http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46195
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46194
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46195
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu 2010-10-27 10:51:06
UTC ---
Created attachment 22173
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22173
A patch
Please try this patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46195
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |target
Target Milestone|---
||
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed||2010.10.27 11:26:53
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |hjl.tools at gmail dot com
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46195
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|UNCONFIRMED
Ever Confirmed|1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46197
Summary: Bad split_stack_return pattern in i386.md
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46197
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46195
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|2010-10-27 11:26:53
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46034
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu 2010-10-28 16:05:44
UTC ---
It is caused by revision 163383:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-08/msg00595.html
||hjl.tools at gmail dot com,
||mkuvyrkov at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2010-10-28 17:14:28
UTC ---
Does -mtune=generic have regressions? The current -mtune=core2 is slower
than -mtune=generic.
Maxim, could you please try this
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46195
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46200
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xinliangli at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46216
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45219
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu 2010-10-28 22:39:39
UTC ---
It was fixed by revision 163775:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-09/msg00066.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46213
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from H.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46227
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/vector-shift2.c
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46228
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46233
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46195
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46242
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46018
--- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu 2010-10-30 13:59:08
UTC ---
Please try:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-10/msg02569.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46241
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46240
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46142
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu 2010-10-31 14:27:41
UTC ---
When configured with --with-cpu=atom, I got
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/fma3-builtin-2.c scan-assembler-times vfmadd...pd 1
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/fma3-builtin-2.c scan-assembler-times vfmsub...pd
||2010.10.31 15:15:00
CC||bernds at codesourcery dot
||com, hjl.tools at gmail dot
||com
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46212
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from H
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46251
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46253
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2010-10-31 18:09:16
UTC ---
Created attachment 22213
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22213
An experimental patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46252
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46257
Summary: [Meta] [4.6 Regression] ifcvt/crossjump failure
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Ass
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46255
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46259
Summary: [4.6 Regression] Revision 166102 failed 416.gamess in
SPEC CPU 2006
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46259
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46259
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-01 14:48:00
UTC ---
#0 internal_error (gmsgid=0x12a2830 "tree check: %s, have %s in %s, at %s:%d")
at ../../src/gcc/diagnostic.c:825
#1 0x00ccb556 in tree_check_failed (node=0x71190f78,
f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46259
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-01 14:49:15
UTC ---
(gdb) f 3
#3 0x0076db8b in const_vector_from_tree (exp=0x703f5880)
at ../../src/gcc/expr.c:10253
10253RTVEC_ELT (v, i) = immed_double_int_const (tree_to_double_int
(
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46259
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-01 14:50:25
UTC ---
(gdb) f 3
#3 0x0076db8b in const_vector_from_tree (exp=0x703f5880)
at ../../src/gcc/expr.c:10253
10253RTVEC_ELT (v, i) = immed_double_int_const (tree_to_double_int
(
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46259
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-01 16:21:11
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> If I had to guess, one of these two hunks is probably responsible:
>
>
> --- trunk/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c2010/10/31 01:58:12166101
> +++ trunk/gcc/tree-ve
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46259
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46195
--- Comment #26 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-02 12:04:27
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #25)
> Hi HJ, I'm getting a ton of failures caused by this same warning message at
> r166110 on i686-pc-cygwin:
>
> Should I reopen this bug or file a new one?
Plea
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46273
Summary: [4.6 Regression] Failed to bootstrap
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46273
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iant at google dot com
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46253
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46277
Summary: [4.6 Regression] Revision 166167 failed to build
252.eon in SPEC CPU 2000
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46277
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-02 2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46277
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-02 21:07:44
UTC ---
Created attachment 22241
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22241
A testcase
This isn't the correct C++ code. But the crash is similar:
(gdb) r -fpreprocessed pr46277.ii
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46280
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-02 22:24:07
UTC ---
I believe all those tests are using SSE vectors without
SSE enabled. The warnings are valid. Those tests should
either add -Wno-psabi or enable SSE.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46277
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46277
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-02 22:51:20
UTC ---
[...@gnu-35 delta]$ cat pr46277.cc
class ggRGBE {
public:
ggRGBE();
};
template class ggIO
{
void readbody(int);
ggRGBE *scanline;
};
template void
ggIO::readbody(int width)
{
sc
||2010.11.03 03:24:23
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com,
||ubizjak at gmail dot com
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-03 03:24:23
UTC ---
-fsplit-stack
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46285
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46285
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46195
--- Comment #28 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-03 12:10:12
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #27)
> > Hi HJ, I'm getting a ton of failures caused by this same warning message
> > at
> > r166110 on i686-pc-cygwin:
>
> Same on i586-suse-linux.
See PR 46280.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46275
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46291
Summary: [4.6 Regression] Failed to bootstrap-lto
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
AssignedTo: unassig...@
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46291
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46018
--- Comment #16 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-03 17:09:36
UTC ---
Please try revision 166259.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46114
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46238
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44374
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46295
Summary: Missing vzeroupper
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46295
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46285
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-04 02:09:18
UTC ---
Please try this
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr46285.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr46285.c
index 8b8cbcf..de705b0 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr46285
||2010.11.04 04:04:37
CC||bernds at codesourcery dot
||com, hjl.tools at gmail dot
||com
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
Ever
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46295
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
||2010.11.04 13:46:40
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |hjl.tools at gmail dot com
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-04 13:46:40
UTC ---
Created attachment 22279
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46199
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #22279|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46199
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #22280|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46304
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45865
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46018
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45314
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-05 16:26:44
UTC ---
On trunk, it was fixed by revision 163123:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-08/msg00334.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46319
Summary: LTO plugin test failures with --wi th-plugin-ld=ld
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
AssignedTo: u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46319
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|LTO plugin test failures|LTO plugin test failures
|wit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45314
--- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-05 18:04:46
UTC ---
Just for the record, this is introduced by revision 155739:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-01/msg00200.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46316
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-05 18:12:25
UTC ---
Please show command line passed to cc1.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46316
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46316
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-05 18:53:25
UTC ---
Revision 166265 is OK.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46316
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||davidxl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46319
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-05 23:27:51
UTC ---
-fwhopr=jobserver -fuse-linker-plugin -frandom-seed=1 miscompiled
selfassign.so. It generated:
[...@gnu-32 stage1-gcc]$ nm selfassign.so | grep plugin_init
09aa T plugin_init
[.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46319
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-05 23:30:36
UTC ---
Created attachment 22300
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22300
selfassign.so generated by bfd linker
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46319
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-05 23:31:23
UTC ---
Created attachment 22301
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22301
selfassign.so generated by gold
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46326
Summary: [4.6 Regression] Revision 166382 failed to bootstrap
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46326
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ubizjak at gmail dot com
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46325
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46335
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-07 15:49:48
UTC ---
It is caused by revision 166167:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-11/msg00053.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46355
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45948
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46365
Summary: [4.6 Regression] Failed to bootstrap
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassig..
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46365
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46366
Summary: gcc.target/i386/pr45352-2.c failed
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
AssignedTo: unas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46365
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46358
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46360
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46367
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46366
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-08 17:13:24
UTC ---
The testcase looks invalid to me:
static bitstream_init (picture_t * picture, void *start)
{
picture->bitstream_ptr = start;
}
...
xine_xvmc_t * xvmc = bitstream_init (picture, buffer);
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46364
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44970
--- Comment #97 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-08 17:30:36
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #96)
> (In reply to comment #88)
> > I also tested the patch on armv5tejl-unknown-linux-gnueabi. The ICE in
> > function '__popcountsi2' is still there, so this must b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46367
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|2010-11-08 14:53:32
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46369
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
901 - 1000 of 1488 matches
Mail list logo