On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Konstantin Serebryany
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The attached patch is the libsanitizer merge from upstream r171973.
>
> Lots of changes. Among other things:
> - slow CFI-based unwinder (off by default for now)
> - more interceptors in asan (read, pread, etc)
> - prec
Hi,
Update my e-mail address in MAINTAINERS file.
Committed:
2013-01-10 Naveen H.S
* MAINTAINERS (Write After Approval): Update e-mail address.--- gcc/MAINTAINERS 2013-01-10 11:46:59.886102413 +0530
+++ gcc/MAINTAINERS 2013-01-10 11:34:31.554115235 +0530
@@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ Manfred
Gary Funck noted that vrp06.c has two tests with the same output. After
further investigation it was clear that expected output strings were too
lenient and were in fact masking a missed optimization.
This patch tightens the expected output from the vrp dump which has the
side effect of mak
I still think a bogus error only with --enable-checking doesn't merit
P1, but it's still worth fixing. The problem was that the typeid code
hadn't been SFINAEd yet.
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk.
commit 0b605fda3f97fd69b8106f096109535881413c83
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Wed
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 02:57:00PM -0800, Mike Stump wrote:
> Ok for 2.8?
Not to 2.8, but to 4.8 it is ok.
> http://gcc.gnu.org/PR31150 is the PR when the assert was added, if you want
> to see it. svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@142892 is the change itself.
That actually didn't add the as
Hi!
We weren't processing GIMPLE_ASMs that set complex SSA_NAMEs, which lead to
SSA_NAMEs with NULL SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT, either leading to crashes or silent
wrong code, depending on --enable-checking. Fixed thusly,
bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
2013-01-09 Ja
I found an assert that trips on my port for trivial constructs, often. I'd
like to remove it, so that my port works better. The assert was added because
the case analysis he did was for when BLKmode MEM stores appeared in back when
he wrote the patch (Hi Jakub). He didn't analyze when dealing
Hi,
currently Mozilla does not build with undefined symbol on
error: /tmp/cc0oq4BG.ltrans1.ltrans.o: requires dynamic R_X86_64_PC32 reloc
against '_ZN12SkAnnotationC1ER23SkFlattenableReadBuffer' which may overflow at
runtime; recompile with -fPIC
This is actually bug in Mozilla (the module is cal
> This fixes PR55882 - set_mem_attributes_minus_bitpos misses to
> account for the to-be applied bitpos when computing MEM_ALIGN.
> It extracts alignment from 't' instead of &t - bitpos.
>
> Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, bootstrap
> and regtest running on mips.
>
> Does thi
On 01/07/2013 01:42 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
For optimizations it's a bit more difficult.
Somewhat. For what I'm suggesting, the way we'd miss an optimization
would be if by removing the unreachable block and simplifying the CFG we
ultimately remove a conditional which produced a result whic
On 01/07/2013 01:42 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
typedef enum fruits { banana = 0, apple = 1, pear = 2, orange = 3 } fruit;
extern void price_fruit_of_the_day (int);
void
discount_of_the_day (fruit f)
{
int p, c = (int) f;
switch (f)
{
case banana:
UNREACHABLE ();
case a
The patch is OK. Thanks!
Tobias
Uros Bizjak wrote:
The regexp in the scan string assumes that dumped temporaries have
exactly 4 numbers. Sometimes, this is not the case.
Attached patch fixes scan string to match a number with arbitrary
number of places instead.
2012-01-09 Uros Bizjak
Hello!
The regexp in the scan string assumes that dumped temporaries have
exactly 4 numbers. Sometimes, this is not the case.
Attached patch fixes scan string to match a number with arbitrary
number of places instead.
2012-01-09 Uros Bizjak
* gfortran.dg/intrinsic_size_3.f90: Make sc
Richard Biener writes:
> On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>>> Eric, any comments?
>>
>> Richard's patch seems fine to me, modulo the name of the routine; I'd rather
>> use maybe_emit_group_store or something along these lines.
>
> Ok, fine with me - you're clearly more experie
My fix for PR 49673 made it so that objects with constant initialization
semantics through constexpr can go into rodata now. But objects with
non-trivial destruction semantics still need to go into writable data so
that the destructor can modify the object.
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applyin
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> No matter whether LRA (if it is a bug in there) is fixed or not,
>> *vec_concatv2df could handle for !avx sse3 x <- x, 1 alternative the same
>> as it handles x <- m, 1 alternative (using movddup).
>>
>> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux
Le 09/01/2013 17:22, Tobias Burnus a écrit :
However, I still believe that we should do something -std=gnu.
Hm, reject?
One can't declare a procedure with one type on one side, and another
different type on the other side and expect things to work.
We don't support passing integer as real, or
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 7:14 AM, Alexander Ivchenko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have test fail for gcc.dg/cpp/trad/include.c on Android. The
> reason for that is that
> -ftraditional-cpp is not expected to work on Android due to variadic
> macro (like #define __builtin_warning(x, y...))
> in standard hea
The following patch fixes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55829
The patch was successfully bootstrapped on x86-64.
Committed as rev. 195057.
2013-01-09 Vladimir Makarov
PR rtl-optimization/pr55829
* lra-constraints.c (match_reload): Add code for absent output
Hello!
Jakub noticed that we declare the mode of movddup insn inconistently
as V2DF or DF. Calculation of various prefixes for certain non-AVX sse
insns depends on correct definition of insn mode; for V2DFmode
prefix_data16 is added and for DFmode, prefix_rep is added. In case of
movddup, the late
Hi,
Attached is a patch that implements support for AdvSIMD instruction LD1R.
Tested on aarch64-none-elf. OK for trunk?
Thanks,
Tejas Belagod
ARM.
2013-01-09 Tejas Belagod
gcc/
* config/aarch64/aarch64-simd.md (*aarch64_simd_ld1r): New.
* config/aarch64/iterators.md (VALLDI
Hi,
Attached is a patch that implements support for AdvSIMD instruction LD1R.
Tested on aarch64-none-elf. OK to commit on aarch64-4.7-branch?
Thanks,
Tejas Belagod
ARM.
2013-01-09 Tejas Belagod
gcc/
* config/aarch64/aarch64-simd.md (*aarch64_simd_ld1r): New.
* config/aarch
Am 08.01.2013 21:07, schrieb Janne Blomqvist:
As written before, I believe that the patch avoids some pitfalls with C
interoperability of logical variables: On one hand, it improves
cross-compiler portability by rejecting non C_BOOL ones with
-std=f2003/f2008/f2008ts;
This part is certainly ok.
On 01/09/2013 10:02 AM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
As the argument 'the_truth()' we care about is type dependant,
uses_template_parms returns true and so convert_nontype_argument is
never called.
Right, but we should call it for the instantiated argument, too. We do
that for class templates by cal
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
> Gabriel Dos Reis writes:
>
>> We already have various predicates to test for constant
>> expressions so I am uneasy to add yet another one.
>
> I understand. I got lost in the number of existing predicates to test
> for constant expression
Gabriel Dos Reis writes:
> We already have various predicates to test for constant
> expressions so I am uneasy to add yet another one.
I understand. I got lost in the number of existing predicates to test
for constant expressions, to the point that I thought (wrongly) the one
I wanted wasn't
Hi,
We have test fail for gcc.dg/cpp/trad/include.c on Android. The
reason for that is that
-ftraditional-cpp is not expected to work on Android due to variadic
macro (like #define __builtin_warning(x, y...))
in standard headers and traditional preprocessor cannot handle them.
The attached pat
Hi Guys,
I am checking in the patch below to fix the V850's floating point
comparison patterns, which was inverted in many places. The also
includes a contribution from Nguyen Duy Dat at Renesas which adds
floating point conditional store patterns and floating point
conditional branch p
Hi,
this patch fixes problem with negative probabilities that result in overflow on
ITERATION_BOUND parameter that is taken from niter code returning wider values
than int. I went for gcov_type instead of HOST_WIDE_INT because it makes sense
to derive the bounds from profile, too.
Will commit it
Jason Merrill writes:
> On 01/08/2013 08:58 AM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
>> There, when we check the argument 'the_truth()' to see if it
>> actually is a constant expression, in check_instantiated_arg, we fail
>> to recognize its constexpr-ness b/c we just look at its TREE_CONSTANT.
>
> The problem
The C++ change is OK.
Jason
OK.
Jason
>
> Ugh. Both to stmt_dominates_stmt_p and to this (both use loops).
> For stmt_dominates_stmt_p you'd simply use GIMPLE uids as other
> passes do (and compute them, of course), for the above you'd
> alongside of the UID store a sequence number that increments
> at each stmt with side-effect. UI
Forgot this hunk in last change.
Dave
--
J. David Anglin dave.ang...@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca
National Research Council of Canada (613) 990-0752 (FAX: 952-6602)
2013-01-09 John David Anglin
* config/pa/pa.c (pa_emit_move_sequence): Replace calls to
On 09/01/13 10:12, Hurugalawadi, Naveen wrote:
Hi,
It would be much appreciated if you would
handle the back port to ARM/aarch64-4.7-branch
Thanks for reviewing the patch and your comments.
Please find attached the backported patch to ARM/aarch64-4.7-branch.
Regressed for aarch64-elf on aarc
This fixes PR55882 - set_mem_attributes_minus_bitpos misses to
account for the to-be applied bitpos when computing MEM_ALIGN.
It extracts alignment from 't' instead of &t - bitpos.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, bootstrap
and regtest running on mips.
Does this look sensible
Alexandre Oliva writes:
> +int
> +main ()
> +{
> + int i;
> + char c;
> + char arr[11];
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < 10; i++)
> +{
> + c = 0x30 + i;
> + foo (&arr[i], c); /* { dg-final { gdb-test 24 "i" "c - 48" } } */
> +}
> +
> + __builtin_printf ("arr = %s\n", arr);
The stri
Hello Maxim,
>>
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
@@ -29146,7 +29146,7 @@ make_name (tree decl, const char *suffix, bool
make_unique)
return global_var_name;
}
-#if defined (ASM_OUTPUT_TYPE_DIRECTIVE) && HAVE_GNU_INDIRECT_FUNCTION
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 02:32:24PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Martin Jambor wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 01:26:23AM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> as discused in the PR log there seems to be ordering issue in
> >> update_indirect_
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 11:11:13AM +0100, Tom de Vries wrote:
> OK for trunk after I've tested this on mips64?
Yes, thanks.
> 2013-01-09 Tom de Vries
>
> PR middle-end/55890
> * calls.c (expand_call): Check if arg_nr is valid.
>
> Index: gcc/calls.c
>
Hi,
>> It would be much appreciated if you would
>> handle the back port to ARM/aarch64-4.7-branch
Thanks for reviewing the patch and your comments.
Please find attached the backported patch to ARM/aarch64-4.7-branch.
Regressed for aarch64-elf on aarch64-4.7-branch.
Thanks,
Naveen.H.S
2013-01
Richard,
I've build r195008 for target mips64-linux-gnu with low optimization level
({CFLAGS,CXXFLAGS,BOOT_CFLAGS}='-g -O0'), and noticed failures for
gcc.dg/torture/pr55890-{1,2,3}.c at -O0 and -O1 (which are not there without the
low optimization level).
The -O1 pr55890-1.c failure looks like t
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 9:00 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> No matter whether LRA (if it is a bug in there) is fixed or not,
> *vec_concatv2df could handle for !avx sse3 x <- x, 1 alternative the same
> as it handles x <- m, 1 alternative (using movddup).
>
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and
On Tue, 8 Jan 2013, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> Hi,
> here is even more updated patch, this time really fixing the testcase, I hope
> ;)
> It turns out there is one extra problem in tree-ssa-loop-niter.c triggered by
> that code. Some bounds, like one based on inequality test or with wrapping
> IVs are
On Tue, 8 Jan 2013, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> This is Steven's patch from the PR plus mine hunk, bootstrapped/regtested on
> x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
Ok.
Thanks,
Richard.
> 2013-01-08 Steven Bosscher
> Jakub Jelinek
>
> PR tree-optimization/48189
>
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 01/08/2013 04:26 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>
>>
>> The issue is VRP - when you remove unreachable blocks you lose the
>> conditional statement as it is no longer necessary and thus the predicate
>> you can derive value-ranges from.
>
> Understoo
On Wed, 9 Jan 2013, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 9:32 PM, Leif Ekblad wrote:
> > After some new suggestions from Uros, I've made a new diff.
> >
> >
> > Change log:
> > * config/gthr.m4: Added rdos thread header.
> > * gcc/config/i386/i386.c: Provided a way to define a default sett
On Tue, 8 Jan 2013, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 5:14 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > After the Ada fix including gmp.h from system.h is trivial
> > (by means of double-int.h it was included from almost everywhere
> > already)
> >
> > Bootstrapped on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, testin
48 matches
Mail list logo
