Hi,
in the test cases dynamic_dispatch_1.f03 and dynamic_dispatch_3.f04 there is
recursive procedure type, make_real,
the front-end generates the equivalent of
extern C float make_real(t1*, ...);
for the call statements, but uses
extern C float make_real(t1*)
{
}
for the procedure itself,
I have found one more test with same issue.
2014-03-31 Vishnu K S vishnu@atmel.com
* gcc.dg/pr59963-2.c (bazi): Use 32-bit SI mode instead of int.
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr59963-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr59963-2.c
index ea05946..263ac37 100644
---
On 03/30/2014 11:02 PM, Oleg Endo wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 2014-03-26 at 08:58 +0100, Christian Bruel wrote:
This patches adds a few instructions to the inlined builtin_strlen to
unroll the remaining bytes for word-at-a-time loop. This enables to have
2 distinct execution paths (no fall-thru in
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 2:26 AM, Cong Hou co...@google.com wrote:
This patch is fixing PR60656. Elements in a vector with
vect_used_by_reduction property cannot be reordered if the use chain
with this property does not have the same operation.
Bootstrapped and tested on a x86-64 machine.
OK
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 9:25 PM, Richard Sandiford
rdsandif...@googlemail.com wrote:
Marek Polacek pola...@redhat.com writes:
@@ -,7 +,16 @@ handle_noinline_attribute (tree *node, tree name,
int ARG_UNUSED (flags), bool *no_add_attrs)
{
if (TREE_CODE
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 8:18 PM, Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net wrote:
On Mar 28, 2014, at 6:23 AM, K_s, Vishnu vishnu@atmel.com wrote:
Test pr59940.c is failing for AVR target because the test assumes the size
of int as 32 bit and test expect to generate warnings for overflow and
Ping.
On 2014-03-16 12:43, Sebastian Huber wrote:
gcc/ChangeLog
2014-03-16 Sebastian Huber sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
* doc/invoke.texi (mapp-regs): Clarify.
---
gcc/doc/invoke.texi | 5 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
Changed the comment in log as the tests are not skipping for AVR only, but for
all
The targets keeps_null_pointer_checks is true.
Corrected the log as per the comments. Please review it and commit it if it's
OK.
Regards
Vishnu KS
2014-03-31 Vishnu K S vishnu@atmel.com
*
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Sebastian Huber
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de wrote:
gcc/ChangeLog
2014-03-16 Sebastian Huber sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
* doc/invoke.texi (mapp-regs): Clarify.
Ok.
Thanks,
Richard.
---
gcc/doc/invoke.texi | 5 -
1 file
This fixes gcc.dg/lto/pr55113_0.c ICEing on x86_64 with -m32
(due to implicit -march=x86-64) by dg-skipping for all
x86_64 and the -m64 i?86 variants (untested, not sure what
-march default we use there - this just removes incrementally
more x86_64 multilibs.
Committed.
Richard.
2014-03-31
As promised here is the followup to handle the same kind of errors
in simple_object_internal_write as in simple_object_internal_read.
Bootstrapped on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, LTO bootstrapped and tested
on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Ok for trunk?
Thanks,
Richard.
2014-03-31 Richard Biener
Hello guys,
On 28 Mar 20:10, Uros Bizjak wrote:
Hello!
Here are more intrinsics that are missing. I know that gcc currently
generates horrible code for most of them but I think it's more important
to have the API in place, albeit non-optimal. Maybe this entices some
one to add the
The following makes install-driver behave sanely when GCC_INSTALL_NAME
and GCC_TARGET_INSTALL_NAME match (or GCC_INSTALL_NAME and
$(target_noncanonical)-gcc-$(version)). We seem to force both
$(target_noncanonical)-gcc and $(target_noncanonical)-gcc-$(version)
installs, but still apply
Jonathan Wakely jwak...@redhat.com writes:
On 25/03/14 17:25 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Tested x86_64-linux, I plan to commit this to trunk soon.
commit 06a845f80204947afd6866109db58cc85dc87117
Author: Jonathan Wakely jwak...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Mar 25 14:42:45 2014 +
PR
On 31/03/14 14:13 +0200, Rainer Orth wrote:
Unfortunately, the new tests FAIL on non-C99 targets (i386-pc-solaris2.9
in my case):
FAIL: 18_support/exception_ptr/60612-terminate.cc (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
This patch fixes some unexpected behaviour of the Weffc++ and Wnon-virtual-dtor
flags. The documentation for the latter says it's also enabled by Weffc++, but
that's untrue.
The current behaviour of Weffc++ is to warn about any non-virtual dtor in a
non-polymorphic base class (relying on the
Hi,
In PR c++/44859, it is noted that the following code does not emit a
returning reference to temporary warning:
struct Base2 { int m_foo; };
struct Derived2 : public Base2 {};
const Base2 f8() { return Derived2(); } // -- here
The source of the problem seems to be that
Hi Jonathan,
On 31/03/14 14:13 +0200, Rainer Orth wrote:
Unfortunately, the new tests FAIL on non-C99 targets (i386-pc-solaris2.9
in my case):
FAIL: 18_support/exception_ptr/60612-terminate.cc (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
The following patch makes sure we wrap symbol references in global
initializers the same as we do for IL references - inside a MEM_REF
that guards their context against type changes due to symbol merging
(and thus in this case against ICEs when processing an ARRAY_REF
around a non-array object).
On 2014-03-31 11:59, Richard Biener wrote:
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Sebastian Huber
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de wrote:
gcc/ChangeLog
2014-03-16 Sebastian Hubersebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
* doc/invoke.texi (mapp-regs): Clarify.
Ok.
Thanks,
Richard.
I don't
On Mon, 31 Mar 2014, Richard Biener wrote:
The following makes install-driver behave sanely when GCC_INSTALL_NAME
and GCC_TARGET_INSTALL_NAME match (or GCC_INSTALL_NAME and
$(target_noncanonical)-gcc-$(version)). We seem to force both
$(target_noncanonical)-gcc and
On 03/29/14 11:24, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 02:51:38PM -0400, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
2014-03-27 Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com
PR rtl-optimization/60650
* gcc.target/arm/pr60650.c: New.
The test fails for me with:
spawn -ignore SIGHUP
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 7:34 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, March 29, 2014, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 09:38:38AM +0100, Eric Botcazou wrote:
Revision 201326 fixes a shrink-wrap bug which is also a regression
on 4.8 branch. This
PR 60604 shows a case where CANNOT_CHANGE_MODE_CLASS is being ignored
for a subreg of a floating-point register, causing it to be replaced
with an invalid (reg ...).
There are various reasons why MIPS floating-point registers can't change
mode, but one important one for big-endian 32-bit targets
On 29/03/14 19:55 +0100, Daniel Krügler wrote:
2014-03-28 13:37 GMT+01:00 Jonathan Wakely jwak...@redhat.com:
On 27/03/14 23:00 +0100, Daniel Krügler wrote:
I'm in favour for changing it, what about something like
layout mismatch
?
How about this?
__cxa_dependent_exception::termHandler
On 31/03/14 19:17 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
This improves the static assertion messages, as suggested by François
and Daniel.
Tested x86_64-linux, committed to trunk.
Oops, apparently mutt doesn't attach attachments until you actually
send the mail, by which time the file I was attaching
This bug report pointed out that we weren't properly decorating template
mangled names with the appropriate abi_tags. This patch fixes this by
making sure that the mangler only looks at the abi_tag from the
template, and the parser warns that we'll ignore tags on specializations
and
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 3:14 AM, Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de wrote:
2014-03-31 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
libiberty/
* simple-object.c (simple_object_internal_write): Handle
EINTR and short writes.
This is OK.
Thanks.
Ian
On 21/02/14 01:00 +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
* include/std/iomanip (_Quoted_string operator): Do not clear
string if input is not quoted.
Currently the string is cleared regardless of
how the string is handled. This patch just
moves the clearing down so that we do not clear
it if we
Updated gfortran.dg/fmt_en.f90 to skip some tests not supported on
i?86-*-solaris2.9* and hppa*-*-hpux* (these tests assume rounding to nearest
and to even on tie, AFAICT i?86-*-solaris2.9* rounds real(16) to zero and
hppa*-*-hpux* rounds all kinds to zero on tie, with some exceptions I don’t
Martin Husemann mar...@duskware.de writes:
In the mips--netbsdelf target gcc 4.9 lost the pre-definition of
__mips_o32, which is heavily used in NetBSD sources.
The obvious trivial patch adds it back.
Are you sure it was ever in FSF GCC? I went through every revision
of netbsd.h in git and
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 08:35:30PM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Are you sure it was ever in FSF GCC? I went through every revision
of netbsd.h in git and couldn't see it.
No, I'm not - guess I never tried a pure gcc on mips.
I can go ahead and apply the patch anyway if it's the right
2014-03-28 20:27 GMT+01:00 Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net:
Just a nit...
2014-03-28 Fabien Chêne fab...@gcc.gnu.org
* cp/init.c (perform_member_init): homogeneize uninitialized
diagnostics.
Sentences begin with an upper case letter, and spelling... Homogenize..
I will fix that,
2014-03-28 17:59 GMT+01:00 Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com:
On 03/27/2014 05:32 PM, Fabien Chêne wrote:
+ permerror (DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (current_function_decl),
+uninitialized reference member in %q#T, type);
+ inform (DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION
2014-03-28 17:59 GMT+01:00 Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com:
[...]
The inform should only happen if permerror returns true (i.e. without
-fpermissive -w). OK with that change.
I did a little tour around the permerror uses, and found that in decl.c:
if (permerror (input_location,
On 03/31/2014 04:27 PM, Fabien Chêne wrote:
* cp/init.c (perform_member_init): Homogenize uninitialized
diagnostics.
OK.
if (permerror (input_location,
default argument given for parameter
%d of %q#D, i, newdecl))
Ping?
Bootstrap and no make check regression on X86-64.
Bootstrap on ARM. In ARM regression test, some new PASS and FAIL of
debug info check for gcc.dg/guality/pr36728-1.c and
gcc.dg/guality/pr36728-2.c since register allocation result is
different with the patch. There is no real new FAIL due
Hi,
Patch for PR60363 is sent at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-03/msg00857.html , but it needs to
wait for stage 1. In the meanwhile this patch is to xfail the case for
logical_op_short_circuit targets. Is it ok?
Thanks,
bin
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
2014-04-01 Bin Cheng
38 matches
Mail list logo
