Hi,
As previously announced, here is a patch that deprecate access
declarations . I did a little tour in the GCC museum old-deja --and in
g++.dg as well -- to disinter and adjust those dusty tests. To avoid
false positive on invalid code, I have decided to only emit the
warning if the access decla
> At 2011-11-24 09:27:04,"Xinyu Qi" wrote:
> > At 2011-11-19 07:08:22,"Ramana Radhakrishnan"
> > wrote:
> > > On 20 October 2011 08:39, Xinyu Qi wrote:
> > > > Ping
> > > >
> > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-07/msg01103.html
> > > >
> > > > * config/arm/arm.c (enum arm_builtin
* config/arm/mmintrin.h: Use __IWMMXT__ to enable iWMMXt intrinsics.
Use __IWMMXT2__ to enable iWMMXt2 intrinsics.
Use C name-mangling for intrinsics.
(__v8qi): Redefine.
(_mm_cvtsi32_si64, _mm_andnot_si64, _mm_sad_pu8): Revise.
(_mm_sad_pu16, _mm_ali
> At 2011-12-15 00:47:48,"Richard Earnshaw" wrote:
> > On 14/07/11 08:35, Xinyu Qi wrote:
> > >>> Hi,
> > >>>
> > >>> It is the first part of iWMMXt maintenance.
> > >>>
> > >>> *config/arm/arm.c (arm_option_override):
> > >>> Enable iWMMXt with VFP. iWMMXt and NEON are incompatible.
> > >> iWMM
At 2011-12-22 17:53:45,"Richard Earnshaw" wrote:
> On 22/12/11 06:38, Xinyu Qi wrote:
> > At 2011-12-15 01:32:13,"Richard Earnshaw" wrote:
> >> On 24/11/11 01:33, Xinyu Qi wrote:
> >>> Hi Ramana,
> >>>
> >>> I solve the conflict, please try again. The new diff is attached.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
>
On Dec 28, 2011, at 1:52 PM, Nenad Vukicevic wrote:
> -systems (Leopard 10.5.7+ and Snow Leopard 10.6)
> +systems (Leopard 10.5.7+, Snow Leopard 10.6, and Lion 1.7)
1.7? Should this be 10.7?
With i386, the regparm(2) is not taken into account when there is a
variadic function. All parameters are in the stack.
Since this variable argument is never used removing it is not a problem.
This solves libitm testcases memset-1.c/memcpy-1.c on i686 (part of
PR51655/51124).
Before:
FAIL: li
This patch to gcc uses the new DW_LANG_Go DWARF language code for Go.
Bootstrapped and ran testsuite on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Committed
on the basis of 1) I am a middle-end maintainer; 2) I am a Go
maintainer; 3) the patch is obvious.
Ian
2011-12-28 Ian Lance Taylor
* dwarf2out.
Hi,
I think the resolution of core/930 and C++11 itself are pretty clear:
alignof of an array of unknown bound is fine, provided the element type
is complete of course.
Tested x86_64-linux.
Thanks,
Paolo.
//
/c-family
2011-12-29 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/51316
Oleg Endo wrote:
> while working on another PR I've noticed that the -mbranch-cost option
> in the SH target is not really working. The attached patch brings it
> back to life, leaving the default behavior unchanged.
>
> Cheers,
> Oleg
>
>
> 2011-12-28 Oleg Endo
>
> * config/sh/sh.h
Hello, I updated GUPC page with the Download section.
Attached is a patch. Ok to commit? Feedback is appreciated.
Nenad
Index: htdocs/projects/gupc.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/projects/gupc.html,v
retrieving revision
Hi,
> Just a nit, can't you break out of the loop when irred_invalidated is set to
> true as well? There is no need to look through any further edges. I.e.
> perhaps:
> if (!irred_invalidated)
> FOR_EACH_EDGE (ae, ei, e->src->succs)
> if (ae != e
> && ae->dest != EXIT_BLOCK_P
Hi,
Here is another patch about failures in gcc.dg/vect tests. These
changes fix fails that could be seen on avx-built compilers. It also
introduces no FAILs/XFAILs/XPASSes/ERRORs on regular i686, x86_64,
avx2_32, avx2_64.
Is it ok for the trunk?
Thanks,
Igor
2011-12-28 Igor Zamyatin
Just commited:
* MAINTAINERS (Write After Approval): Add myself.
Index: MAINTAINERS
===
--- MAINTAINERS (revision 182712)
+++ MAINTAINERS (working copy)
@@ -352,6 +352,7 @@
Michael Eager ea..
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 04:21:55PM +0100, Thomas Koenig wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-12/msg00102.html
>
> >OK for trunk?
>
I did not test the patch, but it appears correct to me.
OK.
--
Steve
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 12:34:25PM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 12/28/2011 09:39 AM, Michael Meissner wrote:
> > && in_section != text_section
> > - && !unlikely_text_section_p (in_section)
> > + && (in_section && (in_section->common.flags & SECTION_CODE)) == 0
>
> You should
ping
I would like to introduce two new -fstack-check options named direct and
indirect.
Targets that did not supporting the new stack checking options will work
as before.
At the ARM platform the old generic options is working as before.
(Including that is now possible to have a checking code
On 12/28/2011 09:39 AM, Michael Meissner wrote:
> && in_section != text_section
> - && !unlikely_text_section_p (in_section)
> + && (in_section && (in_section->common.flags & SECTION_CODE)) == 0
You should be able to delete the text_section test as well,
and in_section should *
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 11:53:41AM -0800, Nathan Froyd wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > else if (is_gimple_call (def_stmt))
> > {
> > + int flags = gimple_call_flags (def_stmt);
> > +
> > + /* Don't optimize away calls that have side-effects. */
> > + if ((flags & (ECF_CONST|ECF_PURE)) ==
- Original Message -
> else if (is_gimple_call (def_stmt))
> {
> + int flags = gimple_call_flags (def_stmt);
> +
> + /* Don't optimize away calls that have side-effects. */
> + if ((flags & (ECF_CONST|ECF_PURE)) == 0
> + || (flags & ECF_LOOPING_CONST_OR_PURE))
This patch does this computat
On Dec 27, 2011, at 10:55 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
> Ping
It was previously approved in the email you quote. See the Ok buried in there.
> 2011/12/15 Dave Korn :
>> On 15/12/2011 17:44, Mike Stump wrote:
>>> On Dec 15, 2011, at 1:43 AM, Kai Tietz wrote:
This patch takes care that we are using
On Dec 16, 2011, at 9:56 AM, Dave Korn wrote:
> On 16/12/2011 09:01, Kai Tietz wrote:
>> 2011/12/15 Dave Korn:
>
>>> { dg-options "-mno-align-double" { target i?86-*-cygwin* i?86-*-mingw* } }
>>> { dg-additional-options "-mno-ms-bitfields" { target i?86-*-mingw* } }
>>>
>>> ... so that MinGW ge
> Just a nit, can't you break out of the loop when irred_invalidated is set to
> true as well? There is no need to look through any further edges. I.e.
Sure, though we do have horrible time complexity in case irreducible
regions are including recomputing the whole CFG flags after every path
remo
Hello,
while working on another PR I've noticed that the -mbranch-cost option
in the SH target is not really working. The attached patch brings it
back to life, leaving the default behavior unchanged.
Cheers,
Oleg
2011-12-28 Oleg Endo
* config/sh/sh.h (BRANCH_COST): Use sh_branch_c
Hi!
For some calls (like memcpy and other builtins that are known to pass
through the first argument) we know the value of the lhs, but still
we shouldn't be replacing the call with just a mere assignment of that
known value to the LHS SSA_NAME, because the call has other side-effects.
Fixed thusl
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 07:31:57PM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> *** cfgloopmanip.c(revision 182708)
> --- cfgloopmanip.c(working copy)
> *** remove_path (edge e)
> *** 290,295
> --- 290,296
> int i, nrem, n_bord_bbs;
> sbitmap seen;
> bool irred_invalidated
Hi,
in this testcase peeling of loop contaiing irreducible region leads to
increasing size of the region (by removing the conditional path into it).
remove_path is not quite ready for this scenario. Still it would be nice to
avoid us creating irreducible region in cases where they are not.
Bootst
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:45:35PM +0800, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
> On 2011/12/19 上午 03:18, Richard Henderson wrote:
> > On 12/17/2011 10:36 PM, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
> >> I don't think it's that kind of problem; the powerpc backend uses
> >> unlikely_text_section_p(), which compares the passed in ar
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-12/msg00102.html
OK for trunk?
Regards
Thomas
Vladimir Makarov writes:
>> In the end I tried an ad-hoc approach in an attempt to do something
>> about (2), (3) and (4b). The idea was to construct a preliminary
>> "model" schedule in which the only objective is to keep register
>> pressure to a minimum. This schedule ignores pipeline charact
[resend: the first time the message didn't get through because
miscategorized as spam]
Hi,
I'm adding the testcase to mainline and closing the PR.
Thanks,
Paolo.
/
2011-12-27 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/51547
* g++.dg/cpp0x/pr51547.C: New.
Index: g++.dg/cpp
Ping for backporting this expand patch, which fixes an ice-on-valid
regression from 4.4 while compiling certain C++ packages on ARM:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-12/msg01550.html
As I understand it, this bug is the only reason Ubuntu is keeping
a GCC 4.4 package: there's no known wor
Hello!
Some targets (i.e. alpha) need -mieee to handle NaNs.
2011-12-28 Uros Bizjak
* gcc.dg/torture/pr50396.c: Use dg-add-options ieee.
Tested on alphaev68-pc-linux-gnu, committed to mainline SVN and 4.6.
Uros.
Index: gcc.dg/torture/pr50396.c
==
Hi,
This patch fixes an attempt to access gsi of pattern statement.
Bootstrapped and tested on ia64-unknown-linux-gnu by Uros and on
powerpc64-suse-linux by me.
Committed.
Ira
ChangeLog:
PR tree-optimization/51684
* tree-vect-slp.c (vect_schedule_slp_instance): Get gsi of ori
34 matches
Mail list logo
