On Thu, 4 Oct 2012, Kenneth Zadeck wrote:
There are a bunch of ways to skin the cat.
1) we can define the extra mode.
2) if we get rid of the mode inside the wide int and replace it with an
explicit precision and bitsize, then we can just make the size of the buffer
twice as big as the analys
Hi,
Thanks for the feedback.
> I can't see how adding target-libgloss is relevant to a gdb port.
This was actually a part of some simulator fixes to update nltvals.def
as it was not emulating the correct system calls.
The Newlib changes have been already checked in and nltvals.def has
been regen
On 4 October 2012 11:10, Christer Solskogen wrote:
> Here's the error:
>
> /home/solskogen/obj/_build/gcc.cross.x86_64-w64-mingw32/./gcc/xgcc
> -B/home/solskogen/obj/_build/gcc.cross.x86_64-w64-mingw32/./gcc/
> -L/home/solskogen/obj/cross-mingw-w64/x86_64-w64-mingw32/lib
> -L/home/solskogen/obj/cro
gfortran supports OPTIONAL since quite some time - also some more
complicated cases involving ELEMENTAL or the new F2008 addition, but as
testing showed, the support is still incomplete; especially with
polymorphic arguments there were several bugs.
Besides a simple absent argument, passing an
On Thu, 4 Oct 2012, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
> On 10/4/12, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > On Tue, 2 Oct 2012, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
> >> On 10/2/12, Richard Guenther wrote:
> >> > On Mon, 1 Oct 2012, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
> >> > > Change more non-GTY hash tables to use the new type-safe
> >> > > templ
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 05:26:11PM -0700, Cary Coutant wrote:
> > Index: gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/localclass1.C
> > ===
> > --- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/localclass1.C (revision 192048)
> > +++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> Both C++11 and OpenMP specify that thread_local/threadprivate variables can
> have dynamic initialization and destruction semantics. This sequence of
> patches implements that.
>
> The first patch adds the C++11 thread_local keyword and imple
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 01:38:38PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> commit 18c01be0ec8b7a3cda6a16e86356e8e434c12f89
> Author: Jason Merrill
> Date: Thu Sep 20 16:00:08 2012 -0400
>
> Support C++11 thread_local destructors.
> libstdc++-v3/
> * libsupc++/cxxabi.h: Declare __cxa_threa
On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 10:29:54AM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> I wonder if an implementation is conforming that performs non-local TLS
> variable inits at thread creation time instead (probably also would require
> glibc support)?
I think it is conforming, but not really doable, because of dl
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
>
>> So, Jan Hubicka requested and approved the current spelling.
>> What now?
>
> I don't think we should hold this up. The names Jan requested seem
> reasonable enough. We seem to be r
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 9:27 PM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> Kenneth Zadeck writes:
>> On 10/04/2012 12:58 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Kenneth Zadeck
>>> wrote:
Let me talk about the mode here first.
What this interface/patch provides is a facili
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Richard Guenther
wrote:
> Look at RTL users of the double-int routines and provide wrappers
> that take RTXen as inputs. Enforce that all CONSTs have a mode.
Which would, btw, allow to "merge" CONST_INT, CONST_DOUBLE
and CONST_WIDE by making the storage size vari
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
> >
> >> So, Jan Hubicka requested and approved the current spelling.
> >> What now?
> >
> > I don't think we should hold this up. The names Jan requested seem
> > reasonable enough.
Richard Guenther writes:
>> As far as the wide_ints recording a mode or precision goes: we're in
>> the "lucky" position of having tried both options. Trees record the
>> type (and thus precision) of all compile-time integer constants.
>> RTL doesn't. And the RTL way is a right pain. It leads t
On 5 October 2012 01:06, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Oct 2012, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>
>> The only patches to gcc proper are documentation-related and adding
>> the D frontend / libphobos to configure and make files. I would have
>> thought that these would typically only be included with the
With the strnlen-related Go failures now gone on Solaris, another issue
crept up: several tests were failing like this:
throw: /proc/self/exe
goroutine 4 [running]:
panic during panic
FAIL: log
This is due to the hardcoded use of /proc/self/exe in libbacktrace,
which doesn't exist on Solaris, an
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> Richard Guenther writes:
>>> As far as the wide_ints recording a mode or precision goes: we're in
>>> the "lucky" position of having tried both options. Trees record the
>>> type (and thus precision) of all compile-time integer constant
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> On 5 October 2012 01:06, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
>> On Thu, 4 Oct 2012, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>>
>>> The only patches to gcc proper are documentation-related and adding
>>> the D frontend / libphobos to configure and make files. I would have
>>>
- Original Message -
> I see all these patches with mixed feeling - it puts breaks on all
> developers
> because they need to learn the new interface which does not bring any
> immediate benefit. So I think _your_ development time would be
> better
> spent by fixing open bugs or by tacklin
On Fri, 5 Oct 2012, Rainer Orth wrote:
> This is due to the hardcoded use of /proc/self/exe in libbacktrace,
> which doesn't exist on Solaris, and probably is also missing on other
> non-Linux OSes. Solaris (since 2.6, it seems) provides getexecname()
> instead, which this patch uses.
:
> I haven'
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Nathan Froyd wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> I see all these patches with mixed feeling - it puts breaks on all
>> developers
>> because they need to learn the new interface which does not bring any
>> immediate benefit. So I think _your_ development time
Hello!
> With the strnlen-related Go failures now gone on Solaris, another issue
> crept up: several tests were failing like this:
>
> throw: /proc/self/exe
>
> goroutine 4 [running]:
> panic during panic
> FAIL: log
>
> This is due to the hardcoded use of /proc/self/exe in libbacktrace,
> which d
Gerald Pfeifer writes:
> Your patch is better in that it checks for getexecname (which does
> not exist in FreeBSD). Mine seems better in that it removes the
> duplication between fileline.c and print.c and also addresses the
> latter case.
>
> Could you just merge mine into yours or am I missi
Uros Bizjak writes:
> +# Check for getexecname function.
> +if test -n "${with_target_subdir}"; then
> + case "${host}" in
> + *-*-solaris2*) have_getexecname=yes ;;
> + *) have_getexecname=no ;;
> + esac
> +else
> + AC_CHECK_FUNC(getexecname, [have_getexecname=yes], [have_getexename=no]
Richard Guenther writes:
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>> Richard Guenther writes:
As far as the wide_ints recording a mode or precision goes: we're in
the "lucky" position of having tried both options. Trees record the
type (and thus precision) of
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> Richard Guenther writes:
>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Richard Sandiford
>> wrote:
>>> Richard Guenther writes:
> As far as the wide_ints recording a mode or precision goes: we're in
> the "lucky" position of having tried
This fixes PR54811 for me - still Ada LTO bootstrap fails for me
with cgraph verification ICEs.
LTO bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied.
Richard.
2012-10-05 Richard Guenther
PR middle-end/54811
* tree-ssa-live.c (clear_unused_block_pointer_1): Look a
Hi!
This is something various Linux distributions have been carrying around for
5 years, and glibc headers rely on this. The comment says what the intended
ideal state is, but during those 5 years that hasn't been implemented.
Pre-approved by Richard on IRC, committed to trunk.
--- gcc/ChangeLo
On Thu, 4 Oct 2012, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 09:42:59AM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > This looks like the wrong place to fix things to me ... either we can
> > fix this at the point we create the VAR_DECLs for the optimized away
> > PARM_DECLs (or we should delay that un
On Wed, 3 Oct 2012, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 03:59:56PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > As discussed in the PR, right now we do a very bad job for debug info
> > of partially inlined functions (both when they are kept only partially
> > inlined, or when partial inlining is pe
Richard Guenther writes:
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>> Richard Guenther writes:
>>> The issue is that unlike RTL where we "construct" double-ints from
>>> CONST_INT/CONST_DOUBLE right now, tree has the double-int
>>> _embedded_. That's why I say that the thing
On Fri, 5 Oct 2012, Rainer Orth wrote:
> Do the FreeBSD headers already provide a define for /proc/curproc/file?
None that I could find.
Gerald
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> Richard Guenther writes:
>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Richard Sandiford
>> wrote:
>>> Richard Guenther writes:
The issue is that unlike RTL where we "construct" double-ints from
CONST_INT/CONST_DOUBLE right now, tree has
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 7:05 AM, Richard Guenther
wrote:
> Sorry, that wasn't intended. I question these numbers because
> unless you bootstrap say 100 times the noise in bootstrap speed
> is way too high to make such claims. Of course critical information
> is missing:
I agree with Nathan. Yo
On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 02:20:13PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> The following could use a comment on what you are doing ...
Will add something.
> > + if (args_to_skip)
> > +for (parm = DECL_ARGUMENTS (current_function_decl), num = 0;
> > +parm; parm = DECL_CHAIN (parm), num++)
> > +
Oleg Endo wrote:
> The atomic options of SH have been changed recently. The attached patch
> updates the 4.8 changes.html accordingly, plus some minor wording fixes.
>
> OK?
OK.
Regards,
kaz
Oleg Endo wrote:
> Do you mean something like the attached patch as a preparation step?
> (checked with 'make all')
Yes. The patch is OK with removing the first line of the ChangeLog
entry for PR number.
Regards,
kaz
Richard Guenther writes:
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>> Richard Guenther writes:
>>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Richard Sandiford
>>> wrote:
Richard Guenther writes:
> The issue is that unlike RTL where we "construct" double-ints from
> CONST_
richi,
let me address a bunch of issues that are randomly spread thru the thread.
1) unlike the double int's current relationship to int cst, we do not
currently wrap a wide-int into an CONST_WIDE_INT nor (in the patch that
you have not seen) do we wrap a wide-int into the int cst.wide-int
Richard Sandiford writes:
How is CONST_WIDE_INT variable size?
>>>
>>> It's just the usual trailing variable-length array thing.
>>
>> Good. Do you get rid of CONST_DOUBLE (for integers) at the same time?
>
> Yeah. I initially thought it might be OK to keep them and have
> CONST_INT, intege
On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 02:49:07PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> I believe that gsi_insert_before in another function
> isn't going to work well.
> E.g. update_modified_stmt starts with
> if (!ssa_operands_active (cfun))
> return;
>
> Or is it ok to use gsi_insert_before_without_update and e
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 3:21 AM, Rainer Orth
wrote:
> With the strnlen-related Go failures now gone on Solaris, another issue
> crept up: several tests were failing like this:
>
> throw: /proc/self/exe
>
> goroutine 4 [running]:
> panic during panic
> FAIL: log
>
> This is due to the hardcoded use
On 10/02/2012 08:56 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Perhaps maybe_constant_value already does all that integral_constant_value
does, but I'm not sure about it.
It does, you can remove that call.
OK with that change.
Jason
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Richard Guenther
wrote:
>
> Ok, I see where you are going. Let me look at the patch again.
* The introduction and use of CONST_SCALAR_INT_P could be split out
(obvious and good)
* DEF_RTL_EXPR(CONST_WIDE_INT, "const_wide_int", "", RTX_CONST_OBJ)
defining that
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 4:21 AM, Rainer Orth
wrote:
>
> I think this should work. The only complication might be that users of
> DEFAULT_PROCESS_FILENAME need to include on Solaris to get
> the declaration of getexecname(). Given that this header is already
> used unconditionally, its inclusion
Hi,
this is the udpated patch I comitted after testing. I suppose we will need to
find way
to make SOC smaller for simple loops - it is way too overestimated currently.
* tree-vectorizer.h (vect_estimate_min_profitable_iters): Remove.
* tree-vect-loop.c (vect_estimate_min_profita
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> Richard Sandiford writes:
> How is CONST_WIDE_INT variable size?
It's just the usual trailing variable-length array thing.
>>>
>>> Good. Do you get rid of CONST_DOUBLE (for integers) at the same time?
>>
>> Yeah. I initial
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
> Because (...) there has been so much
> negative pressure on our work, that we sometimes try to find some
> benefit when reality may provide neutral results.
When people say "your work sucks", they probably don't mean to apply
negative pressure
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 02:20:13PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
>> The following could use a comment on what you are doing ...
>
> Will add something.
>
>> > + if (args_to_skip)
>> > +for (parm = DECL_ARGUMENTS (current_function_decl),
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
> Because (...) there has been so much
> negative pressure on our work, that we sometimes try to find some
> benefit when reality may provide neutral results.
When people say "your work sucks", they probably don't mean to apply
negative pressure
Richard Guenther writes:
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>> Richard Sandiford writes:
>> How is CONST_WIDE_INT variable size?
>
> It's just the usual trailing variable-length array thing.
Good. Do you get rid of CONST_DOUBLE (for integers) at t
On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 03:59:55PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> I don't think we want to rely on that ... so just keep the push/pop_cfun.
Ok, so this is what I'm retesting (basically just comments added and the two
lines (subcode and set) swapped:
2012-10-05 Jakub Jelinek
PR debug
This patch ensures that Deallocate_Subpool is invoked on each subpool when the
owner pool_with_subpools is finalized.
-- Source --
-- gc_spool.ads
with System.Storage_Pools.Subpools;
private with System.Storage_Elements;
package GC_SPool is
use System;
use Syste
This patch fixes a subtle race condition where the master task and the child
task may free the child task concurrently. Found by code reading.
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed on trunk
2012-10-05 Arnaud Charlet
* s-tassta.adb: Update comments.
(Vulnerable_Complete_Mas
The code for statically computing bounds for division and exponent was
incorrect in some cases, possibly leading to wrong results when -gnato2 or
-gnato3 was used. The code for mod and rem was not using optimal bounds, with
possible minor consequences on efficiency of the generated code with -gnato
avr-gcc compiles code like
void f (int, int);
void f_or (int x)
{
f (x, x | 42);
}
to
f_or:
ldi r22,lo8(42) ; 15*movhi/5[length = 2]
ldi r23,0
or r22,r24 ; 6iorhi3/1[length = 2]
or r23,r25
rjmp f
but this is more efficient:
f_or:
movw
This patch changes the default overflow checking mode to suppressed
in the case of targets that support backend divide and overflow
checking as indicated by the appropriate flags in Targparm being
set. There are no such targets currently, so this change has no
effect and no test is needed.
Tested
This patch fixes the handling of type invariants when they are specified on
the completion of a private type, and when public expression functions return
a type with invariants.
Running the following:
gnatmake -q -gnat12a main
main
must yield:
OK
---
with Ada.Assertions; use Ada.Asser
I can't configure libstdc++ separately. To reproduce:
mkdir BUILD
cd BUILD
../libstdc++-v3/configure
Error:
make: *** No rule to make target
`/users/pvchupin/android/toolchain/gcc/gcc-4.8/BUILD/../libgcc/gthr-default.h',
needed by `bits/gthr-default.h'. Stop.
See fix attached.
Ok for trunk and
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> Richard Guenther writes:
>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Richard Sandiford
>> wrote:
>>> Richard Sandiford writes:
>>> How is CONST_WIDE_INT variable size?
>>
>> It's just the usual trailing variable-length array thing.
>
On 10/05/2012 10:36 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
Richard Guenther writes:
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
Richard Sandiford writes:
How is CONST_WIDE_INT variable size?
It's just the usual trailing variable
Kenneth Zadeck writes:
> i will convert ppc if that is what it takes. david's office is 4 isles
> away and mike has a lot of experience on ppc also. (this is unless
> richard is willing to do mips one afternoon.)
'Fraid MIPS is very boring as far as this is concerned. MIPS sets
need_64bit_h
[I am still a little confused, sorry for the long email...]
On Tue, 2 Oct 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
+ if (TREE_CODE (op0) == VECTOR_CST && TREE_CODE (op1) == VECTOR_CST)
+{
+ int count = VECTOR_CST_NELTS (op0);
+ tree *elts = XALLOCAVEC (tree, count);
+ gcc_assert (TREE
Hi,
I'm adding the testcase and closing the PR. Tested x86_64-linux.
Thanks,
Paolo.
/
2012-10-05 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/50893
* g++.dg/cpp0x/defaulted38.C: New.
Index: g++.dg/cpp0x/defaulted38.C
==
On Oct 5, 2012, at 4:16 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 05:26:11PM -0700, Cary Coutant wrote:
>>> Index: gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/localclass1.C
>>> ===
>>> --- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/localclass1
Hi,
This patch refactors the initialisation code for the Advanced
SIMD builtins under the AArch64 target. The patch has been
regression tested on aarch64-none-elf.
OK for aarch64-branch?
(If yes, someone will have to commit this for me as I do not
have commit rights)
Thanks,
James Greenhalgh
As already discussed, this patch removes the -mshort-calls command option from
avr-gcc.
Ok to apply?
If the change is on order, changes to wwwdocs will follow, i.e. deprecate the
option in 4.7 and tell it is removed in the 4.8 caveats.
Johann
* doc/invoke.texi (AVR Options): Remove -ms
richard s,
there are two comments that i deferred to you. that have the word
richard in them,
richi,
thank, i will start doing this now.
kenny
On 10/05/2012 09:49 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Richard Guenther
wrote:
Ok, I see where you are going. Let me loo
On Fri, 5 Oct 2012, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> Would the best approach be to move all handle_* functions and any
> helper functions into a new source file that can be shared between
> frontends, and define two new frontend hooks,
> LANG_HOOK_ATTRIBUTE_TABLE and LANG_HOOK_FORMAT_ATTRIBUTE_TABLE ?
I don'
Hi Jason, Sri has addressed the comments you had on FE part. Can you
take a look if it is ok? Stage-1 is going to be closed soon, and we
hope to get this major feature in 4.8.
thanks,
David
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
> Ping.
>
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 5:34 PM,
On Oct 5, 2012, at 11:34 AM,
wrote:
>
> On Oct 5, 2012, at 4:16 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 05:26:11PM -0700, Cary Coutant wrote:
Index: gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/localclass1.C
===
>>>
On 10/05/2012 04:41 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Unfortunately, that penalty is not only for thread_local vars with
ctors/dtors. There is some penalty even for using
extern thread_local int i;
int foo (void)
{
return i;
}
(as compared to extern __thread int i;), because we have to at least check
Kenneth Zadeck writes:
>> Or do you want to optimize encoding like for CONST_INT (and unlike
>> CONST_DOUBLE)? I doubt the above packs nicely into rtx_def?
>> A general issue of it though - we waste 32bits on 64bit hosts in
>> rtx_def between the bits and the union. Perfect place for num_elem
>>
On 10/05/2012 04:29 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
Or if we have the extra indirection via a reference anyway, we could
have a pointer TLS variable (NULL initialized) that on the first access
will trap where in a trap handler we could then perform initialization
and setup of that pointer.
Interest
Hi,
remove some cruft noticed by Marc (and myself). Sanity checked
x86_64-linux, committed to mainline.
Thanks,
Paolo.
//
2012-10-05 Paolo Carlini
* include/c_global/cstdlib: Remove redundant pasto code protected
by __GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX0X__.
* inc
On 08/24/2012 08:34 PM, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
+ /* If the address of a multiversioned function dispatcher is taken,
+ generate the body to dispatch the right function at run-time. This
+ is needed as the address can be used to do an indirect call. */
It seems to me that you don't ne
> So given the comments, is this patch now ok to commit?
Yes, this is OK. Thanks for doing the extra testing! (I also ran a
quick test with -fdebug-types-section, just to make sure.)
-cary
On 10/05/2012 01:29 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
+/* This is the maximal size of the buffer needed for dump. */
>>+const int MAX = (MAX_BITSIZE_MODE_ANY_INT / 4
>>++ MAX_BITSIZE_MODE_ANY_INT / HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT + 32);
>>
>>I'd prefer a target macro for this, not anything ba
On 10/05/2012 01:43 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 08/24/2012 08:34 PM, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
+ /* If the address of a multiversioned function dispatcher is taken,
+ generate the body to dispatch the right function at run-time. This
+ is needed as the address can be used to do an indirec
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 06:33:33PM +0200, Gunther Nikl wrote:
> Michael Meissner schrieb:
> > On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 10:13:25AM +0200, Gunther Nikl wrote:
> >> Michael Meissner wrote:
> >>> Segher Boessenkool asked me on IRC to break out the fix in the last
> >>> change.
> >>> This patch is just
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 09:42:05PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
> @@ -1115,7 +1118,8 @@ static const struct attribute_spec rs600
>{ NULL,0, 0, false, false, false, NULL, false }
> };
>
> -#ifndef MASK_STRICT_ALIGN
> +#ifndef OPTION_MASK_STRICT_ALIGN
> +#define OPTION_MASK_STRICT_ALI
On 08/24/2012 08:34 PM, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
+ /* For function versions, their parms and types match
+but they are not duplicates. Record function versions
+as and when they are found. */
+ if (TREE_CODE (fn) == FUNCTION_DECL
+ && TREE_CODE
On 10/04/2012 08:26 PM, Cary Coutant wrote:
It seems to me that there are cases where we just want to emit the
class for the context info (like a namespace, which doesn't have to be
complete everywhere). Is there a way to tell the debugger that this
class declaration is incomplete and that it sho
>> It seems to me that there are cases where we just want to emit the
>> class for the context info (like a namespace, which doesn't have to be
>> complete everywhere). Is there a way to tell the debugger that this
>> class declaration is incomplete and that it should look elsewhere for
>> a full d
I've rewritten my rs6000 infrastructure patch to allow more target switches, so
that it does not change the flags currently in the target_flags. This should
reduce the number of changes due to TARGET_ being called OPTION_, and
MASK_ being called OPTION_MASK_. In addition, since it might be
possib
On Oct 5, 2012, at 2:43 PM, Cary Coutant wrote:
>>> It seems to me that there are cases where we just want to emit the
>>> class for the context info (like a namespace, which doesn't have to be
>>> complete everywhere). Is there a way to tell the debugger that this
>>> class declaration is incomp
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 7:32 AM, Pavel Chupin wrote:
> I can't configure libstdc++ separately. To reproduce:
>
> mkdir BUILD
> cd BUILD
> ../libstdc++-v3/configure
>
> Error:
> make: *** No rule to make target
> `/users/pvchupin/android/toolchain/gcc/gcc-4.8/BUILD/../libgcc/gthr-default.h',
> neede
After commiting the last SH changes updates for 4.8 I was kindly
informed that the br tags were left open. I've committed the attached
fix as obvious.
Cheers,
Oleg
? www_4_8_sh_changes_2_close_br.patch
Index: htdocs/gcc-4.8/changes.html
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 09:42:05PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
> @@ -1115,7 +1118,8 @@ static const struct attribute_spec rs600
>{ NULL,0, 0, false, false, false, NULL, false }
> };
>
> -#ifndef MASK_STRICT_ALIGN
> +#ifndef OPTION_MASK_STRICT_ALIGN
> +#define OPTION_MASK_STRICT_ALI
Ping
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-09/msg01557.html
On Fri, 21 Sep 2012, Marc Glisse wrote:
Hello,
this patch adds mixed scalar-vector operations to the C++ front-end. It also
adds a few operators to the C front-end (comparisons in particular). This
patch is mostly an import from t
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
> If you can figure out a better name for the function we should
> probably move it to cfganal.c
It looks like my previous e-mail about this appears to have gone got
somehow, so retry:
Your my_rev_post_order_compute is simply inverted_post
On 10/5/12, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Oct 2012, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
>> On 10/4/12, Richard Guenther wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2 Oct 2012, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
>> >> On 10/2/12, Richard Guenther wrote:
>> >> > On Mon, 1 Oct 2012, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
>> >> > > Change more non-GTY hash tab
Could you please review the patch at
http://www.mail-archive.com/gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org/msg40961.html?
On 10/3/12, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
> Sorry, one more time with the right file contents.
>
> On 10/2/12, Richard Guenther wrote:
>> You are changing a hashtable used by fold checking, did you te
thanks. That will be helpful.
David
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Dehao Chen wrote:
> Sure, I'll add a detailed documentation in a gcc wiki page.
>
> Dehao
>
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
>> Dehao, the file auto-profile.c has some high level description of
>> aFD
The attached change fixes a reload failure encountered testing another
change. It occurred for a constant that didn't match the "J" constraint.
The change makes the HImode pattern the same as the corresponding SImode
pattern.
Tested on hppa-unknown-linux-gn, hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 and
hppa64-hp-hp
On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 01:59:18PM -0700, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
> With the constructor, you don't have to remember and you don't
> have to type more. If you have a variable, you know that it is
> properly initialized.
But we really don't want hundreds or thousands of dynamic constructors
for glob
More testsuite changes, tracking GSOC work.
tested x86/linux
-benjamin2012-10-05 Benjamin Kosnik
* testsuite/28_regex/algorithms/match: Rename to...
* testsuite/28_regex/algorithms/regex_match: ...this.
* testsuite/28_regex/basic_regex/regex.cc: Rename to...
* testsuite/28_regex/basic_re
On Oct 5, 2012, at 2:43 PM, Cary Coutant wrote:
>>> It seems to me that there are cases where we just want to emit the
>>> class for the context info (like a namespace, which doesn't have to be
>>> complete everywhere). Is there a way to tell the debugger that this
>>> class declaration is incomp
> This fixes PR54811 for me - still Ada LTO bootstrap fails for me
> with cgraph verification ICEs.
Thanks for the fix! Yes, I also get the cgraph verification ICEs now, but
that's kind of a progress if you ask me. :-) I'll look into them once the
dust has settled on Jan's recent changes in th
On Sat, 15 Sep 2012, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Index: config.gcc
> ===
> --- config.gcc(revision 191120)
> +++ config.gcc(working copy)
> @@ -708,6 +708,11 @@
> *-*-openbsd2.*|*-*-openbsd3.[012])
>tm_defines="
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
