Ping.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-05/msg00071.html
Thanks,
Kyrill
On 01/05/15 17:02, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
GCC has some logic to expand calls to pow (x, 0.75), pow (0.25) and pow (x,
(int)k + 0.5)
using square roots. So, for the above examples it would generate sqrt (x) *
I'm still playing with the code, so this is a partial review.
We should prevent inlining of ARM state functions into functions we know
will be T16 if !TARGET_SOFT_FLOAT on the grounds that the architecture
doesn't have floating point instruction encodings in the T16 ISA
(Thumb1). We'll just
Hi!
On Thu, 7 May 2015 13:39:40 +0200, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 01:26:57PM +0200, Rainer Orth wrote:
As reported in the PR, with the addition of all those OpenACC tests,
libgomp make check times have skyrocketed since the testsuite is still
run
On 06/05/15 15:27, Christian Bruel wrote:
Implements the hooks for #pragma GCC target
A test included to check that macros were correctly defined/undefined on
pragma regions.
Thanks
Christian
Missing the hooks - this only appears to have the test.
Ramana
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 10:10 PM, François Dumont frs.dum...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Following Marc Glisse comment #4
on:https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65641 I would like to
propose this enhancement to the hash functor for pointers. It simply gets
rid of the irrelevant bits on
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
On Mon, 4 May 2015, Richard Biener wrote:
On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 12:46 AM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
Hello,
this patch tries to tighten a bit the range estimate for x%y.
slp-perm-7.c
started failing by
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Yuri Rumyantsev ysrum...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Here is a patch which gives us significant speed-up on HASWELL for
test containing masked stores. The main goal of that patch is attempt
to avoid HW hazard for maskmove instructions through inserting
additional
On 1 May 2015 at 01:23, Trevor Saunders tbsau...@tbsaunde.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 11:58:09PM +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On April 30, 2015 5:53:02 PM GMT+02:00, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/30/2015 01:58 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
Hi,
On 30 April
On 07/05/15 19:07, Jeff Law wrote:
On 05/06/2015 05:36 AM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
On 30/04/15 00:18, Joseph Myers wrote:
On Wed, 29 Apr 2015, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
only affects [u]int_fastN_t types
(on 64bit systems for N=16,32 musl uses int but glibc uses long)
i can fix glibc-stdint.h, but
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 1:37 AM, Jim Wilson jim.wil...@linaro.org wrote:
I noticed this while reading the match-and-simplify docs. The
gimple_simplify API list has two built-in function cases with three
tree args. The last one is supposed to have four tree args for a
ternary function (3
On 21 September 2012 at 21:11, H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com wrote:
Hi,
This patch adds i386/knetbsd-gnu64.h for x86_64-knetbsd-gnu. OK to
install?
I now installed this to trunk as r222903 after Jeff's approval.
Thanks!
Thanks.
H.J.
---
2012-09-21 H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com
On 07/05/15 19:02, Jeff Law wrote:
On 05/06/2015 05:24 AM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
On 29/04/15 00:30, Joseph Myers wrote:
On Mon, 20 Apr 2015, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
* config/linux.opt (mmusl): New option.
New -m options need documenting in invoke.texi.
Patch v3.
Now with
Hi!
On Mon, 27 Apr 2015 11:20:30 +0100, Richard Sandiford
richard.sandif...@arm.com wrote:
This patch [...] by replacing most of genrecog [...]
OK to commit?
Is it a bug that I'm seeing these warnings only in the stage 1 build with
the bootstrap GCC 4.6 compiler, but not anymore later on? (I
Hi,
GCC's IVO currently handles every IV use independently, which is not right
by learning from cases reported in PR65447.
The rationale is:
1) Lots of address type IVs refer to the same memory object, share similar
base and have same step. We should handle these IVs as a group in order to
Hi Mikael,
thanks for the review. I still have some questions/remarks before commiting:
On Thu, 07 May 2015 12:14:59 +0200
Mikael Morin mikael.mo...@sfr.fr wrote:
snip
@@ -2158,6 +2158,8 @@ build_function_decl (gfc_symbol * sym, bool global)
gfc_set_decl_assembler_name (fndecl,
Hi Michael,
On Thu, 7 May 2015 18:52:52, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
Hi Bernd,
On 05/06/2015 03:01 PM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
On Tue, 5 May 2015 18:03:15, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
Now that gcc-5 is out, what about an automake-1.11.6 update for gcc-6?
BTW, the actual commands I use to
On 05/08/2015 12:10 AM, Bruce Korb wrote:
On 05/06/15 01:58, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
Trivial patch for fixincludes.
A) sufficiently trivial that explicit permission ought not be required
Agreed for the actual code change - more important is to notify the automake
revbump.
B) it is
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Kyrill Tkachov
kyrylo.tkac...@foss.arm.com wrote:
Hi all,
GCC has some logic to expand calls to pow (x, 0.75), pow (0.25) and pow (x,
(int)k + 0.5)
using square roots. So, for the above examples it would generate sqrt (x) *
sqrt (sqrt (x)),
sqrt (sqrt (x))
@@ -5204,28 +5199,6 @@ gnat_write_global_declarations (void)
types_used_by_var_decl_insert (t, dummy_global);
}
}
-
- /* Output debug information for all global type declarations first. This
- ensures that global types whose compilation hasn't been finalized
yet, -
Am 2015-05-07 um 13:37 schrieb Richard Sandiford:
One problem with the automatically-generated gen_rtx_FOO () macros
is that they always have a mode parameter, even for codes like SET
where the mode should always be VOIDmode. This inevitably leads to
cases where a caller accidentally passes
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com wrote:
@@ -5204,28 +5199,6 @@ gnat_write_global_declarations (void)
types_used_by_var_decl_insert (t, dummy_global);
}
}
-
- /* Output debug information for all global type declarations first. This
-
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Marcus Shawcroft
marcus.shawcr...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 September 2014 04:45, Michael Collison
michael.colli...@linaro.org wrote:
On certain patterns in atomics.md the constraint 'n' is used in combination
with the predicate atomic_op_operand. The constraint
Hi!
On 06.05.2015 14:38, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
Hi!
On Tue, 5 May 2015 15:38:03 -0400, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2015-04-29 at 14:10 +0200, Mikael Morin wrote:
Le 29/04/2015 02:02, David Malcolm a écrit :
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/parse.c b/gcc/fortran/parse.c
index
Franz Sirl franz.sirl-ker...@lauterbach.com writes:
Am 2015-05-08 um 13:57 schrieb Segher Boessenkool:
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 12:32:30PM +0200, Franz Sirl wrote:
this patch (r222882 is fine, r222883 fails) breaks bootstrap for me on
x86_64-linux-gnu:
i386.md has set:BND twice; replace that
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 10:18:46AM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
2015-05-08 Segher Boessenkool seg...@kernel.crashing.org
* config/rs6000/rs6000.md: Require operand inequality in one
of the peepholes.
Okay.
Is there an artificial testcase?
I don't have one.
On 05/08/2015 03:35 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com wrote:
@@ -5204,28 +5199,6 @@ gnat_write_global_declarations (void)
types_used_by_var_decl_insert (t, dummy_global);
}
}
-
- /* Output debug information for
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Tom de Vries tom_devr...@mentor.com wrote:
Hi,
this patch fixes PR66013.
I.
Consider this test-case, with a va_list passed from f2 to f2_1:
...
#include stdarg.h
inline int __attribute__((always_inline))
f2_1 (va_list ap)
{
return va_arg (ap, int);
This peephole transforms
lis a,HI ; ori a,a,LO
cmpw c,a,b ; beq c,...
to
xoris a,b,HI1
cmpwi c,a,LO1 ; beq c,...
when a and c are dead after this. But it forgets to check that a and b
are not the same reg, generating non-sensical code. This patch fixes that.
Tested etc.; is this
H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Szabolcs Nagy szabolcs.n...@arm.com
wrote:
On 21/04/15 15:59, Matthew Fortune wrote:
Rich Felker dal...@libc.org writes:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 01:58:02PM +, Matthew Fortune wrote:
There does however appear to
On 08/05/15 15:25, Matthew Fortune wrote:
H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Szabolcs Nagy szabolcs.n...@arm.com
wrote:
On 21/04/15 15:59, Matthew Fortune wrote:
Rich Felker dal...@libc.org writes:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 01:58:02PM +, Matthew
On 08/05/15 16:13, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
On 08/05/15 15:46, Matthew Fortune wrote:
Szabolcs Nagy szabolcs.n...@arm.com writes:
if you think that's ok, i can now submit the patch with %{msoft-float:-
sf} added to all abi variants.
That's fine. Go ahead.
the patch for the record.
I've
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 01:54:17PM +0200, Andre Vehreschild wrote:
I do not have the privileges to do a review so I can't help you there. Good
luck finding a reviewer.
You probably understand this area of code as well as anyone
else, and your contributions to gfortran over the last few
On 8 May 2015 at 16:23, Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com wrote:
Yes, the i386 backend has not implemented conditional sibcalls.
See: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60159
Jay.
Le 08/05/2015 13:54, Andre Vehreschild a écrit :
Hi Mikael,
at first I tried to fix this issue with the scalarizer, too, but I could not
grasp how the scalarizer was working. Do you have any documentation, how it is
meant to be? I mean, I have read the comments in the code, but those are
Hello,
Attempting to build libiberty on LynxOS-178 fails trying to compile
mkstemps.c with the following error:
mkstemps.c:84:18: error: storage size of 'tv' isn't known
struct timeval tv;
^
This file would normally include sys/time.h to get the type's
On Thu, 2015-05-07 at 17:30 -0700, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
Hi folks.
I have divided the patches into 10 pieces. The patches are
interdependent and cannot be applied independently. I am merely
dividing them up to aid the relevant reviewers.
As I've mentioned elsewhere, the patchset as
Szabolcs Nagy szabolcs.n...@arm.com writes:
On 08/05/15 15:25, Matthew Fortune wrote:
H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Szabolcs Nagy
szabolcs.n...@arm.com
wrote:
On 21/04/15 15:59, Matthew Fortune wrote:
Rich Felker dal...@libc.org writes:
On
Hi Mikael,
?? I don't get you there? What do you mean? Do you think the
alloc_comp_class_3/4.* are not correctly testing the issue? Any idea of how
to test this better? I mean the pr is about this artificial constructs. I
merely struck it in search of a pr about allocatable components.
Hi,
so attached is a quick and dirty solution for the allocatable return value
problem. I personally don't like it. It is making a special case from the
assign a function result to a variable. May be you have a better idea how to do
this in gfortran style.
- Andre
On Fri, 8 May 2015 15:31:46
Hello,
here is a rewrite of the patch, using wide_int, and improving a bit the
result. Same ChangeLog, tested again on x86_64-linux-gnu.
--
Marc GlisseIndex: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp97.c
===
---
On 08/05/15 14:56, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 08/05/15 11:18, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Kyrill Tkachov
kyrylo.tkac...@foss.arm.com wrote:
Hi all,
GCC has some logic to expand calls to pow (x, 0.75), pow (0.25) and pow (x,
(int)k + 0.5)
using square roots. So, for
On 08/05/15 14:56, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Szabolcs Nagy szabolcs.n...@arm.com wrote:
On 21/04/15 15:59, Matthew Fortune wrote:
Rich Felker dal...@libc.org writes:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 01:58:02PM +, Matthew Fortune wrote:
There does however appear to be both
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 03:41:31PM +0100, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
I.e. as it stands this patch is not OK for backporting to GCC 5
without further discussion.
There is also the perspective that we should be able to aim for
an ABI variant agnostic dynamic linker at some point over the next
On 08/05/15 11:18, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Kyrill Tkachov
kyrylo.tkac...@foss.arm.com wrote:
Hi all,
GCC has some logic to expand calls to pow (x, 0.75), pow (0.25) and pow (x,
(int)k + 0.5)
using square roots. So, for the above examples it would generate sqrt
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Szabolcs Nagy szabolcs.n...@arm.com wrote:
On 21/04/15 15:59, Matthew Fortune wrote:
Rich Felker dal...@libc.org writes:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 01:58:02PM +, Matthew Fortune wrote:
There does however appear to be both soft and hard float variants
Patch
Thomas Schwinge tho...@codesourcery.com writes:
Hi!
On Mon, 27 Apr 2015 11:20:30 +0100, Richard Sandiford
richard.sandif...@arm.com wrote:
This patch [...] by replacing most of genrecog [...]
OK to commit?
Looks good to me FWIW. Probably counts as obvious.
Thanks,
Richard
On 05/08/2015 07:41 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
On Thu, 2015-05-07 at 17:30 -0700, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
Hi folks.
I have divided the patches into 10 pieces. The patches are
interdependent and cannot be applied independently. I am merely
dividing them up to aid the relevant reviewers.
As I've
Hi,
this patch fixes PR66013.
I.
Consider this test-case, with a va_list passed from f2 to f2_1:
...
#include stdarg.h
inline int __attribute__((always_inline))
f2_1 (va_list ap)
{
return va_arg (ap, int);
}
int
f2 (int i, ...)
{
int res;
va_list ap;
va_start (ap, i);
res = f2_1
On 08/05/15 15:46, Matthew Fortune wrote:
Szabolcs Nagy szabolcs.n...@arm.com writes:
if you think that's ok, i can now submit the patch with %{msoft-float:-
sf} added to all abi variants.
That's fine. Go ahead.
the patch for the record.
Changelog:
2015-05-08 Gregor Richards
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
Hello,
here is a rewrite of the patch, using wide_int, and improving a bit the
result. Same ChangeLog, tested again on x86_64-linux-gnu.
Please use /* */ for comments.
Otherwise ok!
Thanks,
Richard.
--
Marc Glisse
Le 08/05/2015 12:54, Andre Vehreschild a écrit :
Hi Mikael,
thanks for the review. I still have some questions/remarks before commiting:
@@ -5898,8 +5900,21 @@ gfc_generate_function_code (gfc_namespace * ns)
if (TREE_TYPE (DECL_RESULT (fndecl)) != void_type_node)
{
+ bool
Hi all,
please find attached a patch for 66035. An ICE occurred when in a structure
constructor an allocatable component of type class was initialized with an
existing class object. This was caused by
- the size of the memory to allocate for the component was miscalculated,
- the vptr was not
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Segher Boessenkool
seg...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
This peephole transforms
lis a,HI ; ori a,a,LO
cmpw c,a,b ; beq c,...
to
xoris a,b,HI1
cmpwi c,a,LO1 ; beq c,...
when a and c are dead after this. But it forgets to check that a and b
are not
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 02:25:11PM +, Matthew Fortune wrote:
H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Szabolcs Nagy szabolcs.n...@arm.com
wrote:
On 21/04/15 15:59, Matthew Fortune wrote:
Rich Felker dal...@libc.org writes:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at
Currently the vectorizer forces unrolling for grouped loads that
have DR_STEP not constant, forcing the elements loaded with strided
load support. The following patch enhances that machinery to deal
with SLP used groups that have non-constant DR_STEP, avoiding the
excessive unrolling (and
On 05/07/2015 06:20 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
This is a separate issue which really shouldn't have anything to do with
this, but is there a specific reason why:
void good1(int x, int y)
{
_Bool pf;
asm(cmpl %2,%1
: =@ccp (pf)
: r (x), g (y));
if (pf)
beta();
On 05/08/2015 09:23 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 05/07/2015 06:20 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
This is a separate issue which really shouldn't have anything to do with
this, but is there a specific reason why:
void good1(int x, int y)
{
_Bool pf;
asm(cmpl %2,%1
: =@ccp (pf)
On Fri, 8 May 2015, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
One example where there is an incompatibility is missing:
Formerly it had code that emulated the missing flex by
creating a dummy lex.yy.c from the hopefully installed
pre-compiled flex output file. But the version from the
trunk does nothing,
OK for trunk?
H.J.
* config/cris/linux.h (CRIS_ASM_SUBTARGET_SPEC): Use
FPIE_OR_FPIC_SPEC.
---
gcc/config/cris/linux.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/config/cris/linux.h b/gcc/config/cris/linux.h
index bd57986..262aac5 100644
---
OK for trunk?
* config/mips/gnu-user.h (NO_SHARED_SPECS): Use
NO_FPIE_AND_FPIC_SPEC.
---
gcc/config/mips/gnu-user.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/config/mips/gnu-user.h b/gcc/config/mips/gnu-user.h
index 28b00ed..dd4cf11 100644
---
On 2015.05.08 at 09:38 -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote:
This patch has broken the glibc build. I am not sure if the problem is
a bug in your patch or a bug in the code used by glibc. Here is a
cutdown test case from glibc (timezone/scheck.c). This code compiled
before your patch but now it
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 11:25 PM, Thomas Koenig tkoe...@netcologne.de wrote:
Hello world,
this is an update of the matmul inline patch. The only difference to
the last version is that it has the ubound simplification taken out.
Any further comments? OK for trunk?
Thomas
* mkstemps.c: #include time.h if HAVE_TIME_H is defined
but not HAVE_SYS_TIME_H.
Ok.
Thank you, DJ. Pushed to both GCC and binutils-gdb.
--
Joel
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Joseph Myers jos...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On Fri, 6 Mar 2015, H.J. Lu wrote:
+# We don't want to compile the compiler with -fPIE, it make PCH fail.
+COMPILER += @NO_PIE_CFLAGS@
+
+# Link with -no-pie since we compile the compiler with -fno-PIE.
+LINKER +=
On 05/08/2015 08:54 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
Anyway, I'll look into whether the branch around alpha can be optimized, but
I'd be shocked if I'd be able to do anything about the branch around beta.
True, there's nothing in between that will clobber the flags so it would be an
excellent
On Fri, 8 May 2015, Rich Felker wrote:
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 03:41:31PM +0100, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
I.e. as it stands this patch is not OK for backporting to GCC 5
without further discussion.
There is also the perspective that we should be able to aim for
an ABI variant
On 05/07/2015 06:15 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
/* This case really should produce good code in both cases */
void good1(int x, int y)
{
_Bool pf;
asm(cmpl %2,%1
: =@ccp (pf)
: r (x), g (y));
if (pf)
beta();
}
void bad1(int x, int y)
{
_Bool le, pf;
On 05/08/2015 03:26 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
@@ -5204,28 +5199,6 @@ gnat_write_global_declarations (void)
types_used_by_var_decl_insert (t, dummy_global);
}
}
-
- /* Output debug information for all global type declarations first. This
- ensures that global types
OK for trunk?
H.J.
* config/sparc/linux.h (ASM_SPEC): Use FPIE_OR_FPIC_SPEC.
* config/sparc/linux64.h (ASM_SPEC): Likewise.
---
gcc/config/sparc/linux.h | 2 +-
gcc/config/sparc/linux64.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
OK for trunk?
H.J.
* config/rs6000/sysv4.h (ASM_SPEC): Use FPIE_OR_FPIC_SPEC.
---
gcc/config/rs6000/sysv4.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/sysv4.h b/gcc/config/rs6000/sysv4.h
index 9917c2f..1041648 100644
---
; This pattern is identical to the truncsipsi2 pattern except
; that it uses a SUBREG instead of a TRUNC. It is needed in
; order to prevent reload from converting (set:SI (SUBREG:PSI (SI)))
; into (SET:PSI (PSI)).
I'm not sure what that's supposed to mean (what's an SI set of a PSI
... to prepare alpha for TARGET_SUPPORTS_WIDE_INT switch.
2015-05-08 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
* config/alpha/alpha.c (alpha_emit_set_const_1)
(alpha_emit_set_long_const, alpha_extract_integer)
(alpha_legitimate_constant_p, alpha_split_const_mov)
(alpha_expand_block_clear,
On Thu, 2015-05-07 at 21:15 +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 12:00:20PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
OK. Please install if you haven't already.
I have not, so will do momentarily. Thanks,
Marek
Marek,
This patch has broken the glibc build. I am not sure if the
On Fri, 8 May 2015, Steve Ellcey wrote:
On Thu, 2015-05-07 at 21:15 +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 12:00:20PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
OK. Please install if you haven't already.
I have not, so will do momentarily. Thanks,
Marek
Marek,
This patch has
* mkstemps.c: #include time.h if HAVE_TIME_H is defined
but not HAVE_SYS_TIME_H.
Ok.
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 04:50:28PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
On Fri, 8 May 2015, Rich Felker wrote:
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 03:41:31PM +0100, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
I.e. as it stands this patch is not OK for backporting to GCC 5
without further discussion.
There is also the
On 05/08/2015 12:40 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
On 05/07/2015 02:39 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
All jcc mnemonics implemented as =@
to make it easy for someone reading the manual
to figure out what condition is desired.
One request: would it be possible to get a cpp symbol for this (e.g.
On 05/08/2015 04:57 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 2:34 AM, Aldy Hernandez al...@redhat.com wrote:
Maybe you can split out the Java aliases stuff (that annoyed me multiple times
when trying to refactor the FE - middle-end interface). It looks
unrelated enough.
Thanks,
On 05/06/2015 11:29 AM, Michael Meissner wrote:
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 04:03:00PM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Jeff Law l...@redhat.com writes:
So my worry here is that folks writing these loops to iterate over modes
are going to easily miss the != VOIDmode terminator, or not know when to
On May 8, 2015 8:43:15 PM GMT+02:00, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 05/08/2015 03:27 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Yuri Rumyantsev ysrum...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi All,
Here is a patch which gives us significant speed-up on HASWELL for
test containing masked
On 08-05-15 17:31, Richard Biener wrote:
OK for trunk?
As noted in one of the PRs I think that it is the proper time to
re-implement the stdarg optimization on the un-lowered form which
should also fix this.
AFAIU, the implementation of the stdarg optimization on the un-lowered form
should
On May 7, 2015, at 5:39 PM, Aldy Hernandez al...@redhat.com wrote:
So, I don’t feel there is anything in there for me to review, I’d like the
front-end maintainer to review.
dearly-testsuite.patch
Description: Binary data
This is fine if it works. Thanks.
Ian
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Aldy Hernandez al...@redhat.com wrote:
On 05/07/2015 03:38 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
For testing parity coming out of asm flags.
---
gcc/config/i386/i386-modes.def | 2 ++
gcc/config/i386/i386.c | 19 +++
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Seems like it ought to move forward now.
Oh
On 05/08/2015 03:27 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Yuri Rumyantsev ysrum...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Here is a patch which gives us significant speed-up on HASWELL for
test containing masked stores. The main goal of that patch is attempt
to avoid HW hazard for
On 05/07/2015 09:51 AM, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
Are there any cases where you had to do something other than just regenerate
the various files?
Nope - at least nothing that I would call doing something other. What I did:
* touch each configure.ac to ensure automake is really used
* do
On 05/08/2015 11:08 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
This is fine if it works. Thanks.
Ian
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Aldy Hernandez al...@redhat.com wrote:
As mentioned, no regressions with --enable-languages=go.
I will mark the Go changes as approved pending on the rest of the
patches
Jeff Law l...@redhat.com writes:
On 05/08/2015 10:50 AM, Joseph Myers wrote:
Note that however the dynamic linker does properly need to save and
restore call-clobbered registers used for argument passing (because of
IFUNCs, user-provided malloc, audit hooks etc. that might affect them
On 05/08/2015 01:07 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
Steve Ellcey wrote:
After your change GCC sees that the code for f1 and f2 are identical
so it replaced the body of f2 with a call to f1. This optimization will
save space but it is not going to be faster because any call to f2 will
now include an
On May 8, 2015 8:48:26 PM GMT+02:00, Aldy Hernandez al...@redhat.com wrote:
On 05/08/2015 04:57 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 2:34 AM, Aldy Hernandez al...@redhat.com
wrote:
Maybe you can split out the Java aliases stuff (that annoyed me
multiple times
when trying to
On 05/08/2015 08:38 AM, Joel Brobecker wrote:
Hello,
Attempting to build libiberty on LynxOS-178 fails trying to compile
mkstemps.c with the following error:
LynxOS? I haven't had to do anything with that since, umm, the early
90s. So sorry you've got that task...
libiberty/ChangeLog:
On 05/07/2015 03:38 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
Prepatory to converting from tree chains to vectors.
---
gcc/cfgexpand.c | 167
1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 95 deletions(-)
OK with a ChangeLog and the usual testing.
jeff
Thanks for working on this. Have you tried building with
--enable-languages=go? On a GNU/Linux system it should build and pass
all tests with no extra effort.
Yes. No regressions.
Thanks.
Aldy
On May 7, 2015, at 5:38 PM, Aldy Hernandez al...@redhat.com wrote:
Ok.
On 05/08/2015 08:25 AM, Matthew Fortune wrote:
There is also the perspective that we should be able to aim for
an ABI variant agnostic dynamic linker at some point over the next
year by working towards a build that truly uses no float and is
hence compatible with all the ABI variants.
Having
On 05/08/2015 03:09 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
Hi!
On Mon, 27 Apr 2015 11:20:30 +0100, Richard Sandiford
richard.sandif...@arm.com wrote:
This patch [...] by replacing most of genrecog [...]
OK to commit?
Is it a bug that I'm seeing these warnings only in the stage 1 build with
the
On 05/07/2015 02:39 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
All jcc mnemonics implemented as =@
to make it easy for someone reading the manual
to figure out what condition is desired.
One request: would it be possible to get a cpp symbol for this (e.g.
__GCC_X86_INLINE_ASM_CC__) so we don't have to
Steve Ellcey wrote:
After your change GCC sees that the code for f1 and f2 are identical
so it replaced the body of f2 with a call to f1. This optimization will
save space but it is not going to be faster because any call to f2 will
now include an extra call/return. Do other platforms have
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 01:09:52PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
On 05/08/2015 01:07 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
Steve Ellcey wrote:
After your change GCC sees that the code for f1 and f2 are identical
so it replaced the body of f2 with a call to f1. This optimization will
save space but it is not
On 05/07/2015 03:38 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
Using proper vectors instead of lists of trees.
---
gcc/cfgexpand.c | 614 ---
gcc/config/cris/cris.c | 88 +++
gcc/config/i386/i386.c | 24 +-
1 - 100 of 190 matches
Mail list logo
