[Bug c++/102338] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Recursive noexcept specification inside class/struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102338 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/104113] invalid template argument causes the type to become int which confuses the rest of the diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104113 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/101715] [11 Regression] ICE with noexcept and canonical types differ for identical types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101715 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11/12 Regression] ICE with |[11 Regression] ICE with

[Bug target/104172] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ppc64le mangling ICE with -flto -ffat-lto-objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104172 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC|

[Bug c++/104108] [10/11/12 Regression] [c++17+] template alias inside template with static field of template class rejected since r10-6329-g423284053ec51832

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104108 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug libgcc/104207] [12 Regression] Crash in _Unwind_Find_FDE if object lacks unwind information

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104207 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/104213] [12 Regression] bogus use-after-free in virtual dtor with -ffat-lto-objects on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104213 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-01-24 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/104213] [12 Regression] bogus use-after-free in virtual dtor with -ffat-lto-objects on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104213 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects is not needed.

[Bug preprocessor/104030] [12 Regression] -Wbidi-chars should not warn about UCNs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104030 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/104213] [12 Regression] bogus use-after-free in virtual dtor with -ffat-lto-objects on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104213 --- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek --- I've tried diff --git a/gcc/cp/decl.cc b/gcc/cp/decl.cc index 22d3dd1e2ad..c2a0f0c24e2 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/decl.cc +++ b/gcc/cp/decl.cc @@ -17319,6 +17319,7 @@ finish_constructor_body (void)

[Bug c++/101715] [11 Regression] ICE with noexcept and canonical types differ for identical types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101715 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/104213] [12 Regression] bogus use-after-free in virtual dtor with -ffat-lto-objects on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104213 --- Comment #10 from Marek Polacek --- I did but it didn't work either. So I think we need to properly propagate the suppression bits. Something like this: diff --git a/gcc/gimplify.cc b/gcc/gimplify.cc index bf2f60cce9a..0d266241b8c 100644

[Bug target/104213] [12 Regression] bogus use-after-free in virtual dtor with -ffat-lto-objects on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104213 --- Comment #11 from Marek Polacek --- Obviously the 6131 if (COMPARISON_CLASS_P (*from_p)) 6132 copy_warning (assign, *from_p); doesn't work because we are not dealing with a comparison here.

[Bug target/104213] [12 Regression] bogus use-after-free in virtual dtor with -ffat-lto-objects on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104213 --- Comment #12 from Marek Polacek --- Removing the COMPARISON_CLASS_P check regresses uninit-pr74762.C. So how about diff --git a/gcc/cp/decl.cc b/gcc/cp/decl.cc index 22d3dd1e2ad..6534a7fd320 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/decl.cc +++ b/gcc/cp/decl.cc

[Bug target/104213] [12 Regression] bogus use-after-free in virtual dtor with -ffat-lto-objects on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104213 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/104075] bogus/missing -Wuse-after-free

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104075 Bug 104075 depends on bug 104213, which changed state. Bug 104213 Summary: [12 Regression] bogus use-after-free in virtual dtor with -ffat-lto-objects on ARM https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104213 What|Removed

[Bug preprocessor/104030] [12 Regression] -Wbidi-chars should not warn about UCNs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104030 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|-Wbidi-chars should not |[12 Regression]

[Bug preprocessor/104030] [12 Regression] -Wbidi-chars should not warn about UCNs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104030 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > Either we drop the UCN support altogether, or make -Wbidi-chars a 2 level > warning, -Wbidi-chars mapping to -Wbidi-chars=1 which doesn't warn about > UCNs and

[Bug preprocessor/104030] [12 Regression] -Wbidi-chars should not warn about UCNs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104030 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek --- So maybe add -Wbidi-chars-ucn, which is off by default.

[Bug target/104213] [12 Regression] bogus use-after-free in virtual dtor with -ffat-lto-objects on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104213 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/104235] [12 Regression] ICE: in cp_parser_template_id, at cp/parser.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104235 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords|needs-bisection

[Bug c++/104235] [12 Regression] ICE: in cp_parser_template_id, at cp/parser.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104235 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- I guess we want --- a/gcc/cp/parser.cc +++ b/gcc/cp/parser.cc @@ -18574,7 +18574,7 @@ cp_parser_template_name (cp_parser* parser, : parser->context->object_type); if (scope && TYPE_P

[Bug c++/105244] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in implicitly_declare_fn, at cp/method.cc:3114

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105244 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.5 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/105245] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in clear_no_implicit_zero, in cp/constexpr.cc:1892

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105245 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- 0x00b5b5c9 in clear_no_implicit_zero (ctor=) at /home/mpolacek/src/gcc/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc:1892 1892if (TREE_CODE (e.value) == CONSTRUCTOR) (gdb) p ctor $3 = (gdb) pge {.b=} that ctor

[Bug c++/105245] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in clear_no_implicit_zero, in cp/constexpr.cc:1892

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105245 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 CC|

[Bug c++/97296] [10/11 Regression] g++ accepts-invalid after DR2352 fix

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97296 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11/12 Regression] g++ |[10/11 Regression] g++

[Bug c++/105195] spurious warning label defined but not used with if constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105195 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Keywords|

[Bug c++/105187] [12 Regression] ICE in store_init_value, at cp/typeck2.cc:925

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105187 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- We're tripping on this assert + /* A COMPOUND_LITERAL_P CONSTRUCTOR is the syntactic form; by the time we get + here it should have been digested into an actual value for the type. */ +

[Bug c++/105186] ICE in canonicalize_attr_name, at attribs.h:146

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105186 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/105187] [12 Regression] ICE in store_init_value, at cp/typeck2.cc:925

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105187 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/105229] [11/12 Regression] ICE in lookup_template_class_1, at cp/pt.cc:10111

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105229 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug c++/105223] New: [12 Regression] filter_memfn_lookup internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105223 Bug ID: 105223 Summary: [12 Regression] filter_memfn_lookup internal compiler error Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/105223] [12 Regression] filter_memfn_lookup internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105223 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/105228] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'error_mark' in decl_anon_ns_mem_p, at cp/tree.cc:3826

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105228 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/105256] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE compiling firefox-99

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105256 --- Comment #20 from Marek Polacek --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #16) > Don't both of those tests have UB (sure, we shouldn't ICE), using > uninitialized non-static data member? NSDMIs are parsed at the end of the class, but I

[Bug c++/105268] type/value mismatch when using variadic concept

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105268 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/105268] type/value mismatch when using variadic concept

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105268 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/105255] Narrowing conversion from enumerator to integer not detected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105255 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-04-13

[Bug c++/111277] GCC fails to reject braced-init-list in a template-argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111277 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/111284] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Some passing-by-value parameters are mishandled since GCC 9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111284 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/111284] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Some passing-by-value parameters are mishandled since GCC 9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111284 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-09-05 Summary|Some

[Bug c++/111286] [12/13/14 Regression] ICE on functional cast empty brace-init-list to const array reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111286 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Keywords|needs-bisection

[Bug c++/91483] Poor diagnostic on trying to take constexpr reference to non-static object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91483 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/107198] [13/14 Regression] ICE in cp_gimplify_expr, at cp/cp-gimplify.cc:752 since r13-3175-g6ffbf87ca66f4ed9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107198 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/111426] New: [11/12/13/14 Regression] "error: use of deleted function" printed twice

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111426 Bug ID: 111426 Summary: [11/12/13/14 Regression] "error: use of deleted function" printed twice Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/111426] [11/12/13/14 Regression] "error: use of deleted function" printed twice

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111426 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.5 Keywords|

[Bug target/110792] [13/14 Regression] GCC 13 x86_32 miscompilation of Whirlpool hash function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110792 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c/111421] constexpr not working with array subscript

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111421 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/111173] G++ allows constinit functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/110997] [13/14 Regression] internal compiler error: in cxx_eval_constant_expression, at cp/constexpr.cc:8005

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110997 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/111272] [13/14 Regression] Truncated error messages with -std=c++23 and -std=c++26

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111272 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Assignee|unassigned at gcc

[Bug c++/106310] [12/13 Regression] lookup after this-> seems wrong for dependent lookup since r12-6754-g30f2c22def739211

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106310 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/111173] G++ allows constinit functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/91319] Designated initializer doesn't support direct-initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91319 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/111230] show explicit functions in possible candidates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111230 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/111230] New: show explicit functions in possible candidates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111230 Bug ID: 111230 Summary: show explicit functions in possible candidates Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/111247] Very confusing diagnostic when attempting to initialize an incomplete type: "too many initializers"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111247 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/111272] [13/14 Regression] Truncated error messages with -std=c++23 and -std=c++26

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111272 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek --- (In reply to Paul Keir from comment #4) > I believe P2448R2 would only allow the code, without the static_assert. > Explicitly calling `test()`, `Jam::Jam()` and then `Jam::ft()` here would > mean

[Bug c++/111272] [13/14 Regression] Truncated error messages with -std=c++23 and -std=c++26

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111272 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/111776] ICE on delete expression with multiple viable destroying operator delete

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111776 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Last

[Bug c++/111222] ICE on basic_string_view and alias templates with missing template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111222 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/111840] =delete("can have a reason")?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111840 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c/111884] unsigned char no longer aliases anything under -std=c2x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111884 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC|

[Bug testsuite/111883] Wstringop-overflow-6.C FAILs with -std=c++26

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111883 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- Did you mean like the following? I have no idea if that's correct but is suppresses the warnings I see. In C++23 I don't see the code in the .ii file at all, so it doesn't warn. ---

[Bug c++/112365] [12/13/14 Regression] ICE on invalid C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112365 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/111895] error: invalid operands of types 'unsigned char:2' and 'int' to binary 'operator!=' on enum class bitfield cast to bool

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111895 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/112410] error when auto(x) is used in a variable initializer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112410 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug c++/112410] error when auto(x) is used in a variable initializer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112410 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/112288] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE - internal compiler error: in instantiate_decl, at cp/pt.cc:26861

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112288 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection |ice-on-valid-code

[Bug c++/112288] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE - internal compiler error: in instantiate_decl, at cp/pt.cc:26861

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112288 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- // PR c++/112288 namespace { template class counter { public: template static constexpr int next() { return next(0)*Step+Start; } private: template struct slot { template friend

[Bug c++/112288] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE - internal compiler error: in instantiate_decl, at cp/pt.cc:26861

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112288 --- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5) > (In reply to Fabio Alemagna from comment #4) > > (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #2) > > > Confirmed. Started with r6-6830-g20a0c6f9bdbd78: > > > > >

[Bug target/111528] New: aarch64: Test gfortran.dg/pr80494.f90 fails with -fstack-protector-strong with gcc-13

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111528 Bug ID: 111528 Summary: aarch64: Test gfortran.dg/pr80494.f90 fails with -fstack-protector-strong with gcc-13 Product: gcc Version: 13.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/111528] aarch64: Test gfortran.dg/pr80494.f90 fails with -fstack-protector-strong with gcc-13

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111528 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- I see the ICE even with r13-7827-g4bb1ae3c13ce4f in the tree.

[Bug c++/111525] Inconsistent Wsign-compare in c++ with ubsan

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111525 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/111463] Access error in instantiation of template class, incorrectly using inherited constructor of wrong type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111463 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/111482] [14 Regression] ice in lower_bound with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111482 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||guojiufu at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/111483] [14 Regression] ICE in to_sreal, at profile-count.cc:472

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111483 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-09-19 Keywords|

[Bug c/80454] -Wmissing-braces wrongly warns about universal zero initializer {0}

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80454 --- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek --- To fix this, we have to somehow propagate the flag constructor_zeroinit up in pop_init_level.

[Bug c++/111482] [14 Regression] ice in lower_bound with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111482 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/110997] [13/14 Regression] internal compiler error: in cxx_eval_constant_expression, at cp/constexpr.cc:8005

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110997 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- The ICE was fixed by r14-4140-g6851e3423c2b5e.

[Bug c++/111660] [14 Regression] Compilation of constexpr function returning enum takes exponential time with -std=c++2a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111660 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/111660] [14 Regression] Compilation of constexpr function returning enum takes exponential time with -std=c++2a since r14-4140-g6851e3423c2b5e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111660 --- Comment #12 from Marek Polacek --- Candidate fix: --- a/gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.cc +++ b/gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.cc @@ -1072,7 +1072,7 @@ cp_fold_immediate_r (tree *stmt_p, int *walk_subtrees, void *data_) /* We're done here. Don't clear

[Bug c++/111660] [14 Regression] Compilation of constexpr function returning enum takes exponential time with -std=c++2a since r14-4140-g6851e3423c2b5e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111660 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/55004] [meta-bug] constexpr issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004 Bug 55004 depends on bug 111660, which changed state. Bug 111660 Summary: [14 Regression] Compilation of constexpr function returning enum takes exponential time with -std=c++2a since r14-4140-g6851e3423c2b5e

[Bug c++/111840] =delete("can have a reason")?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111840 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/89038] #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wunknown-pragmas" does not work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89038 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug testsuite/111883] Wstringop-overflow-6.C FAILs with -std=c++26

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111883 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/104068] ICE Segmentation fault with type alias

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104068 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/99757] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE: in cp_finish_decl, at cp/decl.c:7736

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99757 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug c++/82165] Operator overloading doesn't work with enum bit fields

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82165 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug rust/111899] [14 regression] GCC fails to bootstrap with 'rust-tree.cc:131:10: error: ‘NON_DEPENDENT_EXPR’ was not declared in this scope'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111899 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/111883] Wstringop-overflow-6.C FAILs with -std=c++26

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111883 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/111884] [13/14 Regression] unsigned char no longer aliases anything under -std=c2x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111884 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/111895] error: invalid operands of types 'unsigned char:2' and 'int' to binary 'operator!=' on enum class bitfield cast to bool

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111895 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug testsuite/111883] New: Wstringop-overflow-6.C FAILs with -std=c++26

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111883 Bug ID: 111883 Summary: Wstringop-overflow-6.C FAILs with -std=c++26 Product: gcc Version: 13.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/99804] cannot convert bit field enum to its own type in a template member function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99804 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/111140] wrong error message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/111158] diagnostics, colors, and std::same_as

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/91483] Poor diagnostic on trying to take constexpr reference to non-static object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91483 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- The error comes from verify_constant, which doesn't explain anything. verify_constant uses reduced_constant_expression_p which just says yes/no but doesn't explain anything. reduced_constant_expression_p

[Bug c++/111160] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE on assigning volatile through ternary operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---

<    7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   >