https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113204
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
13 is affected too at least, I'm pretty sure, but I can't check right now. Just
needs checking.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113204
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
See
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113332
Bug ID: 113332
Summary: [12/13/14 regression] ICE when building fcitx-5.1.6
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113385
Bug ID: 113385
Summary: [14 regression] ICE when building opencv
(dfs_enumerate_from, at cfganal.cc:1590)
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113385
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 57078
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57078=edit
reduced.ii
Attached something a bit smaller but it's not great (not very elegant and too
many warnings).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113258
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #26
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86843
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
libcxx has started working towards this, see
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-hardening-in-libc/73925 and
https://libcxx.llvm.org/Hardening.html.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113454
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111544
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||macro at orcam dot me.uk
--- Comment #15
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113467
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 57131
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57131=edit
somewhat reduced t-mpi-point.c (not standalone)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113467
--- Comment #6 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 57133
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57133=edit
mpi-add.o (correct)
Attaching a good version of mpi-add.o too for comparison (built with
r14-6644-g5060825aa78b3d).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113467
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
I also see test failures for mpfr and gmp. I was hoping something else would
turn up without wrapped integers so I could reduce it a bit easier :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113467
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 57130
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57130=edit
mpi-add.i
gcc -m32 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I../src -I../src -O3 -march=znver2 -ggdb3
-fvisibility=hidden
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113467
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
```
$ gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/14/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113467
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 57129
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57129=edit
mpi-add.o (miscompiled)
The bad object is mpi-add.o, specifically _gcry_mpi_add_ui in there (verified
with optimize
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113467
Bug ID: 113467
Summary: [14 regression] libgcrypt-1.10.3 is miscompiled
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113467
--- Comment #9 from Sam James ---
I get an ICE with that:
```
/tmp/build/./gcc/xgcc -B/tmp/build/./gcc/ -B/tmp/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/
-B/tmp/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem
/tmp/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/include -isystem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113467
--- Comment #10 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #9)
> Reduced:
(just -O2 -m32)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87723
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113467
--- Comment #12 from Sam James ---
/home/sam/git/gcc/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc: In function ‘edge_def*
vec_init_loop_exit_info(loop*)’:
/home/sam/git/gcc/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc:1001:35: error: comparison between
distinct pointer types ‘basic_block’
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113467
--- Comment #13 from Sam James ---
if I just cast RHS to basic_block (doubt that's the right thing), then
libgcrypt tests pass!
this also fixes mpfr + gmp tests, thank you!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113467
--- Comment #14 from Sam James ---
I tried 'if (candidate && candidate->src != EDGE_PRED (loop->latch, 0)->src)'
as well given that seems way more sensible and that works too, but obviously if
I pick something eager or always true, it's going
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113257
Bug ID: 113257
Summary: -march=native or -mcpu=native are ineffective, but
-march=native -mcpu=native works on arm64 M2 Ultra
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113257
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
FWIW, I did try a patch per
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110901#c4 as a quick hack in case
it's the same issue, but it didn't help:
```
--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.h
+++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113257
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #2)
I'm missing why the combination then works though?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113364
Bug ID: 113364
Summary: [14 regression] Failed bootstrap
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113364
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Ugh, I lost the builddir, so give me an hour or so to get it back...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113332
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 57041
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57041=edit
invalid.ii
Here's an invalid reduced version. Re-reducing...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113332
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 57072
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57072=edit
reduced.ii
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113364
--- Comment #10 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #8)
> Hmm curious, does it work for you with --with-build-config='bootstrap-O3'
> that's how I tested it before
Will have a look. I'll try ignore the bootstrap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38534
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
See
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113364
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 57064
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57064=edit
sanitizer_stack_store.ii
Crashes with:
```
# /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-14.0.1./work/build/./gcc/xgcc -c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113135
Bug ID: 113135
Summary: [14 regression] ICE when building unrar (error: PHI
node with wrong VUSE on edge from BB 46)
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113135
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 56932
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56932=edit
unpack.ii.xz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113135
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
'g++ -O3 -march=znver2 -c unpack.ii' is enough to repro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113136
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 56935
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56935=edit
reduced.i
Reduced.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113136
Bug ID: 113136
Summary: [14 regression] ICE when building Perl
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113136
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 56933
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56933=edit
toke.i.xz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113135
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 56934
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56934=edit
reduced.ii
Reduced.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113135
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #3)
> Created attachment 56934 [details]
> reduced.ii
>
> Reduced.
Interestingly, it seems to ICE as C++, not as C.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112678
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112443
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112280
--- Comment #8 from Sam James ---
I suspect I've just hit this when trying to build pixman on s390x too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112716
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
No warning from -Wlto-type-mismatch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109811
--- Comment #16 from Sam James ---
Thank you all for the effort.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48026
--- Comment #6 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Gwenole Beauchesne from comment #5)
> Created attachment 56811 [details]
> Proposed patch against trunk
>
> Here is a proposed patch against trunk, which includes a fix for PR
> preprocessor/87299
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87299
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41201
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||87299
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41201
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48026
Bug 48026 depends on bug 41201, which changed state.
Bug 41201 Summary: #pragma GCC target ("sse2") doesn't alter __SSE2__ in C++
(as it does in C)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41201
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112868
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105562
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #29
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106416
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91092
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112640
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112793
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 56744
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56744=edit
reduced.ii
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112793
--- Comment #11 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 56747
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56747=edit
another cvised testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59874
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
See
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112783
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://github.com/Juniper/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96284
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||108476, 85678
See
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111922
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112734
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96284
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91093
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108224
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44209
Bug 44209 depends on bug 106537, which changed state.
Bug 106537 Summary: GCC doesn't support -W[no-]compare-distinct-pointer-types
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106537
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106537
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82919
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111400
--- Comment #6 from Sam James ---
(In reply to David Brown from comment #4)
> (In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #3)
> > You already have -W[error=]return-type.
>
> Yes, and that is what I normally use - I am a big fan of gcc's static
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112818
Bug ID: 112818
Summary: [14 regression] ICE when building accel-ppp (error:
conversion of register to a different size in
‘view_convert_expr’, verify_gimple failed)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112818
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 56766
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56766=edit
reduced.i
cvise just finished here with this, not massaged it by hand though
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32667
--- Comment #40 from Sam James ---
https://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/musl/tree/src/string/memcpy.c#n5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112666
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108351
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109977
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
If needed, you can email me an SSH key for a Neoverse-N1 (fp asimd evtstrm aes
pmull sha1 sha2 crc32 atomics fphp asimdhp cpuid asimdrdm lrcpc dcpop asimddp
ssbs) which should be fast.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112643
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112697
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14 Regression] 30-40% exec |[14 Regression] 30-40% exec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112789
--- Comment #11 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7)
> Sounds like that HPC QCD app is broken. You should report it to the
> developers. Also since __builtin_ctzg is added, adding __builtin_ctzs really
> does not make
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112823
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112856
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
reduced C version:
```
double *SVD_A_0;
int SVD_i, SVD_j, SVD_k, SVD_n;
double SVD_f;
void SVD() {
SVD_i = SVD_n - 1;
for (; SVD_i; SVD_i--) {
for (; SVD_j; SVD_j++) {
SVD_f = SVD_k = SVD_i;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112856
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111678
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109689
--- Comment #13 from Sam James ---
*** Bug 111678 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112856
Bug ID: 112856
Summary: [14 regression] ICE when building clustal-omega
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112907
Bug ID: 112907
Summary: [14 regression] ICE when building Botan
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112907
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
-march isn't needed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112717
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112415
--- Comment #51 from Sam James ---
manolis, did you have a chance to look at the remaining pass issue? You'll need
to revert Dave's commit locally which made the issue latent for building
Python.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112701
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112741
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112859
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112897
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arsen at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112572
--- Comment #30 from Sam James ---
afaik the best we have so far is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112613#c0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112793
Bug ID: 112793
Summary: [14 regression] ICE when building stellarium (internal
compiler error: in vect_schedule_slp_node, at
tree-vect-slp.cc:9062)
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112793
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> Does gentoo has a patch which adds __builtin_ctzs ?
No, nothing like that. Here's what this one was built with:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112572
--- Comment #32 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #30)
> afaik the best we have so far is
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112613#c0
we also know that pipewire fails a test (test-filter) when built for -m32,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112836
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
Thanks for chasing this down. This has been driving me nuts for a while but I
hadn't dug into it yet.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112818
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
that's in my bisect range, yeah, got a few steps to go..
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112818
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pan2.li at intel dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112823
Bug ID: 112823
Summary: -Wincompatible-pointer-types errors in
libiberty/simple-object-mach-o.c (missing backport for
gcc-11)
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
501 - 600 of 1432 matches
Mail list logo
