On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 09:09:03AM -0800, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
2) for tsan querying of data symbols, apparently the classes want to see
not just the symbol name and start value, but also size. libbacktrace
has all this info available, just doesn't pass it down to the callback.
Hi Jakub,
Thanks for the remarks. Updated patch is attached, and my answers are below.
This will add into the table all omp declare target functions, but you
actually want there only the outlined #pragma omp target bodies.
The question is how to find them here reliably. At least ignoring
On 18/11/13 17:09, Peter Bergner wrote:
On Mon, 2013-11-18 at 10:05 +0100, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
With the patch the htm-nofloat-2 testcase fails. Due to the
returns_twice flag on tbegin the optimizers fail to fold the
compares of the condition code and the s390_optimize_nonescaping_tx
Il 18/11/2013 20:09, Jan Hubicka ha scritto:
this patch switches the default for fat-lto-objects as was documented
for a while.
-ffat-lto-objects doubles compilation time and often makes users to not
notice that
LTO was not used at all (because they forgot to use gcc-ar/gcc-nm
Hello,
I will need for my further patch more general usage of
coverage_compute_cfg_checksum function, so that I added new argument.
Is the patch OK?
Thank you,
Martin
diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog
index d759d4c..32ffc2e 100644
--- a/gcc/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8
On Mon, 18 Nov 2013, David Malcolm wrote:
On Fri, 2013-11-15 at 20:38 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
On Wed, 2013-11-13 at 14:44 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, 13 Nov 2013, David Malcolm wrote:
On Wed, 2013-11-13 at 13:53 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, 13 Nov 2013,
On Tue, 19 Nov 2013, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Hi,
this patch fixes two issues with memcpy testcase - silences warning and
updates
the template as suggested by Uros in the PR. The testcase still fails on
i386.
This is because we end up with:
;; Function t (t, funcdef_no=0, decl_uid=1763,
yep, all good performance-wise :)
Great, Thanks Kyrill.
Ok for trunk ?
Yvan
On 14 November 2013 17:25, James Greenhalgh james.greenha...@arm.com wrote:
Now, every insn has a type, we don't need v8type anymore.
This patch removes v8type.
Tested on aarch64-none-elf with no regression.
OK?
OK
/Marcus
Thanks! Do I need any other maintainer's approval or can I go ahead
and commit, after checking for test regressions and boot-strap parity?
Steven's approval is sufficient here.
--
Eric Botcazou
Hello,
On 15 Nov 20:03, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
Ping?
Ping?
--
Thanks, K
Hello,
On 15 Nov 20:05, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
Is it ok for trunk?
Ping.
Ping.
--
Thanks, K
Hello,
On 15 Nov 20:06, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
Ping.
Ping.
--
Thanks, K
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 10:35:50PM +, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
Attached, please find a patch that will implement SIMD enabled functions
for C targeting the gomp-4_0-branch. Here are the ChangeLog entries. Is
this OK to install?
Have you tested say:
int func9 (int x, int y) __attribute__
Adding back Richard.
On 19 Nov 12:07, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
Hello,
On 15 Nov 20:05, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
Is it ok for trunk?
Ping.
Ping.
--
Thanks, K
Hello,
On 15 Nov 20:07, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
Is it ok for trunk?
Ping.
Ping.
--
Thanks, K
Hello,
On 15 Nov 20:09, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
Is it ok for trunk?
Ping.
Ping.
--
Thanks, K
Alan Modra amo...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 11:16:26AM +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 01:27:39AM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Where does it call a varargs function?
printf
Sorry that wasn't such a helpful response.
Here, really:
res =
Hello,
On 15 Nov 20:10, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
Is it ok to commit to main trunk?
Ping.
Ping.
--
Thanks, K
This fixes a predcom ICE where it commons a combination of two
loads but with the combination being conditionally executed.
It's not prepared to handle this situation, disabled with
the following.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied to
trunk and 4.8 branch for now.
On 13 November 2013 00:04, Andrew Pinski
andrew.pin...@caviumnetworks.com wrote:
Hi all,
This patch implements the trap pattern for the AARCH64 back-end. I
used the brk #0 instruction as that is the breakpoint instruction
that GDB uses. I looked at what other targets did when the
instruction
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 09:50:56AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
this patch fixes two issues with memcpy testcase - silences warning and
updates
the template as suggested by Uros in the PR. The testcase still fails on
i386.
This is because we end up with:
;; Function t (t,
On 15 November 2013 16:52, Tejas Belagod tbela...@arm.com wrote:
Hi,
The attached patch fixes all the reduc_* expansions to be BE-safe by moving
the scalar result to the LSB where RTL expects it. While moving it also adds
patterns that will give gcc the freedom to choose between
On 18 November 2013 18:02, Cesar Philippidis ce...@codesourcery.com wrote:
gcc.c-torture/execute/20101011-1.c test on aarch64. The reason why this
test fails is because aarch64 does not trap on integer division by zero.
Is this OK for trunk? If so, please commit it because I do not have an
It's not desirable since gcc easily loses track of alignment, for instance
with -mstrict-align
void foo (char *p, char *q)
{
__builtin_memcpy (p, q, 4);
}
generates
lbz 7,0(4)
lbz 8,1(4)
lbz 10,2(4)
lbz 9,3(4)
stb 7,0(3)
stb 8,1(3)
On Mon, 18 Nov 2013, Cong Hou wrote:
I tried your method and it works well for doubles. But for float,
there is an issue. For the following gimple code:
c1 = a - b;
c2 = a + b;
c = VEC_PERM c1, c2, [0,5,2,7]
It needs two instructions to implement the VEC_PERM operation in
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 10:50:10PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Mon, 18 Nov 2013, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
@@ -43,6 +44,7 @@
TARGET_OPTF. */
#include tm_p.h /* For C_COMMON_OVERRIDE_OPTIONS. */
+
#ifndef DOLLARS_IN_IDENTIFIERS
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:09 AM, bin.cheng bin.ch...@arm.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Bernd Schmidt [mailto:ber...@codesourcery.com]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 8:05 PM
To: Bin Cheng
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH GCC]Compute, cache and use cost of
On 18/11/13 20:19, Cong Hou wrote:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Richard Earnshaw rearn...@arm.com wrote:
On 15/11/13 02:06, Cong Hou wrote:
Hi
This patch adds the support to two non-isomorphic operations addsub
and subadd for SLP vectorizer. More non-isomorphic operations can be
added
On 14 Nov 11:27, Richard Biener wrote:
+ /* Set when symbol needs to be dumped for lto/offloading. */
+ unsigned need_dump : 1;
+
That's very non-descriptive. What's offloading? But yes, something
like this is what I was asking for.
I've changed it into:
Set when symbol needs to be
On 2013.11.19 at 09:44 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 18/11/2013 20:09, Jan Hubicka ha scritto:
this patch switches the default for fat-lto-objects as was documented
for a while.
-ffat-lto-objects doubles compilation time and often makes users to
not notice that
LTO was not
On 2013.11.19 at 09:44 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 18/11/2013 20:09, Jan Hubicka ha scritto:
this patch switches the default for fat-lto-objects as was
documented for a while.
-ffat-lto-objects doubles compilation time and often makes users to
not notice that
LTO
- Original Message -
This is not a review, but:
* What do you need from rtl.h? It's generally best for GIMPLE passes to
avoid rtl.h where possible (and if you can avoid it, the next question is
whether you can also avoid tm.h).
Yes, for now rtl.h, tm.h and tm_p.h headers can be
Il 19/11/2013 11:05, Markus Trippelsdorf ha scritto:
On 2013.11.19 at 09:44 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 18/11/2013 20:09, Jan Hubicka ha scritto:
this patch switches the default for fat-lto-objects as was documented
for a while.
-ffat-lto-objects doubles compilation time and often makes
Hi Maintainers,
This is RFC patch that adds machine descriptions to support stack
smashing protection in AArch64.
I have written a very simple patch that prints stack set and stack
test as template of instructions.
I had 2 assumptions.
1) For stack_protect_set and stack_protect_test, I
used
PING...
this patch still needs review:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg00133.html
Thanks.
on i686-pc-linux-gnu the test case gcc.target/i386/intrinsics_4.c fails
because of
an internal compiler error, see PR58155.
The reason for this is that the optab CODE_FOR_movv8sf is
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 04:30:21PM +0530, Venkataramanan Kumar wrote:
This is RFC patch that adds machine descriptions to support stack
smashing protection in AArch64.
Most of the testsuite changes look wrong. The fact that aarch64
gets stack protector support doesn't mean all other targets do
*Ping*
This is one of many bugs blocking bootstrap on ARM. It would be
helpful if the fix could be reviewed and, if correct, for it to go
in.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg01820.html
Thanks,
James
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 03:10:49PM +, Martin Jambor wrote:
Perfect, thanks a
On 2013.11.19 at 11:54 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 19/11/2013 11:05, Markus Trippelsdorf ha scritto:
On 2013.11.19 at 09:44 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 18/11/2013 20:09, Jan Hubicka ha scritto:
this patch switches the default for fat-lto-objects as was documented
for a while.
Il 19/11/2013 12:19, Markus Trippelsdorf ha scritto:
So, maybe it is just time to upgrade libtool everywhere in gnu-land?
Yes, that would be better but no need to do that now.
So would Patches 1 and 2 be OK in the interim?
Yes. And Jan's answer suggests that patch 3 is not necessary
Hi all,
This patch implements the CRC32 intrinsics that map down to the optional CRC32
instructions in ARMv8-A as defined by ACLE. They are exposed by a new header
file: arm_acle.h which can be included in user programs similarly to the
existing arm_neon.h header.
To enable the use of these
Hello!
2013-11-19 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
* gcc.dg/c11-complex-1.c: Use dg-add-options ieee.
Tested on alphaev68-pc-linux-gnu, committed to mainline SVN.
Uros.
Index: gcc.dg/c11-complex-1.c
===
---
Hi Richard,
Can I get an approval or some feedback from you about the patch?
Regards,
Yufeng
On 11/13/13 23:25, Yufeng Zhang wrote:
On 11/13/13 20:54, Bill Schmidt wrote:
Hi Yufeng,
The second version of your original patch is ok with me with the
following changes.
Thanks a lot for the
Dull series, sorry, but this is another change taken from wide-int.
After checking host_integerp (now tree_fits_[su]hwi_p), the preferred way
of getting the HWI seemed to be tree_low_cst (now tree_to_[su]hwi).
This series mops up some cases where TREE_INT_CST_LOW was used directly.
Tested on
check_function_arguments_recurse has an assert that is equivalent
to tree_fits_uhwi_p. The extraction can then use tree_to_uhwi.
Asserting here makes the intent obvious, but tree_to_uhwi also asserts
for the same thing, so an alternative would be to use tree_to_uhwi on
its own.
Thanks,
Richard
Hello Eric,
On 2013-09-19 09:23, Eric Botcazou wrote:
I don't expect that this will be back ported to GCC 4.8. You also need
Binutils 2.24 for this.
From a SPARC maintainership viewpoint, I'd think that this is backportable for
the upcoming 4.8.2 release, and the patches are essentially
The (x c) c folding has:
tree_fits_shwi_p (arg1)
TREE_INT_CST_LOW (arg1) prec
tree_fits_shwi_p (TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 1))
TREE_INT_CST_LOW (TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 1)) prec)
At first glance the use of tree_fits_shwi_p rather than tree_fits_uhwi_p
made me
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/08/13 02:02, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
Hi,
Here is an updated patch version with no langhook.
Regarding TLS objects issue - I do not think compiler should compensate
the absence of instrumentation in libraries. Compiler
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 8:12 PM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com wrote:
2013/11/18 Jeff Law l...@redhat.com:
On 11/18/13 11:27, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
How does pointer passed to regular function differ from pointer passed
to splitted function? How do I know then which pointer is to be
This is a case where tree_to_shwi can be used instead of TREE_INT_CST_LOW.
I separated it out because it was using a signed x * y / y == x to check
whether x * y overflows a HWI, which relies on undefined behaviour.
Thanks,
Richard
gcc/
* tree-ssa-alias.c
This patch just changes TREE_INT_CST_LOW to tree_to_[su]hwi in cases
where there is already a protecting tree_fits_[su]hwi_p. I've upped
the number of context lines in case that helps, but there are still
some hunks where the tree_fits_* call is too high up.
Thanks,
Richard
gcc/ada/
2013-11-19
On 19 Nov 13:00, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/08/13 02:02, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
Hi,
Here is an updated patch version with no langhook.
Regarding TLS objects issue - I do not think compiler should compensate
the
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 10:03:53PM +0100, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Mon, 18 Nov 2013, Trevor Saunders wrote:
This patch adds a class auto_vec which releases its internal
storage in its destructor, but unlike stack_vec
2013/11/19 Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 8:12 PM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com wrote:
2013/11/18 Jeff Law l...@redhat.com:
On 11/18/13 11:27, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
How does pointer passed to regular function differ from pointer passed
to splitted
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 10:38:49PM +0400, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
2013/11/18 Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 02:28:58PM +0400, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
Hi,
Here is a patch to disable propagation of bounded values.
Why do ypu need to do this? If the problem is
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 02:46:19PM -0500, Trevor Saunders wrote:
2013-11-18 Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
gcc/
* vec.h (auto_vec): New class.
* cfganal.c cfgloop.c cgraphunit.c config/i386/i386.c dwarf2out.c
function.c genautomata.c gimple.c haifa-sched.c ipa-inline.c
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 2:45 AM, Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com wrote:
When implementing C11 _Alignas in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-11/msg00841.html, I noted
that I has omitted checks that alignment was supported (which, as
constraints in C11, should be errors or pedwarns
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:17 AM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
It looks OK to me.
Thanks. Committed as rev 205023.
Ian, the Go front end will need that patch committed now.
Diego.
On 2013.11.19 at 11:21 +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
On 2013.11.19 at 09:44 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 18/11/2013 20:09, Jan Hubicka ha scritto:
this patch switches the default for fat-lto-objects as was
documented for a while.
-ffat-lto-objects doubles compilation time and
Hello,
This patch introduces new SHA instructions described in [1]
along with tests.
Testing:
1. Bootstrap pass.
2. make check shows no regressions.
3. Spec 2000 2006 build show no regressions both with and without -mavx512f
option.
4. Spec 2000 2006 run shows no stability regressions
Hi,
this is update of my 2012 patch to move rtl loop peeling (the one based on
profile feedback) to tree level. Peeling expose new optimization oppurtunities
and it is good idea to have gimple passes to see them. Moreover we probably
want to hook in a new heuristic that use value histograms of
Hmm, gcc/gcc.c still reads:
690 /* Conditional to test whether the LTO plugin is used or not.
691FIXME: For slim LTO we will need to enable plugin unconditionally.
This
692still cause problems with PLUGIN_LD != LD and when plugin is built but
693not useable. For GCC 4.6
On Tue, 19 Nov 2013, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Hmm, gcc/gcc.c still reads:
690 /* Conditional to test whether the LTO plugin is used or not.
691FIXME: For slim LTO we will need to enable plugin unconditionally.
This
692still cause problems with PLUGIN_LD != LD and when plugin
This fixes PR58956 where we TER a load into a call statement lhs
that is modified by the call. TER already has measures to avoid
doing this for regular assignments so the following simply
extends it to arbitrary stmts (including ASMs).
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu,
Hi All,
We found out that compiler configured with '-fpmath=sse' option does
not generate scalar floating-point instructions present in the SSE
instruction set for generic32 that leads to performance degradation
for Fortran benchmarks using library functions in 32-bit mode.
This simple fix was
graphite-sese-to-poly.c needs expr.h to compile. Fixed thusly and
checked in as revision 205027.
Andrew
* graphite-sese-to-poly.c: Include expr.h.
Index: graphite-sese-to-poly.c
===
*** graphite-sese-to-poly.c (revision 205024)
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 5:31 AM, Yuri Rumyantsev ysrum...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
We found out that compiler configured with '-fpmath=sse' option does
not generate scalar floating-point instructions present in the SSE
instruction set for generic32 that leads to performance degradation
for
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Andrew MacLeod amacl...@redhat.com wrote:
graphite-sese-to-poly.c needs expr.h to compile. Fixed thusly and checked
in as revision 205027.
Thanks!
Diego.
Resend modified ChangeLog:
2013-11-20 Yuri Rumyantsev ysrum...@gmail.com
PR target/57756
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_option_override_internal): Add missed
argument prefix for 'ix86_fpmath'.
* config/i386/ssemath.h: Add missed definition of
TARGET_FPMATH_DEFAULT_P macros.
2013/11/19 H.J. Lu
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Yuri Rumyantsev ysrum...@gmail.com wrote:
Resend modified ChangeLog:
2013-11-20 Yuri Rumyantsev ysrum...@gmail.com
PR target/57756
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_option_override_internal): Add missed
argument prefix for 'ix86_fpmath'.
* config/i386/ssemath.h:
On Tue, 19 Nov 2013, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Hmm, gcc/gcc.c still reads:
690 /* Conditional to test whether the LTO plugin is used or not.
691FIXME: For slim LTO we will need to enable plugin
unconditionally. This
692still cause problems with PLUGIN_LD != LD and when
On Tue, 19 Nov 2013, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Hmm, gcc/gcc.c still reads:
690 /* Conditional to test whether the LTO plugin is used or not.
691FIXME: For slim LTO we will need to enable plugin
unconditionally. This
692still cause problems with PLUGIN_LD != LD
:) agree to you, but as soon as you're a user who tries to introduce
vector code and face a bug in cost model you'd like to have a
workaround until the bug will be fixed and compiler will come to you
with new OS distribution, don't you?
I propose the following, yet SLP have to use a NULL as a
My employer is working on the signature of the papers. Could someone
please do the review meanwhile?
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 3:00 AM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/18/13 13:05, Marcos Díaz wrote:
Hi,
the attached patch adds a new attribute and option flag to control
when to do
Hi,
Here is a patch to add flag for marking symbols as requiring static
initialization of bounds. Used by Pointer Bounds Checker to handle statically
initialized pointers and static bounds vars.
Thanks,
Ilya
--
2013-11-19 Ilya Enkovich ilya.enkov...@intel.com
* cgraph.h
On Tue, 19 Nov 2013, Sergey Ostanevich wrote:
:) agree to you, but as soon as you're a user who tries to introduce
vector code and face a bug in cost model you'd like to have a
workaround until the bug will be fixed and compiler will come to you
with new OS distribution, don't you?
I
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 03:07:52PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, 19 Nov 2013, Sergey Ostanevich wrote:
:) agree to you, but as soon as you're a user who tries to introduce
vector code and face a bug in cost model you'd like to have a
workaround until the bug will be fixed and
On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 2:25 AM, Bernd Edlinger
bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de wrote:
Hello,
on i686-pc-linux-gnu the test case gcc.target/i386/intrinsics_4.c fails
because of
an internal compiler error, see PR58155.
The reason for this is that the optab CODE_FOR_movv8sf is disabled when it
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de wrote:
On Tue, 19 Nov 2013, Sergey Ostanevich wrote:
:) agree to you, but as soon as you're a user who tries to introduce
vector code and face a bug in cost model you'd like to have a
workaround until the bug will be fixed and
On Tue, 19 Nov 2013 06:21:22, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 2:25 AM, Bernd Edlinger
bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de wrote:
Hello,
on i686-pc-linux-gnu the test case gcc.target/i386/intrinsics_4.c fails
because of
an internal compiler error, see PR58155.
The reason for this is that the
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Kirill Yukhin kirill.yuk...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
This patch introduces new SHA instructions described in [1]
along with tests.
Testing:
1. Bootstrap pass.
2. make check shows no regressions.
3. Spec 2000 2006 build show no regressions both with
Hello,
this is a minor update to my previous version of this patch, (using a boolean
expand_reference,
instead of adding a new expand_modifier enum value):
I forgot to pass down the expand_reference value at the second expand_expr call
inside the
case VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR. Sorry for the
I propose the following, yet SLP have to use a NULL as a loop info
which looks somewhat hacky.
I think this is overengineering. -fvect-cost-model will do as
workaround. And -fsimd-vect-cost-model has what I consider
duplicate - simd and vect.
I think it is a good idea, though I agree
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 06:39:48PM +0400, Sergey Ostanevich wrote:
pedwarn isn't really desirable for this, you want just warning,
but some warning you can actually also turn off.
-Wopenmp-simd (and we'd use it also when we ignore #pragma omp declare simd
because it wasn't
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 11:44 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 05:32:12PM +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 06:17:41AM +0100, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
In file included from /tmp/x/gcc/libbacktrace/atomic.c:37:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 09:09:03AM -0800, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
2) for tsan querying of data symbols, apparently the classes want to see
not just the symbol name and start value, but also size. libbacktrace
has
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 06:43:07AM -0800, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
2013-11-19 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com
* backtrace.h (backtrace_syminfo_callback): Add symsize argument.
* elf.c (elf_syminfo): Pass 0 or sym-size to the callback as
last argument.
*
Hi, as noted in gcc/go/README.gcc, the files in gcc/go/gofrontend are
actually mirrored from a different repository. Please do not directly
commit changes to those files. Instead, send the changes to me. I
will commit them upstream. Thanks.
Ian
This patch enables -freorder-blocks-and-partition by default for x86
at -O2 and up. It is showing some modest gains in cpu2006 performance
with profile feedback and -O2 on an Intel Westmere system. Specifically,
I am seeing consistent improvements in 401.bzip2 (1.5-3%), 483.xalancbmk
(1.5-3%), and
This fixes PR59164 - a mismatch during vectorizer analysis and transform.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied to trunk
sofar.
Richard.
2013-11-19 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
PR tree-optimization/59164
* tree-vect-loop-manip.c
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Kirill Yukhin kirill.yuk...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is a patch that introduces tests for AVX-512 instructions.
While implementing testsuite we were strongly connected to the fact that we
don't want more then 2 test files per each instruction - a scan assembler
This patch to the Go frontend incorporates patches by Richard S and
Diego for changes to the middle-end. These patches were already
committed to the GCC repository. This change commits them to the master
Go repository.
Ian
diff -r 75537ee240ab go/expressions.cc
--- a/go/expressions.cc Mon Nov
2013-11-19 Jonathan Wakely jwakely@gmail.com
* doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2014.xml: Create new table for TS statuses.
Committed to trunk.
commit f6ca0fe406b379b4fd7cd4575756fda04156cde0
Author: Jonathan Wakely jwakely@gmail.com
Date: Tue Nov 19 14:56:22 2013 +
*
$subject - the following turns
loop_iterator li;
FOR_EACH_LOOP (li, loop, LI_ONLY_INNERMOST)
{
...
if ()
FOR_EACH_LOOP_BREAK;
}
into
FOR_EACH_LOOP (loop, LI_ONLY_INNERMOST)
{
...
if ()
break;
}
Bootstrapped on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, testing
This patch to libgo updates the use of the libbacktrace library for the
recent addition of a size argument to the syminfo callback.
Bootstrapped and ran Go testsuite on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Committed to mainline.
Ian
diff -r 923fd178d72b libgo/runtime/go-caller.c
---
Hello,
running the testsuite in powerpc64le-linux with --with-cpu=power7 causes
FAIL: tmpdir-g++.dg-struct-layout-1/t024 cp_compat_x_tst.o compile, (internal
compiler error)
due to an unrecognizable insn
(insn 137 136 138 5 (set (reg:V2DI 5 5)
(vec_select:V2DI (reg:V2DI 211)
Hello,
some routines in the ppc64-abi-2.c test case attempt to verify that
the slots of the parameter save area in the caller hold correct values.
However, those slots holds (parts of) vector int data, which the
test case compares against immediate long values. This of course
hard-codes byte
On 11/18/2013 11:39 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
+ init = fold_build2 (COMPOUND_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (init),
+ ubsan_instrument_reference (input_location, init),
+ init);
This looks like it will evaluate init twice.
Jason
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Ian Lance Taylor i...@google.com wrote:
Hi, as noted in gcc/go/README.gcc, the files in gcc/go/gofrontend are
actually mirrored from a different repository. Please do not directly
commit changes to those files. Instead, send the changes to me. I
will commit
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Ulrich Weigand uweig...@de.ibm.com wrote:
Hello,
running the testsuite in powerpc64le-linux with --with-cpu=power7 causes
FAIL: tmpdir-g++.dg-struct-layout-1/t024 cp_compat_x_tst.o compile,
(internal compiler error)
due to an unrecognizable insn
(insn
1 - 100 of 235 matches
Mail list logo
