Hi!
On Wed, 18 Feb 2015 18:04:21 +0100, I wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Oct 2014 14:33:11 +0400, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> > On 13 Oct 12:19, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 06:49:00PM +0400, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> > > > 2. -foffload-abi=[lp64|ilp32]
> > > >This option is supposed to tell m
On 02/17/2015 05:40 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 04:21:06PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
On Tue, 17 Feb 2015, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Third attempt failed with:
../../../libgcc/config/nvptx/realloc.c:24:20: fatal error: stdlib.h: No such
file or directory
compilation terminated
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 03:39:19AM +, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
> Attached, please find a patch that is a fix for PR c++/60269. Tested on
> x86_64 and have no regression issues. Is this OK for trunk?
> +2015-02-18 Balaji V. Iyer
> +
> + PR c++/60269
> + * parser.c (cp_parser_cilk_s
Hi,
I'm posting this patch series for stage1:
- 0001-Disable-lang_hooks.gimplify_expr-in-free_lang_data.patch
- 0002-Add-gimple_find_sub_bbs.patch
- 0003-Factor-optimize_va_list_gpr_fpr_size-out-of-pass_std.patch
- 0004-Handle-internal_fn-in-operand_equal_p.patch
- 0005-Postpone-expanding-va_arg-
Hi!
On Wed, 18 Feb 2015 13:35:18 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 01:09:53PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 Feb 2015 12:34:38 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > offloading fails:
> > >
> > > /usr/src/gcc/objnvptxinst/usr/local/bin/../libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux
On 19-02-15 11:29, Tom de Vries wrote:
Hi,
I'm posting this patch series for stage1:
- 0001-Disable-lang_hooks.gimplify_expr-in-free_lang_data.patch
- 0002-Add-gimple_find_sub_bbs.patch
- 0003-Factor-optimize_va_list_gpr_fpr_size-out-of-pass_std.patch
- 0004-Handle-internal_fn-in-operand_equal_p
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:48:17AM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Like this?
Yes.
> commit 56c0312469f583ba3fa9fa2777981742ab6d6c75
> Author: Thomas Schwinge
> Date: Thu Feb 19 11:41:23 2015 +0100
>
> If we're building an offloading compiler, always enable the LTO front end.
>
>
The problem exposed by this PR is (IIUC) that we hadn't gotten around to
recomputing the inline parameters in the case when optimize_inline_calls
introduces new statements. That results in ICEing later on because in
estimate_edge_growth we assert that estimated size of a statement is not
0.
This
On 19-02-15 11:29, Tom de Vries wrote:
Hi,
I'm posting this patch series for stage1:
- 0001-Disable-lang_hooks.gimplify_expr-in-free_lang_data.patch
- 0002-Add-gimple_find_sub_bbs.patch
- 0003-Factor-optimize_va_list_gpr_fpr_size-out-of-pass_std.patch
- 0004-Handle-internal_fn-in-operand_equal_p
On 19-02-15 11:29, Tom de Vries wrote:
Hi,
I'm posting this patch series for stage1:
- 0001-Disable-lang_hooks.gimplify_expr-in-free_lang_data.patch
- 0002-Add-gimple_find_sub_bbs.patch
- 0003-Factor-optimize_va_list_gpr_fpr_size-out-of-pass_std.patch
- 0004-Handle-internal_fn-in-operand_equal_p
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015, Marek Polacek wrote:
> The problem exposed by this PR is (IIUC) that we hadn't gotten around to
> recomputing the inline parameters in the case when optimize_inline_calls
> introduces new statements. That results in ICEing later on because in
> estimate_edge_growth we assert
On 19-02-15 11:29, Tom de Vries wrote:
Hi,
I'm posting this patch series for stage1:
- 0001-Disable-lang_hooks.gimplify_expr-in-free_lang_data.patch
- 0002-Add-gimple_find_sub_bbs.patch
- 0003-Factor-optimize_va_list_gpr_fpr_size-out-of-pass_std.patch
- 0004-Handle-internal_fn-in-operand_equal_p
Hi!
On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 16:36:21 +0400, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> The patch has been updated:
> if a compiler is configured as accelerator,
> it installs *-accel-*-g++, and other drivers. But only *-accel-*-gcc is
> needed.
> Therefore I suppressed their installation in corresponding Makefiles.
>
Hi!
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 10:28:46 +0100, Bernd Schmidt
wrote:
> On 02/17/2015 05:40 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 04:21:06PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> >> On Tue, 17 Feb 2015, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >>
> >>> Third attempt failed with:
> >>> ../../../libgcc/config/nvptx/re
On 19-02-15 11:29, Tom de Vries wrote:
Hi,
I'm posting this patch series for stage1:
- 0001-Disable-lang_hooks.gimplify_expr-in-free_lang_data.patch
- 0002-Add-gimple_find_sub_bbs.patch
- 0003-Factor-optimize_va_list_gpr_fpr_size-out-of-pass_std.patch
- 0004-Handle-internal_fn-in-operand_equal_p
On 02/19/2015 12:42 PM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
This specific buglet aside (that the handling of intelmic and nvptx
offloading is inconsistent) -- will we have to add such handling to each
and every library that is built for the offloading compilers? (Including
libraries that aren't part of the G
Hi!
When building systemd with LTO and -g, we ICE, because we stream in
__PRETTY_FUNCTION__ VAR_DECL, which isn't referenced in the IL except for
BLOCK_VARS and thus doesn't get a varpool node streamed with it.
Later on when dwarf2out.c calls make_decl_rtl_for_debug on it, it creates
the varpool_n
Hi!
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:08:20 +0100, Bernd Schmidt
wrote:
> On 02/19/2015 12:42 PM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > This specific buglet aside (that the handling of intelmic and nvptx
> > offloading is inconsistent) -- will we have to add such handling to each
> > and every library that is built f
The LEGITIMIZE_RELOAD_ADDRESS macro is only needed for reload. Since the
ARM backend no longer supports reload, this macro is not needed and this
patch removes it.
Tested arm-none-linux-gnueabihf with gcc-check.
Ok for trunk? now or in stage 1?
Matthew
gcc/
2015-02-19 Matthew Wahab
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 19-02-15 11:29, Tom de Vries wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm posting this patch series for stage1:
> > - 0001-Disable-lang_hooks.gimplify_expr-in-free_lang_data.patch
> > - 0002-Add-gimple_find_sub_bbs.patch
> > - 0003-Factor-optimize_va_list_gpr_fpr_size-
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 19-02-15 11:29, Tom de Vries wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm posting this patch series for stage1:
> > - 0001-Disable-lang_hooks.gimplify_expr-in-free_lang_data.patch
> > - 0002-Add-gimple_find_sub_bbs.patch
> > - 0003-Factor-optimize_va_list_gpr_fpr_size-
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 01:41:05PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> I hope we can get rid of this again (which needs re-writing of all
> targets va-arg gimplification hooks... - we are in need of some
> generic diamond/triangle CFG pattern builders anyway).
We already have some in asan.c - create_co
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 01:44:46PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> I'd call it a bug though, and we do have internal fns in
> generic already thus the issue is latent (with ubsan at least).
>
> Which means ok for trunk now.
But the patch should better handle the internal calls right.
I.e. return 0
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 01:48:58PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 01:41:05PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > I hope we can get rid of this again (which needs re-writing of all
> > targets va-arg gimplification hooks... - we are in need of some
> > generic diamond/triangle CF
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 19-02-15 11:29, Tom de Vries wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm posting this patch series for stage1:
> > - 0001-Disable-lang_hooks.gimplify_expr-in-free_lang_data.patch
> > - 0002-Add-gimple_find_sub_bbs.patch
> > - 0003-Factor-optimize_va_list_gpr_fpr_size-
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 19-02-15 11:29, Tom de Vries wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm posting this patch series for stage1:
> > - 0001-Disable-lang_hooks.gimplify_expr-in-free_lang_data.patch
> > - 0002-Add-gimple_find_sub_bbs.patch
> > - 0003-Factor-optimize_va_list_gpr_fpr_size-
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 19-02-15 11:29, Tom de Vries wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm posting this patch series for stage1:
> > - 0001-Disable-lang_hooks.gimplify_expr-in-free_lang_data.patch
> > - 0002-Add-gimple_find_sub_bbs.patch
> > - 0003-Factor-optimize_va_list_gpr_fpr_size-
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 01:41:05PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > I hope we can get rid of this again (which needs re-writing of all
> > targets va-arg gimplification hooks... - we are in need of some
> > generic diamond/triangle CFG pattern builders a
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 01:44:46PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > I'd call it a bug though, and we do have internal fns in
> > generic already thus the issue is latent (with ubsan at least).
> >
> > Which means ok for trunk now.
>
> But the patch sho
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 6:17 AM, Alex Velenko wrote:
> On 13/02/15 05:11, Richard Henderson wrote:
>>
>> On 02/12/2015 08:14 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>>
>>> I tried the second patch. Results look good on Linux/x86-64.
>>
>>
>> Thanks. My results concurr. I went ahead and installed the patch as
>> po
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 09:55:32PM +0100, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 02/17/2015 06:10 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >
> >What exact testcase are you trying to fix with this patch, and how do you
> >think offloading of code using va_list can work?
>
> The exact testcase is any offloaded program - strea
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 01:48:58PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 01:41:05PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > I hope we can get rid of this again (which needs re-writing of all
> > > targets va-arg gimplification hooks... - we
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 7:05 AM, Maxim Kuvyrkov
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This testsuite patch fixes race on additional_source testsuite variable.
> When a test has both dg-additional-sources and "dg-do run { target FOO }"
> directives, it may occur that the FOO test will attempt to use
> additional_so
> On Feb 19, 2015, at 4:31 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 7:05 AM, Maxim Kuvyrkov
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This testsuite patch fixes race on additional_source testsuite variable.
>> When a test has both dg-additional-sources and "dg-do run { target FOO }"
>> directives, it may o
On 18/02/15 18:30, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 06:29:34PM +, Alex Velenko wrote:
this patch also fixes issues for arm-none-eabi.
Could someone add this patch?
ENOPATCH
Jakub
Hi Jakub,
I meant Andrea Azzarone's patch in the previous e-mail. It has not been
added
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 09:55:32PM +0100, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>> On 02/17/2015 06:10 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> >
>> >What exact testcase are you trying to fix with this patch, and how do you
>> >think offloading of code using va_list can w
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 11:21:26PM +0100, Andrea Azzarone wrote:
> We can use the same trick used in the other tests. Patch attached.
> Sorry about that!
Thanks.
I wrote a ChangeLog entry for this and committed.
Jakub
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:17 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 01:54:17PM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2015-02-18 at 12:53 -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
>> >> > T
On 02/18/2015 06:17 AM, Alex Velenko wrote:
> By changing behaviour of varasm.c:default_binds_local_p, this patch changes
> behaviour of gcc/config/arm/arm.c:arm_function_in_section_p and through it
> breaks gcc/config/arm/arm.c:arm_is_long_call_p for weak symbols.
>
> As a result, I get regressio
On 19-02-15 14:07, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 01:44:46PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
I'd call it a bug though, and we do have internal fns in
generic already thus the issue is latent (with ubsan at least).
Which means ok for trunk
Lately,
26_numerics/random/binomial_distribution/operators/values.cc has
started to FAIL on trunk with a timeout for my autotester for
cris-elf, a soft-float simulator target running a cgen-generated
simulator on a six-year-old x86_64-linux-gnu host. The reason
it's started to fail in the last few
Ping?
2015-02-13 15:51 GMT+01:00 Andrea Azzarone :
> Hi all,
>
> this patch try to fix PR c++/64948 (Lambda reference capture
> initialization in template function creates segmentation fault).
>
> 2015-2-13 Andrea Azzarone
> PR c++/64948
> * lambda.c (add_capture) Do not consider as rvalues a
A while ago when I was doing some other work on extend.texi, I noticed
that the section on x86 transactional memory intrinsics was in need of
cleanup. I've checked in this patch to do some content-free
copy-editing -- fixing typos and markup, rephrasing some awkward
sentences, etc.
To tell t
Hello!
I would like to port following patches to 4.8 branch:
2014-11-05 Uros Bizjak
Backport from mainline
2015-01-22 Wei Mi
PR rtl-optimization/64557
* dse.c (record_store): Call get_addr for mem_addr.
(check_mem_read_rtx): Likewise.
Backport from mainline
201
Thanks Sandra. Just a minor comment.
-Valid abort status bits (when the value is not @code{_XBEGIN_STARTED}) are:
+If the transaction aborts, the return value is one of:
Here it is really bits. So maybe something like that:
If the transaction aborts, the return value is a combination of the
follo
[And this time, actually CCing the list :)].
Gentlemen!
Reading in the compiler state for pch (gt_pch_restore) obliterates the
DIE table, and consequently the DW_TAG_GNU_[BE]INCL* DIEs that may have
been in it. This causes inconsistencies when reading in _any_
pre-compiled header into a source
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 08:45:08AM -0800, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> [And this time, actually CCing the list :)].
>
> Gentlemen!
>
> Reading in the compiler state for pch (gt_pch_restore) obliterates the
> DIE table, and consequently the DW_TAG_GNU_[BE]INCL* DIEs that may have
> been in it. This ca
On 19/02/15 14:16, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 02/18/2015 06:17 AM, Alex Velenko wrote:
By changing behaviour of varasm.c:default_binds_local_p, this patch changes
behaviour of gcc/config/arm/arm.c:arm_function_in_section_p and through it
breaks gcc/config/arm/arm.c:arm_is_long_call_p for weak s
Hi,
the attached patch fixes some minor issues with the recently applied
hotpatch testcases.
Bye,
-Andreas-
2015-02-19 Andreas Krebbel
* gcc.target/s390/hotpatch-8.c: Add -march=g5.
* gcc.target/s390/hotpatch-9.c: Add -march=g5.
* gcc.target/s390/hotpatch-compile-1.
Hi,
the attached patch does some cleanup in the S/390 specific testcases.
- The scan-assembler testcases do not need --save-temps.
- One of them needs it so with the patch we make sure to cleanup the
files.
Bye,
-Andreas-
2015-02-19 Andreas Krebbel
* hotpatch-1.c: Remove --save-t
Hi,
the attached patch add the -Wno-implicit-function-declaration option
to the S/390 specific testcases which require it.
Bye,
-Andreas-
2015-02-19 Andreas Krebbel
* gcc.target/s390/20090223-1.c: Add
-Wno-implicit-function-declaration option.
* gcc.target/s390/pr42
On 02/19/2015 09:08 AM, Alex Velenko wrote:
> Your suggestion seem to fix gcc.target/arm/long-calls-1.c, but has to be
> thoroughly tested.
Before you do complete testing, please also delete the TREE_STATIC test.
That bit should never be relevant to functions, as it indicates not that
it is in the
Hi,
the attached patch makes the hoist-register-pressure testcases to work
with -m31 on 64 bit.
Ok to apply?
Bye,
-Andreas-
2015-02-19 Andreas Krebbel
* gcc.dg/hoist-register-pressure-1.c: Make S/390 target check work
with -m31 on 64 bit.
* gcc.dg/hoist-register-pr
[Ughh...I'm apparently incapable of CCing gcc-patches on the first try.
My apologies again.]
Please see the long explanation in the PR:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58123
But the short explanation for this patch is that, at the very least, we
should fix the location of the GIM
On 02/19/2015 08:50 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 08:45:08AM -0800, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
[And this time, actually CCing the list :)].
Gentlemen!
Reading in the compiler state for pch (gt_pch_restore) obliterates the
DIE table, and consequently the DW_TAG_GNU_[BE]INCL* DIEs
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:33:20AM -0800, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> Well, any PCH file we generate will have some sort of early DIE in it (at
> the very least the compilation unit DIE) and we will read these in at PCH
> read-in time, obliterating whatever was already there. But most
> importantly, w
The offset overflow warning would cause build fails when function's
start line is missing(0). Until the start line issues is fixed, we
will suppress this warning.
Testing on-going. OK for google-4_9?
Thanks,
Dehao
Index: gcc/auto-profile.c
===
ok
david
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Dehao Chen wrote:
> The offset overflow warning would cause build fails when function's
> start line is missing(0). Until the start line issues is fixed, we
> will suppress this warning.
>
> Testing on-going. OK for google-4_9?
>
> Thanks,
> Dehao
>
> I
On 19/02/15 16:31 +0100, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
Lately,
26_numerics/random/binomial_distribution/operators/values.cc has
started to FAIL on trunk with a timeout for my autotester for
cris-elf, a soft-float simulator target running a cgen-generated
simulator on a six-year-old x86_64-linux-gnu h
On 02/19/2015 09:38 AM, Patrick Marlier wrote:
Thanks Sandra. Just a minor comment.
-Valid abort status bits (when the value is not @code{_XBEGIN_STARTED}) are:
+If the transaction aborts, the return value is one of:
Here it is really bits. So maybe something like that:
If the transaction abort
Hi,
I've just committed obvious fix to PR65116 after testing it with a fresh
bootstrap and regression test with all languages. I have also confirmed that
it still fixes the race on additional_sources.
The fix is trivial, and I don't think I could have goofed up with a testsuite
change more an
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:06:40PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Feb 2015, Marek Polacek wrote:
>
> > The problem exposed by this PR is (IIUC) that we hadn't gotten around to
> > recomputing the inline parameters in the case when optimize_inline_calls
> > introduces new statements. Th
The branch limits are a bit too far, resulting in reloc errors in rare
cases. Ok?
* config/v850/v850.md (branch_normal): Adjust branch limits.
(branch_invert): Likewise.
(branch_z_normal): Likewise.
(branch_z_invert): Likewise.
(branch_nz_normal): Likewise
DR 488 changed std:rotate to return an iterator, implemented on trunk
in r219793. To avoid problems where code expecting a non-void return
links to an instantiation of the old void-returning definition I'm
putting the new definition in the inline namespace _V2 (already used
for other entities that
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
2015-02-12 H.J. Lu
Richard Henderson
PR rtl/32219
* cgraphunit.c (cgraph_node::finalize_function): Set definition
before notice_global_symbol.
(varpool_nod
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>
> 2015-02-12 H.J. Lu
> Richard Henderson
>
> PR rtl/32219
> * cgraphunit.c (cgraph_node::finalize_function): Set definition
>
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 1:07 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>>
>> 2015-02-12 H.J. Lu
>> Richard Henderson
>>
>> PR rtl/32219
>> * cgraphunit
On 02/19/2015 01:04 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> 2015-02-19 Uros Bizjak
>
> * config/alpha/alpha.c (alpha_in_small_data_p): Reject common symbols.
Ok. Thanks.
r~
On 02/19/2015 01:07 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> > The attached patch fixes all alpha-linux-gnu failures.
>> >
>> > 2015-02-19 Uros Bizjak
>> >
>> > * config/alpha/alpha.c (alpha_in_small_data_p): Reject common symbols.
>> >
>> > Patch was bootstrapped and regression tested on alphaev68-linux-gnu.
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 02/19/2015 01:04 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> 2015-02-19 Uros Bizjak
>>
>> * config/alpha/alpha.c (alpha_in_small_data_p): Reject common symbols.
>
> Ok. Thanks.
We tried it on ia64 and failed with Ada build.
--
H.J.
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:35 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> On 02/19/2015 01:04 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>> 2015-02-19 Uros Bizjak
>>>
>>> * config/alpha/alpha.c (alpha_in_small_data_p): Reject common symbols.
>>
>> Ok. Thanks.
>
> We tri
Hi,
this patch fixes alignment propagation that causes wrong code on solex and
firefox.
Patch is by Martin, I just added the obvous MINUS_EXPR fix (the offset would be
wrong,
but I see no reason for MINUX_ExPR appearing there with constant parameter),
went
ahead and commited the fix.
Tested on
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 12:39:29AM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> Hi,
> this patch fixes alignment propagation that causes wrong code on solex and
> firefox.
> Patch is by Martin, I just added the obvous MINUS_EXPR fix (the offset would
> be wrong,
> but I see no reason for MINUX_ExPR appearing ther
On 2015-02-16, at 1:47 PM, John David Anglin wrote:
> On 2015-02-16, at 11:38 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>
>>>
>>> Possibly the constant can somehow be forced into the data section where the
>>> relocations
>>> aren't a problem?
>>
>> Hmm. It looks like we might already do that. See
>> de
Hi!
As reported, !!x == y is quite common in the Linux kernel
and unlike the !x == y case it usually doesn't mean mistyped
!(x == y) or x != y. clang++ apparently doesn't warn about that
either, and it doesn't warn even about the case where ! is applied
to a bool. As the argument is already fold
I've committed the attached patch to fix two failures of
tree-ssa tests on SH. Tested on sh4-unknown-linux-gnu
and i686-pc-linux-gnu.
Regards,
kaz
--
2015-02-19 Kaz Kojima
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c: Don't XFAIL on sh*-*-*.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/sra-12.c: Skip for sh*-
In spite of the relocation, this sequence is shorter than loading the constant
and symbol_ref independently
when the constant doesn't fit in 14 bits. So, I believe this is a win.
I've also added a REG_EQUAL note to improve optimization.
Tested on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu, hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 an
On 2015-02-18 12:25 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
Hello!
Richard's patch at [1] is needed to fix a bootstrap failure on
alpha-linux-gnu on 4.8 branch. Without the patch, IRA creates
different sequences, depending on the presence of -g option.
One of the many comparison failures is in expr.c, where
-f
Hi Marcus,
>> The handling of SYMBOL_SMALL_TPREL is present in 4.9 and very clearly
>> has exactly the same issue.
Please find attached the patch ported for gcc-4.9.
Please review the patch and let us know if its okay?
Regression tested on aarch64-elf.
Thanks,
Naveen
2015-02-20 Andrew Pinski
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 12:39:29AM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > Hi,
> > this patch fixes alignment propagation that causes wrong code on solex and
> > firefox.
> > Patch is by Martin, I just added the obvous MINUS_EXPR fix (the offset
> > would be wrong,
> > but I see no reason for MINUX_ExPR
Hello Everyone,
Attached, please find a patch that is a fix for PR c++/60198. Is this
OK for trunk?
Here are the changelog entries:
Cp/ChangeLog
+2015-02-19 Balaji V. Iyer
+
+ PR c++/60198
+ * pt.c (tsubst_copy_and_build): Added CILK_SPAWN_STMT case.
+
Testsuite/ChangeLo
81 matches
Mail list logo
