Re: Combiner fix for PR79910

On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 11:23:56AM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > Bootstrapped and regression checked on x86_64-linux and powerpc64-linux > {-m32,-m64}. Now also tested on aarch64-linux; no new failures. Segher > 2017-03-18 Segher Boessenkool > > PR

Re: [doc] Add Segher to contrib.texi

On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 10:17:00PM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > Applied. Thanks! You now have added two entries for me; fixed like this: 2017-03-18 Segher Boessenkool * doc/contrib.texi (Contributors): Remove duplicate entry for myself. ---

[Patch, fortran] PR39239 EQUIVALENCE and BIND(C)

Hello everyone, I submitted this patch a week ago, but I think it got lost. It adds an error if BIND(C) is used with EQUIVALENCE. Nicolas Regression tested for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. 2017-03-18 Nicolas Koenig PR fortran/39239 *

Re: [PATCH][AArch64][wwwdocs] Summarise some more AArch64 changes for GCC6

On Wed, 27 Apr 2016, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: > Thanks, I've incorporated your and James' feedback. > Since James ok'd the content of the patch from an AArch64 perspective > I'll commit this later today if I receive no further feedback. Thanks, Kyrill, those were quite some additions! I made a few

[doc] Add Segher to contrib.texi

Applied. (Segher kindly reviewed this in draft form.) If anyone else is missing, now would be a good time to speak up. ;) Gerald 2017-03-18 Gerald Pfeifer * doc/contrib.texi (Contributors): Add Segher Boessenkool. Index: doc/contrib.texi

Re: [libstdc++,doc] Strip links to ANSI (web shop)

On Wed, 15 Feb 2017, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > The C++14 standard is: > http://webstore.ansi.org/RecordDetail.aspx?sku=ISO%2fIEC+14882%3a2014 Thanks, Jonathan! >> What do you think? > Should we make the FAQ link to the info in the manual, instead of just > removing it? Great idea. Unfortunately

New French PO file for 'gcc' (version 7.1-b20170226)

Hello, gentle maintainer. This is a message from the Translation Project robot. A revised PO file for textual domain 'gcc' has been submitted by the French team of translators. The file is available at: http://translationproject.org/latest/gcc/fr.po (This file, 'gcc-7.1-b20170226.fr.po',

Re: Updating config.guess

On Mon, 13 Mar 2017, Jeff Law wrote: >> Here is the entire difference between the config.guess we have >> and upstream. > Yea, fine with me. Cool, here is what I just installed. (Richi, i386-unknown-freebsd* is now "gone", both in terms of our release documentation and automatic target

[BUILDROBOT] Maybe uninitialized warnings in mips targets (was: [PATCH] Fix PR79345, better uninit warnings for memory)

Hi Richard, Catherine, Matthew On Thu, 2017-03-02 14:40:46 +0100, Richard Biener wrote: [...] > On IRC we decided to wait for the TREE_NO_WARNING issue. So the > following is what I committed. > > Bootstrapped / tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. [...] > 2017-03-02 Richard

Re: [PATCH] Document -fipa-vrp

On Fri, 17 Mar 2017, Martin Jambor wrote: > I have noticed that -fipa-vrp was not documented in gcc/doc/invoke.texi > so I propose the following. When at ti, I took the liberty of replacing > "ipa" with "interprocedural" in the description of -fipa-bit-cp. That's definitely a good change,

Re: C++ PATCH to fix ICE with noexcept and -fgnu-tm (PR c++/80059)

On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Marek Polacek wrote: > + cond = instantiate_non_dependent_expr_sfinae (cond, tf_none); Why this rather than instantiate_non_dependent_expr (and so tf_error)? Jason

Re: Combiner fix for PR79910

On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 04:23:57PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > >>+ /* For combinations that may result in two insns, we have to gather > >>+ some extra information about registers used, so that we can > >>+ update all relevant LOG_LINKS later. */ > > > >Please just refuse to do the

New German PO file for 'gcc' (version 7.1-b20170226)

Hello, gentle maintainer. This is a message from the Translation Project robot. A revised PO file for textual domain 'gcc' has been submitted by the German team of translators. The file is available at: http://translationproject.org/latest/gcc/de.po (This file, 'gcc-7.1-b20170226.de.po',

[PATCH] Streamline MAINTAINERS

...by removing entries in the Write After Approval section that are already listed as Reviewers. This came up in a conversation between Andrew and me when he added himself. Applied Gerald 2017-03-18 Gerald Pfeifer * MAINTAINERS (Write After Approval): Remove

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR79676 - [submodules] Compilation/linking error when module procedures PRIVATE

Dear All, OK'd by Steve and committed as revision 246256. Cheers Paul On 27 February 2017 at 19:23, Paul Richard Thomas wrote: > Dear All, > > This bug resulted from a cock-up on my part. The mechanism for > suppressing .smod files depended on detecting the

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR71838 - ICE with OpenCoarrays on submodule

Dear All, I have just noticed that this patch never went to the list because it contained some mime content. As it happens, Anton has tested it and it is relatively trivial. This is just as well because I have unwittingly gone ahead and committed it as revision 246255! Cheers Paul On 26

Re: install.texi and arm

On Mon, 13 Mar 2017, Nick Clifton wrote: >>> Okay to yank this? >> Fine by me. > Me too. Okay, so I went ahead and committed the patch below. > None. Are you intending to replace the requirement with a more recent > version of the binutils, or just remove the requirement entirely ? This is

Re: C++ backports to 6

On 2017.03.14 at 17:08 +0100, Marek Polacek wrote: > I've backported the attached patches gcc-6. The PR79264 backport caused: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80091 -- Markus