[Bug c++/104108] [10/11 Regression] [c++17+] template alias inside template with static field of template class rejected since r10-6329-g423284053ec51832

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104108 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11/12 Regression] |[10/11 Regression] [c++17+]

[Bug c++/104847] [11/12 Regression] ICE in write_unqualified_name, at cp/mangle.cc:1406

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104847 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Priority|P3

[Bug rtl-optimization/104777] [9/10/11 Regression] gcc crashes while compiling a custom coroutine library sample

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104777 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10/11/12 Regression] gcc |[9/10/11 Regression] gcc

[Bug c++/104846] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected function_decl, have field_decl in grokmethod, at cp/decl.cc:17999

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104846 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Last

[Bug c++/104846] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected function_decl, have field_decl in grokmethod, at cp/decl.cc:17999

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104846 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/104865] Wrong code for conditional expression on VAX

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104865 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/104752] `Concept auto(x)` should not be a valid function-style cast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104752 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/104608] [12 Regression] internal compiler error: in cp_parser_template_id, at cp/parser.cc:18367

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104608 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/104971] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Optimisation for __builtin_ia32_readeflags corrupts the stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104971 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-03-17 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/104008] [11 Regression] New g++ folly compile error since r11-7931-ga2531859bf5bf6cf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104008 --- Comment #12 from Marek Polacek --- (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #11) > FWIW it seems the new test g++.dg/cpp0x/variadic-alias3.C crashes when using > --param=hash-table-verification-limit=1000, similar to PR103769. I cannot

[Bug c++/104846] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected function_decl, have field_decl in grokmethod, at cp/decl.cc:17999

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104846 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/104846] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected function_decl, have field_decl in grokmethod, at cp/decl.cc:17999

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104846 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #1) > Confirmed. Started with r10-2475-g777e426772f80c. It would be trivial to > bring back the grokmethod hunk to fix this ICE, but we should be more > helpful and

[Bug c++/104284] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE: unexpected expression '' of kind implicit_conv_expr since r9-6073-ge8b3c1bc3ba22dcf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104284 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug rtl-optimization/104777] [9/10 Regression] gcc crashes while compiling a custom coroutine library sample

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104777 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Summary|[9/10/11

[Bug c++/90847] misplaced alignment-specifier not diagnosed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90847 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/104647] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in get_or_insert_ctor_field, at cp/constexpr.cc:3705

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104647 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC|

[Bug c++/104647] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in get_or_insert_ctor_field, at cp/constexpr.cc:3705

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104647 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.5

[Bug c++/104682] New: Missing deprecated warning on enumerator in class template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104682 Bug ID: 104682 Summary: Missing deprecated warning on enumerator in class template Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/104682] Missing deprecated warning on enumerator in class template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104682 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug testsuite/104694] New test case g++.dg/pr104540.C has excess errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104694 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED CC|

[Bug c++/104667] [10 Regression] ICE in is_late_template_attribute, at cp/decl2.cc:1299

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104667 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11 Regression] ICE in |[10 Regression] ICE in

[Bug c++/98939] [C++23] Implement P1787R6 "Declarations and where to find them"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98939 --- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek --- Additional comments about this proposal: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-August/578297.html

[Bug c++/104682] Missing deprecated warning on enumerator in class template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104682 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/104667] [10/11 Regression] ICE in is_late_template_attribute, at cp/decl2.cc:1299

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104667 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11/12 Regression] ICE |[10/11 Regression] ICE in

[Bug c++/104682] Missing deprecated warning on enumerator in class template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104682 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #2 from Marek

[Bug c++/104668] [12 Regression] ICE in lookup_attribute_spec, at attribs.cc:425

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104668 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/104669] [11/12 Regression] ICE in is_function_default_version, at attribs.cc:1219

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104669 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Ever

[Bug c++/104667] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in is_late_template_attribute, at cp/decl2.cc:1299

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104667 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/70077] noexcept, inheriting constructors and the invalid use of an incomplete type that is actually complete

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70077 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/79493] Bad diagnostic when referring to inner type that does not exist

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79493 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/104667] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in is_late_template_attribute, at cp/decl2.cc:1299

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104667 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-02-23 CC|

[Bug c++/104760] Attribute [[deprecated]] causes diagnostic in never-instantiated template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104760 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- And I think this is the same problem as in https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33911#c18. Not sure if we want to change anything.

[Bug c++/104760] Attribute [[deprecated]] causes diagnostic in never-instantiated template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104760 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/104752] `Concept auto(x)` should not be a valid function-style cast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104752 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-03-02

[Bug c++/103871] [11/12 Regression] co_await causes build error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103871 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/104765] Expression statement with a return in a lambda-parameter-default causes segfault when called in a different function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104765 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug c++/104618] [12 Regression] trunk 20220221 on x86_64-linux-gnu ICEs building sh.cc for sh4-linux-gnu (in build_call_a, at cp/call.cc:381)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104618 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/104622] [12 Regression] ICE in compare_ics, at cp/call.cc:11419

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104622 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P2 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek

[Bug c++/104642] Add __builtin_trap() for missing return at -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104642 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Ever

[Bug c++/104765] Expression statement with a return in a lambda-parameter-default causes segfault when called in a different function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104765 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- The attached patch disables ({}) in lambda param list, which fixes the bug, but also makes things less consistent: void G() { void fn (int i, int = ({ 1; })); // currently OK } void g() { auto a =

[Bug c++/103871] [11/12 Regression] co_await causes build error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103871 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/102538] [11/12 Regression] Wrong narrowing conversion checking for initializer with union

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102538 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/104624] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in standard_conversion, at cp/call.cc:1213

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104624 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/104623] [11/12 Regression] ICE in cp_parser_skip_to_pragma_eol, at cp/parser.cc:4107

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104623 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-02-22 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/104623] [11/12 Regression] ICE in cp_parser_skip_to_pragma_eol, at cp/parser.cc:4107

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104623 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Looks like a missing CPP_PRAGMA_EOL.

[Bug c++/104622] [12 Regression] ICE in compare_ics, at cp/call.cc:11419

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104622 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/104608] [12 Regression] internal compiler error: in cp_parser_template_id, at cp/parser.cc:18367

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104608 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/104646] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in cx_check_missing_mem_inits, at cp/constexpr.cc:845

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104646 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-02-22 Priority|P3

[Bug c++/104646] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in cx_check_missing_mem_inits, at cp/constexpr.cc:845

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104646 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Somewhat reduced: template struct pair { _T1 first; int second; }; template class __normal_iterator { _Iterator __traits_type; public: constexpr __normal_iterator() {} }; template class

[Bug c/84685] Designated initializers warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84685 --- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek --- Patch seems safe to backport to 11.

[Bug c/82283] Wrong warning with -Wmissing-field-initializers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82283 --- Comment #15 from Marek Polacek --- Patch seems safe to backport to 11.

[Bug c/82283] Wrong warning with -Wmissing-field-initializers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82283 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/84685] Designated initializers warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84685 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/104620] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp23/consteval-if2.C -std=gnu++20 (test for errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104620 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Host|hppa*-*-linux* | CC|

[Bug c++/104620] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp23/consteval-if2.C -std=gnu++20 (test for errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104620 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- FAIL: g++.dg/cpp23/consteval-if2.C -std=gnu++20 (test for errors, line 80) FAIL: g++.dg/cpp23/consteval-if2.C -std=gnu++20 (test for errors, line 84) After r12-7264-gc19f317a78c0e4 these two errors

[Bug c++/104944] [9/10/11 Regression] incorrect alignas(void) accepted (with warning if templated)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104944 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10/11/12 Regression] |[9/10/11 Regression]

[Bug c++/104583] [10/11/12 regression] ICE dolphin-emu at cp/cp-gimplify.cc:746

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104583 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- Candidate fix: --- a/gcc/cp/init.cc +++ b/gcc/cp/init.cc @@ -679,10 +679,10 @@ get_nsdmi (tree member, bool in_ctor, tsubst_flags_t complain) if (simple_target) init = TARGET_EXPR_INITIAL (init);

[Bug c++/104583] [10/11/12 regression] ICE dolphin-emu at cp/cp-gimplify.cc:746

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104583 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/104583] [10/11/12 regression] ICE dolphin-emu at cp/cp-gimplify.cc:746

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104583 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/102990] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in tsubst_copy_and_build with NSDMI and double to int conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102990 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE |[9/10/11 Regression] ICE in

[Bug c++/102990] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in tsubst_copy_and_build with NSDMI and double to int conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102990 --- Comment #13 from Marek Polacek --- I was planning to backport the fix to 11, yes.

[Bug c++/101030] [9/10 Regression] ICE with -Wconversion and a?:b extension in template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101030 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10/11 Regression] ICE|[9/10 Regression] ICE with

[Bug c++/101030] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE with -Wconversion and a?:b extension in template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101030 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE |[9/10/11 Regression] ICE

[Bug c++/104583] [10/11 regression] ICE dolphin-emu at cp/cp-gimplify.cc:746

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104583 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11/12 regression] ICE |[10/11 regression] ICE

[Bug c++/101869] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ::enumvalue is rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101869 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/102629] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE: tree check in lookup_base, at cp/search.c:233 since r10-2194-g10acaf4db9f8b54b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102629 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Last

[Bug c++/101833] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE with -Wformat on a constructor with a virtual base

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101833 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/47634] Incorrect checking of attribute format printf on constructor of derived class with virtual base

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47634 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Ever

[Bug c/105131] Warning for mismatched declaration/definition with enum

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105131 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Maybe something like the attached patch would work (but needs a new option, maybe -Wenum-int-mismatch, possibly enabled by -Wall?). With it, the following test enum E { l = -1, z = 0, g = 1 }; int

[Bug c/105131] Warning for mismatched declaration/definition with enum

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105131 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-04-01 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/105003] ICE in new test case from r12-7710-gc7a6a32739d62d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105003 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/105003] ICE in new test case from r12-7710-gc7a6a32739d62d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105003 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-03-21

[Bug c++/104008] [11 Regression] New g++ folly compile error since r11-7931-ga2531859bf5bf6cf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104008 --- Comment #13 from Marek Polacek --- Ah, need -fchecking=2: $ ./cc1plus -quiet variadic-alias3.C -Iinclude --param=hash-table-verification-limit=1000 -fchecking=2 hash table checking failed: equal operator returns true for a pair of values

[Bug c++/105098] ICE: endless recursion during auto deduction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105098 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/102479] segfault when deducing class template arguments for tuple with libc++-14

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102479 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||a3at.mail at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c/105097] hashtab_chk_error when using g3 option to compile some C program

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105097 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-03-29 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/105098] ICE: endless recursion during auto deduction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105098 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- Seems to be fixed on trunk by r12-3906-g51018dd1395c72.

[Bug c++/101030] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE with -Wconversion and a?:b extension in template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101030 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/100789] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE with __transaction_relaxed and left shit signed overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100789 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek --- The problem is that we're creating a C_MAYBE_CONST_EXPR inside of a TRANSATION_EXPR, but c_fully_fold doesn't walk into TRANSATION_EXPRs, so the C_MAYBE_CONST_EXPR leaks into the gimplifier.

[Bug middle-end/103597] [12 Regression] False -Wimplicit-fallthrough= involving macro since r12-5638-ga3e75c1491cd2d50

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103597 --- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek --- (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #6) > I'm marking this as middle-end; as mentioned in the commit message, I > removed the folding from the front-end because it was interfering with a > middle-end

[Bug middle-end/103597] [12 Regression] False -Wimplicit-fallthrough= involving macro since r12-5638-ga3e75c1491cd2d50

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103597 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/104284] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE: unexpected expression '' of kind implicit_conv_expr since r9-6073-ge8b3c1bc3ba22dcf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104284 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10/11/12 Regression] |[9/10/11 Regression] ICE:

[Bug c++/101371] [9/10 Regression] constexpr expansions trigger internal Compiler Error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101371 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c/82283] Wrong warning with -Wmissing-field-initializers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82283 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c/84685] Designated initializers warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84685 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/104944] [9/10 Regression] incorrect alignas(void) accepted (with warning if templated)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104944 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/104944] [9/10 Regression] incorrect alignas(void) accepted (with warning if templated)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104944 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10/11 Regression]|[9/10 Regression] incorrect

[Bug c++/102990] [9/10 Regression] ICE in tsubst_copy_and_build with NSDMI and double to int conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102990 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Summary|[9/10/11

[Bug c++/104108] [10 Regression] [c++17+] template alias inside template with static field of template class rejected since r10-6329-g423284053ec51832

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104108 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11 Regression] [c++17+] |[10 Regression] [c++17+]

[Bug c++/104284] [9/10 Regression] ICE: unexpected expression '' of kind implicit_conv_expr since r9-6073-ge8b3c1bc3ba22dcf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104284 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Summary|[9/10/11

[Bug c++/70077] noexcept, inheriting constructors and the invalid use of an incomplete type that is actually complete

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70077 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/79493] Bad diagnostic when referring to inner type that does not exist

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79493 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/102434] [11/12 Regression] ICE in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:5514 since r11-4547-g6fb7e3c29188ab7c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102434 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/101874] [12 Regression] ICE with auto specifier for VLAs since r12-1933-ge66d0b7b87d105d2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101874 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/102414] [12 Regression] ICE in unify_array_domain, at cp/pt.c:23442 since r12-1933-ge66d0b7b87d105d2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102414 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/16994] [meta-bug] VLA and C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16994 Bug 16994 depends on bug 101874, which changed state. Bug 101874 Summary: [12 Regression] ICE with auto specifier for VLAs since r12-1933-ge66d0b7b87d105d2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101874 What|Removed

[Bug c++/101988] [12 Regression] Accepts invalid new-expression of array of deduced class template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101988 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/101715] [11/12 Regression] ICE with noexcept and canonical types differ for identical types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101715 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #17 from Marek

[Bug c++/104093] Make -Wvexing-parse warn on declaration of void functions as well

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104093 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/102338] [9/10/11 Regression] Recursive noexcept specification inside class/struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102338 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10/11/12 Regression] |[9/10/11 Regression]

<    6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   >