On 8. 2. 2016 04:45, David Wohlferd wrote:
> Hey Bernd.
>
> I replied with a patch that includes most of the changes you asked for
> (see inline below). Were you waiting on me for something more?
>
ChangeLog entries are still missing.
> I have cleaned up the testcases so they aren't so i386-sp
Hi,
The problem is that even though expand knows how to expand
VEC_COND when there is no vcond_mask pattern,
expand_vec_cond_expr_p returns false. So this patch allows
expand_vec_cond_expr_p to try the next part of the function if there
is no vcond_mask pattern.
OK? Bootstrapped and tested on a
This test was added by git commit 7c5f55675 (svn 231569)
Here's the log message from that commit:
avoid alignment of static variables affecting stack's
Function (or more narrow) scope static variables (as well as others not
placed on the stack) should also not have any effect on t
Here, we are calling template_class_depth on a FIELD_DECL corresponding
to a lambda that is used inside variable template. template_class_depth
however does not see that this FIELD_DECL is used inside a variable
template binding because its chain of DECL_CONTEXTs does not include the
corresponding
Hey Bernd.
I replied with a patch that includes most of the changes you asked for
(see inline below). Were you waiting on me for something more?
I have cleaned up the testcases so they aren't so i386-specific, but
otherwise this patch (attached) is the same. Let me know if there is
somethi
On 02/07/2016 07:30 AM, Joseph Myers wrote:
On Fri, 5 Feb 2016, Jeff Law wrote:
Shouldn't c-opt.def be changed to note the option is deprecated and ignored
rather than totally removing it?
No. That's appropriate with optimization options which can safely be
ignored, not with options such as
On Fri, 5 Feb 2016, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> +
> +This page is a brief summary of the huge number of improvements made to
> +GCC in GCC 6. For more information, see the
> +Porting to GCC 6 page and the
> +full GCC documentation.
> +
>
> I'd say "brief summary of some of the huge number of improvem
PR c++/69139
* cp/parser.c (cp_parser_simple_type_specifier): Don't mistake 'auto'
in trailing return function pointer types as an implicit template
parameter.
PR c++/69139
* g++.dg/cpp0x/trailing12.C: New test.
---
gcc/cp/parser.c
While I worked on avoiding local styles, I noticed a couple of things
on the main page (and a couple others). This is one of them that makes
the main page a little liker.
Make section on releases a bit denser: Rename it from "Release Series and
Status" to just "Releases", replace "and" by ampers
Hi Alexander!
On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 18:12:06 +0300, Alexander Monakov
wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jan 2016, Alexander Monakov wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 11 Jan 2016, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > > Alexander, would you please also submit a fix for that for nvptx-tools'
> > > nvptx-run.c? (Or want me to do that?)
On Fri, 5 Feb 2016, Jeff Law wrote:
> Shouldn't c-opt.def be changed to note the option is deprecated and ignored
> rather than totally removing it?
No. That's appropriate with optimization options which can safely be
ignored, not with options such as this that have an incompatible effect on
A
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'gcc' has been submitted
by the Swedish team of translators. The file is available at:
http://translationproject.org/latest/gcc/sv.po
(This file, 'gcc-6.1-b20160131.sv.po',
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.target/s390/morestack.c: New test.
---
Here's the promised test.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog | 4 +
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/morestack.c | 260 ++
2 files changed, 264 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 gcc/te
I noticed we have some unnatural vertical whitespace here (and
have had for years, but this became more exposed when I played
a little bit with font sizes).
Fixed thusly.
Gerald
Index: index.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdoc
Shorten the request for further news. Use global CSS, thus practically
also reducing font size when being served from gcc.gnu.org.
Applied
Gerald
Index: index.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/index.html,v
retrieving revis
On 06.02.2016 at 23:37 Trevor Saunders wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 08:36:27PM +, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jakub,
>>
>> as a follow-up for your c/69669 fix, I'd like to have the enum mode also
>> honored
>> in C++ code, because the mode attribute now finally really works in C, but
>
Hi Jerry,
Attached patch adds diagnostics to catch this.
Test case included. Regression tested on x86-64
OK for trunk?
OK. Thanks for the patch!
Thomas
17 matches
Mail list logo