Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com wrote:
It's not fully fixing the issue as _all_ aggregates that may be
accessed beyond their declarations size are broken.
Sure, but we don't need to support such nonsense in the general case.
And not
every language allows it, for example in Ada you cannot
Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com wrote:
That being said, the concern is certainly valid so we may want to go
for a
kludge instead of the fix. The point is that the kludge should do
exactly
what the fix would have done in the RTL expander and nothing more;
it's out
of question to pessimize
Richard Sandiford rdsandif...@googlemail.com wrote:
Kenneth Zadeck zad...@naturalbridge.com writes:
#define WIDE_INT_MAX_ELTS \
- ((4 * MAX_BITSIZE_MODE_ANY_INT + HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT - 1) \
- / HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT)
+ (((MAX_BITSIZE_MODE_ANY_INT + HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT - 1) \
I sent a patch to upstream dejagnu so that things like:
FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/global-overflow-1.c -Os output pattern test, is ==4731
==ERROR: AddressSanitizer failed to allocate 0xdfff0001000 (15392894357504) byte
s at address 0x02008fff7000 (12)
==4731==ReserveShadowMemoryRange failed while
Richard Sandiford rdsandif...@googlemail.com writes:
I sent a patch to upstream dejagnu so that things like:
FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/global-overflow-1.c -Os output pattern test, is
==4731
==ERROR: AddressSanitizer failed to allocate 0xdfff0001000 (15392894357504)
byte
s at address
This patch is about rejects-valid and accepts-invalid and does
essentially only:
a) It ensures that sym-attr.pure/elemental gets set for pure/elemental
intrinsics (isym-pure/elemental).
b) It rejects dummy procedures / procedure pointers which are ELEMENTAL.
* * *
To quote (link see PR)
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 8:33 PM, Sriraman Tallam tmsri...@google.com wrote:
Patch updated with two more tests to check if the vfmadd insn is being
produced when possible.
Thanks
Sri
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Sriraman Tallam tmsri...@google.com wrote:
Hi,
I have attached a patch
On Sun, Dec 08, 2013 at 10:31:56AM +, Richard Sandiford wrote:
--- gcc/testsuite/lib/asan-dg.exp (revision 205654)
+++ gcc/testsuite/lib/asan-dg.exp (working copy)
@@ -288,9 +288,10 @@
if { $status == fail } {
pass $testname execution test
Hi Tobias,
first off: I assume the first PR number in the subject line is wrong,
since I don't see how it is related to your patch. I guess you meant
58099?
This patch is about rejects-valid and accepts-invalid and does essentially
only:
a) It ensures that sym-attr.pure/elemental gets set
Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com writes:
On Sun, Dec 08, 2013 at 10:31:56AM +, Richard Sandiford wrote:
--- gcc/testsuite/lib/asan-dg.exp(revision 205654)
+++ gcc/testsuite/lib/asan-dg.exp(working copy)
@@ -288,9 +288,10 @@
if { $status == fail } {
And here the web page update for Mark's departure and Joseph
joining.
Applied.
Gerald
Index: steering.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/steering.html,v
retrieving revision 1.36
diff -u -3 -p -r1.36 steering.html
---
On Sun, Dec 08, 2013 at 07:18:37PM +, Richard Sandiford wrote:
gcc/testsuite/
* lib/asan-dg.exp (asan-gtest): Remove actual and expected output
from the pass/fail line and add it to the log instead.
Looks ok to me, except the ChangeLog, all I'm seeing is that you are
removing
Hi Janus,
Janus Weil wrote:
first off: I assume the first PR number in the subject line is wrong,
since I don't see how it is related to your patch. I guess you meant
58099?
Yes. Well spotted.
a) It ensures that sym-attr.pure/elemental gets set for pure/elemental
intrinsics
Hello!
2013-12-08 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
* gcc.dg/macro-fusion-1.c: Cleanup sched2 rtl dump.
* gcc.dg/macro-fusion-2.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/vect/vect-simd-clone-10a.c: Cleanup vect tree dump.
* gcc.dg/vect/vect-simd-clone-12a.c: Ditto.
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu,
Adjusted for Richard Biener's patch
Index: fixincludes/ChangeLog
===
--- fixincludes/ChangeLog (revision 205790)
+++ fixincludes/ChangeLog (working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+2013-12-07 Bruce Korb bk...@gnu.org
+
+ * inclhack.def:
On 12/08/13 13:06, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
Lovely. Thank you very much!
$ svn diff
Index: configure.ac
===
--- configure.ac(revision 205790)
+++ configure.ac(working copy)
@@ -1319,10 +1319,17 @@
# Used for
On 7 December 2013 17:28, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 9:26 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
FAIL: 30_threads/async/async.cc execution test
async.exe:
Hello,
The attached patch deprecates the SH options mcbranchdi and mcmpeqdi,
since they turn out to be not so useful.
For example, disabling the cbranchdi pattern results in worse code for
-Os than -O1 and enabling the cmpeqdi patterns seems to trigger
broken/incomplete code paths. Effectively
Hello,
This is a summary of what has been happening on the SH side during 4.9.
Applied.
Cheers,
Oleg
? sh_changes_49_1.patch
Index: htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html,v
retrieving
On 12/06/13 19:44, Bin.Cheng wrote:
Right. Based on reading the archives, it looks like this stuff is/was
generated by PRE. I also suspect jump threading can create them. There was
talk of throttling PRE to leave things in a form that the IV analysis could
more easily digest, but I'm not sure
On 12/07/13 03:44, Eric Botcazou wrote:
I'd certainly be concerned. Ports have (for better or worse) keyed on
BLKmode rather than looking at the underlying types. So if something
which was previously SImode or DImode is now BLKmode, there's a nonzero
chance we're going to change how it gets
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 11:44:46PM -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
Alan Modra amo...@gmail.com writes:
Bootstrapped etc. powerpc64-linux. OK mainline and 4.8 branch?
* configure.ac (BUILD_CXXFLAGS) Don't use ALL_CXXFLAGS for
build != host.
recursive call for build != host: Clear
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/06/13 19:44, Bin.Cheng wrote:
Right. Based on reading the archives, it looks like this stuff is/was
generated by PRE. I also suspect jump threading can create them. There
was
talk of throttling PRE to leave things in a
Hello,
On 05 Dec 16:40, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
On 05 Dec 05:30, H.J. Lu wrote:
Kirill, can you take a look why it doesn't work for x86?
Okay, I'll look at this.
I've looked at this. It seems that `CANNOT_CHANGE_MODE_CLASS'
is too conservative for x86.
In rtlanal.c we have
On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 03:04:44PM +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 11:44:46PM -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
Alan Modra amo...@gmail.com writes:
Bootstrapped etc. powerpc64-linux. OK mainline and 4.8 branch?
* configure.ac (BUILD_CXXFLAGS) Don't use ALL_CXXFLAGS for
25 matches
Mail list logo
