On Thu, 15 Jan 2015, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 07:46:18AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
That last line means the compiler is free to delete a non-volatile
asm with a memory clobber if that asm is not needed for dataflow. Or
that is how I read it; it is trying to
Hi!
With the addition of build libcpp, my build failed because of distro default
flags of -Werror=format-security.
The first hunk is I think no big deal, making it const makes the warning
go away.
The second hunk is more controversial, as even making message const doesn't
help with the warning.
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:17:44PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi!
I ran into -Werror=maybe-uninitialized errors during profiledbootstrap
(../configure --enable-languages=c,c++ --enable-checking=release;
make -j16
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:17:44PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi!
I ran into -Werror=maybe-uninitialized errors during profiledbootstrap
Your patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2015-01/txtThsA1zTNFd.txt
looks very similar to the Mikael's one for pr58023 at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30633
with retval replaved with success.
Was it intended?
Nope. I wasn't even aware of that patch. To which PR is it
Committed.
Richard.
2015-01-15 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
PR lto/64415
* gcc.dg/lto/pr64415_0.c: Skip on darwin.
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/pr64415_0.c
===
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/pr64415_0.c
Hi Janus,
Your patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2015-01/txtThsA1zTNFd.txt
looks very similar to the Mikael's one for pr58023 at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30633
with retval replaved with success.
Was it intended?
Cheers,
Dominique
Hi,
This patch is to fix https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64363. Patch
disables instrumentation for functions we cannot clone correctly due to labels.
Bootstrapped and checked on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK for trunk?
Thanks,
Ilya
--
gcc/
2015-01-14 Ilya Enkovich
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Yuri Rumyantsev ysrum...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I did a change proposed by Richard - unconditionally allocate from the heap.
Bootstrap and regression testing did not show any new failures.
Is it OK for trunk?
+ if (!is_gimple_assign (stmt)
+
Hi!
I ran into -Werror=maybe-uninitialized errors during profiledbootstrap
(../configure --enable-languages=c,c++ --enable-checking=release;
make -j16 profiledboostrap) before I hit a miscompilation I'm going to file.
Is this ok for trunk, or do we want to work around them differently?
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi!
I ran into -Werror=maybe-uninitialized errors during profiledbootstrap
(../configure --enable-languages=c,c++ --enable-checking=release;
make -j16 profiledboostrap) before I hit a miscompilation I'm going to file.
I have tested this for both mips and micromips, and the tests now pass
successfully.
The ChangeLog and patch are below.
Ok to commit?
Since you had not got to committing this yet. I have added the micromips
variants of the tests and committed your patch for you. Thanks for
finding the
A bit of housekeeping in mips.exp. Several test options are incompatible
with micromips so this patch enforces no-micromips as required.
The number of failures in mips.exp for -mmicromips is now much lower and
primarily related to branch distance differences vs MIPS.
Thanks,
Matthew
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 09:13:30AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
differently. Just trying to grep for a few:
glibc:
./sysdeps/alpha/bits/atomic.h:# define atomic_full_barrier() __asm (mb : :
: memory);
./sysdeps/alpha/bits/atomic.h:# define atomic_read_barrier() __asm (mb : :
: memory);
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 10:43 PM, Steve Ellcey sell...@imgtec.com wrote:
I tried compiling an empty plugin that just included gcc-plugin.h and
plugin-version.h and found that these header files were included from
gcc-plugin.h but not in the list of header files to be copied to the
plugin
Hi All,
I did a change proposed by Richard - unconditionally allocate from the heap.
Bootstrap and regression testing did not show any new failures.
Is it OK for trunk?
ChangeLog
2015-01-15 Yuri Rumyantsev ysrum...@gmail.com
PR tree-optimization/64434
* cfgexpand.c (reorder_operands): New
Hi,
This patch implements a new scheduler model for the ARM Cortex-A57
processor.
This model results in better code generation for the Cortex-A57 with a
more mixed blend of instruction types, particularly when scheduling for
the new instructions introduced in ARMv8-A.
I haven't yet wired it up
Hi,
pinging this patchlet...
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-12/msg01926.html
On 12/29/2014 03:54 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
in this ICE on invalid, we crash during error recovery when
maybe_adjust_types_for_deduction gets an elt which has TREE_TYPE (elt)
== error_mark_node.
Robert, can you look at reload.c::reload_inner_reg_of_subreg and verify
that the comment just before its return statement is effectively the
situation you're in.
There are certainly cases where a SUBREG needs to be treated as an
in-out operand. We walked through them eons ago when we were
I am testing the following hack^Wpatch which makes us preserve
range information in some very special case in PRE. This is
important to get number of iteration analysis results in a way
to enable unrolling of loops in some EEMBC testcase (I don't
have access to that benchmark unless it is part
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 1:34 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
Since PIE is also PIC, we need to add -fno-pie to avoid PIC. OK for trunk?
Thanks.
H.J.
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr54445-2.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
2015-01-11 H.J. Lu
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 02:02:51PM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 2:00 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr54445-2.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
2015-01-11 H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com
*
Le 14/01/2015 19:30, Janus Weil a écrit :
Hi Mikael,
the attached patch fixes an ICE-on-invalid problem with
procedure-pointer components by making sure that we continue resolving
all components of a derived type, even after an error is thrown.
Does the fonction return false as before,
Hi,
libitm.c/stackundo.c fails with -fpic since test1 and test2 may be
preempted with -fpic. This patch makes those 2 functions static.
Tested on Linux/x86. OK for trunk?
Thanks.
H.J.
diff --git a/libitm/ChangeLog b/libitm/ChangeLog
index 74e2940..e46819c 100644
--- a/libitm/ChangeLog
Le 15 janv. 2015 à 12:37, Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org a écrit :
Your patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2015-01/txtThsA1zTNFd.txt
looks very similar to the Mikael's one for pr58023 at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30633
with retval replaved with success.
Was it
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 4:44 AM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 1:34 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
Since PIE is also PIC, we need to add -fno-pie to avoid PIC. OK for trunk?
Thanks.
H.J.
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr54445-2.c | 2 +-
1 file
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 2:00 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr54445-2.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
2015-01-11 H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com
* gcc.target/i386/pr54445-2.c: Add -fno-pie.
diff --git
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
This patch is to fix https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64363.
Patch disables instrumentation for functions we cannot clone correctly due to
labels.
Bootstrapped and checked on
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 2:15 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr54445-2.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
2015-01-11 H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com
* gcc.target/i386/pr54445-2.c: Add -fno-pie.
diff --git
Hi,
This is the patch to improve the test case gcc.target/arm/scd42-1.c for both
UAL and non-UAL. It now checks UAL format assembly code for Thumb1 and
Thumb2 while non-UAL format assembly code for ARM mode.
With this patch, the test passes for both cases.
Thanks,
Tony
2015-01-15 Tony Liu
On Thu, 15 Jan 2015, Richard Biener wrote:
Committed.
Turns out we can do better.
Committed.
Richard.
2015-01-15 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
PR lto/64415
* gcc.dg/lto/pr64415_0.c: Re-enable for darwin with
-Wl,-undefined,dynamic_lookup.
Index:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 1:28 AM, Ian Lance Taylor i...@golang.org wrote:
I've committed a patch to libgo to update it to the Go 1.4 release,
except for the runtime package. Much of the runtime package was
rewritten in Go, and it does not really affect users of the library,
so I've postponed
Le 15/01/2015 14:25, Mikael Morin a écrit :
Le 15/01/2015 12:37, Janus Weil a écrit :
Your patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2015-01/txtThsA1zTNFd.txt
looks very similar to the Mikael's one for pr58023 at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30633
with retval replaved with
On 14 January 2015 at 12:14, Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
On 14 January 2015 at 17:31, Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
On 14 January 2015 at 11:16, Prathamesh Kulkarni
2015-01-15 16:07 GMT+03:00 Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
This patch is to fix https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64363.
Patch disables instrumentation for functions we cannot clone
On 15/01/15 14:10, Renlin Li wrote:
Hi all,
This is a simple fix to correct two typos (I believe) in the newly
introduced volatileloadpair-1.c volatileloadpair-2.c test case.
After the change, the test cases compiles and runs correctly.
Okay to commit?
Regards,
Renlin Li
Le 15/01/2015 12:37, Janus Weil a écrit :
Your patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2015-01/txtThsA1zTNFd.txt
looks very similar to the Mikael's one for pr58023 at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30633
with retval replaved with success.
Was it intended?
Nope. I wasn't
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com wrote:
2015-01-15 16:07 GMT+03:00 Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
This patch is to fix
Hi all,
This is a simple fix to correct two typos (I believe) in the newly
introduced volatileloadpair-1.c volatileloadpair-2.c test case.
After the change, the test cases compiles and runs correctly.
Okay to commit?
Regards,
Renlin Li
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2015-01-15 Renlin Li
Hi,
Looks like new ISA doc [1] renamed srli,slli intrinsics to bsrli,bslli.
This patch adds b* versions, while keeping old srli for backward
compatibility.
OK for trunk?
1:https://software.intel.com/sites/default/files/managed/0d/53/319433-022.pdf
ChangeLog:
gcc/
*
Stage3 is closing rapidly. I've drained my queue of patches I was
tracking for gcc-5.However, note that I don't track everything. If
it's a patch for a backend, language other than C or seemingly has
another maintainer that's engaged in review, then I haven't been
tracking the patch.
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Ilya Tocar tocarip.in...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Looks like new ISA doc [1] renamed srli,slli intrinsics to bsrli,bslli.
This patch adds b* versions, while keeping old srli for backward
compatibility.
OK for trunk?
OK.
Jason
101 - 143 of 143 matches
Mail list logo
