bug target/48084] [x32] internal compiler error: in copy_to_mode_reg, at explow.c:630

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48084 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2011-03-12 04:04:49 UTC --- Another one: [hjl@gnu-6 ilp32-31]$ cat f.i void _mm_clflush (void const *__A) { __builtin_ia32_clflush (__A); } [hjl@gnu-6 ilp32-31]$ /export/build/gnu/gcc-x32/build-x86_64-linux/gcc/xgcc

[Bug target/48084] [x32] internal compiler error: in copy_to_mode_reg, at explow.c:630

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48084 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu 2011-03-12 15:22:11 UTC --- Another one [hjl@gnu-6 ilp32-31]$ cat r.i int _rdrand16_step (unsigned short *__P) { return __builtin_ia32_rdrand16_step (__P); } [hjl@gnu-6 ilp32-31]$ make r.s /export/build/gnu/gcc-x32

[Bug other/48093] New: -mtls-dialect= is undocumented

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48093 Summary: -mtls-dialect= is undocumented Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.

[Bug debug/48147] New: [4.7 Regression] New debug test failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48147 Summary: [4.7 Regression] New debug test failures Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: debug AssignedTo: unassig..

[Bug bootstrap/48148] New: [4.7 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48148 Summary: [4.7 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

[Bug bootstrap/48148] [4.7 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48148 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2011-03-16 12:52:05 UTC --- It may be caused by revision 171033: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2011-03/msg00455.html

[Bug bootstrap/48148] [4.7 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48148 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2011-03-16 1

[Bug bootstrap/48148] [4.7 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48148 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu 2011-03-16 14:49:05 UTC --- It is caused by revision 171033: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2011-03/msg00455.html

[Bug bootstrap/48148] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48148 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.7 Regression] LTO|[4.7 Regression] bootstrap |b

[Bug debug/48150] New: [4.7 Regression] gcc.dg/guality/sra-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48150 Summary: [4.7 Regression] gcc.dg/guality/sra-1.c Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: debug AssignedTo: unassig...

[Bug debug/48150] [4.7 Regression] gcc.dg/guality/sra-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48150 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Version|4.7.0 |4.6.0 Target Milestone|4.7.0

[Bug middle-end/48016] Inconsistency in non-local goto save area

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48016 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu 2011-03-16 16:40:31 UTC --- Another problem. expand_function_start has t_save = build4 (ARRAY_REF, ptr_type_node, cfun->nonlocal_goto_save_area, integer_zero_node,

[Bug target/48154] New: [4.7 Regression] 481.wrf in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48154 Summary: [4.7 Regression] 481.wrf in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug target/48154] [4.7 Regression] 481.wrf in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48154 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2011-03-16 18:43:08 UTC --- I used -O3 -funroll-loops -ffast-math.

[Bug rtl-optimization/48155] New: Reload doesn't handle subreg properly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48155 Summary: Reload doesn't handle subreg properly Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization AssignedTo: u

[Bug debug/48160] New: prepare_call_arguments failed to handle subreg

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48160 Summary: prepare_call_arguments failed to handle subreg Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: debug AssignedTo: una

[Bug debug/48160] prepare_call_arguments failed to handle subreg

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48160 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p |

[Bug c++/48162] New: [4.7 Regression] 447.dealII in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48162 Summary: [4.7 Regression] 447.dealII in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug c++/48162] [4.7 Regression] 447.dealII in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48162 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at redhat dot com Target Milestone|---

[Bug bootstrap/48148] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48148 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/48148] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48148 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/48162] [4.7 Regression] 447.dealII in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48162 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW

[Bug c++/48162] [4.7 Regression] 447.dealII in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48162 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2011-03-17 16:01:01 UTC --- Created attachment 23700 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23700 A testcase [hjl@gnu-18 delta]$ /export/gnu/import/svn/gcc-test/usr/bin/gcc -O2 -ffast-math -S testcase-min

[Bug bootstrap/48148] [4.7 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48148 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug target/48171] New: Missing "Save" on -mavx and -mfma

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48171 Summary: Missing "Save" on -mavx and -mfma Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.

[Bug target/48171] Missing "Save" on -mavx and -mfma

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48171 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p |

[Bug debug/48160] prepare_call_arguments failed to handle subreg

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48160 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/48175] New: [x32] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/strcat.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48175 Summary: [x32] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/strcat.c Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end Assig

[Bug target/48171] Missing "Save" on -mavx and -mfma

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48171 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libfortran/47439] Fun with scratch files on Windows MKTEMP only allows for 26 files

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47439 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu 2011-03-19 14:30:37 UTC --- On Linux/ia32, revision 171179 gave: FAIL: gfortran.dg/scratch_1.f90 -O0 execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/scratch_1.f90 -O1 execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/scratch_1.f90 -O2 executio

[Bug target/48085] [x32] Unnecessary zero-extension

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48085 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2011-03-19 15:03:05 UTC --- The existing testcase is gcc.target/i386/pr32661-1.c.

[Bug bootstrap/48148] [4.7 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48148 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|NEW --- Comment #21 from H.J. Lu 201

[Bug middle-end/48270] New: [4.7 Regression] New test failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48270 Summary: [4.7 Regression] New test failures Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end AssignedTo:

[Bug middle-end/48270] [4.7 Regression] New test failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48270 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |UNCONFIRMED Target Milestone|4.7.0

[Bug bootstrap/48282] New: [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48282 Summary: [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassig...@

[Bug bootstrap/48282] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48282 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone|-

[Bug bootstrap/48282] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48282 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2011-03-25 05:20:36 UTC --- On Linux/x86-64, revision 171426 also causes massive testsuite regressions: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2011-03/msg00376.html

[Bug boehm-gc/48299] New: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: boehm-gc.c/thread_leak_test.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48299 Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: boehm-gc.c/thread_leak_test.c Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: boehm-gc Assign

[Bug middle-end/48300] New: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr38529.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48300 Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr38529.c Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end AssignedTo:

[Bug bootstrap/48307] New: [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48307 Summary: [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassig...@

[Bug bootstrap/48307] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48307 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2011-03-28 00:39:55 UTC --- Failed with ../../../src-trunk/libgfortran/generated/product_c8.c: In function 'mproduct_c8': ../../../src-trunk/libgfortran/generated/product_c8.c:372:1: internal compiler error: in update

[Bug boehm-gc/48299] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: boehm-gc.c/thread_leak_test.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48299 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2011-03-28 12:31:35 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Could you please check if this test worked before my patch? It may have > been that the failure simply went unnoticed. > I don't think thread_leak_test.c was te

[Bug testsuite/48276] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr47502-2.c on x86_64-apple-darwin10.7.0 with -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48276 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC|hjl at gcc dot gnu.org |hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment #1 from

[Bug testsuite/48276] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr47502-2.c on x86_64-apple-darwin10.7.0 with -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48276 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/47744] [x32] ICE: in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:403

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47744 --- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu 2011-03-29 04:06:02 UTC --- Another testcase: [hjl@gnu-6 gcc]$ ./xgcc -B./ /export/gnu/import/git/gcc-x32/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/eoshift_large_1.f90 -Os -pedantic-errors -S -mx32 /export/gnu/import/git/gcc-x32/gc

[Bug target/48338] New: [4.7 Regression] Glibc miscompiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48338 Summary: [4.7 Regression] Glibc miscompiled Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc

[Bug target/48338] [4.7 Regression] Glibc miscompiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48338 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone|-

[Bug target/48338] [4.7 Regression] Glibc miscompiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48338 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2011-03-29 22:36:52 UTC --- I used CC="gcc -m32" CXX="g++ -m32" CFLAGS="-O2 -g -march=i686" /export/gnu/import/git/glibc/configure --enable-add-ons=nptl --prefix=/usr --without-cvs --enable-multi-arch --enable-test-mu

[Bug target/48349] New: FLOAT_SSE_REGS typo in i386.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48349 Summary: FLOAT_SSE_REGS typo in i386.h Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.

[Bug target/48349] FLOAT_SSE_REGS typo in i386.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48349 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/48367] New: [4.7 Regression] 200.sixtrack/301.apsi in SPEC CPU 2000 are miscompiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48367 Summary: [4.7 Regression] 200.sixtrack/301.apsi in SPEC CPU 2000 are miscompiled Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug middle-end/48367] [4.7 Regression] 200.sixtrack/301.apsi in SPEC CPU 2000 are miscompiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48367 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vmakarov at redhat dot com --- Comment #1 from

[Bug middle-end/48367] [4.7 Regression] 200.sixtrack/301.apsi in SPEC CPU 2000 are miscompiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48367 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2011-03-30 16:26:14 UTC --- I used "-O3 -funroll-loops -msse2 -mfpmath=sse -ffast-math" to compile it.

[Bug middle-end/48367] [4.7 Regression] 200.sixtrack/301.apsi in SPEC CPU 2000 are miscompiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48367 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2011-03-30 16:53:11 UTC --- It still fails at revision 171734.

[Bug bootstrap/48371] New: [4.7 Regression] bootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48371 Summary: [4.7 Regression] bootstrap failure Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassig...@

[Bug bootstrap/48371] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48371 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comment #1 from H.J.

[Bug bootstrap/48371] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48371 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2011-03-30 19:38:24 UTC --- Created attachment 23822 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23822 A testcase [hjl@gnu-34 delta]$ /export/regression/rrs/171731/usr/bin/gcc -S -m32 -msse2 -mfpmath=sse -fpi

[Bug bootstrap/48148] [4.7 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48148 --- Comment #22 from H.J. Lu 2011-03-31 14:14:08 UTC --- Can we apply Jaub's patch to fix bootstrap?

[Bug bootstrap/48403] New: [4.7 Regression] bootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403 Summary: [4.7 Regression] bootstrap failure Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassig...@

[Bug bootstrap/48403] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.7.0 |--- --- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu 2011-04-02 00:

[Bug bootstrap/48403] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403 --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu 2011-04-02 12:35:18 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > Tried on Gentoo yesterday, now on Ubuntu 10.04. Still not reproduced. How do > the files differ? Would anyone be willing to help debug this? May I suggest you try

[Bug middle-end/48413] New: [4.7 Regression] 403.gcc in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48413 Summary: [4.7 Regression] 403.gcc in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug middle-end/48413] [4.7 Regression] 403.gcc in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48413 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2011-04-02 13:16:00 UTC --- Created attachment 23851 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23851 A testcase [hjl@gnu-34 rrs]$ ./171649/usr/bin/gcc -w -m32 -O3 -funroll-loops -msse2 -mfpmath=sse -ffast-ma

[Bug middle-end/48413] [4.7 Regression] 403.gcc in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48413 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vmakarov at redhat dot com Target Milestone|-

[Bug middle-end/48413] [4.7 Regression] 403.gcc in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48413 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2011-04-02 13:30:24 UTC --- This seems to be fixed. I will verify it after bootstrap is fixed.

[Bug bootstrap/48403] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap comparison failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403 --- Comment #15 from H.J. Lu 2011-04-02 13:55:31 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) > Bernd, if you have a compile farm account: It reproduces on gcc17 for me. Can you try gcc20: a dual Xeon X5670 2.93 GHz 12 cores 24 threads 24 GB RAM system I

[Bug bootstrap/48403] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap comparison failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.7.0 |--- --- Comment #16 from H.J. Lu 2011-04-02 14

[Bug target/48416] New: [4.7 Regression] Revision 171890 failed to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48416 Summary: [4.7 Regression] Revision 171890 failed to build Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo:

[Bug lto/48423] crash when using lto, linker plugin with bfd ld

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48423 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment #1 from

[Bug lto/48423] crash when using lto, linker plugin with bfd ld

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48423 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2011-04-03 18:06:23 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > thanks hl, > it looks promising. > the thets runs and > nm -C -D libBase.o > shows > 00201140 V typeinfo for Base > 0fb3 V typeinfo name for Ba

[Bug bootstrap/48403] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap comparison failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403 --- Comment #28 from H.J. Lu 2011-04-04 18:25:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #27) > still fails bootstrap after #26 > > make[3]: Leaving directory `/mnt/share/bld/gcc-trunk' What is your target? It works for me on Linux/ia32 and Linux/x86-64.

[Bug bootstrap/48403] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap comparison failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403 --- Comment #30 from H.J. Lu 2011-04-04 18:52:13 UTC --- This --enable-clocale=gnu --with-system-zlib --enable-shared --with-demangler-in-ld --enable-cloog-backend=isl --with-ppl-include=/opt/gnu/include --with-ppl-lib=/opt/gnu/lib64 --with-clo

[Bug bootstrap/48148] [4.7 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48148 --- Comment #24 from H.J. Lu 2011-04-04 19:24:03 UTC --- Still doesn't work. Revision 171942 gave: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2011-04/msg00253.html /tmp/ccuKub9z.s: Assembler messages: /tmp/ccuKub9z.s:180352: Error: symbol `.Ldebug_i

[Bug bootstrap/48403] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap comparison failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403 --- Comment #31 from H.J. Lu 2011-04-04 19:41:46 UTC --- (In reply to comment #29) > f14 x86_64, no ppl > Configured like so: > /mnt/share/src/gcc.svn-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++ --verbose > --prefix=/mnt/share/bin/H-x86_64-gcc-trunk

[Bug bootstrap/48403] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap comparison failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403 --- Comment #35 from H.J. Lu 2011-04-04 19:56:49 UTC --- (In reply to comment #31) > (In reply to comment #29) > > f14 x86_64, no ppl > > Configured like so: > > /mnt/share/src/gcc.svn-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++ --verbose > > --pref

[Bug bootstrap/48403] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap comparison failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403 --- Comment #36 from H.J. Lu 2011-04-04 19:57:14 UTC --- (In reply to comment #34) > Perhaps the patches can be reverted until it's clear what is wrong here? The > trunk is now broken for 3 days, it will make things like bisecting regressions > m

[Bug bootstrap/48148] [4.7 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48148 --- Comment #25 from H.J. Lu 2011-04-04 20:01:29 UTC --- (In reply to comment #24) > Still doesn't work. Revision 171942 gave: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2011-04/msg00253.html > > /tmp/ccuKub9z.s: Assembler messages: > /tmp/ccuKu

[Bug middle-end/48440] New: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/labels-3.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48440 Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/labels-3.c Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug middle-end/48440] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/labels-3.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48440 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2011-04-04 22:05:30 UTC --- The record_reference change remove the cast, which is needed for Pmode != ptr_mode: diff -upr bad/x.i.143r.expand good/x.i.143r.expand --- bad/x.i.143r.expand2011-04-04 15:02:05.6524582

[Bug middle-end/48440] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/labels-3.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48440 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2011-04-04 22:15:54 UTC --- This patch: diff --git a/gcc/cgraphbuild.c b/gcc/cgraphbuild.c index 3948cf6..c80d7ab 100644 --- a/gcc/cgraphbuild.c +++ b/gcc/cgraphbuild.c @@ -56,7 +56,10 @@ record_reference (tree *tp, i

[Bug bootstrap/48444] New: [4.7 Regression] bootstrap failure with --disable-checking

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48444 Summary: [4.7 Regression] bootstrap failure with --disable-checking Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug bootstrap/48403] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap comparison failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403 --- Comment #42 from H.J. Lu 2011-04-05 00:42:39 UTC --- (In reply to comment #41) > I can confirm that r171959 with --enable-checking bootstraps on > f14/x86_64/linux, which was not previously the case. Thanks Bernd! I can also > assert that it

[Bug middle-end/48440] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/labels-3.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48440 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p |

[Bug bootstrap/48444] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap failure with --disable-checking

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48444 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug bootstrap/48148] [4.7 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48148 --- Comment #26 from H.J. Lu 2011-04-05 02:52:15 UTC --- (In reply to comment #25) > (In reply to comment #24) > > Still doesn't work. Revision 171942 gave: > > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2011-04/msg00253.html > > > > /tmp/ccuKub

[Bug debug/48466] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Wrong variable locations at -O0 on i686

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48466 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2011-04-05 19:12:53 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Created attachment 23885 [details] > gcc46-pr48466.patch > > This seems to work and doesn't regress PR36977 (which I've added as guality > testcase too). Whether

[Bug bootstrap/48469] New: [4.7 Regression] bootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48469 Summary: [4.7 Regression] bootstrap failure Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassig...@

[Bug bootstrap/48469] [4.7 Regression] bootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48469 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||froydnj at codesourcery dot |

[Bug c++/48528] New: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/sfinae10.C (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48528 Summary: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/sfinae10.C (test for excess errors) Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/48529] New: [x32] Testsuite failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48529 Summary: [x32] Testsuite failures Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org

[Bug rtl-optimization/48496] [4.7 Regression] 'asm' operand requires impossible reload in libffi/src/ia64/ffi.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48496 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment #3 from

[Bug middle-end/48558] New: -Warray-bounds fails o detect the out of bound array access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48558 Summary: -Warray-bounds fails o detect the out of bound array access Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug middle-end/48558] -Warray-bounds fails to detect the out of bound array access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48558 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2011-04-11 18:40:07 UTC --- A testcase: [hjl@gnu-6 bfd]$ cat x.c enum bfd_reloc_code_real { BFD_RELOC_386_IRELATIVE }; typedef enum bfd_reloc_code_real bfd_reloc_code_real_type; typedef const struct reloc_howto_str

[Bug middle-end/48558] -Warray-bounds fails to detect the out of bound array access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48558 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2011-04-11 19:09:54 UTC --- A simple change from return &elf_howto_table[R_386_IRELATIVE]; to return elf_howto_table[R_386_IRELATIVE]; makes GCC to warn: [hjl@gnu-6 bfd]$ cat x.c enum bfd_reloc_code_real { BFD_R

[Bug middle-end/48560] New: [4.6/4.7 Regression] -Warray-bounds fails to detect the out of bound array access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48560 Summary: [4.6/4.7 Regression] -Warray-bounds fails to detect the out of bound array access Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug middle-end/48573] New: [4.7 Regression] Many testcase failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48573 Summary: [4.7 Regression] Many testcase failures Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end AssignedTo: unass

[Bug middle-end/48573] [4.7 Regression] Many testcase failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48573 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2011-04-12 14:03:18 UTC --- I got /export/gnu/import/svn/gcc-test-ia32corei7/src-trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/20031208-1.c: In function 'bar':^M /export/gnu/import/svn/gcc-test-ia32corei7/src-trunk/gcc/te

[Bug middle-end/48573] [4.7 Regression] Many testcase failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48573 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone|

[Bug rtl-optimization/48575] New: RTL vector patterns are limited to 26 elements

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48575 Summary: RTL vector patterns are limited to 26 elements Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-03/msg02105.htm l Status: UNCONFIRMED

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >