https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e802786436851b1f5efca21a14d4f41c83c83f4f

commit r13-8637-ge802786436851b1f5efca21a14d4f41c83c83f4f
Author: Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
Date:   Sat Apr 20 00:12:36 2024 +0200

    c-family: Allow arguments with NULLPTR_TYPE as sentinels [PR114780]
    
    While in C++ the ellipsis argument conversions include
    "An argument that has type cv std::nullptr_t is converted to type void*"
    in C23 a nullptr_t argument is not promoted in any way, but va_arg
    description says:
    "the type of the next argument is nullptr_t and type is a pointer type that 
has the same
    representation and alignment requirements as a pointer to a character type."
    So, while in C++ check_function_sentinel will never see NULLPTR_TYPE, for
    C23 it can see that and currently we incorrectly warn about those.
    
    The only question is whether we should warn on any argument with
    nullptr_t type or just about nullptr (nullptr_t argument with integer_zerop
    value).  Through undefined behavior guess one could pass non-NULL pointer
    that way, say by union { void *p; nullptr_t q; } u; u.p = &whatever;
    and pass u.q to ..., but valid code should always pass something that will
    read as (char *) 0 when read using va_arg (ap, char *), so I think it is
    better not to warn rather than warn in those cases.
    
    Note, clang seems to pass (void *)0 rather than expression of nullptr_t
    type to ellipsis in C23 mode as if it did the C++ ellipsis argument
    conversions, in that case guess not warning about that would be even safer,
    but what GCC does I think follows the spec more closely, even when in a
    valid program one shouldn't be able to observe the difference.
    
    2024-04-20  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>
    
            PR c/114780
            * c-common.cc (check_function_sentinel): Allow as sentinel any
            argument of NULLPTR_TYPE.
    
            * gcc.dg/format/sentinel-2.c: New test.
    
    (cherry picked from commit 2afdecccbaf5c5b1c7a235509b37092540906c02)

Diff:
---
 gcc/c-family/c-common.cc                 |  1 +
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/format/sentinel-2.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+)

diff --git a/gcc/c-family/c-common.cc b/gcc/c-family/c-common.cc
index aae397ed755..d423cbbacae 100644
--- a/gcc/c-family/c-common.cc
+++ b/gcc/c-family/c-common.cc
@@ -5703,6 +5703,7 @@ check_function_sentinel (const_tree fntype, int nargs, 
tree *argarray)
       sentinel = fold_for_warn (argarray[nargs - 1 - pos]);
       if ((!POINTER_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (sentinel))
           || !integer_zerop (sentinel))
+         && TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (sentinel)) != NULLPTR_TYPE
          /* Although __null (in C++) is only an integer we allow it
             nevertheless, as we are guaranteed that it's exactly
             as wide as a pointer, and we don't want to force
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/format/sentinel-2.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/format/sentinel-2.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..eeff4b2f4bb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/format/sentinel-2.c
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+/* PR c/114780 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-std=c2x -Wformat" } */
+
+#include <stddef.h>
+
+[[gnu::sentinel]] void foo (int, ...);
+[[gnu::sentinel]] void bar (...);
+
+void
+baz (nullptr_t p)
+{
+  foo (1, 2, nullptr);
+  foo (3, 4, 5, p);
+  bar (nullptr);
+  bar (p);
+  foo (6, 7, 0);       // { dg-warning "missing sentinel in function call" }
+  bar (0);             // { dg-warning "missing sentinel in function call" }
+  foo (8, 9, NULL);
+  bar (NULL);
+}

Reply via email to