On 13/12/23 12:54 AM, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
>> Other than these two, I think this can go in.
>> > Bernd
> Attached is the updated patch for the compiler.
>
> Since Bernd is a Global Reviewer, am I clear for committing the port
> now? (including the testsuite and libgcc parts)
I will be taking Ber
Hi Vladimir,
I am trying to fix a potential bug of cost_classes_eq in ira-costs.c. This
patch is for gcc-4.8 branch and should work for gcc-4.9.
Library function memcmp return 0 if no difference for the two compared data.
Please take a look.
/* Compares cost classes info V1 and V2. */
This patch is to fix `md5sum: WARNING: 1 line is improperly formatted' thing.
2013-12-28 Dmitry Gorbachev
PR 56653
* gcc_release: Add an extra `#' character to the comment header of
MD5SUMS.
*** maintainer-scripts/gcc_release
--- maintainer-scripts/gcc_release
**
This patch from Uros Bizjak changes TestSelfConnect to use DialTimeout,
to avoid a problem where some operating systems take a long time to fail
a connection to localhost. This patch adds a timeout to make the
connection fail quickly. This is PR 59506. Ran Go testsuite on
x86_64-unknown-linux-gn
Hi
Here is a patch to add recycling of Rb tree nodes when possible.
I replaced the _Rb_tree::_M_move_assign with a move assignment
operator to benefit from:
- move of elements when the whole data structure cannot be moved
- faster data structure cloning rather than full regeneration of
Hi
Here is a patch to fix an issue in normal mode during the move
assignment. The destination vector allocator instance is moved too
during the assignment which is wrong.
As I discover this problem while working on issues with management
of safe iterators during move operations this
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> On 18 Dec 18:16, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> the patch is OK (with above mentioned changes) for mainline.
> Thanks,
>
> One more nit. It seems that currently vectorizer expects mask_type to
> be equal to operand_type, which doesn't hold for AVX-51
Hello,
On 18 Dec 18:16, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> the patch is OK (with above mentioned changes) for mainline.
Thanks,
One more nit. It seems that currently vectorizer expects mask_type to
be equal to operand_type, which doesn't hold for AVX-512F.
So, I'll comment out like this:
@@ -34677,6 +36423,3
Jakub wrote:
> Ok, I guess I can live with the original patch then.
r206219.
-Y
Hi,
On 12/12/2013 03:19 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
I wouldn't expect it to cause problems.
Ok. Then I looked a bit into this and something is making me nervous:
lookup_base wants to return a binfo, not a type. Thus what do we do when
the type is incomplete and there is no binfo? Something like t
Many thanks for your effort in fixing the issue. I can confirm that the
new tests pass on arm-eabi using qemu as the simulator.
Thanks,
Yufeng
P.s. Wish you have nice holiday break and happy new year!
On 12/20/13 01:12, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
Here's a patch that splits up 20_util/hash/chi
Hi,
This patch adds Intel microarchitecture changes to GCC 4.9 changes.html.
OK to install?
Thanks.
--
H.J.
--
Index: changes.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html,v
retrieving revision 1.49
diff -u -p -r1
Hi!
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 03:06:06PM +0400, Yury Gribov wrote:
> We did exactly this for majority of tests except for
Ah, sorry, I saw one test and didn't check carefully the rest of them.
> * c-c++-common/asan/use-after-return-1.c (back-ported from Clang, no UB)
Well, it is still UB, but one
Jakub wrote:
IMNSHO it is far better to just change those
tests into compile time tests and verify assembly using dg-final
scan-assembler.
We did exactly this for majority of tests except for
* c-c++-common/asan/use-after-return-1.c (back-ported from Clang, no UB)
* c-c++-common/asan/no-asan-st
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 10:05:37AM +0400, Yury Gribov wrote:
> Yury wrote:
> >> Still sounds like a bug elsewhere to me.
> >
> > Let me investigate this deeper tomorrow (rebuilding fresh Dg, etc.).
>
> So I've double-checked that this is a problem with trunk DejaGNU
> rsh.exp script removing trail
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 02:10:57PM +0400, Maxim Ostapenko wrote:
> >As for the tests, I'm afraid I don't like them at all.
> >If anything, it ought to be dg-do compile tests where you say
> >scan assembly or some dump, but having runtime testcases that
> >trigger undefined behavior that isn't detec
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 02:11:13PM +0400, Andrey Belevantsev wrote:
> >Testcase is very small. Why not add it?
>
> Frankly, I think that the chances of this test uncovering similar
> issues in the future are very small. It needs lots of options to
> make it trigger and even with this a specific r
On 23.12.2013 16:24, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Andrey Belevantsev wrote:
Hello,
As described in the PR, the ICE reason was the typo made when introducing
calls to add_hard_reg_set. Fixed by the first attached patch, bootstrapped
and tested on both ia64 and x86_64, commi
18 matches
Mail list logo
