Ok for google branches after updating the doc/invoke.texi file.
David
http://codereview.appspot.com/5825054/
Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net writes:
We currently only support constant integer
widths = 2*HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT, and the assert is correctly
triggering if we try to build a wider constant.
Can you give me a concrete example of what will fail with the constant
0 generated by:
On Thu, 8 Mar 2012, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
The manual claims a future version of G++ will support a hybrid
instantiation model, which I don't think is still planned, and
describes extern templates as an extension when they are in C++11.
* doc/extend.texi (Template Instantiation):
Hi,
That won't catch something like
int i;
static_castint(i);
which is also a useless cast, because i is already an int lvalue; not
all lvalues are derived from references. Note that something like
static_castint(42);
is not a useless cast, because it turns a prvalue into an xvalue.
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 10:50 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
Since we must use reg64 in %fs:(%reg) memory operand like
movq x@gottpoff(%rip),%reg64;
mov %fs:(%reg64),%reg
this patch optimizes x32 TLS IE load and store by wrapping
%reg64 inside of UNSPEC when Pmode == SImode. OK
On Mar 18, 2012, at 3:16 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net writes:
We currently only support constant integer
widths = 2*HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT, and the assert is correctly
triggering if we try to build a wider constant.
Can you give me a concrete example of what
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012, Tom G. Christensen wrote:
Latest results for 4.6.x
-tgc
Testresults for 4.6.2:
hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
i386-pc-solaris2.8
i686-pc-linux-gnu
powerpc-apple-darwin8.11.0
sparc-sun-solaris2.8 (2)
x86_64-apple-darwin10.8.0
x86_64-apple-darwin11.3.0
Dear All,
Please find attached a fix for PR41600 plus some. It is reasonably
straightforward but the following should be noted:
(i) gfc_get_vptr_from_expr exploits that seeming fact that tracing
back any class expression through TREE_OPERAND 0 eventually gets one
back to the class expression. I
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
I am testing this patch. OK for trunk if it passes all tests?
No, force_reg will generate a pseudo, so this conversion is valid only
for !can_create_pseudo ().
At least for *tls_initial_exec_x32_store, you will need a
On Fri, 9 Mar 2012, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
Per the DWARF web site
http://dwarfstd.org/Download.php
the correct names of the various versions of the DWARF standard appear
to be either DWARF Version N or DWARF N, rather than e.g. DWARF2,
DWARF-2, dwarf2, or whatever. This patch to
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 6:12 PM, William J. Schmidt
wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Greetings,
Now that we're into stage 1 again, I'd like to submit the first round of
changes for dominator-based strength reduction, which will address
issues from PR22586, PR35308, PR46556, and perhaps
Updated doc/invoke.texi and submitted.
Thanks,
-Sri.
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 11:58 PM, davi...@google.com wrote:
Ok for google branches after updating the doc/invoke.texi file.
David
http://codereview.appspot.com/5825054/
12 matches
Mail list logo