> we prohibited unaligned loads
Sorry, meant to say "vectorization of unaligned loads".
-Y
> As can be seen here:
>
http://cbuild.validation.linaro.org/build/cross-validation/gcc/207533/report-build-info.html
> this has caused some regressions on armv5t targets.
IMHO this is expected: with this patch we prohibited unaligned loads on
all platforms with -mno-unaligned-access. Perhaps
Hi,
this testcase triggers overactive check in record_target_from_binfo.
It is confused by fact that we may have hard time not only looking for a vtable
of virtual base but also of base of this virtual base that no longer has virtual
flag on it.
Regtsted ad comitted as obvious.
Honza
Index: test
On 30.01.2014 9:42, Andrey Belevantsev wrote:
Hello,
Ping.
As detailed in http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58960#c6, we
fail to use the DF liveness info in the register pressure sensitive
scheduling for the new blocks as we do not properly compute it in this
case. The patch fixes
On 07/02/14 03:54, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> On 6 February 2014 10:49, Yury Gribov wrote:
>> Kugan wrote:
Ok if no regressions.
>>>
>>> Tested it on qemu for arm-none-linux-gnueabi and there is no new
>>> regressions. I am sorry I didn't mention it when I posted the patch.
>>
>> Commited in
Hi,
this patch fixes undefined symbol seen while compiling LLVM with LTO.
The bug here is that lto-cgraph and lto-partition both contain
knowledge about what symbols gets partitioned and what gets duplicated
to each partition that uses them. This has got out of sync
causing lto-cgraph to not set i
As mentioned in the PR, we call try_combine with:
i1 = (insn 14 13 16 2 (set (reg/v/f:SI 34 [ stack ])
(reg/f:SI 15 %sp)) pr52714.c:9 38 {*movsi_m68k2}
(nil))
i2 = (insn 16 14 17 2 (set (cc0)
(compare (reg/v/f:SI 34 [ stack ])
(const_int 0 [0]))) pr52714.c:10 4
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 10:45:23AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 08:42:27PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > > So, where do we want to do that instead? E.g. should it be e.g. in
> > > > tree_versionable_function_p di
Ramana Radhakrishnan writes:
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 2:12 AM, Michael Hudson-Doyle
> wrote:
>> Ping? I'm attaching a marginally cleaner version of the test. I've had
>> a look at integrating this into aapcs64.exp but got defeated in the
>> end. If go-torture-execute took a list of sources as
Hi Mikael,
thanks for your comments ...
>> attached is a small patch which fixes an ICE-on-invalid regression
>> with finalization. In the PR, Dominique objected to the patch, but I
>> think it's the correct thing to do after all. The line that I'm
>> removing was added in a patch authored by Tob
Hello Everyone,
Attached, please find a patch that will fix the issue in PR 59691. The
main issue was that the Cilk library (libcilkrts) was not checking if the
target has SSE support before emitting SSE instruction. This patch should fix
that.
Here is the ChangeLog entries:
libcilkrts/
Patch attached.
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
> I sent the following patch for review for trunk commit here. Details here:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-02/msg00328.html
>
> This is important for function layout for the following reason.
> Without this patc
I sent the following patch for review for trunk commit here. Details here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-02/msg00328.html
This is important for function layout for the following reason.
Without this patch, the thunk's section name is the same as the original
function's section name for wh
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 10:45:23AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 08:42:27PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > So, where do we want to do that instead? E.g. should it be e.g. in
> > > tree_versionable_function_p directly and l
Richard Sandiford writes:
> libgcc/
> * configure.ac (libgcc_cv_mips_hard_float): New.
> * configure: Regenerate.
> * config.host (mips*-*-*): Use t-hardfp-sfdf rather than
> t-softfp-sfdf for hard-float targets.
> * config/mips/t-mips (LIB2_SIDITI_CONV_FUNCS): Reins
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 11:00:14AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> Ah, so __builtin_setjmp_receiver is like setjmp in this regard
> and setjmp is LEAF (it's a stmt that doesn't direct control-flow
> anywhere else). So __builtin_setjmp_receiver should be LEAF as well
> (and so should __builtin_setjm
Hi the following patch removes the 'state' print for
-ftree-tree-vectorize option which does not make sense anymore. Ok for
trunk?
thanks,
David
Index: ChangeLog
===
--- ChangeLog (revision 207581)
+++ ChangeLog (working copy)
@@
Below patch fixes a small copy-paste mistake, reported by Hui Wu.
(Whether the fix is correct, I'm not fully sure, but the code as
it is looks nonsensical.)
2014-02-06 Benno Schulenberg
PR target/49008
* genautomata.c (add_presence_absence): Fix copy-paste error.
Index: gcc
[Oops, had a wrong bug number in the subject line.]
Below patch fixes another miswording in an error message,
reported by Roland Stigge. Please apply.
2014-02-06 Benno Schulenberg
PR translation/52289
* fortran/resolve.c (resolve_ordinary_assign): Fix typoed word
in an error me
Below patch fixes another miswording in an error message,
reported by Roland Stigge. Please apply.
2014-02-06 Benno Schulenberg
PR translation/52289
* fortran/resolve.c (resolve_ordinary_assign): Fix typoed word
in an error message.
Index: fortran/resolve.c
===
Committed to branch dmalcolm/jit:
gcc/jit/
* libgccjit++.h: Include rather than , since
the former gets us std::ostream, and the latter may introduce
startup-time overhead for constructing std::cout et al.
(gccjit::context::new_child_context): New.
(gccjit:
Updating a bit the Dutch translations of GCC's messages,
I noticed the following mistakes in three msgids:
"only displayed one" ==> "displayed only once"
"none class-method" ==> "non-class method"
"incorect" ==> "incorrect"
Below patch fixes those. I'm not entirely sure about
the se
Le 06/02/2014 11:43, Janus Weil a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> attached is a small patch which fixes an ICE-on-invalid regression
> with finalization. In the PR, Dominique objected to the patch, but I
> think it's the correct thing to do after all. The line that I'm
> removing was added in a patch author
"Joseph S. Myers" writes:
> On Tue, 4 Feb 2014, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> So here I just provide simple C functions for each operation that has
>> hard-float support. We can then restrict the softfp stuff to functions
>> that really do need softfp support, meaning that softfp_exclude_libgcc2 :=
expand_expr has, for as long as I can remember, had the ability to
ignore the desired mode provided by its callers and instead returning
something in a completely different mode. It's always been the caller's
responsibility to deal with that.
For the testcase in 54041, we call expand_expr w
OK.
Jason
On Nov 25, 2013, at 3:09 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> please add streamer_read/write_wi () helpers to data-streamer*
>
> replicating the above loop N times is too ugly.
Agreed. Below is the patch to collapse the code. Thanks.
diff --git a/gcc/lto-streamer-in.c b/gcc/lto-streamer-in.c
index 08
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 2:12 AM, Michael Hudson-Doyle
wrote:
> Ping? I'm attaching a marginally cleaner version of the test. I've had
> a look at integrating this into aapcs64.exp but got defeated in the
> end. If go-torture-execute took a list of sources as c-torture-execute
> does, then I thin
I have no further comments on the patch.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 06:06:41PM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > this is improved patch I am testing. The basic idea is to remove push
> > > expanders for cases where we do not have push instruction anyway.
> > > emit_move_insns then resorts to unconditonally call move expander
> > >
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 06:06:41PM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > Hi,
> > this is improved patch I am testing. The basic idea is to remove push
> > expanders for cases where we do not have push instruction anyway.
> > emit_move_insns then resorts to unconditonally call move expander
> > with push o
Hi,
seems no one cared about memory use for a while, since stats code got bit
rotten.
Bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-linux, will commit it shortly.
Honza
* ggc.h (ggc_internal_cleared_alloc): New macro.
* var.h (vec_safe_copy): Handle memory stats.
* omp-low.c (simd_clone
> Hi,
> this is improved patch I am testing. The basic idea is to remove push
> expanders for cases where we do not have push instruction anyway.
> emit_move_insns then resorts to unconditonally call move expander
> with push operand. I expended ix86_expand_vector_move to handle
> it gracefully a
Hi,
according to memory stats this is relatively common reason for garbage left
after tree merging.
Bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-linux, OK?
Honza
* lto/lto.c (unify_scc): Free also CONSTRUCTOR_ELTS.
Index: lto/lto.c
===
---
Hi,
This bug seems already fixed on mainline. I have added two testcases,
but as the C++11 one is not obvious to me, I guess this path does not
qualify as obvious. Incidentally, while writing the C++11 testcase, I
realized that the diagnostic was not emitted at the proper location
and fixed it.
O
Hi,
at WPA we currently read trees accessed by jump functions and then copy them
to remove location that is already known to be UNKNOWN and then keep copying
them for every inline clone introduced (and there are many for firefox)
This patch makes us to copy only when expression really has an locat
On 6 February 2014 10:49, Yury Gribov wrote:
> Kugan wrote:
>>> Ok if no regressions.
>>
>> Tested it on qemu for arm-none-linux-gnueabi and there is no new
>> regressions. I am sorry I didn't mention it when I posted the patch.
>
> Commited in r207533. Thanks!
>
Hi,
As can be seen here:
http://
Hi,
I did some memory measurements for Firefox. We seems in shape in exception of
linemaps that takes about 20% of memory and I also noticed that we produce a lot
of garbage by copy_tree_r. Analyzing the reasons for copy_tree_r I found two
about
equally important. The first one is that gimple_g
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 04:37:38PM +, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Kyrill Tkachov
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This patch adds the rtx costs table for Cortex-A57 and sets its issue rate
> > properly in the arm backend.
> >
> > Tested on arm-none-eabi on a mod
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 08:27:09AM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
> > All I know is that the generated code with the ZERO_EXTEND has been larger
> > than with the paradoxical subreg. But if you prefer, I can surely emit a
> > ZERO_EXTEND and open a PR for GCC 5.0 that we should investigate why we
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This patch adds the rtx costs table for Cortex-A57 and sets its issue rate
> properly in the arm backend.
>
> Tested on arm-none-eabi on a model.
>
>
> Ok for trunk?
In my view this is OK - this is just a tuning patch for A57 an
On 02/06/2014 08:25 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 08:23:00AM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> On 02/06/2014 08:02 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 06:53:55AM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 02/04/2014 04:40 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> - tem =
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 08:23:00AM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 02/06/2014 08:02 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 06:53:55AM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
> >> On 02/04/2014 04:40 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >>> - tem = expand_shift (LSHIFT_EXPR, mode, lopart, hprec,
On 02/06/2014 08:02 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 06:53:55AM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> On 02/04/2014 04:40 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>>> - tem = expand_shift (LSHIFT_EXPR, mode, lopart, hprec, NULL_RTX, 1);
>>> + tem = gen_rtx_SUBREG (mode, lopart, 0);
>>> +
Here is a new version of the patch not limited to NaNs and Infs
anymore.
Bootstrapped and regtested on s390 with various options.
-Andreas-
2014-02-06 Andreas Krebbel
* config/s390/32/_fixdfdi.c: Throw invalid exception if number
cannot be represented.
* config/s390/3
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 06:53:55AM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 02/04/2014 04:40 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > - tem = expand_shift (LSHIFT_EXPR, mode, lopart, hprec, NULL_RTX, 1);
> > + tem = gen_rtx_SUBREG (mode, lopart, 0);
> > + tem = expand_shift (LSHIFT_EXPR, mode, tem, hpr
On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
+/* Handle a "alloc_align" attribute; arguments as in
+ struct attribute_spec.handler. */
+
+static tree
+handle_alloc_align_attribute (tree *node, tree ARG_UNUSED (name), tree args,
+ int, bool *no_add_attrs)
+{
+ unsigned
Hi Jakub,
2014-01-30 Jakub Jelinek
PR target/59575
* config/arm/arm.c (emit_multi_reg_push): Add dwarf_regs_mask argument,
don't record in REG_FRAME_RELATED_EXPR registers not set in that
bitmask.
(arm_expand_prologue): Adjust all callers.
(arm
Hi!
As discussed on IRC, this patch introduces two new attributes,
so that the C library (and other headers) have a way to
a) tell the compiler something about functions like aligned_alloc
or memalign
b) tell the compiler the alignment of pointers returned say by malloc
Ok for trunk if bootstr
On Wed, 5 Feb 2014, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Marc Glisse writes:
On Wed, 5 Feb 2014, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Wrt. the function decl it should probably just be changed to a variable
decl. Alignments on function decls are kind of exotic.
Good idea. How about this patch then?
LGTM.
Done at r
Hi Jeff,
According to our coding conventions, the ability to build with something
other than gcc is still desirable. You could argue that you're unlikely
to be bootstrapping on a mn103 with something other than GCC and if
you're building a cross, you could start by first building gcc native.
H
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 8:38 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> For -Os, apparently ARM backend sometimes decides to push (up to 8?) dummy
> registers to stack in addition to the registers that actually need to be
> saved, in order to avoid extra instruction to adjust stack pointer.
> These regist
On 02/06/2014 06:48 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Richard Henderson writes:
>> On 02/06/2014 01:55 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>>> OK, I agree that's not 4.9 material. What about the other change
>>> of replacing:
>>>
>>>REF_CFA_DEF_CFA (plus (stack_pointer_rtx) (const_int 160/96))
>>>
>>>
On 01/30/2014 12:38 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> 2014-01-30 Jakub Jelinek
>
> PR target/59575
> * config/arm/arm.c (emit_multi_reg_push): Add dwarf_regs_mask argument,
> don't record in REG_FRAME_RELATED_EXPR registers not set in that
> bitmask.
> (arm_expand_prologu
On 02/04/2014 04:40 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> - tem = expand_shift (LSHIFT_EXPR, mode, lopart, hprec, NULL_RTX, 1);
> + tem = gen_rtx_SUBREG (mode, lopart, 0);
> + tem = expand_shift (LSHIFT_EXPR, mode, tem, hprec, NULL_RTX, 1);
I would be happier with gen_lowpart rather than th
> 2014-01-30 Jakub Jelinek
>
> PR debug/59992
> * var-tracking.c (adjust_mems): Before adding a SET
> to amd->side_effects, adjust it's SET_SRC using
> simplify_replace_fn_rtx.
>
> * gcc.dg/pr59992.c: New test.
Ok.
r~
Richard Henderson writes:
> On 02/06/2014 01:55 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> OK, I agree that's not 4.9 material. What about the other change
>> of replacing:
>>
>>REF_CFA_DEF_CFA (plus (stack_pointer_rtx) (const_int 160/96))
>>
>> with:
>>
>>REF_CFA_ADJUST_CFA (set (stack_pointer_r
On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> This re-writes posix_memalign calls to
>
> posix_memalign (ptr, align, size);
> tem = *ptr;
> tem = __builtin_assume_aligned (align);
> *ptr = tem;
>
> during CF lowering (yeah, ok ...) to make alignment info accessible
> to
This re-writes posix_memalign calls to
posix_memalign (ptr, align, size);
tem = *ptr;
tem = __builtin_assume_aligned (align);
*ptr = tem;
during CF lowering (yeah, ok ...) to make alignment info accessible
to SSA based analysis.
I have to adjust the added alias-31.c test
On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 02:21:01PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > + /* We marking allocated storage local, we deal with it becoming
> > +global by escaping and setting of vars_contains_escaped_heap. */
>
> Did you mean By marking ..., or s
Richard Biener writes:
> + case BUILT_IN_POSIX_MEMALIGN:
> + {
> + tree ptrptr = gimple_call_arg (t, 0);
> + get_constraint_for (ptrptr, &lhsc);
> + do_deref (&lhsc);
> + varinfo_t vi = make_heapvar ("HEAP");
> + /* We marking allocated storage local, w
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 02:21:01PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> + /* We marking allocated storage local, we deal with it becoming
> + global by escaping and setting of vars_contains_escaped_heap. */
Did you mean By marking ..., or something else?
> + extern int posix_memalign(vo
On 02/06/2014 01:55 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> OK, I agree that's not 4.9 material. What about the other change
> of replacing:
>
>REF_CFA_DEF_CFA (plus (stack_pointer_rtx) (const_int 160/96))
>
> with:
>
>REF_CFA_ADJUST_CFA (set (stack_pointer_rtx)
>(plu
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> An obvious one, use location if available. Can this be considered as
> a "docfix" though, thus ok for trunk? (Not a regression.)
>
> Regtested/bootstrapped on x86_64-linux.
Ok.
Thanks,
Richard.
> 2014-02-06 Marek Polacek
>
> PR
This adds a builtin for C11 aligned_alloc and support for it
in the alias and alignment tracking machinery.
Bootstrap and regtest in progress on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Ok for trunk?
Thanks,
Richard.
2014-02-06 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/60092
* builtins.def (DEF_C11_BU
This adds posix_malloc as builtin and support for it in the
alias machinery.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?
Thanks,
Richard.
2014-02-06 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/60092
* builtin-types.def (BT_FN_INT_PTRPTR_SIZE_SIZE): Add.
* bui
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 5:10 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> could somebody please shed some light on how this is done? It's nice that
> everybody has this kind of testing, but the only bit in the gcc sources itself
> seems to be a bit bit-rot and incomplete (contrib/test_installed).
Our case is sim
An obvious one, use location if available. Can this be considered as
a "docfix" though, thus ok for trunk? (Not a regression.)
Regtested/bootstrapped on x86_64-linux.
2014-02-06 Marek Polacek
PR c/60087
c-family/
* c-common.c (warn_for_sign_compare): Call warning_at with loc
Hi!
I'd like to ping a few outstanding patches:
- PR59575 P1 ARM dwarf2cfi ICEs fix
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-01/msg01997.html
- PR59992 P1 var-tracking improvement
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-01/msg01962.html
- PR60030 P1 ubsan expansion fix
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/
Hi,
On 02/05/2014 10:28 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 02/05/2014 11:19 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
if (vec_safe_is_empty (vbases))
/* No virtual bases to worry about. */;
else if (!assign_p)
{
if (constexpr_p)
*constexpr_p = false;
*constexpr_p should be false for a co
Hi all,
attached is a small patch which fixes an ICE-on-invalid regression
with finalization. In the PR, Dominique objected to the patch, but I
think it's the correct thing to do after all. The line that I'm
removing was added in a patch authored by Tobias and myself. I suspect
it was added to wor
this patch updates the analysis of package body stubs and subprogram body stubs
to maintain the configuration options of the enclosing context in a stack-like
fasion. This ensures that options pertaining to the proper body do not govern
the options of the enclosing context.
-- Source
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 08:42:27PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> > So, where do we want to do that instead? E.g. should it be e.g. in
>> > tree_versionable_function_p directly and let the inlin
This adjusts the documentation of Pragma Optimize_Alignment by mentioning that
the pragma also has an effect on individual objects in addition to types.
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed on trunk
2014-02-06 Eric Botcazou
* gnat_rm.texi (Pragma Optimize_Alignment): Document the
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 11:00:14AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> Then __builtin_setjmp_setup is?
No, it never returns twice through the fallthru edge. It only
returns second time through the abnormal edge virtually to the
ABNORMAL_DISPATCHER and from that through another abnormal edge
to __built
"Joseph S. Myers" writes:
> On Tue, 4 Feb 2014, Rainer Orth wrote:
>
>> > The patch to libgo/ltmain.sh is now committed to mainline.
>>
>> I've now committed the rest, thanks.
>>
>> Btw., what's the procedure for syncing the toplevel ltmain.sh these
>> days? AFAIK there's both the old CVS src
This patch modifies the expansion of attribute 'Old to insert the generated
temporary that captures the value of the prefix before routine _Postconditions.
As a result, the precondition of a subprogram will be evaluated first, before
any postcondition-related code is executed.
-- Sour
This patch modifies the analysis of aspect/pragma [Refined_]Depends to catch
clauses that contain multiple parenthesis as this is not allowed by the syntax
of the aspect/pragma.
-- Source --
-- multi_parents.ads
pragma SPARK_Mode;
package Multi_Parents
with Abstract
On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 10:33:54AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > Not even in call_can_make_abnormal_goto? I mean, as we split
> > > __builtin_setjmp into __builtin_setjmp{_setup,_receiver} and the former
> > > has abnormal edge out of it, there is n
The following patch modifies the analysis of generic packages and subprograms
to flag aspect/pragma SPARK_Mode as illegal.
-- Source --
-- in_function.ads
pragma SPARK_Mode (On);
generic
Val : Integer;
function In_Function return Integer with SPARK_Mode;
-- in_f
This patch fixes the order in which the conjuncts in complex postconditions
are tested. Such postconditions are expanded into individual tests, chained
to internal lists when aspects are processed, and combined with other tests
when building the contract checking procedure for a given subprogram. T
This patch fixes some errors in the handling of dynamic predicates applied to
private types.
Compiling and executing the following:
gnatmake -q -gnata main
main
must yield:
Endevour
Ariane5
Failure to launch
---
with gnat.io;
with ada.assertions;
procedure Main is
package S
This patch corrects the transient object machinery to detect subprogram calls
in constructs that have been heavily expanded.
-- Source --
-- types.ads
with Ada.Finalization; use Ada.Finalization;
package Types is
Bomb : exception;
Not_Zero : exception;
p
Richard Henderson writes:
> On 02/05/2014 02:30 PM, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
>> Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 10:26:16PM +0100, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
Actually, now I think the problem originally described there is still
valid: on s390 the CFA is *not* equal to the value a
This patch modifies the mechanism that detects an enabled property to handle
the case where the property appears with an expression.
-- Source --
-- serial_port.ads
pragma SPARK_Mode;
package Serial_Port
with Abstract_State =>
(Input_Port with External => (Async
On 16 January 2014 18:10, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The Cortex-A53 and Cortex-A57 cores support the CRC32 and Crypto extensions
> to the ARMv8-A architecture. This patch adds that information to their
> definitions in aarch64-cores.def.
Both cortex-a53 and cortex-a57 can be configured w
This patch corrects the finalization machinery to properly handle a controlled
object that is initialized by an aggregate and acts as a transient. The object
is now considered fully initialized after the last component assignment takes
place. This avoids the finalization of uninitialized data that
Kugan wrote:
>> Ok if no regressions.
>
> Tested it on qemu for arm-none-linux-gnueabi and there is no new
> regressions. I am sorry I didn’t mention it when I posted the patch.
Commited in r207533. Thanks!
-Y
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 8:12 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have noticed that with the .deps introduction for gcc/ we've lost
> these two dependencies, which autodependency creation isn't aware of,
> as the Makefile runs cat on those files and passes the content through
> -D option.
>
> Ok fo
On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 08:42:27PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > So, where do we want to do that instead? E.g. should it be e.g. in
> > tree_versionable_function_p directly and let the inliner (if it doesn't do
> > already) also treat optimize(0) funct
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 10:33:54AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > Not even in call_can_make_abnormal_goto? I mean, as we split
> > __builtin_setjmp into __builtin_setjmp{_setup,_receiver} and the former
> > has abnormal edge out of it, there is no need to have another abnormal edge
> > out of th
On 29/01/14 17:42, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 23/01/14 08:58, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 16/01/14 18:10, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
The Cortex-A53 and Cortex-A57 cores support the CRC32 and Crypto extensions to
the ARMv8-A architecture. This patch adds that information to their definitions
in a
On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 10:13:25AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > trunk? Alternatively we could special case BUILT_IN_SETJMP_RECEIVER
> > > instead
> > > in call_can_make_abnormal_goto, there is probably no need to have AB edge
> > > out of __builti
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 10:31:48AM +, Alex Velenko wrote:
> Hi,
> I agree to changelog change. Could this patch, please, be submitted as I
> do not have rights to do so.
> Kind regards,
> Alex
>
> On 30/01/14 22:36, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
> > On 30 January 2014 15:28, Alex Velenko wrote:
>
On Jan 9, 2014, at 7:16 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
>> Richi has asked the we break the wide-int patch so that the individual port
>> and front end maintainers can review their parts without have to go through
>> the entire patch.This patch
On Wed, 5 Feb 2014, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 02:20:05PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > Using !!optimize to determine if we should switch local ABI to regparm
> > > convention isn't compatible with optimize attribute, as !!optimize is
> > > whether the current function is
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 10:13:25AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > trunk? Alternatively we could special case BUILT_IN_SETJMP_RECEIVER instead
> > in call_can_make_abnormal_goto, there is probably no need to have AB edge
> > out of __builtin_setjmp_receiver, we already have one out of
> > __built
Hello,
This is a patch regarding a couple of Objective-C related dialect
options and warning switches. I have already submitted it a while ago
but gave up after pinging a couple of times. I am now informed that
should have kept pinging until I got someone's attention so I'm
resending it.
On 06/02/14 01:56, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
>
>
>>
>> Ramana wrote:
Attached patch fixes this. Is this OK for trunk?
>>>
>>> How has it been tested ?
>>
>> I was hoping Linaro people could run their magical cbuild on it...
>
> Ok if no regressions.
>
Tested it on qemu for arm-none-linu
On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've looked at the spawner_inline.c timeout issue, and it looks like the
> problem is that __builtin_setjmp_receiver is a stmt_ends_bb_p call and
> insert_backedge_copies then happily inserts statements before the call,
> because it can't insert
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
