On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi,
while analyzing c-ray I noticed two issues. First is that I originally set
number
of size/time entries to 32. Once we reach this limit we conservatively
account
everything as unconditional. This limit is not met on
One to be committed as obvious.
* reorg.c (resource_conflicts_p): Use hard_reg_set_intersect_p.
Index: reorg.c
===
--- reorg.c (revision 193787)
+++ reorg.c (working copy)
@@ -292,18 +292,7 @@ resource_conflicts_p
Hi,
stop_search_p will reach the default case on DEBUG_INSN, and the
default case is gcc_unreachable(). I suppose this means nobody is
using DWARF3+ on a dbr_sched target, it can't possibly ever have
worked. Eric?
Anyway, also obvious: Don't stop on DEBUG_INSNs.
Ciao!
Steven
* reorg.c
... I believe I posted a patch?
Yes: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-11/msg01799.html
I have found another fall out: I have some avatars of the polyhedron tests
where the REAL(8) have been replaced with REAL(10). Some of them are now
Should I open a new PR for that?
Cheers,
Dominique
My mailer has eaten a line in my previous mail. One should read:
I have found another fall out: I have some avatars of the polyhedron tests
where the REAL(8) have been replaced with REAL(10). Some of them are now ~50%
slower with the new value of max-completely-peeled-insns.
Should I open a new
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com wrote:
But UNKNOWN_LOCATION is effectively wrong as well. If other
optimizations move the statements above the inserted instruction, then
the new instruction ends up inheriting whatever location happens to be
in the previous
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com wrote:
Hi,
that's not really a bugfix, but I don't see the point in keeping this flag,
which was already dead in 4.7, one more release.
Tested on x86_64-suse-linux, OK for the mainline?
Ok.
Thanks,
Richard.
2012-11-16
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Hans-Peter Nilsson h...@bitrange.com
wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2012, Diego Novillo wrote:
I have now committed all 25 parts of this patch as rev 193595. Please
CC me on any problems that
Am 17.11.2012 10:09, schrieb Thomas Koenig:
I wrote:
Attached is the new version of the patch, regression-tested.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-11/msg00836.html
Thanks for the review!
OK for trunk?
Ping?
Ping**2?
Thomas
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 9:38 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi!
If a type has 2 * HWI precision, sizem1 is maximum double_int (all ones)
and thus size = sizem1 + double_int_one overflows into 0. If either min0
or min1 is also zero, we might wrongly canonicalize the range into a
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
In compiling one of the very large C++ source, the compiler hit a
segfault in cddce -- the ssa_name of a vuse operand has a null def
stmt.
The def stmt was a PHI node, and later got removed by the phicprop
pass (in
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi!
var ={v} {CLOBBER};
stmts shouldn't be tsan instrumented, those aren't stores, just
markups that var's scope ends. Additionally this patch removes the
IMHO unneeded TODO_update_address_taken (discussed earlier
Hello,
reorg.c:rare_destination() tries to determine whether a given insn is
a likely destination of a branch. To make this determination, it walks
the insns chain from insn and stops at barriers, labels, return insns,
or if more than 10 jumps have been followed.
The function is supposed to
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Thomas Koenig wrote:
Ping**2?
This is OK.
Ciao!
Steven
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 8:11 AM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
Doesn't that mean that a non-GCC host compiler might fail to build
4.8 during stage1?
Yes. Fixed last week. vec needed to become a pure POD. So sad.
Diego.
Hi,
the following patch adjusts used registers for thiscall-calling
convention thunks, so that there aren't register-collisions. Issue
was that thiscall-convention has different register-usage as
regparam, but it wasn't handled.
ChangeLog
2012-11-25 Kai Tietz
PR target/55171
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Doug Evans d...@google.com wrote:
2012-11-24 Doug Evans d...@google.com
* testsuite-management/validate_failures.py: Record ordinal with
TestResult.
OK.
Diego.
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Doug Evans d...@google.com wrote:
2012-11-24 Doug Evans d...@google.com
* testsuite-management/validate_failures.py: Use target_alias
instead of
target. Minor whitespace changes.
OK.
Diego.
Hi,
the issue here is that the predefined macro __SEH__ does just indicate
that SEH-infrastructure is present. It doesn't mean that SEH is used
as exception-mechansim. Therefore the checks in libgcc's (and as
followup in libstdc++'s) eh exception-mechansim for SEH were not
regarding that there
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Doug Evans d...@google.com wrote:
Hi.
This third patch passes options.results to GetSumFiles when fetching the
results
for the clean build.
It is useful in my use cases, but I'm not sure it's useful for upstream.
[An alternative is to add another option to
Hi,
this patch fixes used exception-mechanism for SEH-enabled targets,
which are requesting for SjLj-exception-mechanism.
See also patch for libgcc.
ChangeLog
2012-11-25 Kai Tietz
PR target/55445
* libsupc++/eh_personaltity.cc (__SEH__): Additional check
for not being
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Doug Evans d...@google.com wrote:
Hi.
This fifth patch makes options a global variable.
As validate_failures.py becomes more complex, passing it around everywhere
becomes cumbersome with no real gain.
Ok to check in?
2012-11-24 Doug Evans d...@google.com
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Doug Evans d...@google.com wrote:
Hi.
This seventh patch adds new options --manifest_subdir, --manifest_name.
Useful when using validate_failures.py with a different tool, instead of gcc.
Ok to check in?
2012-11-24 Doug Evans d...@google.com
*
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Doug Evans d...@google.com wrote:
2012-11-24 Doug Evans d...@google.com
* testsuite-management/validate_failures.py: Add support for
@include, @remove
directives in manifest files.
OK. Thanks for all the cleanups and features!
Diego.
Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com writes:
Hello,
reorg.c:rare_destination() tries to determine whether a given insn is
a likely destination of a branch. To make this determination, it walks
the insns chain from insn and stops at barriers, labels, return insns,
or if more than 10 jumps
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Steven Bosscher writes:
Hello,
reorg.c:rare_destination() tries to determine whether a given insn is
a likely destination of a branch. To make this determination, it walks
the insns chain from insn and stops at barriers, labels,
Le 11/10/2012 23:49, Janus Weil a écrit :
Hi all,
here is an OOP patch for the above PR, which has two disconnected parts:
1) It fixes a problem with ASSOCIATED, when it is fed a CLASS-valued
function as argument (i.e. the ICE in the bug title). This is the
trans-intrinsic part of the patch.
Committed as Rev. 193796. I forgot to change the condition after
changing how the rounding mode is detected.
Tobias
Index: libquadmath/ChangeLog
===
--- libquadmath/ChangeLog (Revision 193792)
+++ libquadmath/ChangeLog
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 02:02:05PM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
I have been working to enable native thread-local storage on AIX. One
problem I encountered is the AIX assembler has difficulty with the
anchor symbol for TLS CSECTs. While the section anchors machinery
uses a separate pool for
Hello!
When unaligned moves were split to unaligned store/loads, mode
calculation didn't get updated. Attached patch fixes this oversight.
2012-11-25 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
* config/i386/sse.md (sse_loadussemodesuffixavxsizesuffix):
Do not depend on
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 2:09 AM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 11:45 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
Removing the note is easier but it may hurt optimization later on:
CSE2 puts the note back in but this introduces a pass ordering
dependency. Perhaps that's not a big problem, but
On Sun, 25 Nov 2012, Steven Bosscher wrote:
stop_search_p will reach the default case on DEBUG_INSN, and the
default case is gcc_unreachable(). I suppose this means nobody is
using DWARF3+ on a dbr_sched target, it can't possibly ever have
worked. Eric?
There must be something else
Hello!
Otherwise, we can generate real memcpy call for certain targets
(corei7) that interferes with shrink-wrapping.
2012-11-25 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
* gcc.target/i386/sw-1.c (dg-options): Add -mtune=generic.
Tested on x86_64-linux-gnu, committed to mainline SVN.
Uros.
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 12:59:48PM +0100, Steven Bosscher wrote:
stop_search_p will reach the default case on DEBUG_INSN, and the
default case is gcc_unreachable(). I suppose this means nobody is
using DWARF3+ on a dbr_sched target, it can't possibly ever have
worked. Eric?
Isn't dbr
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 11:09 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 12:59:48PM +0100, Steven Bosscher wrote:
stop_search_p will reach the default case on DEBUG_INSN, and the
default case is gcc_unreachable(). I suppose this means nobody is
using DWARF3+ on a
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 2:09 AM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 11:45 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
Removing the note is easier but it may hurt optimization later on:
CSE2 puts the note back in but this introduces a pass
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 9:55 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 9:10 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 03:35:45PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Hi,
this patch
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
Do you want to handle TLS_MODEL_EMULATED that way? If not, the test
should be DECL_THREAD_LOCAL_P (decl) (I believe you want that),
if yes, perhaps DECL_TLS_MODEL (decl) != TLS_MODEL_NONE.
Thanks for pointing this out. I
38 matches
Mail list logo
