On Tue, 1 Oct 2013, Tom G. Christensen wrote:
> Testresults for 4.5.4:
> i386-pc-solaris2.8 (2)
> i386-pc-solaris2.9
> sparc-sun-solaris2.7 (2)
> sparc-sun-solaris2.8
> sparc-sun-solaris2.9
> sparc64-sun-solaris2.7
> sparc64-sun-solaris2.8
> sparc64-sun-solaris2.9
Thanks, Tom.
Ger
On Tue, 1 Oct 2013, Tom G. Christensen wrote:
> Latest results for gcc 4.7.x.
Applied, thanks!
Gerald
Richard,
This patch fixes line number data for the PIC register setup code for ARM,
resulting in 174 removed FAILs for the gdb testsuite with -fPIC.
Consider break.c (minimized from gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/break.c):
...
1 void *v;
2 void a (void *x) { }
3 void b (void) { }
4
Hi,
today I noticed that in cp_parser_lookup_name the code in the
object_type != NULL_TREE else can be tidied a bit and a lookup_name_real
often avoided. Tested x86_64-linux.
Thanks,
Paolo.
/
2013-10-14 Paolo Carlini
* parser.c (cp_parser_lookup_name): Tid
This fixes an ICE on a rare conjunction of pragma Inline_Always, 2-element
array and uninitialized local variable.
Tested on x86_64-suse-linux, applied on the mainline.
2013-10-13 Eric Botcazou
* gcc-interface/decl.c (gnat_to_gnu_entity) : Force all local
variables with aggr
Chung-Ju Wu writes:
> + push_p ? false : true,
Minor nit, but I think the normal GCC style would be to use !push_p here.
Thanks for your patience in dealing with all my comments. All three
subparts look good to me with the change above and the on
This patch implements the following semantic rule of aspect Depends:
The input set of a subprogram is the explicit input set of the subprogram
augmented with those formal parameters of mode out having discriminants, array
bounds, or a tag which can be read and whose values are not implied by the
s
Chung-Ju Wu writes:
> + /* If operands[1] is a large constant and cannot be performed
> + move behavior with single instruction, we need to split it. */
Suggest "...cannot by performed by a single instruction..."
> + high20_rtx = GEN_INT ((INTVAL (operands[1]) >> 12) << 12);
Better t
This implements four new pragmas, Pre, Pre_Class, Post, Post_Class
that are intended to closely mirrir the four corresponding aspects
Pre, Pre'Class, Post, and Post'Class. They inherit the same set of
restrictions as these aspects. In particular, a given aspect can be
specified only once for a give
This change removes incorrect obsolete code for CLOCK_MONOTONIC support
on AIX, and fixes a wrong mapping of the clockid_t type on that target.
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed on trunk
2013-10-13 Thomas Quinot
* s-oscons-tmplt.c (CLOCK_RT_Ada): Set to CLOCK_MONOTONIC when
The special SPARK expansion used for formal verification special-cased
calls to introduce temporaries for actuals in some cases. This is not
needed anymore, and this could prevent detection of aliasing later, so
it has been removed.
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed on trunk
2013-10-13 Ya
The special SPARK expansion used for formal verification special-cased the
attributes Old and Result. This is not needed anymore.
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed on trunk
2013-10-13 Yannick Moy
* exp_spark.adb (Expand_SPARK_N_Attribute_Reference): Remove procedure.
(E
I forgot to remove it when I removed the associated code back in June.
Tested on x86_64-suse-linux, applied on the mainline and 4.8 branch.
2013-10-13 Eric Botcazou
* gcc-interface/decl.c (gnat_to_gnu_param): Remove obsolete comment.
--
Eric BotcazouIndex: gcc-interface/decl.c
===
Changes compared to previous version of patch:
This patch only includes -Wfloat-conversion in -Wconversion, it does not
include it in -Wextra
It also changes several testcases to use -Wfloat-conversion instead of
-Wconversion
A split out patch to make the floating conversions explicit is attached
a
This is a problem with note distribution in the combiner present on the
mainline. From:
(insn 19 18 21 2 (parallel [
(set (reg:SI 83 [ D.1762 ])
(neg:SI (reg:SI 90 [ D.1762 ])))
(clobber (reg:CC 17 flags))
]) ../pr58662.c:17 464 {*negsi2_1}
(e
> But if zero-sized arrays everywhere in a structure is valid C,
> then the attached test case is a valid test case.
Not necessarily, you can write the declaration but you cannot index the array,
i.e. this is undefined behavior. And there is nothing new, distinct fields
have been disambiguated
Hi Eric,
>> Would you agree that this "error: flexible array member"
>> should also be emitted for a zero-sized array member,
>> maybe as "error: zero-sized array member not at end of struct"?
>
> I would have answered yes when zero-sized arrays where introduced, but it's
> far less clear a couple
> Would you agree that this "error: flexible array member"
> should also be emitted for a zero-sized array member,
> maybe as "error: zero-sized array member not at end of struct"?
I would have answered yes when zero-sized arrays where introduced, but it's
far less clear a couple of decades later
*PING*: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-10/msg00018.html
Additionally, I'd like to early ping for the do concurrent patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-10/msg00022.html , even if the ME
review is still pending.
Tobias Burnus wrote:
The patch is rather obvious. The question is just wh
19 matches
Mail list logo
