Hi, following discussion here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-07/msg00229.html
(and a few other mails in the thread between Richard Sandiford)
A number of targets implement the same name __builtin_thread_pointer(),
__builtin_set_thread_pointer() TLS builtins. This set of patches changes
Core parts adding the new hooks. BUILT_IN_THREAD_POINTER and
BUILT_IN_SET_THREAD_POINTER are different hooks, as some targets only
implement one of them (thread pointer read).
Thanks,
Chung-Lin
* targhooks.c (default_expand_builtin_thread_pointer): New.
Alpha parts. Note that now the machine-independent
__builtin_thread_pointer() is now marked as const/readonly, slightly
different from the original alpha backend code.
Thanks,
Chung-Lin
* config/alpha/alpha.c (alpha_builtin): Remove
ALPHA_BUILTIN_THREAD_POINTER,
ARM parts, no further notes.
Thanks,
Chung-Lin
* config/arm/arm.c (arm_builtins): Remove
ARM_BUILTIN_THREAD_POINTER.
(arm_init_tls_builtins): Remove function.
(arm_init_builtins): Remove call to arm_init_tls_builtins().
(arm_expand_builtin): Remove
S390 parts. In this patch, because the thread-pointer builtins were the
only machine-dependent builtins in the s390 backend, I have removed
basically all the init/expand builtin hook code. If the s390 maintainers
want to keep the code for possible future backend builtins, this patch
might need to
xtensa parts. No other notes.
Thanks,
Chung-Lin
* config/xtensa/xtensa.c
(xtensa_expand_builtin_thread_pointer): Add hook function for
TARGET_EXPAND_BUILTIN_THREAD_POINTER.
(xtensa_expand_builtin_set_thread_pointer): Add hook function
for
Finally, what I personally need, the MIPS parts.
Thanks,
Chung-Lin
* config/mips/mips.c (mips_get_tp): Add 'target' parameter for
generating to specific reg.
(mips_legitimize_tls_address): Update calls to mips_get_tp().
(mips_expand_builtin_thread_pointer): Add
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
GCC calls free_after_parsing in rest_of_clean_state.
That's way too late, it can be done in free_lang_data_in_cgraph instead.
But that's only called with -flto ... I think it should be called in
Dimitrios Apostolou ji...@gmx.net writes:
@@ -3849,6 +3850,32 @@ sprint_ul_rev (char *s, unsigned long va
return i;
}
+/* Write a signed HOST_WIDE_INT as decimal to a file, fast. */
+
+void
+fprint_w (FILE *f, HOST_WIDE_INT value)
+{
+ /* python says: len(str(2**64)) == 20 */
+
Kenneth,
I see I replied to your original message that had the wrong CC, I'm now CC-ing
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org.
Thanks,
- Tom
On 12/07/12 11:05, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 12/07/12 03:39, Kenneth Zadeck wrote:
Tom,
I have a problem with the approach that you have taken here. I believe
that
On 07/07/2012 11:28 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
I must say, I am surprised that gfortran.h includes coretypes.h. The
idea always was to try and keep the front end and the back end as much
separated as possible, and including coretypes.h in the most important
front-end header doesn't fit in that
On 12 July 2012 07:52, Chung-Lin Tang clt...@codesourcery.com wrote:
ARM parts, no further notes.
ARM parts are ok, modulo approval for generic parts and no
regressions with testing on arm-linux-gnueabi.
Thanks,
Ramana
Thanks,
Chung-Lin
* config/arm/arm.c (arm_builtins): Remove
*ping*
On 06/28/2012 09:34 AM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
This patch generates inline code for C_F_POINTER with an array
argument. One reason is that GCC didn't handle SHAPE= arguments which
were noncontiguous.
Actually, I just messed up my test case and didn't properly read the
On some targets, there is a catch-all handler to catch unhandled exceptions.
This patch adjust the personality routine to report them as unhandled.
Behavior not changed.
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed on trunk
2012-07-12 Tristan Gingold ging...@adacore.com
* raise-gcc.c: Do
This change moves the GNAT runtime package GNAT.Byte_Swapping under System
(with a renaming under GNAT for compatibility) so that the unit can be
used from expanded code at a later point.
No visible behaviour change (simple code reorganization), no test.
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed
To meet MINSIGSTKSZ requirement.
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed on trunk
2012-07-12 Tristan Gingold ging...@adacore.com
* s-osinte-hpux.ads: Increase alternate stack size on hpux.
Index: s-osinte-hpux.ads
===
When gnatmake is invoked with --subdirs=, but without -P, the binder
generated files and the executable are put by default in the specified
subdirectory.
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed on trunk
2012-07-12 Vincent Celier cel...@adacore.com
* make.adb (Binding_Phase): If
It is possible to have the same library project in different aggregated
projects, so in different project tree.
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed on trunk
2012-07-12 Pascal Obry o...@adacore.com
* prj-nmsc.adb (Check_Library_Attributes): Allow the same library
project
This patch completely changes the way restrictions information is
generated in the ALI file. Instead of using a positional notation
that is sensitive to the addition of new restrictions, it uses a
named notation, that avoids this dependency. If a new restriction
is added, and an incompatible
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed on trunk
2012-07-12 Vasiliy Fofanov fofa...@adacore.com
* vms_data.ads: Add VMS qualifiers for -gnatn1/2 switches.
Index: vms_data.ads
===
--- vms_data.ads(revision 189431)
sorry about the two messages. i mis spelled the gcc-patches on the first
try.
you are on the right track with the example but combine will not get
this unless everything is in the same bb.
the whole point of having a separate pass for doing extension
elimination is that it needs to be done
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de wrote:
On 07/07/2012 11:28 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
I must say, I am surprised that gfortran.h includes coretypes.h. The
idea always was to try and keep the front end and the back end as much
separated as possible, and
Hello,
The global variable first_pass_instance exists to hack jump threading,
see tree-pass.h:
/* Set to true if the pass is called the first time during compilation of the
current function. Note that using this information in the optimization
passes is considered not to be clean, and it
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
The global variable first_pass_instance exists to hack jump threading,
see tree-pass.h:
/* Set to true if the pass is called the first time during compilation of the
current function. Note that using
Hi Hans,
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Hans-Peter Nilsson h...@bitrange.com wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012, Jia Liu wrote:
Hi all,
When I build lm32-elf-gcc, it failed at libgcc configure due to
lm32-elf-cc1 segment fault when compile conftest.c:
void bar ();
void clean (int *);
void foo
Hello!
A test is added. Is it ok?
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
2012-07-08 Dehao Chen de...@google.com
* gcc.dg/debug_info_inline.c: New test.
This test fails on alphaev68-unknown-linux-gnu [1] and other non-x86
targets [2] too:
FAIL: gcc.dg/debug_info_inline.c scan-assembler loc 1
On 06/15/2012 04:27 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
FAIL: g++.dg/template/access7.C -std=c++98 (test for errors, line 8)
FAIL: g++.dg/template/access7.C -std=c++98 (test for errors, line 12)
FAIL: g++.dg/template/access7.C -std=c++98 (test for warnings, line 17)
FAIL: g++.dg/template/access7.C
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
Richi, could you please have a look at jump threading, and see if
first_pass_instance can be remove?
Ping? :-)
Bootstrappedtested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK for trunk?
This was proposed before and I
Hello!
2012-07-12 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
* config/i386/i386.md (QImode and HImode cmove splitters): Merge
QImode and HImode splitters. Use ix86_comparison_operator.
Explicitly match FLAGS_REG.
(DFmode cmove splitter): Explicitly match FLAGS_REG.
Tested
Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
Richi, could you please have a look at jump threading, and see if
first_pass_instance can be remove?
Ping? :-)
Bootstrappedtested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK
Hi Chung-Lin,
Chung-Lin Tang clt...@codesourcery.com writes:
Core parts adding the new hooks. BUILT_IN_THREAD_POINTER and
BUILT_IN_SET_THREAD_POINTER are different hooks, as some targets only
implement one of them (thread pointer read).
Thanks a lot for doing this. It looks great to me,
On 28/06/2012 09:34, Tobias Burnus wrote:
This patch generates inline code for C_F_POINTER with an array argument.
One reason is that GCC didn't handle SHAPE= arguments which were
noncontiguous.
However, the real motivation is the fortran-dev branch with the new
array-descriptor:
Chung-Lin Tang clt...@codesourcery.com writes:
@@ -2851,11 +2851,12 @@ mips_call_tls_get_addr (rtx sym, enum mips_symbol_
/* Return a pseudo register that contains the current thread pointer. */
static rtx
-mips_get_tp (void)
+mips_get_tp (rtx target)
{
- rtx tp, fn;
+ rtx fn;
+
Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Bernd Schmidt ber...@codesourcery.com
wrote We're moving a load across a call since we don't recognize calls as
memory-clobbering.
Bootstrapping and testing now on 4.7 x86_64-linux, ok everywhere?
Maybe:
+
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012, Jia Liu wrote:
May you
give me more comment? I wanna fix it.
Sorry, I'll leave that to the lm32 maintainer, I just wasnted to
clear a misunderstanding regarding TARGET_LEGITIMATE_CONSTANT_P.
brgds, H-P
On 06/07/2012 23:13, Tobias Burnus wrote:
In case it's not, then everything is fine I guess, though I prefer
avoiding polluting the scalarizer with assumed rank stuff ;-).
It still will get worse, see above. Though, I wouldn't mind if you could
modify the scalarizer.
I don't see how I
Mikael Morin wrote:
I don't see how I could. The scalarizer's purpose is translating array
statements like foo(:,:) = bar(:,:), where the rank at least is supposed
known, so that we know how many nested loops we have to generate. If
the number of loops is known at runtime only, hem, I don't
From: Hans-Peter Nilsson h...@axis.com
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 01:02:34 +0200
PR rtl-optimization/53176
* rtlanal.c (rtx_cost): Adjust default cost for X with a
UNITS_PER_WORD factor for all X according to the size of
its mode, not just for SUBREGs with untieable
Hi Mikael, dear all,
Mikael Morin wrote:
PPS: The offset handling in gfortran is really complicated. I wonder
whether we have to (or at least should) change it for the new array
descriptor.
I don't know exactly what you mean by really complicated. There are
not many simple things in gfortran
PR c++/53531
* testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/variadic135.C: New.
As suggested in the PR comments this adds a test to ensure this doesn't regress.
OK for trunk?
commit 2fa33c6b4e5533b7d87ba559b43bb06e501e9851
Author: Jonathan Wakely jwakely@gmail.com
Date: Thu Jul 12 23:37:40 2012
And here's a fix for the access7 failure, to be applied on top of your
patch.
I notice that your patch changes the behavior of C++98/03 mode as well,
which seems wrong to me; I think this is a big enough change that we
should limit it to C++11 mode.
Jason
commit
These patches fix the typedef11.C and friend13/15.C failures. Each
fixes a latent bug in the compiler.
1) We shouldn't do access control checking for typedefs used in the body
of a function when the declaration is instantiated; we should wait until
the body is instantiated.
2) We shouldn't
On Jul 11, 2012, at 11:52 PM, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
Core parts adding the new hooks. BUILT_IN_THREAD_POINTER and
BUILT_IN_SET_THREAD_POINTER are different hooks, as some targets only
implement one of them (thread pointer read).
sorry seems a little overly dramatic. I would have thought that
This patch adds __int256 to the front-ends. We follow the __int128 code fairly
closely...
So, an outstanding question would be, how do I get the mangle codes allocated
for the type? I just choose two unused codes, for now. All in all, the patch
was pretty straight forward.
We have another
44 matches
Mail list logo
