On 08/11/2011 08:24 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 11:19 AM, H.J. Luhjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 8:23 AM, Rainer Orth
r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de wrote:
Paolo Bonzinibonz...@gnu.org writes:
On 08/10/2011 06:05 PM, Rainer Orth wrote:
True: it is
Shouldn't you document that you need isl now?
skimo
diff --git a/gcc/graphite.c b/gcc/graphite.c
index 8f6d8a1..b2cf7c6 100644
--- a/gcc/graphite.c
+++ b/gcc/graphite.c
@@ -260,10 +260,12 @@ graphite_transform_loops (void)
bool need_cfg_cleanup_p = false;
VEC (scop_p, heap) *scops = NULL;
htab_t bb_pbb_mapping;
+ isl_ctx *ctx;
if
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 05:44:37PM -0500, Sebastian Pop wrote:
+ ctx = isl_ctx_alloc ();
I can't find the call to cloog_isl_state_malloc in this patch
that Tobi correctly requested.
skimo
Jie But it does not work as we want, is there something wrong?
Did you rebuild all of libgcj?
Yes. :)
If you did, then I don't know, you'll have to debug it, sorry.
I vaguely recollect that -fcheck-references adds a check for 'this' at
the start of final methods. If I'm misremembering,
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Jie Liu lj8...@gmail.com wrote:
The method length() is not a final method, as java/lang/String.java line 447:
public int length()
{
return count;
}
Is this the problem?
As String is a final class, all its methods are implicitly final.
Bryce
On 3 August 2011 01:44, Joey Ye joey...@arm.com wrote:
This patch fixes PR49437 with a single line change in ARM backend
and a regression test case for ARM target
ChangeLog:
2011-08-02 Matthew Gretton-Dann matthew.gretton-d...@arm.com
PR target/49437
* config/arm/arm.c
2011-08-10 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
* tree.h (can_trust_pointer_alignment): Remove.
* builtins.c (can_trust_pointer_alignment): Remove.
cp/
* call.c (build_over_call): Call memcpy unconditionally.
Hi,
This appears to have caused a regression on
Hi,
The attached patch fixes up PR50022 which exposed a problem in my reworking
the movdi_vfp_cortex_a8 patterns. The problem was the ce_count attribute
wasn't being set at all for alternatives that would have more than
one assembler instruction that could be generated as a result of
On 12 August 2011 10:19, Ramana Radhakrishnan
ramana.radhakrish...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi,
The attached patch fixes up PR50022 which exposed a problem in my reworking
And with the patch even :( ...
Ramana
2011-08-12 Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana.radhakrish...@linaro.org
PR target/50022
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011, James Greenhalgh wrote:
2011-08-10 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
* tree.h (can_trust_pointer_alignment): Remove.
* builtins.c (can_trust_pointer_alignment): Remove.
cp/
* call.c (build_over_call): Call memcpy unconditionally.
Hi,
On 12/08/11 10:28, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
On 12 August 2011 10:19, Ramana Radhakrishnan
ramana.radhakrish...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi,
The attached patch fixes up PR50022 which exposed a problem in my reworking
And with the patch even :( ...
Ramana
2011-08-12 Ramana Radhakrishnan
Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com writes:
On 08/11/2011 10:49 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
There might be an alternative implementation that is less invasive to
the C++ frontend, though: add
TARGET_DECL_NAMESPACE_STD_P (decl)
in write_unscoped_name, defaulting to true, override it in sol2.h
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote:
Currently, conversion from floating point to integer on 64bit targets
goes through DImode temporary, due to missing BUILT_IN_ICEIL (and
other) builtins that can convert directly from FP to integer.
Please document
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote:
Currently, conversion from floating point to integer on 64bit targets
goes through DImode temporary, due to missing BUILT_IN_ICEIL (and
other) builtins that can convert
This implements NEGATE_EXPR as 0 - X, re-using code we have for
MINUS_EXPR.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied to trunk.
Richard.
2011-08-12 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
* tree-vrp.c (extract_range_from_unary_expr_1): Implement
-X as 0 - X.
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 12:04 AM, Paolo Bonzini bonz...@gnu.org wrote:
On 08/11/2011 08:24 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 11:19 AM, H.J. Luhjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 8:23 AM, Rainer Orth
r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de wrote:
Paolo Bonzinibonz...@gnu.org
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote:
Currently, conversion from floating point to integer on 64bit targets
goes through DImode temporary, due to missing BUILT_IN_ICEIL (and
other) builtins that can convert directly from FP to integer.
Please document
On 08/12/2011 02:13 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
We may have a race condition here.
I opened:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50047
Does the attached patch work?
Can you provide a patch instead of the whole Makefile.in?
Sorry, that was not intended.
Paolo
2011-08-12 Paolo Bonzini
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote:
Currently, conversion from floating point to integer on 64bit targets
goes through DImode temporary, due to missing BUILT_IN_ICEIL (and
other) builtins that can convert
Hi,
Quite some time back someone had pointed out that the ARM backend
used optimize_size in quite a few areas and that backends shouldn't
use this directly in patterns any more. I had written this patch up a few weeks
back and it was in one of my trees and had gone through some degree of
testing.
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote:
Attached patch adds testcases for all conversion builtins. The gcc.dg
one tests that we are always able to link executable correctly, no
matter if target implements convresion optabs or not, the
gcc.target/i386 test
On Friday 12 August 2011 13:17:21, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
2011-08-12 Paolo Bonzini bonz...@gnu.org
* Makefile.in (install-unwind_h): Create
$(gcc_objdir)/include/unwind.h
atomically.
Index: Makefile.in
===
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana.radhakrish...@linaro.org writes:
While the ARM backend doesn't support hot cold partitioning of basic blocks
because of issues with the mini-pool placements, I suspect
this by itself is a good cleanup. The bits of the use that I'm not
convinced about
yet are the
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 5:38 AM, Pedro Alves pe...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On Friday 12 August 2011 13:17:21, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
2011-08-12 Paolo Bonzini bonz...@gnu.org
* Makefile.in (install-unwind_h): Create
$(gcc_objdir)/include/unwind.h
atomically.
Index:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 09:45, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote:
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011, Diego Novillo wrote:
This is mind numbing but mechanical. This rename does two things:
1- Replaces the 'lto_' prefix with 'streamer_' in all the public functions
that deal with generic
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011, Diego Novillo wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 09:45, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote:
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011, Diego Novillo wrote:
This is mind numbing but mechanical. This rename does two things:
1- Replaces the 'lto_' prefix with 'streamer_' in all the
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 09:50, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote:
Oh, how even more confusing ;) So maybe hwi and uhwi instead then?
That's what we use elsewhere.
Sounds good. Done.
Diego.
Hello,
-fbranch-probabilities fails to find the gcda information, because they
are initialized only if flag_profile_use.
The problem is easily observable by recompiling with
-fbranch-probabilities instead of -fprofile-use (after profile
information generation)
This fails with xxx.gcda not
Hi,
The Thumb2 tbh instruction can take half word values that are
multiplied by 2 which implies the maximum offset is 0x1 when you
add it to the pc ,
rather than 0xFFF which is what the current range check of 0x2000 for
HImode values indicates. Checked that a pre-compiled insn-recog.i that
I
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 1:57 AM, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote:
On Wed, 10 Aug 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, 10 Aug 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, 10 Aug 2011, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 08/10/2011 08:35 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
* call.c
Hello,
This fixes an ICE triggered by resolve.c's gfc_expr_to_initialize reseting a
range array ref into a full array ref, updating the rank, but leaving the
shape as is, which eventually leads to an out of bound error.
The right fix would probably be to avoid this kind of tricks. But I don't
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 02:22, Sven Verdoolaege sk...@kotnet.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 05:44:37PM -0500, Sebastian Pop wrote:
+ ctx = isl_ctx_alloc ();
I can't find the call to cloog_isl_state_malloc in this patch
that Tobi correctly requested.
Yes, sorry, I forgot about this one
---
gcc/graphite-poly.c |6
gcc/graphite-sese-to-poly.c | 54 --
2 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/graphite-poly.c b/gcc/graphite-poly.c
index 1828727..2835311 100644
--- a/gcc/graphite-poly.c
+++
Hi,
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011, Diego Novillo wrote:
3- Replaces dwarf terminology for numbers with C-like terminology:
sleb128 - wide_int
uleb128 - wide_uint
I see downthread that this is changed to hwi/uhwi already. I even would
have suggested int/uint directly, as we never stream
---
gcc/graphite.c | 11 ++-
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/graphite.c b/gcc/graphite.c
index b2cf7c6..7d124c7 100644
--- a/gcc/graphite.c
+++ b/gcc/graphite.c
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3. If not see
#include
---
gcc/doc/install.texi |8 +++-
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/doc/install.texi b/gcc/doc/install.texi
index 368221f..f2b2fd9 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/install.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/install.texi
@@ -368,6 +368,11 @@ It can be downloaded from
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 11:16, Michael Matz m...@suse.de wrote:
I see downthread that this is changed to hwi/uhwi already. I even would
have suggested int/uint directly, as we never stream other numbers than
host_wide_ints or chars.
For now, that's true. Over in PPH we do stream out
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 10:16:05AM -0500, Sebastian Pop wrote:
---
gcc/doc/install.texi |8 +++-
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/doc/install.texi b/gcc/doc/install.texi
index 368221f..f2b2fd9 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/install.texi
+++
Can't this sequence happen?
proc1: cp unwind.h $(gcc_objdir)/include/tmp-unwind.h
proc2: cp unwind.h $(gcc_objdir)/include/tmp-unwind.h
proc1: sh $(srcdir)/../move-if-change \
$(gcc_objdir)/include/tmp-unwind.h \
$(gcc_objdir)/include/unwind.h
Hi,
tested x86_64-linux, committed to mainline.
Paolo.
PS: will add separately tests for the C++11 cmath facilities.
//
2011-08-12 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
* include/c_global/cmath (fmod(_Tp, _Up)): Add.
* include/c_std/cmath: Likewise.
Index:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 8:40 AM, Paolo Bonzini bonz...@gnu.org wrote:
Can't this sequence happen?
proc1: cp unwind.h $(gcc_objdir)/include/tmp-unwind.h
proc2: cp unwind.h $(gcc_objdir)/include/tmp-unwind.h
proc1: sh $(srcdir)/../move-if-change \
On 08/12/2011 05:50 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
Thanks, you are correct.
It should work.
Thanks.
I prefer to wait for testing results to commit it, the breakage is minor.
Paolo
Hi,
On Tue, 9 Aug 2011, Michael Matz wrote:
Are there any updates on the libada problem or other reasons why the
patch cannot go in?
Nope, I've solved that one. Letme update it.
Like so. Regstrapped on x86_64-linux (all languages + Ada). Okay for
trunk?
Ciao,
Michael.
--
On Friday 12 August 2011 16:40:33, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
install-unwind_h:
- rm -f $(gcc_objdir)/include/unwind.h
- cp unwind.h $(gcc_objdir)/include/unwind.h
- chmod a+r $(gcc_objdir)/include/unwind.h
+ dest=$(gcc_objdir)/include/tmp-unwind.h; \
+ cp
If you did, then I don't know, you'll have to debug it, sorry.
I vaguely recollect that -fcheck-references adds a check for 'this' at
the start of final methods. If I'm misremembering, then that is
probably the problem.
In my debug, there appears no check for 'this' at start of
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Paolo Bonzini bonz...@gnu.org wrote:
On 08/12/2011 05:50 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
Thanks, you are correct.
It should work.
Thanks.
I prefer to wait for testing results to commit it, the breakage is minor.
It bootstraps successfully with make -j12 on a 24 core
Hi Jeff,
The point of the patch is that the cmpstrnsi machine pattern should
not be used to implement the memcmp builtin function. This is
because a string comparison will terminate if two zero bytes are read
whereas a memory comparison should continue.
OK. Kindof surprised this wasn't
This patch adds an option for enabling/disabling the warning for
attempting to free nonheap objects (PR/38509). The warning is
imprecise and can issue false positives.
Bootstrapped on x86-64. Ok for trunk?
Mark
2011-08-11 Mark Heffernan meh...@google.com
PR middle-end/38509
On 08/05/2011 04:24 PM, Torvald Riegel wrote:
Note that I did have code ready to have a single statically allocated
__thread gtm_thread object. However, I then saw that unlike discussed
off-list, the compiler does indeed complain about using non-trivial
objects with __thread (which makes
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011, Sebastian Pop wrote:
---
gcc/doc/install.texi |8 +++-
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/doc/install.texi b/gcc/doc/install.texi
index 368221f..f2b2fd9 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/install.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/install.texi
@@ -368,6
Jie == Jie Liu lj8...@gmail.com writes:
Jie In my debug, there appears no check for 'this' at start of String.length():
Yeah, I looked for uses of flag_check_references and didn't see one when
building a method's body. So I guess I mis-remembered this.
In any case, the spot you found is just
On 08/12/2011 06:25 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
I prefer to wait for testing results to commit it, the breakage is minor.
It bootstraps successfully with make -j12 on a 24 core machine.
Thanks.
Committed.
Paolo
Now that we do not depend on the LTO streamer anymore, these calls are
unnecessary. There are still some remnants that will be necessary
until I factor the pickling buffers out of lto-streamer.h.
Tested on x86_64. Committed to branch.
Diego.
* pph-streamer-in.c (pph_init_read): Do
On 08/09/2011 05:01 AM, Torvald Riegel wrote:
Maintain a list of all threads' transactions.
* libitm_i.h (next_tx): Add list of all threads' transaction.
* beginend.cc (GTM::gtm_transaction::begin_transaction): Register
transaction with list of transactions and ...
On 08/05/2011 10:33 AM, Torvald Riegel wrote:
Use per-transaction reader flags for the serial lock (gtm_rwlock).
* config/posix/rwlock.cc (gtm_rwlock::read_lock): Changed locking
implementation.
(gtm_rwlock::read_unlock): Same.
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 05:02:18PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011, Sebastian Pop wrote:
+@item Integer Set Library (ISL) version 0.08
+
+Necessary to build GCC with the Graphite loop optimizations.
+It can be downloaded from @uref{http://www.kotnet.org/~skimo/isl/}.
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 07:35:24PM +0200, Sven Verdoolaege wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 05:02:18PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011, Sebastian Pop wrote:
+@item Integer Set Library (ISL) version 0.08
+
+Necessary to build GCC with the Graphite loop optimizations.
Gabriel == Gabriel Charette gch...@google.com writes:
Gabriel Removed LINEMAP_POSITION_FOR_COLUMN, it did the EXACT same
Gabriel thing as linemap_position_for_column, so maintaining both in
Gabriel parallel seems like overkill to me. The only thing I can think
Gabriel of is that it's more
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011, Sven Verdoolaege wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 05:02:18PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011, Sebastian Pop wrote:
+@item Integer Set Library (ISL) version 0.08
+
+Necessary to build GCC with the Graphite loop optimizations.
+It can be
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 06:56:38PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
I don't see why that should make any difference to the build requirements.
If CLooG-ISL builds and installs a library libisl.a as well as
libcloog-isl.a (as config/cloog.m4 thinks it does at present), why should
someone need
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011, Sven Verdoolaege wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 06:56:38PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
I don't see why that should make any difference to the build requirements.
If CLooG-ISL builds and installs a library libisl.a as well as
libcloog-isl.a (as config/cloog.m4
Hi,
When the location for throw() exception specification is not the same
as the function it is written against, it leads gcov to give incorrect
results. See bug 50055 for details of the the same. The following
patch makes sure that the exception specification block (nothrow or
otherwise) is
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 07:16:55PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
Do you mean there is not only a requirement to build both libraries, but
there is a requirement to build CLooG *first*, then ISL, so that ISL's
libisl.a overwrites CLooG's rather than the other way round (supposing
that they
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Richard Sandiford
rdsandif...@googlemail.com wrote:
gcc/
* config/arm/arm.c (get_label_padding): New function.
(create_fix_barrier, md_reorg): Likewise.
The ChangeLog doesn't match the patch:
* create_fix_barrier is not a new function.
* md_reorg
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 12:50, Jack Howarth howa...@bromo.med.uc.edu wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 07:35:24PM +0200, Sven Verdoolaege wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 05:02:18PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011, Sebastian Pop wrote:
+@item Integer Set Library (ISL) version
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011, Sven Verdoolaege wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 07:16:55PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
Do you mean there is not only a requirement to build both libraries, but
there is a requirement to build CLooG *first*, then ISL, so that ISL's
libisl.a overwrites CLooG's rather
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 09:22:04PM +0200, Sven Verdoolaege wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 07:16:55PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
Do you mean there is not only a requirement to build both libraries, but
there is a requirement to build CLooG *first*, then ISL, so that ISL's
libisl.a
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 07:28:52PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011, Sven Verdoolaege wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 07:16:55PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
Do you mean there is not only a requirement to build both libraries, but
there is a requirement to build CLooG
On 08/11/2011 08:06 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
A new patch with lightly modified the test case.
if (lost)
BV_LOST_PRIMARY (*virtuals) = true;
+ else
+BV_LOST_PRIMARY (*virtuals) = false;
Might as well just do
BV_LOST_PRIMARY (*virtuals) = lost;
OK for trunk and 4.6 with
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 03:30:25PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
Skimo,
Currently we don't have any checks for the minimal isl version required.
I assume they will be added at some point.
AFAIU, Sebastian just started working on this.
It will take some time for him to finish the transition.
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Michael Matz m...@suse.de wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 9 Aug 2011, Michael Matz wrote:
Are there any updates on the libada problem or other reasons why the
patch cannot go in?
Nope, I've solved that one. Letme update it.
Like so. Regstrapped on x86_64-linux
Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Richard Sandiford
rdsandif...@googlemail.com wrote:
gcc/
* config/arm/arm.c (get_label_padding): New function.
(create_fix_barrier, md_reorg): Likewise.
The ChangeLog doesn't match the patch:
*
Extra dependencies are needed to avoid creating incorrect unwind info.
See the patch and the PR for more details.
Tested on x86_64-linux. Committed.
r~
diff --git a/gcc/sched-deps.c b/gcc/sched-deps.c
index 2961cca..ed592c8 100644
--- a/gcc/sched-deps.c
+++ b/gcc/sched-deps.c
@@ -2696,6
On 08/11/2011 05:19 AM, Nick Clifton wrote:
Hi Guys,
I am applying the patch below on behalf of Renesas. It adds support
to the RX backend for conditional register moves.
Tested without any regressions on an rx-elf toolchain.
Cheers
Nick
gcc/ChangeLog
2011-08-11 Kazuhiro
G++ was complaining about performing the lvalue-rvalue conversion on an
lvalue of abstract type, which is correct when the conversion is
potentially evaluated, but as it turns out, not in unevaluated context.
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk.
commit
Andrew Pinski writes:
This is wrong as -iquote takes an operand. So it is eating up -I. for
the -iquote. You have to replace all of the -I after -I- with
-iquote.
OK, here is an amended patch. I don't dare call it trivial anymore :)
(Note that even the wrong patch solved the problem
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
This is an optimization in machine dependent reorg to
remove redundant comparisons like in
cc0 = compare (Reg, Num)
if (cc0 == 0)
goto L1
cc0 = compare (Reg, Num)
if (cc0 0)
goto L2
The second comparison is
On 08/11/2011 02:42 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
The names for the previous set implies the fetch is done before the
operation, so the new ones simply drop the fetch and simply use the
operation name. I found sync_mem_op_fetch slightly less clear.
Really? I guess I'm pretty used to that, and it
Hi,
as I am not working anymore at AMD, I will commit the following patch.
Sebastian
---
MAINTAINERS |6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 3c7e8a9..ec0579d 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -225,9 +225,9 @@
On 08/12/2011 07:05 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 08/11/2011 02:42 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
The names for the previous set implies the fetch is done before the
operation, so the new ones simply drop the fetch and simply use the
operation name. I found sync_mem_op_fetch slightly less clear.
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:12 AM, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jul 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jul 2011, Michael Matz wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 8 Jul 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:
It should be indeed safe with the current handling of conversions, but
This patch is the beginning stages of my revamp of the builtin function
handling in the rs6000 port. When I added target attribute support in GCC 4.6,
I ran out of time in tackling enabling builtin functions if the user says a
function is to be compiled for a different target machine. These
83 matches
Mail list logo
