Just a terminology note: it should be "template alias" and not the
other way around.
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011, Jeff Law wrote:
> Attached wrong file as Andrey pointed out earlier... Here's the right
> one... Oh how I wish thunderbird would show the attachment inline...
Ok.
Just mind the long line and it's Rawhide (uppercase), I think.
Gerald
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
Reading this I was wondering which platforms. On the other page it
says x86 and alpha; should we just use this here, or were you thinking
to keep this more marketing speak? ;-)
*blush*, yes... marketing speak. Seeing that people are contributing other
> Given that x86 memset/memcpy is still broken, I think we should revert
> it for now.
Well, looking into the code, the SSE alignment issues needs work - the
alignment test merely tests whether some alignmnet is known not whether 16 byte
alignment is known that is the cause of failures in 32bit bo
Hi, Joseph, thanks!
ChangeLog entries added to the issue description.
ChangeLog
* Makefile.in (GPLUSPLUS_INCLUDE_DIR_ADD_SYSROOT): add a macro
definition to compile command.
* cppdefault.c (GPLUSPLUS_INCLUDE_DIR_ADD_SYSROOT): replace hard
coded "add_sysroot" field
Hi,
is this the right place to handle these TREE_CODEs and avoid the ICEs on
invalid or should we do something else/earlier?
(tested x86_64-linux)
Thanks,
Paolo.
///
Index: testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/pr51216.C
===
--
Re-posting to gcc-patches.
Diego.
Original Message
Subject: Re: Links to release criteria?
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:05:24 -0800
From: Diego Novillo
To: Gerald Pfeifer
CC: Richard Guenther , g...@gcc.gnu.org
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 07:54, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Thu, 17
The patch in class.c for PR50640 makes the default initializer
("__def_init_)TREE_READONLY. I also set attr.subroutine for __copy_,
which is not needed but its lacking irritated me once when stepping
through trans*.c.
The patch in trans-decl.c/trans.h fixes a 4.7 regressions (P1), which
cause
Hi Xinyu,
This doesn't apply cleanly currently on trunk and the reject appears
to come from iwmmxt.md and I've not yet investigated why.
Can you have a look ?
cheers
Ramana
On 26 September 2011 04:22, Xinyu Qi wrote:
> Ping.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-09/msg00279.html
>
>
On 10 November 2011 18:07, Sameera Deshpande wrote:
> Please find attached the reworked patch.
OK but for a very small bit .
I'll note that we need to add support for the iwMMXt registers but the
attached patch (untested) should be what is needed to support the
iwMMxt registers and this should b
On 11/18/2011 10:29 PM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> For the test-case of PR50764, a dead label is introduced by
>> fixup_reorder_chain in cfg_layout_finalize, called from
>> pass_reorder_blocks.
>
> I presume that there is no reasonable way of preventing fixup_reorder_chain
> from introducing it or o
On 17 November 2011 15:16, Sameera Deshpande wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Please find attached the patch updating NEG_POOL_RANGE from 1008 to
> 1020 -(8 + ).
This is OK - can you add a comment around the neg_pool_range attribute
in arm.md stating that the limit should essentially be -
(8 + ?.
cheers
Raman
On 20 October 2011 08:39, Xinyu Qi wrote:
> Ping
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-07/msg01103.html
>
> * config/arm/arm.c (enum arm_builtins): Revise built-in fcode.
> (builtin_description bdesc_2arg): Revise built in declaration.
> (builtin_description bdesc_1arg):
The testcase gcc.dg/cpp/assert4.c, which tests that #system(linux) is true
if and only if __gnu_linux__ is defined, wasn't updated for the changes
associated with Android support that arranged for __linux__ to be defined
for all systems with the Linux kernel but __gnu_linux__ only to be defined
On Nov 17, 2011, at 8:24 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> As things stand, Darwin's 'as' cannot produce dwarf debug.
> OK for trunk?
Ok.
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> > > Index: gcc/defaults.h
> > > ===
> > > --- gcc/defaults.h(revision 181476)
> > > +++ gcc/defaults.h(working copy)
> > > @@ -392,6 +392,14 @@ see the files COPYING3 and COPYI
> With the patch from http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49452
> the regstate information is resetted at the unspec_volatile instead of
> invalidated!
You're right. This wouldn't have happened if the code had been properly
commented.
> 2011-11-14 Andreas Krebbel
>
> * postrelo
On 5 October 2011 17:04, Sameera Deshpande wrote:
> Ping!
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-09/msg01855.html
This should now be rebased given your other changes to the Thumb2
epilogues patch or is there a newer version of this patch . This
doesn't apply cleanly on top of the other patch
> For the test-case of PR50764, a dead label is introduced by
> fixup_reorder_chain in cfg_layout_finalize, called from
> pass_reorder_blocks.
I presume that there is no reasonable way of preventing fixup_reorder_chain
from introducing it or of teaching fixup_reorder_chain to remove it?
--
Eric
Hi Richard.
David reports that on AIX, you can have DECL_COMDAT defined, but no
DEC_COMDAT_GROUP. Consequently tm_mangle() gets called incorrectly with
a null. I suggested making tm_mangle() handle nulls, but David
preferred handling it in the caller.
I tested this patch on x86-64 Linux, a
On 11/18/2011 09:16 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 5:11 AM, Tom de Vries wrote:
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> this patch fixes an inefficiency problem I observed while working on PR50764.
>>
>> For the test-case of PR50764, a dead label is introduced by
>> fixup_reorder_chain
>> in cfg_la
On 11/18/2011 02:53 PM, Fabien Chêne wrote:
I have just committed. Unfortunately, I have mentioned the wrong PR
number in the ChangeLog. Consequently, Bugzilla isn't quite happy,
shall I adjust the previous commit with the good PR number (51188) ?
Yes, do adjust the ChangeLog. I do this period
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 5:11 AM, Tom de Vries wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> this patch fixes an inefficiency problem I observed while working on PR50764.
>
> For the test-case of PR50764, a dead label is introduced by
> fixup_reorder_chain
> in cfg_layout_finalize, called from pass_reorder_blocks.
> The
2011/11/18 Jason Merrill :
> On 11/18/2011 05:18 AM, Fabien Chêne wrote:
>>
>> +template< size_t, size_t> struct AlignedBuffer;
>> +template< size_t size> struct AlignedBuffer
>> +< size, 8> {
>> +};
>
> This testcase will break on targets where alignof(void*) != 8; just define
> the base tem
See my comment in the PR.
Jason
---
gcc/config/m68k/m68k.md |9 +
gcc/config/m68k/sync.md | 80 +++
2 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 gcc/config/m68k/sync.md
diff --git a/gcc/config/m68k/m68k.md b/gcc/config/m68k/m68k.md
index 672ef0d..e4b
The first patch adds support for the m68k-linux syscall. The second
patch adds native support for the m680[2346]0 CAS instruction, and
the m68000/Coldfire TAS instruction.
Both tested only via cross-compile.
Please test...
r~
Richard Henderson (2):
m68k-linux: Implement atomic operations
---
gcc/config/m68k/linux.h |4 +
gcc/config/m68k/m68k.c|8 ++
libgcc/config.host|6 +-
libgcc/config/m68k/linux-atomic.c | 211 +
libgcc/config/m68k/t-linux|1 +
5 files changed, 227 insertions(+),
Hello,
As reminded in the audit trail of this PR, the identifier of an
elaborate specifier should never be a simple-template-id that resolves
to an alias template specialization, but the current implementation
fails to enforce that.
I reused check_elaborated_type_specifier in
cp_parser_elaborated
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 6:58 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> _mm_stream_si64 intrinsic is missing. It is implemented in VC++:
>
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb531466.aspx
>
> We are adding it to Intel64 SDM. Here is a patch to implement it in GCC.
> I added UNSPEC_MOVNTI so that it won't get
Iain Sandoe writes:
> well ... what about this instead then?
That one should at least be no worse than the current situation :-)
> Index: gcc/defaults.h
> ===
> --- gcc/defaults.h(revision 181476)
> +++ gcc/defaults.h(worki
On 18 Nov 2011, at 18:12, Rainer Orth wrote:
Iain Sandoe writes:
This, together with the unconditional use in varasm.c, will lead
to a
bootstrap failure on Tru64 UNIX, which lacks named sections
completely.
right, it was worrying me what a target without named sections does -
... I can
Mike Stump wrote:
> On Nov 18, 2011, at 9:04 AM, "Ulrich Weigand" wrote:
> > Huh, it seems the test in this form assumes the assembler supports /* ...
> > */
> > comments. But this isn't really necessary for the test to work; I think the
> > best fix would be to just remove the comment and simp
Iain Sandoe writes:
>> This, together with the unconditional use in varasm.c, will lead to a
>> bootstrap failure on Tru64 UNIX, which lacks named sections completely.
>
> right, it was worrying me what a target without named sections does -
> ... I can easily remove the #if defined (TARGET_ASM_N
On 18 Nov 2011, at 17:56, Rainer Orth wrote:
Iain Sandoe writes:
Index: gcc/defaults.h
===
--- gcc/defaults.h (revision 181476)
+++ gcc/defaults.h (working copy)
@@ -392,6 +392,14 @@ see the files COPYING3 and COPYING.
Hi,
_mm_stream_si64 intrinsic is missing. It is implemented in VC++:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb531466.aspx
We are adding it to Intel64 SDM. Here is a patch to implement it in GCC.
I added UNSPEC_MOVNTI so that it won't get confused with
(define_insn "sse_movntdi"
[(set (matc
Iain Sandoe writes:
> Index: gcc/defaults.h
> ===
> --- gcc/defaults.h(revision 181476)
> +++ gcc/defaults.h(working copy)
> @@ -392,6 +392,14 @@ see the files COPYING3 and COPYING.RUNTIME respect
> #endif
> #endif
>
> +/
At least Darwin needs a different name for the tm_clone_table section.
I'm wondering what a target without named sections does for this - is
there some reason it needs to be in a separate section (from data)...
... perhaps what I'm missing here will help understand why the clone
tests fail
Hi,
PR 50744 is an issue with an integer overflow when we propagate the
estimated size and time effects from callees to callers. Because such
paths in the parameter value graph can be arbitrarily long, we simply
need to introduce an artificial cap on these values. This is what the
patch below do
On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 18:26 +0100, Michael Matz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 18 Nov 2011, Steve Ellcey wrote:
>
> > This patch fixes the IA64 bootstrap when building libunwind. When using
> > -fexceptions libunwind will have a reference to __gcc_personality_v0 and
> > the bootstrap fails, using -fno
On 11/17/2011 03:58 PM, Alan Modra wrote:
> Thanks! This, along with my mutex.h rewrite plus adding a
> memory_barrier insn gets me down to just one libgomp failure.
The memory_barrier thing should be fixed now as well...
r~
On 11/17/2011 03:47 PM, Alan Modra wrote:
> BTW, we're left with dead stores into oldval's stack slot. Is it
> legal for the first two parameters of __atomic_compare_exchange to
> alias? I'm guessing that the stores might disappear if we tell gcc
> that they can't alias.
No they cannot alias.
M
Steve Ellcey writes:
> This patch fixes the IA64 bootstrap when building libunwind. When using
> -fexceptions libunwind will have a reference to __gcc_personality_v0 and
> the bootstrap fails, using -fno-exceptions fixes this. This problem
> started with r181172, Michael Matz's fix to mark obje
On 11/18/2011 04:00 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> libitm:
>
> * config/x86/sjlj.S (CONCAT1, CONCAT2, SYM): Respond to
> __USER_LABEL_PREFIX__ for targets that use it.
> TYPE, SIZE, HIDDEN): New macros to assist on non-elf targets.
> (_ITM_beginTransaction): Use SYM, TYPE, SIZE macros to
On 11/18/2011 04:27 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> libitm:
>
> * testsuite/libitm.c/memcpy-1.c: Allow for MAP_ANON spelling.
> * testsuite/libitm.c/memset-1.c: Likewise.
Ok.
r~
On Nov 18, 2011, at 9:04 AM, "Ulrich Weigand" wrote:
> David Edelsohn wrote:
>> I noticed that gcc.c-torture/compile/pr44707.c fails on AIX because it
>> generates invalid assembly language:
>>
>> # 12 "/farm/dje/src/src/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr44707.c" 1
>>/* 0(6) 0(7) 0(8)
Hi,
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> This patch fixes the IA64 bootstrap when building libunwind. When using
> -fexceptions libunwind will have a reference to __gcc_personality_v0 and
> the bootstrap fails, using -fno-exceptions fixes this. This problem
> started with r181172, Michael
This patch fixes the IA64 bootstrap when building libunwind. When using
-fexceptions libunwind will have a reference to __gcc_personality_v0 and
the bootstrap fails, using -fno-exceptions fixes this. This problem
started with r181172, Michael Matz's fix to mark objects death at end of
scope.
Tes
David Edelsohn wrote:
> I noticed that gcc.c-torture/compile/pr44707.c fails on AIX because it
> generates invalid assembly language:
>
> # 12 "/farm/dje/src/src/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr44707.c" 1
> /* 0(6) 0(7) 0(8) 0(9) 0(10) */
> # 0 "" 2
>
> I'm confused why
>
> __
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 6:18 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> I found another bug in current implementation. A patch for it doesn't
>> cure i686-linux- bootstrap, but fixes fails on some tests (see
>> attached).
>>
>> The problem was that we tried to add runtime tests for alignment even
>> if both SRC an
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011, Han Shen wrote:
> 2011-11-15 Han Shen
>
> * gcc/Makefile.in:
> * gcc/configure:
> * gcc/cppdefault.c:
You need to include the full ChangeLog entries with your patch. Note that
paths in ChangeLogs are relative to the directory with the ChangeLog, so
n
On 18 Nov 2011, at 16:17, Jack Howarth wrote:
For gcc trunk at r181476 with 181473-libitm-config-weakref.txt,
181473-libitm-tests-mapanon.txt
and 181473-libitm-user-label-prefix.txt as well as the regenerations
performed in libitm, I see
the following failures on x86_64-apple-darwin11 unde
+ The project was partially funded by
+ thehttp://www.velox-project.eu/";>Velox project. This
+ feature is experimental and is available for C and C++ on selected
+ platforms.
Reading this I was wondering which platforms. On the other page it
says x86 and alpha; should we just use this here
Gerald Pfeifer writes:
> The snippet below was written when a new major release of FreeBSD
> would happen every couple of years, not as frequently as recently
> the case. FreeBSD 1.x and 2.x, and a.out support, have been obsolete
> for what must be a decade or so, yet the regular expressions now
Using /sw/share/dejagnu/baseboards/unix.exp as board description file for
target.
Using /sw/share/dejagnu/config/unix.exp as generic interface file for target.
Using
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc47-4.7.0-1/gcc-4.7-2018/libitm/testsuite/config/default.exp
as tool-and-target-specific interface file
Richard Henderson writes:
> On 11/16/2011 08:38 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
>> * config/generic/asmcfi.h: Fix comment.
>> * config/x86/sjlj.S (_ITM_beginTransaction): Provide PIC code
>> sequence without .hidden support.
>> (GTM_longjmp) [__ELF__]: Only use .hidden if
>> HAVE_
Hi,
tested x86_64-linux, committed to mainline.
Paolo.
/
2011-11-18 Harti Brandt
PR libstdc++/51209
* include/bits/hashtable.h (_Hashtable<>::_M_find_node): Return
nullptr when no node is found.
* include/tr1/hashtable.h (_Hashtable<>::_M_find
Hi Rainer,
On 18 Nov 2011, at 14:49, Rainer Orth wrote:
I hope it also works for Rainer and that I've got the right
designator
for the Tru64 cross-case.
I guess it does, given that the testcase is based on my own one :-)
so long as my wrapping it in m4 hasn't broken the intent .. ;-
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 02:43:58PM +, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>
> On 18 Nov 2011, at 14:40, Jack Howarth wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 01:44:40PM +, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> one of the three remaining libitm issues for Darwin is to supply the
>>> dummy funcs fro the weakrefs (as
OK.
Jason
On 11/18/2011 03:19 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
On 11/18/2011 03:11 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 11/18/2011 08:57 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
On 11/18/2011 02:53 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
I think let's go straight to cp_build_unary_op from
tsubst_copy_and_build in this case; it can't be overloaded, an
2011/11/17 Georg-Johann Lay :
> Denis Chertykov wrote:
>
>> Let's wait for
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-10/msg01874.html
>> Denis.
>
> This are yet more intrinsic named address spaces:
>
> * __pgm1, ... __pgm5 are 16-bit address spaces that refer to
> the n-th 64k chunk of flash. Coun
Hi Iain,
> one of the three remaining libitm issues for Darwin is to supply the dummy
> funcs fro the weakrefs (as Rainer has done for Tru64) for the versions of
> Darwin that need them.
>
> Since we now have the situation where there are several targets which might
> need dummy functions for the
> "Roberto" == Roberto Agostino Vitillo writes:
Roberto> I ended up not using it and it's clear to me that its practical
Roberto> uses may be questionable ("fast" single stepping in a
Roberto> debugger?) but I thought it might be worth to share it.
Thanks.
I think that if there is no use fo
On 18 Nov 2011, at 14:40, Jack Howarth wrote:
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 01:44:40PM +, Iain Sandoe wrote:
Hi,
one of the three remaining libitm issues for Darwin is to supply the
dummy funcs fro the weakrefs (as Rainer has done for Tru64) for the
versions of Darwin that need them.
Since we
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 01:44:40PM +, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> one of the three remaining libitm issues for Darwin is to supply the
> dummy funcs fro the weakrefs (as Rainer has done for Tru64) for the
> versions of Darwin that need them.
>
> Since we now have the situation where there
On 10/11/11 03:57, Joey Ye wrote:
> Trunk gcc mis-handles following volatile bitfield case on ARM target:
>
> $ cat a.c
> extern void check(int);
> typedef struct {
> volatile unsigned short a:8, b:8;
> } BitStruct;
> BitStruct bits = {1, 2};
> int main ()
> {
> check(bits.a);
> return 0;
>
Hej Aldy,
thanks for doing this. It is mostly okay, I just have a minor
suggestion or two.
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> + The project was partially funded by
> + the http://www.velox-project.eu/";>Velox project. This
> + feature is experimental and is available for C and C++ on
For some reason, Darwin spells "MAP_ANONYMOUS" and "MAP_ANON" which
causes the memcpy/set tests to fail.
fixed as below
OK for trunk?
Iain
libitm:
* testsuite/libitm.c/memcpy-1.c: Allow for MAP_ANON spelling.
* testsuite/libitm.c/memset-1.c: Likewise.
Index: libitm/testsuite/
On 11/18/2011 03:11 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 11/18/2011 08:57 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
On 11/18/2011 02:53 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
I think let's go straight to cp_build_unary_op from
tsubst_copy_and_build in this case; it can't be overloaded, and we
don't want to mess with build_non_depende
> I found another bug in current implementation. A patch for it doesn't
> cure i686-linux- bootstrap, but fixes fails on some tests (see
> attached).
>
> The problem was that we tried to add runtime tests for alignment even
> if both SRC and DST had unknown alignment - in this case it could be
> i
On 11/18/2011 08:57 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
On 11/18/2011 02:53 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
I think let's go straight to cp_build_unary_op from
tsubst_copy_and_build in this case; it can't be overloaded, and we
don't want to mess with build_non_dependent_expr.
Ok. In the meanwhile I actually test
Darwin needs to account for __USER_LABEL_PREFIX__ in the asm.
I used some of the arm code in libgcc as an example ...
allows the lib to build OK on x86-darwin ... (with working hidden
symbols etc.)
comments/OK for trunk (assuming a test on linux is successful, of
course)?
Iain
libitm:
On 11/18/2011 02:53 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
I think let's go straight to cp_build_unary_op from
tsubst_copy_and_build in this case; it can't be overloaded, and we
don't want to mess with build_non_dependent_expr.
Ok. In the meanwhile I actually tested the attached, and it works. Is it
what you
I think let's go straight to cp_build_unary_op from
tsubst_copy_and_build in this case; it can't be overloaded, and we don't
want to mess with build_non_dependent_expr.
Jason
Hi,
one of the three remaining libitm issues for Darwin is to supply the
dummy funcs fro the weakrefs (as Rainer has done for Tru64) for the
versions of Darwin that need them.
Since we now have the situation where there are several targets which
might need dummy functions for the weak dec
On 11/18/2011 02:29 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
On 11/18/2011 02:27 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
On 11/18/2011 02:16 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 11/17/2011 06:52 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
The problem is, in all these tests,
value is always a FIX_TRUNC_EXPR, which, AFAICS, is always left
untouched.
Aha
On 11/18/2011 02:27 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
On 11/18/2011 02:16 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 11/17/2011 06:52 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
The problem is, in all these tests,
value is always a FIX_TRUNC_EXPR, which, AFAICS, is always left
untouched.
Aha, I guess tsubst_copy_and_build needs to handl
On 11/18/2011 02:16 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 11/17/2011 06:52 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
The problem is, in all these tests,
value is always a FIX_TRUNC_EXPR, which, AFAICS, is always left
untouched.
Aha, I guess tsubst_copy_and_build needs to handle FIX_TRUNC_EXPR better.
I see. Maybe better
On 11/17/2011 06:52 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
The problem is, in all these tests,
value is always a FIX_TRUNC_EXPR, which, AFAICS, is always left
untouched.
Aha, I guess tsubst_copy_and_build needs to handle FIX_TRUNC_EXPR better.
Jason
Hi Eric,
this patch fixes an inefficiency problem I observed while working on PR50764.
For the test-case of PR50764, a dead label is introduced by fixup_reorder_chain
in cfg_layout_finalize, called from pass_reorder_blocks.
The dead label is removed by a cleanup_cfg in pass_duplicate_computed_got
On 11/17/2011 06:32 PM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
I am bootstrapping and testing the (IMHO better) patch below on
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu against trunk.
OK.
Jason
On 11/18/2011 05:18 AM, Fabien Chêne wrote:
+template< size_t, size_t> struct AlignedBuffer;
+template< size_t size> struct AlignedBuffer
+< size, 8> {
+};
This testcase will break on targets where alignof(void*) != 8; just
define the base template and remove the partial specialization.
Hi,
this makes sure the various hash specializations are declared noexcept.
Francois, please let me know if you are seeing something wrong / missing
as part of your work...
Tested x86_64-linux, committed.
Thanks,
Paolo.
//
2011-11-18 Paolo Carlini
* src/hash-
I found another bug in current implementation. A patch for it doesn't
cure i686-linux- bootstrap, but fixes fails on some tests (see
attached).
The problem was that we tried to add runtime tests for alignment even
if both SRC and DST had unknown alignment - in this case it could be
impossible to m
On Fri, 4 Nov 2011, Tom G. Christensen wrote:
> I missed them since my script that parses the archive did not expect
> the extra text after the 'testsuite' part of the subject.
>
> Here's an updated patch.
Thanks, applied.
Gerald
PING
2011/8/9 Kai Tietz :
> Hello,
>
> actual the remaining issue about this PR is that vrp
> constructs by range analyzis for bitwise and/or expressions
> type-casted results, like ((type) A) op ((type) B), or ((type) A) op CST.
> So I've added to simplify_bit_ops_using_rnages the transformation
Hi,
As discussed in the audit trail, here is a patch that fixes this PR
and all its duplicates.
Tested x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu without regressions. OK to commit ?
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
2011-11-18 Fabien Chêne
PR c++/51188
* g++.dg/lookup/using46.C: New.
* g++.dg/lo
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:55 PM, William J. Schmidt
wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> While investigating http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39976, I
> found that tree-outof-ssa.c:insert_backedge_copies tests whether edges
> are back edges, but the back edges haven't been marked to facilitate
> th
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 8:47 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Currently, bootstrap crashes with --enable-stage1-checking=all with:
>
> ../../../libgcc/libgcc2.c:553:3: internal compiler error: tree check: expected
> tree that contains ‘typed’ structure, have ‘block’ in fold_checksum_tree, at
>
On Nov 17, 2011, at 20:46 , David Edelsohn wrote:
> Coincidentally, IBM's XL compiler is encountering a similar issue and
> proposing a similar solution of having the stack pointer update
> conflict with all memory accesses.
Interesting timing :-)
> I think all these corner cases
> confirm tha
91 matches
Mail list logo
