https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112793
--- Comment #11 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 56747
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56747&action=edit
another cvised testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91092
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106416
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91093
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96284
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||108476, 85678
See Also|https://gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96284
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111400
--- Comment #6 from Sam James ---
(In reply to David Brown from comment #4)
> (In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #3)
> > You already have -W[error=]return-type.
>
> Yes, and that is what I normally use - I am a big fan of gcc's static
> w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108224
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106537
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Assignee|unassigned at g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44209
Bug 44209 depends on bug 106537, which changed state.
Bug 106537 Summary: GCC doesn't support -W[no-]compare-distinct-pointer-types
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106537
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82919
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112818
Bug ID: 112818
Summary: [14 regression] ICE when building accel-ppp (error:
conversion of register to a different size in
‘view_convert_expr’, verify_gimple failed)
Product
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112818
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 56766
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56766&action=edit
reduced.i
cvise just finished here with this, not massaged it by hand though
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112823
Bug ID: 112823
Summary: -Wincompatible-pointer-types errors in
libiberty/simple-object-mach-o.c (missing backport for
gcc-11)
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112823
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
At some point, I think we should consider using formal Fixes: git trailers or
something to help find missed backports, but that's another story.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112823
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112789
--- Comment #11 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7)
> Sounds like that HPC QCD app is broken. You should report it to the
> developers. Also since __builtin_ctzg is added, adding __builtin_ctzs really
> does not make a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112836
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
Thanks for chasing this down. This has been driving me nuts for a while but I
hadn't dug into it yet.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112818
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
that's in my bisect range, yeah, got a few steps to go..
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112818
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pan2.li at intel dot com
Summary
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112572
--- Comment #32 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #30)
> afaik the best we have so far is
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112613#c0
we also know that pipewire fails a test (test-filter) when built for -m32, b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107181
--- Comment #9 from Sam James ---
Thanks Peter!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115992
Bug ID: 115992
Summary: [15 regression] ICE when building linux-6.9.10 (RTL
check: expected code 'reg', have 'subreg' in
rhs_regno, at rtl.h:1934)
Product: gcc
V
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115049
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||15.0
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115991
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[15 Regression] ICE on |[15 Regression] ICE on
|l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115991
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amker at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115951
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-07-19
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115996
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
(i.e. it's fine if this is WONTFIX, it's not that interesting)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115996
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98495
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115996
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
With the following, it warns with -O0 and -O1, just not -O2, so we're back to
the general optimiser-analyser ordering problem:
```
int foo() {
int i = 0;
while(foo) {
i++;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115958
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115394
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115996
Bug ID: 115996
Summary: Missing -Wanalyzer-infinite-loop with -Waddress
violation
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115951
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85316
Bug 85316 depends on bug 115951, which changed state.
Bug 115951 Summary: [15 Regression] pgo+lto enabled bootstrap fails building
gnat (ICE in fold_stmt, at gimple-range-fold.cc:701)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115951
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116009
Bug ID: 116009
Summary: [15 regression] ICE when building cython-3.0.10 on
arm64 for Python 3.12 (insert_def_after, at
rtl-ssa/accesses.cc:622)
Product: gcc
Vers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108508
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116009
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
```
int _Py_NoneStruct,
__pyx_pw_6Cython_7Tempita_8_tempita_29parse_signature___pyx_t_9,
__pyx_pw_6Cython_7Tempita_8_tempita_29parse_signature___pyx_t_12;
int *__pyx_pw_6Cython_7Tempita_8_tempita_29parse
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115767
--- Comment #8 from Sam James ---
While we wait for Honza, Ignacy, if you could try reduce it to get rid of the
Boost dependency, it'd be appreciated.
You can cvise for runtime testcases, just add several checks with different
compilers and UBS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115526
--- Comment #28 from Sam James ---
Many thanks both.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113357
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.gentoo.org/sho
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113357
--- Comment #16 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #11)
Jeff, could you show me your tester's configuration so I can compare the two?
Thank you!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116024
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115877
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114930
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115502
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||14.1.1, 15.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115502
Bug 115502 depends on bug 114930, which changed state.
Bug 114930 Summary: [14/15 regression] ICE in fld_incomplete_type_of when
building libwebp with -std=c23 -flto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114930
What|Remove
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116028
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
Summar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116009
--- Comment #7 from Sam James ---
I have a sparc testcase too but I won't bother spending time on that unless you
want it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116009
--- Comment #8 from Sam James ---
(mpfr)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115277
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116034
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115277
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |hubicka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115033
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |hubicka at gcc dot
gnu.org
Kno
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104011
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-07-22
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116037
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116043
Bug ID: 116043
Summary: [15 regression] TLS relocation issue when building
glibc with -O3 -march=znver4
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116043
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 58732
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58732&action=edit
reduced.i
First attempt at reduction. Not sure it's valid.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116043
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
'gcc argp-help.i -O3 -mavx512bf16' is enough.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116043
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #2)
> 'gcc argp-help.i -O3 -mavx512bf16' is enough.
gcc argp-help.i -O2 -mavx512bf16 --param=max-inline-insns-auto=30
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116043
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #58732|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116057
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
See Als
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116064
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
See Als
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116028
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
I'll file a new PR for that then if I can reproduce still. Will check.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116067
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116035
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96217
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116067
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |law at gcc dot gnu.org
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116074
Bug ID: 116074
Summary: [15 regression] ICE when building harfbuzz-9.0.0 on
arm64 (related_int_vector_mode, at stor-layout.cc:581)
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116074
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Actually, just -O3 is enough.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116035
--- Comment #7 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Patrick O'Neill from comment #5)
> (In reply to Sam James from comment #3)
> > I assume this is a '[14/15 regression]', or does < 14 not support these
> > instructions and you're using it just to sa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116074
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 58753
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58753&action=edit
partial.ii.xz
Reduction is slowgoing. Attached a partial one while it carries on. I've not
tried to isolate it man
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116074
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 58754
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58754&action=edit
reduced.ii
Still pretty big.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116082
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alx at kernel dot org,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116074
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #58754|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103868
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|11.5|12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115135
--- Comment #12 from Sam James ---
Could you try trunk or the 14.2 RC1? A bunch of IPA fixes landed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115767
--- Comment #10 from Sam James ---
Could you try trunk or the 14.2 RC1? A bunch of IPA fixes landed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70112
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50394
Bug 50394 depends on bug 70112, which changed state.
Bug 70112 Summary: [lto] Segmentation fault in Libreoffice's program gengal.bin
when build with LTO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70112
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115658
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65421
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69493
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116088
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116088
--- Comment #8 from Sam James ---
Try running this directly (no gdb), note the appended '-wrapper gdb,--args'.
/builds/psumbera/userland-gcc-11.5/components/gcc11/build/amd64/gcc/xgcc
-B/builds/psumbera/userland-gcc-11.5/components/gcc11/build/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116088
--- Comment #10 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Petr Sumbera from comment #9)
> Thread 2 received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction.
> [Switching to Thread 1 (LWP 1)]
> 0x7fd0fef67f3a in isl_hash_table_init () from /usr/lib/64/libisl.so.23
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116094
Bug ID: 116094
Summary: Missing -Wodr diagnostic
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116098
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116104
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-07-26
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116088
--- Comment #12 from Sam James ---
You're very welcome. Cheers!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114941
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
r1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114941
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14/15 regression] |[14 regression]
|libbackt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110458
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25521
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116086
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67920
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67947
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamrial at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116040
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Build|powerpc64-linux-gnu,|powerpc64-linux-gnu,
|pow
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116040
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
1301 - 1400 of 1725 matches
Mail list logo