On 3/29/17 5:28 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Typo ("argument").
Oops! :-)
>> +/* { dg-skip-if "" { powerpc*-*-darwin* } { "*" } { "" } } */
>> +/* { dg-skip-if "" { powerpc*-*-*spe* } { "*" } { "" } } */
>> +/* { dg-require-effective-target dfp } */
>
> You can leave off the default argumen
On 03/21/2017 01:33 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 03/20/2017 10:27 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 7:58 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 03/20/2017 05:51 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 7:04 PM, Martin Sebor
Hi!
As the testcase shows, we ICE with -mavx512f -ffloat-store, because
at -O0 during expansion the destination is MEM, and the corresponding dup
operand is some pseudo. There are *_mask patterns that have just
register_operand / =v for the desination and vector_move_operand / 0C
for the correspo
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 04:27:28PM -0500, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> There is finally a permanent link to the OpenPOWER ELF V2 ABI Specification
> document. This patch adds a paragraph to the PowerPC Built-Ins section of
> the GCC documentation to describe its value and provide a link to it.
Woohoo!
Hi!
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 04:11:19PM -0500, Peter Bergner wrote:
> This passed bootstrap and regtesting on powerpc64le-linux and
> powerpc64-linux (testsuite in both 32-bit and 64-bit). Ok for mainline?
> Ok for the open release branches too?
Okay. A few nits below. Thanks!
> gcc/testsuite
On 03/29/2017 03:22 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 5:20 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 03/29/2017 02:56 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 4:48 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 03/29/2017 02:21 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
The problem is GCC EH tables and static linking.
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 02:56:51PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > Here we have a reference initialization with NSDMI and *this. We are
> > crashing
> > because a PLACEHOLDER_EXPR crept into the gimplifier.
> >
> > This happens since r2186
Hi,
There is finally a permanent link to the OpenPOWER ELF V2 ABI Specification
document. This patch adds a paragraph to the PowerPC Built-Ins section of
the GCC documentation to describe its value and provide a link to it.
I've generated and verified the PDF, and it looks ok. I am very open to
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 5:20 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 03/29/2017 02:56 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 4:48 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>>>
>>> On 03/29/2017 02:21 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
The problem is GCC EH tables and static linking. libstdc++ and the
>>>
On 03/29/2017 02:56 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 4:48 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 03/29/2017 02:21 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
The problem is GCC EH tables and static linking. libstdc++ and the
main application are ending up with two separate copies of the tables
to register E
PR80246 shows a problem with the dxex, dxexq, diex and diexq insn patterns,
that shows up when calling their associated builtins. The dxex and dxexq
instructions are defined to return 64-bit signed integers (in a FP register),
but the output mode of their patterns is _Decimal64/_Decimal128.
This l
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 4:48 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 03/29/2017 02:21 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
>>
>>
>> The problem is GCC EH tables and static linking. libstdc++ and the
>> main application are ending up with two separate copies of the tables
>> to register EH frames.
>>
>> Static linking work
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 02:35:32PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> ps. Never in a million years would I have expected isolation of
> division by zero to have exposed as many latent issues as it has. Sigh.
The trap insns weren't handled very well before, but we didn't generate
many either. They still
On 03/29/2017 02:44 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 02:35:32PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
On 03/29/2017 12:23 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
If combine has added an unconditional trap there will be a new basic
block as well. It will then end up considering the NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK
On 03/29/2017 02:21 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
The problem is GCC EH tables and static linking. libstdc++ and the
main application are ending up with two separate copies of the tables
to register EH frames.
Static linking worked in GCC 4.8, but not in GCC 4.9. I have been
trying to understand
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 02:35:32PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 03/29/2017 12:23 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > If combine has added an unconditional trap there will be a new basic
> > block as well. It will then end up considering the NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK
> > as the last_combined_insn, but the
On 03/29/2017 12:23 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
If combine has added an unconditional trap there will be a new basic
block as well. It will then end up considering the NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK
as the last_combined_insn, but then it tries to take the DF_INSN_LUID
of that and that dereferences a NU
Hi all,
here is a patch that enhances the diagnostics for procedure-pointer
assignments, so that procedure-pointer components that need an
explicit interface are correctly rejected.
Regtests cleanly on x86_64-linux-gnu. Ok for trunk?
Cheers,
Janus
2017-03-29 Janus Weil
PR fortran/80046
Hello everyone,
can someone please review that patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-03/msg01171.html
Thanks.
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 03/27/2017 09:41 AM, David Edelsohn wrote:
>>>
>>> As far as I have discovered, the real problem with AIX exception handling
>>> is
>>> that the exception landing pads are symbols that must not (but still are)
>>> exported from shared libraries
On 03/27/2017 09:41 AM, David Edelsohn wrote:
As far as I have discovered, the real problem with AIX exception handling is
that the exception landing pads are symbols that must not (but still are)
exported from shared libraries - even libstdc++.
I'm wondering if attached libtool(!)-patch would f
Hi!
When a C++17 inline static data member has a redundant out-of-class
deprecated redeclaration, we can end up with 2 DW_TAG_variable in
DW_TAG_compile_unit, one DW_AT_declaration and one with DW_AT_specification
pointing to it (the latter emitted for the redeclaration), before
gen_member_die can
On 03/26/2017 06:05 PM, Joel Brobecker wrote:
Hello,
I got some review comment from Bernhard Reutner-Fischer, and I have
updated the patch accordingly.
This patch is for bug opened
here:https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21187
This patch has been identified as one of the desirabl
Hi!
GCC 4.8 and earlier didn't allow in C++ initialization of VLA and
C doesn't allow it in any GCC release. This has changed when the
support for C++1y VLA has been added, then reverted, but apparently
only partially.
The question is, do we want to support VLA initialization, if yes,
with what
On 03/26/2017 06:54 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
Nitish works for IBM and I can stand in as the contributor. The patch
would be very helpful to work around an AIX exception handling
problem.
Because the patch is a generic option and not target-specific, it
needs a build machinery maintainer or Glo
On 03/29/2017 12:07 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
DECL_HARD_REGISTER only expects a VAR_DECL, so check for that first
(C++'s make_rtl_for_nonlocal_decl does that, too).
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk?
2017-03-29 Marek Polacek
PR c/79730
* c-decl.c (finish_de
On 03/29/2017 04:05 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
After quite some pondering over this and other related bugs I propose
the following for GCC 7 which tames down PRE a bit (back to levels
of GCC 6). Technically it's the wrong place to fix this, we do
have measures in place during elimination but the
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> Here we have a reference initialization with NSDMI and *this. We are crashing
> because a PLACEHOLDER_EXPR crept into the gimplifier.
>
> This happens since r218653 where set_up_extended_ref_temp was changed to
> use split_nonconstant_init.
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'gcc' has been submitted
by the French team of translators. The file is available at:
http://translationproject.org/latest/gcc/fr.po
(This file, 'gcc-7.1-b20170226.fr.po', h
If combine has added an unconditional trap there will be a new basic
block as well. It will then end up considering the NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK
as the last_combined_insn, but then it tries to take the DF_INSN_LUID
of that and that dereferences a NULL pointer (since such a note is not
an INSN_P).
Th
DECL_HARD_REGISTER only expects a VAR_DECL, so check for that first
(C++'s make_rtl_for_nonlocal_decl does that, too).
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk?
2017-03-29 Marek Polacek
PR c/79730
* c-decl.c (finish_decl): Check VAR_P.
* gcc.dg/pr79730.c:
This problem reports an assertion error when certain rtl expressions
which are not eligible as producers or consumers of a store bypass
optimization are passed as arguments to the store_data_bypass_p
function. The proposed patch returns false from store_data_bypass_p
rather than terminating with
Here we have a reference initialization with NSDMI and *this. We are crashing
because a PLACEHOLDER_EXPR crept into the gimplifier.
This happens since r218653 where set_up_extended_ref_temp was changed to
use split_nonconstant_init. As a consequence, cp_gimplify_init_expr might
now be receiving
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 11:05 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> After quite some pondering over this and other related bugs I propose
> the following for GCC 7 which tames down PRE a bit (back to levels
> of GCC 6). Technically it's the wrong place to fix this, we do
> have measures in place during e
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 05:57:51PM +0100, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 01:46:47PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Fri, 10 Mar 2017, Martin Jambor wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > PR 77333 is a i686-windows target bug, which however has its root in
> > > our gen
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 2:01 PM, Bin Cheng wrote:
>> Hi,
>> This patch is to fix PR80153. As analyzed in the PR, root cause is
>> tree_affine lacks
>> ability differentiating (unsigned)(ptr + offset) and (unsigned)ptr +
>> (unsigned)offs
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 09:27:35PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> The attached patch optimizes the atomic_exchange and
> atomic_compare patterns on s390 and s390x (mostly limited to
> SImode and DImode). Among general optimizaation, the changes fix
> most of the problems reported in PR 80080:
> http
On Mär 29 2017, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> But I still see some ICEs while running the testsuite,
>> which I haven't investigated yet. And the original comment before this
>> hunk doesn't make sense at this point.
>
> The hunk in the 'else' arm of the big surrounding conditional?
Yes. It talks ab
> Thanks, this gets me further, the ada library now compiles with
> -mabi=ilp32.
Great, I think that you can apply it as obvious then, it's code which is only
exercised in Ada and on ILP32 64-bit platforms so the risk is very low...
> But I still see some ICEs while running the testsuite,
> whic
Hi,
The fix for PR80158 is technically correct, but not "future-proof" in the
sense that someday we may implement more than one alternate interpretation
for a strength reduction candidate. This patch cleans that up.
Bootstrapped on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu with no regressions,
committed.
T
On 29/03/17 14:51 +0300, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
Tested on Linux-x64.
2017-03-29 Ville Voutilainen
Adjust optional's pretty printer for LWG 2900.
* python/libstdcxx/v6/printers.py (StdExpOptionalPrinter::__init__):
Look at the nested payload in case of non-experimental optional.
Tested on Linux-x64.
2017-03-29 Ville Voutilainen
Adjust optional's pretty printer for LWG 2900.
* python/libstdcxx/v6/printers.py (StdExpOptionalPrinter::__init__):
Look at the nested payload in case of non-experimental optional.
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/python/libstdcxx/v6/print
The attached patch removes the XFAIL in attr-alloc_size-11.c on
s390. (PR 79356).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79356
Untested.
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt
IBM Germany
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog-attr-alloc-size-11
PR testsuite/79356
* gcc.dg/attr-alloc_
Hi all
During combine GCC tries to merge CMP (with zero) and AND into a TST. However,
in cases where an ANDS operand is not compatible, this was being missed. Adding
a define_split where this operand was moved to a register seems to help out.
For example for a test :
int
f (unsigned char *p)
After quite some pondering over this and other related bugs I propose
the following for GCC 7 which tames down PRE a bit (back to levels
of GCC 6). Technically it's the wrong place to fix this, we do
have measures in place during elimination but they are not in effect
at -O2. For GCC 8 I'd like
On Mär 28 2017, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> That needs to use ptr_mode, not Pmode.
>
> I don't think so, the whole computation is in Pmode. Could you try something
> similar to what is done in the 'else' arm of the big surrounding conditional?
Thanks, this gets me further, the ada library now comp
46 matches
Mail list logo
