On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:50 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/25/2015 05:09 PM, Sebastian Pop wrote:
Specifically, it seems to me that copy_bbs should be refactored into
copy_bbs and copy_bbs_for_threading or somesuch. Where those
routines call into refactored common subroutines,
Ok?
2015-03-27 Marek Polacek pola...@redhat.com
* gimple-iterator.h (gsi_prev_nondebug): Fix typo.
diff --git gcc/gimple-iterator.h gcc/gimple-iterator.h
index 6be88dd..9aa7508 100644
--- gcc/gimple-iterator.h
+++ gcc/gimple-iterator.h
@@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ gsi_next_nondebug
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 10:58:14AM +0100, Tobias Burnus wrote:
For -fopenmp-simd, GCC did not properly jump passed the clauses of
ignored directives. It worked, for for simd directives and for
those without clauses.
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86-64-gnu-linux.
OK for the trunk?
Tobias
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
This patch avoids various ICEs due to -fcheck-pointer-bounds used for not
supported languages. All options get the same languages list. Bootstrapped
and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Does it look OK?
Hi Xingxing,
do you know if it is possible to test this patch inside Marvell (as it
is a fix for iWMMXT arch.) ?
Thanks a lot
Yvan
On 23 March 2015 at 18:47, Yvan Roux yvan.r...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi,
On 23 March 2015 at 17:08, Ramana Radhakrishnan
ramana@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed,
From: Trevor Saunders tbsaunde+...@tbsaunde.org
Hi,
Unfortunately when testing r217869 I didn't realize the modified code in
alpha.c was only used for some alpha targets. So testing alpha-linux wasn't
enough or even really useful :(
I tested cc1 for alpha-dec-vms now builds as discussed before
2015-03-27 13:13 GMT+03:00 Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
This patch avoids various ICEs due to -fcheck-pointer-bounds used for not
supported languages. All options get the same languages list.
Ping.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-03/msg01014.html
Thanks,
Kyrill
On 19/03/15 14:39, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
This patch fixes PR 65358. For details look at the excellent write-up
by Honggyu in bugzilla. The problem is that we're trying to pass a struct
partially on the stack
Hi,
this patch fixes ICE in is_a test when cgraph_update_edges_for_call_stmt_node
tries to convert non-call stmt to call. I have bootstrapped/regtested
x86_64-linux and tested firefox/chromium LTO build, so hope it is the last
issue surfacing from the today verifier change.
PR
Original post https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-01/msg02096.html
Tested check-gcc on aarch64-none-linux-gnu (native), fixes all variants of
gcc.dg/pch/largefile.c (below).
Ok?
Cheers, Alan
gcc/ChangeLog:
Backport r207785 from mainline
2014-01-31 Kyle McMartin
For -fopenmp-simd, GCC did not properly jump passed the clauses of
ignored directives. It worked, for for simd directives and for
those without clauses.
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86-64-gnu-linux.
OK for the trunk?
Tobias
2015-03-28 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de
PR c/65586
gcc/c/
*
On 27 March 2015 at 03:14, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
On 2015.03.27 at 00:46 +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
On 26 March 2015 at 22:12, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
After this fix, I can see build failures in glibc:
key_call.c:574:1: internal compiler error: in inline_call, at
Hi,
This patch avoids various ICEs due to -fcheck-pointer-bounds used for not
supported languages. All options get the same languages list. Bootstrapped
and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Does it look OK?
Thanks,
Ilya
--
2015-03-27 Ilya Enkovich ilya.enkov...@intel.com
PR
On 03/26/2015 09:56 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 01:19:38PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
@@ -11368,6 +11349,7 @@ static void
s390_reorg (void)
{
bool pool_overflow = false;
+ int hw_before, hw_after;
/* Make sure all splits have been performed; splits
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 10:30:38AM +0100, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
At a second glance it is not really clear to me why we disable hotpatching
for nested functions at
all. While it is probably a bit difficult to actually hotpatch them I don't
see why we should
prevent it. We probably just
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 10:55:48AM +0100, Marek Polacek wrote:
Ok?
Sure, it is obvious.
2015-03-27 Marek Polacek pola...@redhat.com
* gimple-iterator.h (gsi_prev_nondebug): Fix typo.
diff --git gcc/gimple-iterator.h gcc/gimple-iterator.h
index 6be88dd..9aa7508 100644
---
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 12:50:09AM +0100, Marek Polacek wrote:
2015-03-26 Marek Polacek pola...@redhat.com
PR sanitizer/65583
* ubsan.c (ubsan_create_edge): New function.
(instrument_bool_enum_load): Call it.
(instrument_nonnull_arg): Likewise.
On 03/27/2015 01:05 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
For misalignment memory access, c6x gcc will cause issue, so need remove
clobber (match_scratch ...) which will be symmetric with movmisalign
mode_load, then pass compiling and generate correct assembly code.
* config/c6x/c6x.md
Dear Andre,
I am in the UK as of last night. Before leaving, I bootstrapped and
regtested your patch and all was well. I must drive to Cambridge this
afternoon to see my mother and will try to get to it either this
evening or tomorrow morning. There is so much of it and it touches
many places; so
This is a tiny tweak to add a missing piece of C++14 support, the
duration literals should be usable via using namespace std::chrono.
It doesn't affect anything in C++03 or C++11 mode so safe for trunk
now.
Tested x86_64-linux, committed to trunk.
commit 907f5e128d855d339829abbd1d314f382e3ae6fc
This is a problem where we reject labels on a jump instruction because
they are invalid with pic for the 's' constraint. It seems that the
constraint wasn't checked in earlier versions of the compiler.
Fixed by adding a new constraint and using that instead.
Bernd
commit
Hi,
this patch adds verification to libgomp.graphite/force-parallel-6.c.
Committed as approved by Jakub here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65594#c8 .
Thanks,
- Tom
Add verification to libgomp.graphite/force-parallel-6.c
2015-03-27 Tom de Vries t...@codesourcery.com
*
Hi,
I regularly run into a timeout of libgomp.graphite/force-parallel-6.c (filed as
PR65594).
This patch scales down libgomp.graphite/force-parallel-6.c, which fixes the
timeout.
Committed as approved by Jakub here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65594#c8 .
Thanks,
- Tom
On 15/03/15 23:27 -0700, Tim Shen wrote:
+#include regex
+#include testsuite_hooks.h
+
+// libstdc++/65420
+void
+test01()
+{
+ bool test __attribute__((unused)) = true;
I forgot to say that for a { dg-do compile } test you don't need a
'test' variable and don't need to #include
Hi all,
commited as r221729 to meet the legal requirements and fix some typos.
Regards,
Andre
--
Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de
Index: gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
===
--- gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog (Revision
please find attached a fix for the recently introduced regression when
allocating arrays with an intrinsic function for source=. ...
I confirm that the patch fixes pr65548 without regression.
Thanks,
Dominique
Hi,
this patch fixes PR65443, a todo in the parloops pass for function
transform_to_exit_first_loop:
...
TODO: the common case is that latch of the loop is empty and immediately
follows the loop exit. In this case, it would be better not to copy the
body of the loop, but only move
In this testcase we were crashing while trying to gimplify a switch, because
the types of the switch condition and case constants didn't match. This ICE
started with my -Wswitch-with-enum-bit-fields fix where I used the unlowered
type so that we're able to get hold of the enum type. The problem
Hi,
I would like to resubmit these patches for comments. The previous detailed
discussion is available in the below mentioned link.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01679.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg00489.html
The issue is still reproducible on GCC v4.8
The following patch fixes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65407
The patch was bootstrapped and tested on x86/x86-64, ppc64, aarch64.
Committed as rev. 221734.
2015-03-27 Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com
PR target/65407
* ira-costs.c (record_reg_classes):
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately, while normal bootstrap works OK with alpha-linux-gnu
and alphaev68-linux-gnu, the bootstrap still fails when configured
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 12:11 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net wrote:
On Mar 18, 2015, at 2:55 AM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is the updated patch with testcases. Tested on Linux/x86. OK
for trunk?
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 5:52 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 12:11 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net wrote:
On Mar 18, 2015, at 2:55 AM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is the
Hi!
For %rip addressing, we only can use disp32 and thus can add
constants to the symbol/label, but not a register etc., as
there is no instruction supporting (plus (symbol_ref) (reg))
for PIC.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
2015-03-27 Jakub Jelinek
Hi,
this patch fixes ICE with register variable when WHOPR decides to partition
it. I did not include testcase because it depends on partitining and thus
it is huge. It may be possible to produce smaller one with
-flto-partition=max
Bootstrap/regtest x86_64-linux is running, will commit it once
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 6:08 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
For %rip addressing, we only can use disp32 and thus can add
constants to the symbol/label, but not a register etc., as
there is no instruction supporting (plus (symbol_ref) (reg))
for PIC.
Bootstrapped/regtested on
On 03/06/2015 05:42 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
gcc/
PR target/65248
* output.h (default_binds_local_p_2): New.
* varasm.c (default_binds_local_p_2): Renamed to ...
(default_binds_local_p_3): This. Don't return true on protected
data symbol if protected data may be
Hi,
I notieced that GGC hash tables are now accounted to hash-table.h:alloc_entries
that is not very informative (we do not have any stats for heap hash tables that
would be nice to have).
This patch fixes the first problem by adding annotations. OK (perhaps for next
stage1?)
It took me a while to get a test case I'm happy with, so I'm
re-submitting the whole patch for approval.
2015-03-27 Caroline Tice cmt...@google.com
* final.c (final_scan_insn): Change 'cold_function_name' to
'cold_partition_name' and make it a global variable; also output
Hi,
this patch fixes ice in resolve_speculatoin expecting that there is callgraph
node for declaration it is passed. I also revisited earlier fix to
cgraph_update_edges_for_call_stmt_node: the function would still ICE if
dead indirect call was updated. I do not think it happens as only user
is
Hi,
this patch fixes bug in symtab_node::verify_symtab_nodes pointed out by Ilya.
The loop checking that there all comdats are linked by same_comdat_group was
completely bogus. In addition it checked also external symbols that are
currently not kept in groups. This bug was in mainline for months
This was breaking because ancient code in the front end to avoid
emitting unreferenced static const variables was preventing the
vdefinition flag from being set on the varpool node for the variables.
Now that we have cgraph controlling what gets emitted, there is no point
in keeping this code
Hi,
there is now pending GDB patch for: (gdb) compile print EXPR
[PATCH 4/4] compile: New 'compile print'
https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-03/msg00875.html
Reasons for this patch:
How to implement '@' GDB-like operator for libcc1
OK.
Jason
On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 13:09:19 +0100
Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:44:39PM +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote:
If it is too late for such global changes (rework initialization in
libgomp, change mic and ptx plugins), then here is a small
workaround patch to fix
On 03/27/2015 02:53 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
Yeah, and refactoring copy_bbs so that the actual edge duplication happens
in another function (thus we can have two of them).
Exactly.
I was also playing with the idea to support value-numbering the stmts
on-the-fly as we copy them and use
The following patch was ported to gcc-4.9 branch from the mainline.
The patch was bootstrapped on x86/x86-64.
Committed as rev. 221743.
2015-03-27 Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com
Backport from mainline
2015-01-30 Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com
PR
This patch reworks the out-of-ssa expander to enable coalescing of SSA
partitions that don't share the same base name. This is done only when
optimizing.
The test we use to tell whether two partitions can be merged no longer
demands them to have the same base variable when optimizing, so they
On 24/03/15 19:53, Yvan Roux wrote:
Hi,
after the issue with duplicated alternatives exhibited by PR64208, I
checked the arm.md file and found that *arm_subsi3_insn has a
duplication where alt 4 is (r,rI,r) and alt 6 is (r,r,r), this results
in emitting an rsb instruction instead of a sub one,
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/06/2015 05:42 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
gcc/
PR target/65248
* output.h (default_binds_local_p_2): New.
* varasm.c (default_binds_local_p_2): Renamed to ...
(default_binds_local_p_3): This.
On Mar 27, 2015, Alexandre Oliva aol...@redhat.com wrote:
Regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu native and on i686-pc-linux-gnu native
on x86_64, so without lto. Is this ok to install?
Err, sorry, wrong keystroke, I didn't mean to post that message yet, I
was just drafting it while several of the
In gcc-5/changes.html the section about __has_include and __has_include_next
says:
The header search paths for __has_include_next and __has_include_next are
equivalent to those of the standard directive #include and the extension
#include_next respectively.
I think the first __has_include_next
The following patch avoids the dereferencing of
a null pointer, which led to an ICE. The patch
here is a slight variation on the patch submitted
by drikosev at otenet dot gr. The testcase is a
slight variation on the code submitted by FX.
Built and regression tested on x86_64-*-freebsd.
OK to
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Marek Polacek pola...@redhat.com wrote:
In this testcase we were crashing while trying to gimplify a switch, because
the types of the switch condition and case constants didn't match. This ICE
started with my -Wswitch-with-enum-bit-fields fix where I used the
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Marek Polacek pola...@redhat.com wrote:
In this testcase we were crashing while trying to gimplify a switch, because
the types of the switch condition and case constants didn't match. This ICE
started with my -Wswitch-with-enum-bit-fields fix where I used the
Steve Kargl wrote:
The following patch avoids the dereferencing of
a null pointer, which led to an ICE. The patch
here is a slight variation on the patch submitted
by drikosev at otenet dot gr. The testcase is a
slight variation on the code submitted by FX.
Built and regression tested on
The related warning:
g++ -c -DIN_GCC_FRONTEND -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE
-fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing
-Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wmissing-format-attribute -Woverloaded-virtual
-pedantic -Wno-long-long
At first glance this looked like only a regression in 4.9. While searching for
the regression I noticed an error in unit.c (probably a copy/paste error). Upon
correcting that obvious error, the regression found in 4.9 also appeared in 5.0.
The fix is simple and obvious and I have regression
Steve,
AFAICT your test succeeds without your patch and does not test that the ICE
reported by FX is gone (indeed it is with your patch).
TIA
Dominique
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 01:01:57AM +0100, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
AFAICT your test succeeds without your patch and does not test that the ICE
reported by FX is gone (indeed it is with your patch).
Yeah, I thought about that, but did not pursue it, yet.
It is a zero-size string issue
On 3/27/15 21:03, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
On 03/27/2015 01:05 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
For misalignment memory access, c6x gcc will cause issue, so need remove
clobber (match_scratch ...) which will be symmetric with movmisalign
mode_load, then pass compiling and generate correct assembly code.
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Jonathan Wakely jwak...@redhat.com wrote:
I forgot to say that for a { dg-do compile } test you don't need a
'test' variable and don't need to #include testsuite_hooks.h,
Committed.
--
Regards,
Tim Shen
commit a1b32eec28442e38b830078ce3a9c142b1072647
Author:
62 matches
Mail list logo
