Re: [PATCH] [MIPS] Fix operands for microMIPS SW16, SH16 and SB16

2014-04-12 Thread Richard Sandiford
Matthew Fortune matthew.fort...@imgtec.com writes: Hi Catherine/Richard, I think there may be some impact on register move costs by introducing this class. Yeah, I was worried about that too. I'm going to do some code comparison tests for SE and MIPS16 to see what happens. Is it worth

Re: [v3] complex functions with expression template reals

2014-04-12 Thread Eric Botcazou
r209321 (for a patch accepted long ago, I guess it is better to leave a trace in gcc-patches near the commit date) Nope, see the doc, we have ChangeLog and gcc-cvs for this purpose. -- Eric Botcazou

Re: [v3] complex functions with expression template reals

2014-04-12 Thread Marc Glisse
On Sat, 12 Apr 2014, Eric Botcazou wrote: r209321 (for a patch accepted long ago, I guess it is better to leave a trace in gcc-patches near the commit date) Nope, see the doc, we have ChangeLog and gcc-cvs for this purpose. Those don't point to the conversation in gcc-patches where the

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR60717 - Wrong code with recursive procedure with unlimited polymorphic dummy argument

2014-04-12 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 10:29:23PM +0200, Paul Richard Thomas wrote: 2014-04-12 Paul Thomas pa...@gcc.gnu.org PR fortran/58771 * trans.h : Add 'use_offset' bitfield to gfc_se. * trans-array.c (gfc_conv_expr_descriptor) : Use 'use_offset' as a trigger to unconditionally

Re: [patch, libgfortran] [4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] list directed io from array results in end of file

2014-04-12 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 04:57:42PM -0700, Jerry DeLisle wrote: On 04/11/2014 04:31 PM, Tobias Burnus wrote: Jerry DeLisle wrote: I plan to commit the following patch to 4.10, 4.9, 4.8, and 4.7. It is a partial revert of the patch to PR38199 which is an optimization of internal unit

Re: [patch, libgfortran] PR60128 Wrong ouput using en edit descriptor

2014-04-12 Thread Dominique Dhumieres
This test, after the update on 4.8 in r209070 when the test-case was modified substantially (not really covered by the ChangeLog entry) to be identical to that on trunk, apparently takes a different route in the fortran run-time library on 4.8 compared to trunk. For 4.8, it requires more

Re: [PATCH] [MIPS] Fix operands for microMIPS SW16, SH16 and SB16

2014-04-12 Thread Richard Sandiford
Richard Sandiford rdsandif...@googlemail.com writes: Matthew Fortune matthew.fort...@imgtec.com writes: Hi Catherine/Richard, I think there may be some impact on register move costs by introducing this class. Yeah, I was worried about that too. I'm going to do some code comparison tests

RFA: testsuite fix for 4.8 (was Re: [patch, libgfortran] PR60128 Wrong ouput using en edit descriptor)

2014-04-12 Thread Hans-Peter Nilsson
On Sat, 12 Apr 2014, Dominique Dhumieres wrote: This test, after the update on 4.8 in r209070 when the test-case was modified substantially (not really covered by the ChangeLog entry) to be identical to that on trunk, apparently takes a different route in the fortran run-time library on

Re: Fwd: [Patch, fortran] PR60717 - Wrong code with recursive procedure with unlimited polymorphic dummy argument

2014-04-12 Thread Paul Richard Thomas
Dear All, I have upgraded this patch slightly to fix PR58085 as well. I would judge this to be completely safe because the fixes depend on the new bit flag for both PRs. Bootstrapped and regtested on FC17/x86_64 - OK for 4.9 immediately and trunk? Paul 2014-04-12 Paul Thomas

Re: Hurd port for gcc go PATCH 0-3 (9)

2014-04-12 Thread Svante Signell
On Fri, 2014-04-11 at 07:48 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 5:47 AM, Svante Signell svante.sign...@gmail.com wrote: Attached are patches to enable gccgo to build properly on Debian GNU/Hurd on gcc-4.9 (4.9-20140406). Thanks. Will review after 4.9 has branched.

Re: Hurd port for gcc go PATCH 0-3 (9)

2014-04-12 Thread Svante Signell
On Sat, 2014-04-12 at 16:04 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: On Fri, 2014-04-11 at 07:48 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 5:47 AM, Svante Signell svante.sign...@gmail.com wrote: I don't understand this comment. The GCC libraries do still use automake. I regularly

Re: Hurd port for gcc go PATCH 0-3 (9)

2014-04-12 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Svante Signell svante.sign...@gmail.com wrote: (cd src/libgo;automake-1.11) aclocal.m4:16: warning: this file was generated for autoconf 2.64. You have another version of autoconf. It may work, but is not guaranteed to. To rebuild any of the GCC

Re: [Patch, avr] Propagate -mrelax gcc driver flag to assembler

2014-04-12 Thread Georg-Johann Lay
Senthil Kumar Selvaraj schrieb: This patch modifies AVR target's ASM spec to pass -mlink-relax to the assembler if -mrelax is passed to the compiler driver. This was already being passed on to the linker, this patch merely makes the assembler also aware of it. The corresponding patch in

[patch, fortran] Fix PR 59604

2014-04-12 Thread Thomas Koenig
Hello world, please find attached a patch for PR 59604. The patch makes sure that, if -fno-range-check is specified, using int on an overflowing boz constant yields the same result for compile-time simplification and run-time execution. OK for trunk? Thomas 2014-03-12 Thomas Koenig

Re: [DOC PATCH] Rewrite docs for inline asm

2014-04-12 Thread Hans-Peter Nilsson
On Tue, 8 Apr 2014, dw wrote: The general bits seems like a big improvement, but what worries me is the deleted text. For example, the aspects of Explicit Reg Vars when *directly feeding an asm* and how to write them to avoid the named registers being call-clobbered between assignment