[Bug c++/110978] ICE lambda constrained with to-be-deduced object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110978 --- Comment #2 from Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña --- Thank you for the clarification. Now I can be conscious about that.

[Bug c++/110936] if constexpr: member function pointers cannot be checked with ubsan

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110936 --- Comment #1 from Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña --- This should block BUG101603.

[Bug c++/110936] if constexpr: member function pointers cannot be checked with ubsan

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110936 --- Comment #2 from Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña --- FWIW, it seems that you can use to test the validity during constant evaluation. It seems that an invalid constant e

[Bug c++/103524] [meta-bug] modules issue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524 Bug 103524 depends on bug 104993, which changed state. Bug 104993 Summary: [modules] Missing diagnostic when exporting using-directive https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104993 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug c++/104993] [modules] Missing diagnostic when exporting using-directive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104993 Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|

[Bug c++/111841] New: Lookup context rejected at definition if lookup finds a namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111841 Bug ID: 111841 Summary: Lookup context rejected at definition if lookup finds a namespace Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: rejects-vali

[Bug c++/111841] Lookup context rejected at definition if lookup finds a namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111841 --- Comment #1 from Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña --- According to my reading of and , Clang and MSVC are right.

[Bug c++/111841] Lookup context rejected at definition if lookup finds a namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111841 --- Comment #3 from Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña --- Thank you. For reference, here's how I found out this bug: .

[Bug c++/100470] std::is_nothrow_move_constructible incorrect behavior for explicitly defaulted members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100470 Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña changed: What|Removed |Added CC||johelegp at gmail dot com

[Bug c++/109781] [11/12/13/14 Regression] erroneous error "lambda-expression in template parameter type" for tparam lambda returning a lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109781 --- Comment #4 from Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña --- This isn't valid since .

[Bug c++/109781] [11/12/13/14 Regression] erroneous error "lambda-expression in template parameter type" for tparam lambda returning a lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109781 --- Comment #5 from Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña --- Add `+` to convert it to a pointer, and it's still rejected (): ```C++ template struct C {}; ``` ```output : In lambda function: :1:32: error: lamb

[Bug c++/110936] if constexpr: member function pointers cannot be checked with ubsan

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110936 --- Comment #4 from Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña --- They talk about `-fno-delete-null-pointer-checks` in BUG71962.

[Bug c++/99524] initializer_list storage considered a temporary when accessed through NTTP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99524 Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status

[Bug c++/110211] New: Local lambda treated as non-local

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110211 Bug ID: 110211 Summary: Local lambda treated as non-local Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: c++-lambda, rejects-valid Severity: normal P

[Bug c++/110211] Local lambda treated as non-local

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110211 Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||9.5.0 --- Comment #1 from

[Bug c++/110674] New: Structured binding fails with partial specialization of `std::tuple_element` without `std::size_t` NTTP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110674 Bug ID: 110674 Summary: Structured binding fails with partial specialization of `std::tuple_element` without `std::size_t` NTTP Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONF

[Bug c++/99493] Address of template parameter object is not a valid template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99493 --- Comment #8 from Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña --- Thank you!

<    1   2   3