On 07-12-13 16:07, Tom de Vries wrote:
Richard,
This patch implements the target hook TARGET_FN_OTHER_HARD_REG_USAGE (posted
here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-03/msg01318.html) for MIPS, to
address the issue that $6 is sometimes used in split calls.
Build and reg-tested on MIPS.
OK
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 7:59 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 9:11 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/19/13 19:33, David Malcolm wrote:
FWIW, it looks like you attached the whitespace cleanup patch again,
rather than the one you discuss above.
For the
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen
carew...@gmail.com wrote:
Will libgcc/config/i386/cpuinfo.c update be a separate patch?
Should we use a single definition for both i386.c and libgcc?
Currently they need to be in the same patch. But yes, moving the definition
out to a
On Wednesday 25 December 2013, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen
carew...@gmail.com wrote:
Will libgcc/config/i386/cpuinfo.c update be a separate patch?
Should we use a single definition for both i386.c and libgcc?
Currently they need to be in
Hi,
In libitm, x86_sse.cc must be compiled with -msse and x86_avx.cc must
be compiled with -mavx. We need to make sure that -msse/-mavx is
appended at the end of compiler options. This patch appends -msse/-mavx
to CXXFLAGS, instead of appending them to XCFLAGS. Tested with
CXXFLAGS=-g -O2
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 7:03 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
cpu_names in i386.c is only used by ix86_function_specific_print which
accesses it with enum processor_type index. But cpu_names is defined as
array with enum target_cpu_default index. This patch adds processor
names to
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 7:03 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
cpu_names in i386.c is only used by ix86_function_specific_print which
accesses it with enum processor_type index. But cpu_names is defined as
array with
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 10:02 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 7:03 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
cpu_names in i386.c is only used by ix86_function_specific_print which
accesses it
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 10:03:45PM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 10:02 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 7:03 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
cpu_names in i386.c
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen
carew...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday 25 December 2013, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen
carew...@gmail.com wrote:
Will libgcc/config/i386/cpuinfo.c update be a separate patch?
Should we use a
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 10:31 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
cpu_names in i386.c is only used by ix86_function_specific_print
which
accesses it with enum processor_type index. But cpu_names is
defined as
array with enum target_cpu_default index. This patch adds processor
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen
carew...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday 25 December 2013, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen
carew...@gmail.com wrote:
Will
Hello!
2013-12-26 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
* config/i386/driver-i386.c (decode_caches_intel): Add missing entries.
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu and committed to mainline and 4.8 branch.
Uros.
Index: driver-i386.c
===
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 3:09 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen
carew...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday 25 December 2013, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at
Hi,
(get_amd_cpu): Handle AMD_BOBCAT, AMD_JAGUAR, AMDFAM15H_BDVER2 and
AMDFAM15H_BDVER3.
As mentioned earlier, we would like to stick with BTVER1 and BTVER2 instead of
using BOBCAT or JAGUAR.
Attached patch does the changes.
Regards
Ganesh
NameChange.patch
Description:
15 matches
Mail list logo