Re: [C++] DR1473 - let literal operators be defined with empty user-defined string literal

On 06/26/2013 05:01 PM, Jason Merrill wrote: On 06/26/2013 09:43 AM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote: + if (bad_encoding_prefix) +error (invalid encoding prefix in literal operator); + { +tree string_tree = USERDEF_LITERAL_VALUE (token-u.value); No need to open a nested block for a

Folding (a ? b : c) op d

Hello, this patch changes the test deciding whether to fold op d with both branches in (a ? b : c) op d. I don't know if the new test is right, it gives what I expect on the new testcase, but I may have missed important cases. Cc: Eric for comments as the author of the previous conditions.

Re: [patch] regex_traits implementation

Thank you for response! On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 7:08 AM, Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com wrote: Very nice to see progress in this area! Obvious question - I may have missed past discussions: is your paperwork, the copyright assignment, Ok? Otherwise, unfortunately, the technical review

Re: Unordered container insertion hints

Patch applied, I also needed to update some dg-error line numbers, it was not part of the original patch. The only remaining thing will be to update the doxygen links on the unordered containers to point to the new hint doc. 2013-06-29 François Dumont fdum...@gcc.gnu.org *

Re: [patch] regex_traits implementation

On 29 June 2013 08:16, Tim Shen wrote: Thank you for response! On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 7:08 AM, Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com wrote: Very nice to see progress in this area! Obvious question - I may have missed past discussions: is your paperwork, the copyright assignment, Ok?