OK.
Jason
On Apr 12, 2012, Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
+ /* If the conditions in which this function uses VALUE change,
+ adjust gimple_replace_lhs_wants_value(). */
+ gcc_assert (gimple_replace_lhs_wants_value ()
+ == MAY_HAVE_DEBUG_STMTS);
+
if
On 2012/6/14 02:18 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
On 29 May 2012 10:07, Yi-Hsiu Hsu a...@marvell.com wrote:
Hi,
This patch maintains Marvell PJ4 cores pipeline description.
Run arm testsuite on arm-linux-gnueabi and no extra regressions are found.
* config/arm/marvell-pj4.md: New
Thanks for your comments. Responses inline.
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 4:48 AM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 7:16 AM, Sharad Singhai sing...@google.com wrote:
Okay, I have updated the attached patch so that the output from
-ftree-vectorizer-verbose is
On Wed, 13 Jun 2012, William J. Schmidt wrote:
This is just some general maintenance to the vectorizer's cost model
code:
* Corrects a typo in a function name;
* Eliminates an unnecessary function;
* Combines some duplicate inline functions.
Bootstrapped and tested on
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 4:39 AM, Kaz Kojima kkoj...@rr.iij4u.or.jp wrote:
Oleg Endo oleg.e...@t-online.de wrote:
The attached patch improves code generated for byte swap expressions
such as ((x 0xFF) 8) | ((x 8) 0xFF).
It seems that currently the tree optimizers only detect bswap32 and
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Sharad Singhai sing...@google.com wrote:
Thanks for your comments. Responses inline.
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 4:48 AM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 7:16 AM, Sharad Singhai sing...@google.com wrote:
Okay, I have
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 06:07:18AM -0500, venkataramanan.ku...@amd.com wrote:
Please find the patch below that backports PR target/52908 to GCC 4.7.
The patch passed bootstrap and regression test.
Ok to commit?
Please
On 06/13/2012 10:35 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 2012-06-13 02:13, Pedro Alves wrote:
Related, does gcc forbid long long / ULL ?
Normally, yes. The vmsdbgout.c file seems to use it all over though.
And git blame shows:
8d60d2bc (kenner 2001-12-02 14:38:07 + 41) /* Difference
On Jun 14, 2012, at 11:12 AM, Pedro Alves wrote:
On 06/13/2012 10:35 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 2012-06-13 02:13, Pedro Alves wrote:
Related, does gcc forbid long long / ULL ?
Normally, yes. The vmsdbgout.c file seems to use it all over though.
And git blame shows:
This patch removes the command line options that enabled generation of
FPA and maverick instructions, along with their associated documentation.
* arm.opt (mfp=2, mfp=3, mfpe, mfpe=2, mfpe=3): Delete options.
* arm-fpus.def (fpa, fpe2, fpe3, maverick): Delete FPU types.
*
Tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied.
Richard.
2012-06-14 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp.h: New testcase.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp68.c: Likewise.
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp.h
On 06/14/2012 10:20 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
On Jun 14, 2012, at 11:12 AM, Pedro Alves wrote:
And git blame shows:
8d60d2bc (kenner 2001-12-02 14:38:07 + 41) /* Difference in seconds
between the VMS Epoch and the Unix Epoch */
8d60d2bc (kenner 2001-12-02 14:38:07 +
Hi,
This patch improves bound check diagnostics code.
Thanks
Sofiane
-
2012-06-13 Sofiane Naci sofiane.n...@arm.com
[AArch64] Fix bound check diagnostics.
* gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
(bounds_check): Remove.
(aarch64_simd_lane_bounds): Replace
This is another attempt at ensuring that operator new[] always returns a
block of sufficient size.
This is on top of my previous patch rejecting VLA allocations:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-06/msg00616.html
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux-gnu.
--
Florian Weimer / Red Hat
Hi,
This patch adds missing AdvSIMD intrinsics vmlsq_laneq_suf16,32 to
arm_neon.h. OK?
Thanks,
Tejas Belagod
ARM.
Changelog:
2012-06-14 Tejas Belagod tejas.bela...@arm.com
gcc/
* config/aarch64/arm_neon.h (vmlsq_laneq_f32, vmlsq_laneq_s16,
vmlsq_laneq_u16,
Hi,
This patch removes vpadd_f64 from arm_neon.h because the definition is incorrect
and it should be vpaddq_f64 which is defined elsewhere in the same header. OK?
Thanks,
Tejas.
Changelog:
2012-06-14 Tejas Belagod tejas.bela...@arm.com
gcc/
* config/aarch64/arm_neon.h
On 14/06/12 11:15, Tejas Belagod wrote:
Hi,
This patch removes vpadd_f64 from arm_neon.h because the definition is incorrect
and it should be vpaddq_f64 which is defined elsewhere in the same header. OK?
Thanks,
Tejas.
Changelog:
2012-06-14 Tejas Belagodtejas.bela...@arm.com
gcc/
This patch adds logic to postpone the finalization of temporary controlled
function results in the context of conditional expressions because the results
are finalized too early.
-- Source --
-- types.ads
with Ada.Finalization; use Ada.Finalization;
package Types is
This patch restores the original error messages for duplicated pragma and
attribute definition clause and cleans up the ??? comments.
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed on trunk
2012-06-14 Vincent Pucci pu...@adacore.com
* einfo.adb einfo.ads (Get_Rep_Item): Removed.
No functional change.
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed on trunk
2012-06-14 Tristan Gingold ging...@adacore.com
* gnatname.adb (Gnatname): Make sure that dynamic table
argument_data is initialized.
Index: gnatname.adb
This patch implements a Lock_Free pragma for Ada2005 usage and a Lock_Free
attribute for user query.
The test provided below illustrates the usage of both Lock_Free pragma and
attribute.
-
-- Source --
-
with Text_IO; use Text_IO;
procedure Main is
protected type
In Ada 2012 formal parameters can be declared explicitly aliased. Mode
conformance now requires that both or neither formal be aliased.
Compiling alias.adb must yield:
alias.adb:7:13: not fully conformant with declaration at line 6
alias.adb:7:13: aliased parameter mismatch
alias.ads:7:24: not
This patch implements the correct freezing actions in the context of a
quantified expression inside an expression function.
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed on trunk
2012-06-14 Vincent Pucci pu...@adacore.com
* freeze.adb (In_Exp_Body): Expression function case added.
A reference to a subprogram that appears in a pragma Eliminate is not an error
if it appears within a default expression: the enclosing subprogram may itself
be eliminated. Previous to this patch, the check for default expressions was
performed when resolving a call, but not for attribute
Status
==
The GCC 4.7.1 release tarballs have been created and are being uploaded
to ftp.gnu.org right now. The GCC 4.7 branch is thus open again for
regression and documentation fixes.
Quality Data
Priority # Change from Last Report
---
Hi,
This patch allows propagation of vector constants into VEC_PERM_EXPRs
in lower_vec_perm, motivation explained in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-06/msg00615.html
Bootstrapped and regression tested on gcc110.fsffrance.org .
Ok ?
regards,
Ramana
* tree-vect-generic.c
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Ramana Radhakrishnan
ramana.radhakrish...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi,
This patch allows propagation of vector constants into VEC_PERM_EXPRs
in lower_vec_perm, motivation explained in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-06/msg00615.html
Bootstrapped and
Eric,
Jacek Caban sent this:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-03/msg01987.html
in response to this:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-03/msg01986.html
But it never got reviewed. Could you review and commit?
Hi,
This patch updates LINK_SPEC in the AArch64 port.
Thanks
Sofiane
-
2012-06-14 Sofiane Naci sofiane.n...@arm.com
[AArch64] Update LINK_SPEC.
* config/aarch64/aarch64-linux.h (LINUX_TARGET_LINK_SPEC): Remove
%{version:-v}, %{b} and %{!dynamic-linker}.
Take into account the prefix specified with --program-prefix when installing
and uninstalling the Ada tools.
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed on trunk
2012-06-14 Jose Ruiz r...@adacore.com
* gcc-interface/Make-lang.in (ada.install-common, ada.uninstall):
Use the prefix
This patch removes the define_insn and define_expand support for the FPA.
Tested on arm-eabi and committed to trunk.
* arm.md (divsf3, divdf3): Remove FPA support.
(negsf2, negdf2): Likewise.
(sqrtsf2, sqrtdf2): Likewise.
(movdfcc): Likewise.
(modsf3,
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com wrote:
On 2012-06-05 12:33, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
for gcc/ChangeLog
from Alexandre Oliva aol...@redhat.com
PR debug/49888
* var-tracking.c: Include alias.h.
(overlapping_mems): New struct.
Hi,
[Honza, for you a question below]
On Wed, 13 Jun 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
Was a non-implemented optimization. If the compound literal value
isn't used as lvalue and doesn't have its address taken (and generally
fits the current predicate) we can as well subst it in place
if (!from_decl
...
|| (symtab_get_node (from_decl)-symbol.in_other_partition))
return true;
in can_refer_decl_in_current_unit_p. Honza: I don't understand this
particular condition. If we have a from_decl (i.e. the decl we're
concerned about stems from the
Hi,
On Thu, 14 Jun 2012, Jan Hubicka wrote:
if (!from_decl
...
|| (symtab_get_node (from_decl)-symbol.in_other_partition))
return true;
in can_refer_decl_in_current_unit_p. Honza: I don't understand this
particular condition. If we have a from_decl
On Thu, 14 Jun 2012, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
Take into account the prefix specified with --program-prefix when installing
and uninstalling the Ada tools.
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed on trunk
2012-06-14 Jose Ruiz r...@adacore.com
* gcc-interface/Make-lang.in
Hi,
On Thu, 14 Jun 2012, Michael Matz wrote:
In any case, this patch is currently in regstrapping on x86-64. Okay if
it passes (modulo changes for the above symtab_get_node() issue)?
After discussion with Honza, consider the patch changed like so:
if (!from_decl
|| TREE_CODE
Hi,
On Thu, 14 Jun 2012, Michael Matz wrote:
In any case, this patch is currently in regstrapping on x86-64. Okay if
it passes (modulo changes for the above symtab_get_node() issue)?
After discussion with Honza, consider the patch changed like so:
if (!from_decl
||
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 04:50:37PM +0200, Olivier Hainque wrote:
2012-06-10 Olivier Hainque hain...@adacore.com
* Makefile.in (GNATLIBCFLAGS_FOR_C): Remove $(PIC_FLAG_FOR_TARGET).
(gnatlib-shared-default): Add $(PIC_FLAG_FOR_TARGET) to
GNATLIBCFLAGS_FOR_C passed to
Take into account the prefix specified with --program-prefix when
installing
and uninstalling the Ada tools.
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed on trunk
2012-06-14 Jose Ruiz r...@adacore.com
* gcc-interface/Make-lang.in (ada.install-common,
ada.uninstall):
I committed this patch to the web site to clarify that GCC 4.7.1
supports Go 1.
Ian
Index: changes.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.7/changes.html,v
retrieving revision 1.117
diff -u -r1.117 changes.html
---
This patch removes the define_insn and define_expand support for the
obsolete Maverick co-processor.
There's some necessary purging of code in arm.c as well (though the
major cleanups here are still to come).
Tested on arm-eabi and committed to trunk.
* arm.c (arm_cirrus_insn_p):
Hello Jakub,
On Jun 14, 2012, at 18:22 , Jakub Jelinek wrote:
2012-06-10 Olivier Hainque hain...@adacore.com
* Makefile.in (GNATLIBCFLAGS_FOR_C): Remove $(PIC_FLAG_FOR_TARGET).
You've apparently committed during 4.7 branch freeze a variant of this
patch to the 4.7 branch as well,
Thanks for the duplicate ping. This is fine.
So this indeed solves the discrepancy between running SMS w/ and w/o debugging?
Please include a comment next to the code stating why it's important
not to create such deps.
You may also want to store the result of DEP_PRO (dep) in
src_something and use
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 06:53:46PM +0200, Olivier Hainque wrote:
On Jun 14, 2012, at 18:22 , Jakub Jelinek wrote:
2012-06-10 Olivier Hainque hain...@adacore.com
* Makefile.in (GNATLIBCFLAGS_FOR_C): Remove $(PIC_FLAG_FOR_TARGET).
You've apparently committed during 4.7 branch
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Michael Matz m...@suse.de wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 14 Jun 2012, Michael Matz wrote:
In any case, this patch is currently in regstrapping on x86-64. Okay if
it passes (modulo changes for the above symtab_get_node() issue)?
After discussion with Honza, consider
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Ian Lance Taylor i...@google.com wrote:
I committed this patch to the web site to clarify that GCC 4.7.1
supports Go 1.
Can you move that/add it to the sub-section for changes in 4.7.1?
Thanks,
Richard.
Ian
When the ARM compiler needs to ensure the stack pointer stays aligned
and it's already doing a multi-register push/pop in the prologue and
epilogue, it chooses some arbitrary register to add to the register set
in that push and pop just to increase the size of the stack used by 4
bytes. This is
On Jun 14, 2012, at 19:00 , Jakub Jelinek wrote:
For reverting it is too late, 4.7.1 has been released already with the bug.
I'm already bootstrapping/regtesting the simple one-liner, if it works, will
post it.
Thanks. So sorry again :-(
Olivier
Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com writes:
On 2012-06-12 22:50, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
The third patch is a small optimization to alleviate
__atomic_compare_exchange[_n] builtins being a use-one-for-all
solutions. These builtins return both boolean success and oldval
results. As most cases
This is a revised edition of the fix pubnames patch discussed earlier; it
addresses all the earlier comments made.
This edition of the patch has three changes from the earlier one:
1. Fix a typo (anoymous - anonymous).
2. Move enumerator names to pubnames from pubtypes.
3. Switch to using the
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 07:17:24PM +0200, Olivier Hainque wrote:
On Jun 14, 2012, at 19:00 , Jakub Jelinek wrote:
For reverting it is too late, 4.7.1 has been released already with the bug.
I'm already bootstrapping/regtesting the simple one-liner, if it works, will
post it.
Thanks.
Hi!
I've committed following 3 backports to 4.7 branch after
bootstrapping/regtesting it on x86_64-linux and i686-linux.
Jakub
2012-06-14 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com
Backported from mainline
2012-06-06 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com
PR libgomp/52993
Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Ian Lance Taylor i...@google.com wrote:
I committed this patch to the web site to clarify that GCC 4.7.1
supports Go 1.
Can you move that/add it to the sub-section for changes in 4.7.1?
Done like so.
Ian
Hi,
OK for trunk?
thanks, Dinar.
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Paolo Bonzini bonz...@gnu.org wrote:
Il 12/06/2012 08:52, Dinar Temirbulatov ha scritto:
is safe? That is, that the underflows cannot produce a wrong result?
[snip]
Thanks very much!
Paolo
2012-06-14
Hello!
movd to/from MMX or SSE registers is SSE2 instruction. Also, remove
wrong x,x alternative.
2012-06-14 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
* config/i386/i386.md (*zero_extendsidi2): Mark movd alternatives
SSE2 only. Remove x,x alternative.
(*zero_extendsidi2_rex64):
On Jun 14, 2012, at 19:50 , Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Here is what I've committed as obvious after bootstrap/regtest on
x86_64-linux.
2012-06-14 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com
* gcc-interface/Makefile.in (gnatlib-shared-default): Append
$(PICFLAG_FOR_TARGET) to
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 8:47 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
movd to/from MMX or SSE registers is SSE2 instruction. Also, remove
wrong x,x alternative.
2012-06-14 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
* config/i386/i386.md (*zero_extendsidi2): Mark movd alternatives
SSE2
I committed this patch to the 4.7 branch to bring in the accumulated bug
fixes to the Go frontend and to libgo.
This corresponds to these revisions on mainline: 188548 188547 188545
188496 188494 188482.
Ian
Index: gcc/go/gofrontend/gogo.cc
Hi.
Ok to commit?
2012-06-14 Doug Evans d...@google.com
* dwarf2.def (DW_OP): Add DW_OP_GNU_const_index.
Index: dwarf2.def
===
--- dwarf2.def (revision 188634)
+++ dwarf2.def (working copy)
@@ -588,6 +588,7 @@
DW_OP
On Jun 14, 2012, at 10:16 AM, Roland McGrath wrote:
But if e.g. I use -ffixed-r9 then I think it's a reasonable expectation
that no code is generated that touches r9 in any way, shape, or form.
Also, I can't help but wonder if global_regs is respected. In theory, people
are allowed to
+cc c++ front-end maintainers
Hi,
C++ Frontend maintainers, Could you please take a look at the
front-end part when you find the time?
Honza, your thoughts on the callgraph part?
Richard, any further comments/feedback?
Additionally, I am working on generating better mangled names
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net wrote:
On Jun 14, 2012, at 10:16 AM, Roland McGrath wrote:
But if e.g. I use -ffixed-r9 then I think it's a reasonable expectation
that no code is generated that touches r9 in any way, shape, or form.
Also, I can't help but
Another small patch to add some omissions to the C++11 status table.
Tested x86_64-linux, committed to trunk.
commit e6df5f90c8804a513c8790e1b5288b1398014f85
Author: redi redi@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4
Date: Thu Jun 14 20:32:11 2012 +
* doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2011.xml:
On Thu, 14 Jun 2012, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
On 14/06/2012, at 6:33 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Maxim Kuvyrkov ma...@codesourcery.com writes:
+/* Subroutines of the mips_process_sync_loop.
+ Emit barriers as needed for the memory MODEL. */
+
+static bool
Hi!
This patch performs some of the expand_divmod tricks to expand
integer division by constant using widening vector multiplication,
some shifts and/or additions/subtractions.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
2012-06-14 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com
Hi!
While looking at pattern recognizer, I've noticed that we needlessly
allocate a single member array from heap. An automatic variable for that
would be fine, but BB_VINFO_BB is also addressable.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
2012-06-14 Jakub Jelinek
Using the empty base-class optimization in std::tuple can result in
ambiguous base classes when you have a tuple of tuples. This patch
disables the EBO for tuple elements that are themselves tuples, with
tuple_size 1 (because for a zero-size tuple the base class will be
_Tuple_impl1 and the tuple
We've known for ages that it's not portable to do:
__gthread_mutex_t tmp = __GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT;
_M_mutex = __tmp;
As PR 53270 shows, the copy assignment now actually fails in C++11
mode on platforms using LinuxThreads, because the mutex has a volatile
member so in C++11 mode the copy assignment
Reviewers: ,
Message:
Hi, this is to port the patch from google/main to trunk, which provides
a new stack protection option - fstack-protector-strong.
Previous review for google trunk is here -
http://codereview.appspot.com/5461043
Status - it has been used in google/main for 2 quarters,
On Thu, 14 Jun 2012, shen...@google.com wrote:
Hi, this is to port the patch from google/main to trunk, which provides
a new stack protection option - fstack-protector-strong.
If you are proposing a patch for trunk, please include the whole patch in
the gcc-patches posting.
Detail -
Walter,
While working on atomics for a different target, I've noticed below typo bug in
TileGX.
Patch checked in as obvious.
Thank you,
--
Maxim Kuvyrkov
CodeSourcery / Mentor Graphics
fsf-gcc-tile-sync.patch
Description: Binary data
Hi,
I've applied the attached patch which updates libjava/sysdep/sh/locks.h
with new atomic builtins. Tested on sh4-unknown-linux-gnu with no new
failures.
Regards,
kaz
--
2012-06-14 Kaz Kojima kkoj...@gcc.gnu.org
* sysdep/sh/locks.h (__cas_lock): Remove.
As suggested by Hans-Peter this patch unifies logic for emitting pre- and
post-barriers for atomic operations across Alpha, ARM, MIPS and TileGX.
Currently these targets use copy-pasted switch statements and this patch cleans
that up.
I'm going to test this patch on MIPS, and I would
On 15/06/2012, at 8:51 AM, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jun 2012, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
On 14/06/2012, at 6:33 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Maxim Kuvyrkov ma...@codesourcery.com writes:
+/* Subroutines of the mips_process_sync_loop.
+ Emit barriers as needed for the memory MODEL.
Hi,
This is to port the patch from google/main to trunk, which provides a new stack
protection option - fstack-protector-strong.
Previous review for google trunk is here -
http://codereview.appspot.com/5461043
Status - it has been used in google/main for 2 quarters, building the whole
On 2012-06-14 16:06, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
2012-06-15 Maxim Kuvyrkov ma...@codesourcery.com
* emit-rtl.c (need_atomic_barrier_p): New function.
* emit-rtl.h (need_atomic_barrier_p): Declare it.
* config/alpha/alpha.c (alpha_{pre,post}_atomic_barrier): Remove, use
Here's the version of the change that incorporates Mike's suggestion.
Thanks,
Roland
gcc/
2012-06-14 Roland McGrath mcgra...@google.com
* config/arm/arm.c (arm_get_frame_offsets): Never use a fixed register
as the extra register to save/restore for stack-alignment padding.
This fixes an invalid narrowing conversion that causes problems when
libstdc++ is used with clang++ on non-pthreads targets.
PR libstdc++/53578
* include/ext/concurrence.h (__recursive_mutex::_S_destroy): Fix
narrowing conversion.
* include/std/mutex
OK.
Jason
The conditional dead call elimination pass shrink wraps certain dead
calls to math functions. It doesn't handle case like this:
D.142420_139 = powD.549 (D.142421_138, D.142419_132);
fooD.120935.barD.113815 = D.142420_139;
# foo.bar is dead here.
This code gets cleaned up by DCE and leaves only
ChangeLog entry has a gcc/ prefix that shouldn't be there. Here is the
revised entry:
2012-06-14 Easwaran Raman era...@google.com
* passes.c (init_optimization_passes): Remove pass_call_cdce
from its current position and insert after pass_dce.
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 6:38
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
On 15/06/2012, at 8:51 AM, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
While you're editing in these parts, how about making this
bool emit_atomic_barrier_p (enum memmodel, bool pre) and move it to
the middle-end, say emit-rtl.c?
I've posted a separate patch to
From: Hans-Peter Nilsson h...@axis.com
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 02:31:10 +0200
From: Hans-Peter Nilsson h...@axis.com
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 01:38:22 +0200
gcc:
Fix configure test for stack protector support in target C library.
* configure.ac (test_prefix, test_exec_prefix):
Y is 28 for introduction of the quoted code in
arch/arm/mm/alignment.c, AFAICT, so how about this one, ok now?
Index: changes.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.7/changes.html,v
retrieving revision 1.113
diff -p -u
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 12:07 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 9:29 PM, Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com wrote:
At the Bloomington C++ meeting we discussed some issues with the constexpr
specification that the clang team encountered while trying to implement it.
Hello Everyone,
This patch is for the Cilkplus branch affecting the C++ compler. The
compiler was dropping the Cilk_sync across templates. This patch will preserve
this.
Thanking You,
Yours sincerely,
Balaji V. Iyer.
This time with the patch :-).
-Balaji V. Iyer.
From: Iyer, Balaji V
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2012 11:40 PM
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH][Cilkplus] Capturing Cilk Sync across templates
Hello Everyone,
This patch is for the Cilkplus
It looks reasonable to move it after DCE which exposes more opportunities.
David
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Easwaran Raman era...@google.com wrote:
The conditional dead call elimination pass shrink wraps certain dead
calls to math functions. It doesn't handle case like this:
On 14/06/2012, at 7:01 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Maxim Kuvyrkov ma...@codesourcery.com writes:
...
After a chat with Bernd Schmidt, this is not a bug. I've already fixed the
patch per yours and Bernd's instructions. Do you want to look through an
updated patch or should I just commit
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 4:48 AM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 7:16 AM, Sharad Singhai sing...@google.com wrote:
Okay, I have updated the attached patch so that the output from
-ftree-vectorizer-verbose is considered diagnostic information and is
92 matches
Mail list logo
