Hello Richard,
I used the SPU code in GCC as example for creating an r5900_single_format
structure. The patch is attached to the e-mail. I want to submit this patch.
> >> * removing the ISA_HAS_LDC1_SDC1 setting. I realise what you did
> >> describes the reality of the processor, but the prob
Hello,
the first attached patch does not bootstrap and has at least 2 main
issues. The second patch does pass bootstrap+testsuite, but I liked the
first more...
First, the fold-const bit causes an assertion failure (building libjava)
in combine_cond_expr_cond, which calls:
t = fold_binar
Alexander Ivchenko Mon, 29 Apr 2013 23:24:55 -0700
2013/4/29 Mike Stump :
On Jan 9, 2013, at 7:14 AM, Alexander Ivchenko wrote:
We have test fail for gcc.dg/cpp/trad/include.c on Android. The
reason for that is that
-ftraditional-cpp is not expected to work on Android due to variadic
macro (l
Index: ChangeLog
===
--- ChangeLog (revision 200737)
+++ ChangeLog (working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2013-07-06 Bruce Korb
+
+ * inclhack.def (cdef_cplusplus): removed, per Bug 51776
+
2013-05-23 Alexander Ivchenko
* inclhack.
Hello!
While ATT dialect doesn't care about pointer sizes, Intel dialect
requires correct pointer size decorations.
Attached patch introduces correct pointer size overrides, and fixes
all instructions, so gcc.target/i386/sse-13.c mega-testcase compiles
without problems with -masm=intel. Unfortuna
Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>Hi!
>
>Attached are two versions of a patch to teach VRP about the int bitop
>builtins. Both patches are identical for all builtins but
>__builtin_c[lt]z*, which are the only two from these that are
>documented
>to have undefined behavior on some argument (0).
>
>The first