On Mar 5, 2012, at 6:28 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 03/05/2012 09:14 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
* In the alpha backend, there are a couple of cases that might be
osf-specific, but I cannot tell for certain:
macro osf5.halpha.h
The gnattools and gcc/ada parts are OK, except for the comment removal in
s-tassta.adb: this comment is still useful, and needs to be revisited at
some point ratheer than removed silently as you did, to understand
why we can't use a when E: others = construct.
So either remove the s-tassta.adb
Rainer,
On Mar 5, 2012, at 6:14 PM, Rainer Orth wrote:
The Tru64 UNIX V5.1 port has been obsoleted in GCC 4.7, and it's now
time to remove it from mainline. The following patch does just that,
and should be mostly uncontroversial, like removing target-specific
fixincludes hacks, files, and
On 03/06/2012 12:30 AM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
This is a long-overdue cleanup of f95-lang.c. This file was once added
as an almost one-to-one copy from one of the other languages and
tweaked until it worked. But the comments in the file are misleading,
out-dated, or wrong for other reasons, and
On 03/05/2012 07:44 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
--- Comment #1 from Mikael Petterssonmikpe at it dot uu.se 2012-03-04
21:01:28 UTC ---
Created attachment 26827
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26827
reduced test case in C
Depends on target CPU selection.
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:42 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
+ case '^':
+ if (TARGET_64BIT Pmode == SImode)
+ {
+ fputs (addr32, file);
+#ifndef HAVE_AS_IX86_REP_LOCK_PREFIX
+ if (ASSEMBLER_DIALECT == ASM_ATT)
+ fputs (addr32; ,
On Mon, 5 Mar 2012, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
Hi,
The patch below addresses an issue with gcc-4.7.0 the issue I had reported in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-03/msg00035.html
and somebody else had bz'ed as
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51417
Tested by cross-building
This is another fix I postponed for 4.8 (or 4.7.1 if it doesn't have
any fallout). We fail to honor the (unwritten) rule that type
variants ought to share their TYPE_FIELDs. Which breaks users
that compare FIELD_DECLs by pointers.
This should also save some memory at WPA/LTRANS stage.
LTO
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Georg-Johann Lay a...@gjlay.de wrote:
Richard Guenther wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Georg-Johann Lay a...@gjlay.de wrote:
Richard Guenther wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Georg-Johann Lay a...@gjlay.de wrote:
Richard Guenther wrote:
On Mon,
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 12:51 AM, Richard Kenner
ken...@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu wrote:
I found a weird piece of code that was added by kenner in a really early
revision. It checks for VAR_DECLs with frame or stack pointers as
DECL_RTL, and the comment in front of it mentions strength reduction.
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 06:54:13PM +1300, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
On 2/03/2012, at 1:53 AM, Martin Jambor wrote:
Hi,
the following patch backports 4.5 behavior to 4.4 IPA-CP
initialization when it decides which nodes need to be duplicated (we
often say cloned, but cloning is an
Hi,
as a hack, we need to redefined the makefile variable 'version' so that the
version subdir is 4_X_Y, because VMS doesn't like dots in directory names. But
we need to do that only if we build for VMS, not for cross compilers.
Also, remove the stamp declarations that prevented some run of
Ralf Corsepius ralf.corsep...@rtems.org writes:
* Incompatiblible/insufficient binutils (I am using binutils-2.22)?
* Some as/ld-flags getting lost/improperly propagated during
assembly/linking?
* Bad/incompatible inline-asm hard-coded somewhere?
TAS needs at least ISA_B, ie. at least CFV4.
Hi,
the name PRNTF was not well chosen, and I prefer to rename it to LDBL to make
it clear that it refers to long double.
Applied on trunk.
Tristan.
2012-03-06 Tristan Gingold ging...@adacore.com
* config/vms/vms.c (VMS_CRTL_LDBL): Rename from VMS_CRTL_PRNTF.
*
Hi,
this patch:
* handles 'octaword' alignment in pragma __nomember_alignment.
* handles 'relaxed_refdef' in pragma __extern_model.
* allow preprocessor expansion in pragma nomember_alignment.
* improve the documentation of external model.
Committed on trunk.
Tristan.
2012-03-06 Tristan
This fixes PR52493 by robustifying the ptr_derefs_may_alias_p code.
It should handle being passed MEM[0 + 0] (which is a missed folding,
to be addressed by a separate patch). The simplification code always
should recurse, we failed to do so for the MEM_REF case.
Bootstrap regtest pending on
This adds folding of MEM[CST + CST] to
build_fold_addr_expr_with_type_loc.
Bootstrap and regtest pending on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Richard.
2012-03-06 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
* fold-const.c (build_fold_addr_expr_with_type_loc): Fold
MEM_REF with constant
Richard Guenther wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Georg-Johann Lay a...@gjlay.de wrote:
Richard Guenther wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Georg-Johann Lay a...@gjlay.de wrote:
Richard Guenther wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Georg-Johann Lay a...@gjlay.de wrote:
Richard
I don't see how a VAR_DECL can ever get a DECL_RTL equal to one of
the mentioned regs.
Doesn't that happen when you have a local variable that's a
variable-sized object? What would have changed that would cause it to
no longer happen? This is tree-level stuff, not RTL.
The patch is ok if a
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 06:17:52AM -0500, Richard Kenner wrote:
I don't see how a VAR_DECL can ever get a DECL_RTL equal to one of
the mentioned regs.
Doesn't that happen when you have a local variable that's a
variable-sized object? What would have changed that would cause it to
no
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Georg-Johann Lay a...@gjlay.de wrote:
Richard Guenther wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Georg-Johann Lay a...@gjlay.de wrote:
Richard Guenther wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Georg-Johann Lay a...@gjlay.de wrote:
Richard Guenther wrote:
On Mon,
VLA VAR_DECLs have just DECL_HAS_VALUE_EXPR_P set and DECL_VALUE_EXPR being
INDIRECT_REF (or MEM_REF now?) dereferencing some DECL_ARTIFICIAL VAR_DECL
that is initialized from alloca builtin.So the VLA VAR_DECLs don't have
any DECL_RTL at all (kept for debug info purposes only), and the
Hi
just rediffed and retested on x86_64-linux the new version of the patch.
Is it Ok for mainline?
Thanks,
Paolo.
///
/cp
2012-03-06 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
PR c++/52422
* cp-tree.h (build_addr_func, decay_conversion,
I'd suggest you generate local label in the expander and pass it to
insn RTX. This way, we can also reuse insn pattern later with eventual
different code label.
Thanks! Done.
New patch attached.
Updated changelogs:
ChangeLog:
2012-02-16 Kirill Yukhin kirill.yuk...@intel.com
*
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Kirill Yukhin kirill.yuk...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd suggest you generate local label in the expander and pass it to
insn RTX. This way, we can also reuse insn pattern later with eventual
different code label.
Thanks! Done.
New patch attached.
Updated
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 6:36 AM, Andrew Pinski pins...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
value_replacement in PHIOPT currently works only when there is one
PHI (which is non virtual).
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-01/msg01195.html improves the
situation but we can improve it even more as
The problem is that RAMPD/X/Y/Z are restored in the wrong order in ISR epilogue.
Ok for trunk?
Johann
PR target/52506
* gcc/config/avr/avr.c (expand_epilogue): Fix order of restoration
to: RAMPZ, RAMPY, RAMPX, RAMPD.
(expand_prologue): Only clear RAMPZ if it has
Updated patch attached.
Technically OK, but let's wait for rth's comments about -mrtm option.
Thanks! Let's wait then.
break;
+ case INT_FTYPE_VOID:
Please add vertical space.
Added.
+(define_expand xbegin
+ [(set (match_operand:SI 0 register_operand =a)
+
Hi,
this patch has some impacts to the C front-end, and I'd like to know wether my
approach is correct before finalizing it. So comments are welcome.
It implements the VMS 'pragma pointer_size 32/64/short/long', which change the
default size of a pointer. This feature allows to use a 32 bits
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Jiangning Liu jiangning@arm.com wrote:
It's definitely not ok at this stage but at most for next stage1.
OK. I may wait until next stage1.
This is a very narrow pattern-match. It doesn't allow for a[i].x for
example,
even if a[i] is a one-element
Jonathan Wakely jwakely@gmail.com writes:
On 5 March 2012 17:01, Rainer Orth wrote:
* The libstdc++ testsuite is messy since every thing pthread test
includes the complete list of targets where it should be run, and the
options required. I've long meant to clean this up, but this will
Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com writes:
There's one particular issue: the change to java/io/File.java required
my to regenerate the .class file in classpath. I've used Sun javac
-target 1.5 for that and hope I got it right.
I'd have expected regeneration to use GCJ built to
This fixes a wrong loop label in the movmemhi worker for the __memx address
space case.
Ok for trunk?
Johann
PR target/52507
* config/avr/lib1funcs.S (__movmemx_hi): Fix loop label in RAM-part.
Index: libgcc/config/avr/lib1funcs.S
Bruce Korb bk...@gnu.org writes:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
wrote:
On Mon, 5 Mar 2012, Rainer Orth wrote:
* There are some fixincludes hacks that from their names seem to be
osf-specific, but are not restricted to alpha*-dec-osf*. Bruce,
Arnaud Charlet char...@adacore.com writes:
The gnattools and gcc/ada parts are OK, except for the comment removal in
s-tassta.adb: this comment is still useful, and needs to be revisited at
some point ratheer than removed silently as you did, to understand
why we can't use a when E: others =
Tristan,
* As I've mentioned, I've ripped out the #pragma extern_prefix support:
while VMS has something similar, it doesn't use the common code.
in fact VMS use some of the already existing #pragma extern_prefix support.
You're removing too much code here !
oops, seems I was too eager
This is fix for __memx address space reads that might read from RAM or flash.
For flash reads, never read from RAM so that I/O latches don't get read out
unintentionally.
Ok for trunk?
Johann
libgcc/
PR target/52505
* config/avr/lib1funcs.S (__xload_1): Don't read
This splits out some small chunks from the patch killing
TYPE_IS_SIZETYPE. It introduces a helper function that
performs object-size checks and uses it in the few places
that would need adjustments when host_integerp is no longer
appropriate for verifying that the size fits in half of the
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Tom de Vries tom_devr...@mentor.com wrote:
On 13/02/12 12:54, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Tom de Vries tom_devr...@mentor.com wrote:
Richard,
this patch fixes PR52801.
Consider test-case pr51879-12.c:
...
__attribute__((pure))
Hi!
The 4.4 branch is now frozen, all commits require RM approval.
There will be the 4.4.7 release next week released from it and
after that the branch will be closed.
Jakub
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 9:11 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 11:47 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 4:53 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
and compiler does generate the same output. i386.c also has
xasm = jmp\t%A0;
On Tue, 6 Mar 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
This splits out some small chunks from the patch killing
TYPE_IS_SIZETYPE. It introduces a helper function that
performs object-size checks and uses it in the few places
that would need adjustments when host_integerp is no longer
appropriate
On 03/05/12 12:47, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 03/05/2012 10:37 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
I thought there'd be a lot less overhead by callocing the value myself. Is the
overhead negligible?
Yes, it's negligible.
I can certainly make it a VEC in a follow up patch if you want, though I'll
On 03/06/12 07:55, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
+ bb_regions = VEC_alloc (tm_region_p, heap, last_basic_block);
+ VEC_reserve (tm_region_p, heap, bb_regions, last_basic_block);
+ for (i = 0; i last_basic_block; ++i)
+VEC_quick_insert (tm_region_p, bb_regions, i, NULL);
The reserve is
2012/3/6 Georg-Johann Lay a...@gjlay.de
This is fix for __memx address space reads that might read from RAM or flash.
For flash reads, never read from RAM so that I/O latches don't get read out
unintentionally.
Ok for trunk?
Johann
libgcc/
PR target/52505
*
2012/3/6 Georg-Johann Lay a...@gjlay.de:
This fixes a wrong loop label in the movmemhi worker for the __memx address
space case.
Ok for trunk?
Johann
PR target/52507
* config/avr/lib1funcs.S (__movmemx_hi): Fix loop label in RAM-part.
Approved.
Denis.
2012/3/6 Georg-Johann Lay a...@gjlay.de:
The problem is that RAMPD/X/Y/Z are restored in the wrong order in ISR
epilogue.
Ok for trunk?
Johann
PR target/52506
* gcc/config/avr/avr.c (expand_epilogue): Fix order of restoration
to: RAMPZ, RAMPY, RAMPX, RAMPD.
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 08:04:12AM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 03/06/12 07:55, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
+ bb_regions = VEC_alloc (tm_region_p, heap, last_basic_block);
+ VEC_reserve (tm_region_p, heap, bb_regions, last_basic_block);
+ for (i = 0; i last_basic_block; ++i)
+
On 03/06/12 10:20, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 08:04:12AM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 03/06/12 07:55, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
+ bb_regions = VEC_alloc (tm_region_p, heap, last_basic_block);
+ VEC_reserve (tm_region_p, heap, bb_regions, last_basic_block);
+ for (i = 0;
On 03/06/12 02:13, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Ralf Corsepius ralf.corsep...@rtems.org writes:
* Incompatiblible/insufficient binutils (I am using binutils-2.22)?
* Some as/ld-flags getting lost/improperly propagated during
assembly/linking?
* Bad/incompatible inline-asm hard-coded somewhere?
Dear Paul, dear all,
I have merged (Rev. 184999) the trunk (Rev. 184980) to the fortran-dev
branch, which now followed GCC 4.8.
Additionally, I have committed to the fortran-dev branch (Rev. 185004)
the first rough and incomplete version of ISO_Fortran_binding.h, which
tries to follow TS
On Tue, 6 Mar 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
* c-decl.c (grokdeclarator): Properly check for sizes that
cover more than half of the address-space.
The C front-end change is OK.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
On Tue, 6 Mar 2012, Tristan Gingold wrote:
The patch is simple: the C front-end will now calls c_build_pointer_type
(instead of build_pointer_type), which in turn calls
build_pointer_type_for_mode using the right mode.
There seem to be quite a lot of build_pointer_type calls in the C front
On 03/06/2012 05:14 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
Joseph S. Myersjos...@codesourcery.com writes:
There's one particular issue: the change to java/io/File.java required
my to regenerate the .class file in classpath. I've used Sun javac
-target 1.5 for that and hope I got it right.
I'd
Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com writes:
On 03/06/12 02:13, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Ralf Corsepius ralf.corsep...@rtems.org writes:
* Incompatiblible/insufficient binutils (I am using binutils-2.22)?
* Some as/ld-flags getting lost/improperly propagated during
assembly/linking?
*
I have committed a patch to update libgo to the weekly.2012-03-04
release. As usual, this e-mail message only includes the diffs to files
that are specific to gccgo. Bootstrapped and ran Go testsuite on
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Committed to mainline.
Ian
diff -r 99cd08e36ace libgo/MERGE
---
On 02/29/12 03:22, Richard Guenther wrote:
So fixing up individual passes is easier - I can only think of PRE being
problematic right now, I am not aware that any other pass moves loads
or stores. So I'd simply pre-compute the stmt bit in PRE and adjust
the
if
On 02/27/12 11:58, Richard Sandiford wrote:
gcc/
* rtl.h (pc_rtx, ret_rtx, simple_return_rtx, cc0_rtx): Redefine as
variables.
(GR_PC, GR_CC0, GR_RETURN, GR_SIMPLE_RETURN): Delete.
* emit-rtl.c (pc_rtx, ret_rtx, simple_return_rtx, cc0_rtx): New
variables.
On 03/06/12 09:55, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com writes:
On 03/06/12 02:13, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Ralf Corsepius ralf.corsep...@rtems.org writes:
* Incompatiblible/insufficient binutils (I am using binutils-2.22)?
* Some as/ld-flags getting lost/improperly
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 7:37 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 9:11 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 11:47 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 4:53 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
and compiler does
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 8:10 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 7:37 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 9:11 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 11:47 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 1:38 AM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 10:14 PM, H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com wrote:
This is the last patch for Pmode == SImod in x32. In x32, the return value
of the symbol address must be zero-extended to DImode, This patch adds
On 03/06/12 11:10, H.J. Lu wrote:
(define_insn *call
- [(call (mem:QI (match_operand:P 0 call_insn_operand czw))
+ [(call (mem:QI (match_operand:C 0 call_insn_operand czw))
(match_operand 1 ))]
- !SIBLING_CALL_P (insn)
+ !SIBLING_CALL_P (insn)
+(GET_CODE (operands[0]) ==
Rainer Orth r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de writes:
I'm currently working on removing the obsolete Tru64 UNIX and IRIX
ports. When IRIX is gone, the obsoleted OpenBSD/MIPS is the only
remaining port that uses MIPS_DEBUGGING_INFO (which I plan to remove as
a followup once IRIX is gone).
The
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Aldy Hernandez al...@redhat.com wrote:
On 02/29/12 03:22, Richard Guenther wrote:
So fixing up individual passes is easier - I can only think of PRE being
problematic right now, I am not aware that any other pass moves loads
or stores. So I'd simply
Hi,
This cleans up some remnants of the ancestors of fortran's convert.c,
which was copied from GNAT IIRC.
I would bootstraptest this, but trunk appears to be broken for
x86_64-linux right now (ICE in patch_jump_insn). But I can post this
for review, at least.
OK for trunk, after
Hi,
This is a re-post of the patch I posted for comments in January to
address http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18589. The patch
modifies reassociation to expose repeated factors from __builtin_pow*
calls, optimally reassociate repeated factors, and possibly reconstitute
On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 21:18 +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Aldy Hernandez al...@redhat.com wrote:
On 02/29/12 03:22, Richard Guenther wrote:
So fixing up individual passes is easier - I can only think of PRE being
problematic right now, I am not aware that
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/06/12 11:10, H.J. Lu wrote:
(define_insn *call
- [(call (mem:QI (match_operand:P 0 call_insn_operand czw))
+ [(call (mem:QI (match_operand:C 0 call_insn_operand czw))
(match_operand 1 ))]
-
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:42 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
+ case '^':
+ if (TARGET_64BIT Pmode == SImode)
+ {
+ fputs (addr32, file);
+#ifndef HAVE_AS_IX86_REP_LOCK_PREFIX
+
Hi,
push/pop in x86 only works on word_mode registers. This patch properly
handles push/pop on registers in x86. Tested on Linux/x86-64. OK for
trunk?
Thanks.
H.J.
---
2012-03-06 H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com
* config/i386/i386.c (setup_incoming_varargs_64): Use word_mode
Committed the following as obvious to prevent the test from running on non-vmx
powerpc64 hardware. Tested on a Power5 system to verify.
-Pat
testsuite/ChangeLog:
2012-03-06 Pat Haugen pthau...@us.ibm.com
* gcc.dg/torture/va-arg-25.c: Fix typo for powerpc64-*-* check.
Index:
We have a regression on one of the testcases of our internal testsuite on IA-64
with a 4.7-based compiler, which is of the form:
test_vec_madd.adb: In function 'Test_Vec_Madd':
test_vec_madd.adb:160:5: error: could not split insn
(insn 887 4859 889 16 (set (reg:TI 158 f30 [orig:417 m ] [417])
This at last implements static stack checking for the IA-64, i.e. stack
checking of the static part of the frame, and makes it possible to pass the
entire ACATS testsuite. The peculiarity is the second stack in memory, namely
the Backing Store of the Register Stack Engine, that needs to be
If you try to bootstrap the GNAT 4.7.0 compiler on IA-64/Linux with non-default
options (-gnatpg replaced with -gnatpgn), you get another comparison failure
caused by debug insns, stemming from the machine-specific reorg pass (aka insn
bundling on IA-64). With -g , when cselib is called on:
Well. I suppose fixing that negative DECL_FIELD_OFFSET thing should
be #1 priority.
OK, let me try over the next few days.
--
Eric Botcazou
Pmode may not be word_mode for TARGET_64BIT. This patch changes to
word_mode instead of Pmode. OK for trunk?
Thanks.
H.J.
2012-03-02 H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com
* config/i386/i386.c (function_value_64): Return pointers in
word_mode instead of Pmode.
Patch for CPU detection at run-time.
===
Patch for CPU detection at run-time, to be used in dispatching of
multi-versioned functions. Please see this discussion:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-08/msg01355.html
when this patch for reviewed the last time.
The standard Go library provides a couple of functions that can be used
to get filename and line number information of the running program. An
example is runtime.Caller, which can be used to return the filename and
line number of the caller of the current function. In the gccgo world,
this kind
On 03/06/2012 07:22 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 03/06/12 09:55, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Richard Hendersonr...@redhat.com writes:
On 03/06/12 02:13, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Ralf Corsepiusralf.corsep...@rtems.org writes:
* Incompatiblible/insufficient binutils (I am using binutils-2.22)?
*
Hello,
Can anybody please review and approve the following simple patch? Thanks
very much.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2011-08/msg00063.html
BR,
Terry
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 11:45 PM, H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com wrote:
Pmode may not be word_mode for TARGET_64BIT. This patch changes to
word_mode instead of Pmode. OK for trunk?
2012-03-02 H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com
* config/i386/i386.c (function_value_64): Return pointers in
On 03/06/2012 10:43 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Mon, 5 Mar 2012, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
Hi,
The patch below addresses an issue with gcc-4.7.0 the issue I had reported in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-03/msg00035.html
and somebody else had bz'ed as
83 matches
Mail list logo
