On Sun, Apr 09, 2017 at 05:06:58PM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
> PR middle-end/80364 - sanitizer detects signed integer overflow in
> gimple-ssa-sprintf.c
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> PR middle-end/80364
> * gimple-ssa-sprintf.c (get_int_range): Use the specified type when
> recursing
Hi Jakib,
On 07 Apr 16:52, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> This patch is slightly larger, so I haven't included it in the patch I've
> sent a few minutes ago.
>
> I've looked at godbolt for what ICC generates for these and picked sequences
> that generate approx. as good code as that. For
> min_epi
On 04/07/2017 03:25 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
This issue caused a lot of build failures during the GCC mass rebuilds
for Fedora, but isn't in the porting to guide yet.
Is this accurate and clear enough for casual readers?
Index: htdocs/gcc-7/porting_to.html
===
Bug 80364 - sanitizer detects signed integer overflow in
gimple-ssa-sprintf.c, points out a runtime error (integer
overflow when negating LONG_MIN) triggered by the undefined
saniziter for an invalid test case recently added to the test
suite. The test case passes an argument of type long as
the
On 7 Apr, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-04-07 at 21:55 +0200, Volker Reichelt wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> with the following patch I suggest to add a diagnostic for extra
>> semicolons after in-class member function definitions:
>>
>> struct A
>> {
>> A() {};
>> void foo() {};
>> f
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 10:11:34AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
>
...
>
> I ran into a case where the libgomp hsa plugin wouldn't load. The
> following patch helped me to quickly diagnose and then fix that. OK for
> trunk?
Yes, thanks.
Martin
>
> commit 54099202eb88464530dd3a55709c9afb8
On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 09:36:44AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Tue, 9 Jun 2015 16:43:57 +0200, Martin Jambor wrote:
> > [hsa libgomp plugin]
>
> > I'm looking forward to any comments and suggestions, meanwhile I have
> > committed the patch to the branch as r224284.
>
> Commentin
The original test in pr51218 is also miscomputed with the patch:
Before t:
Program received signal SIGSEGV: Segmentation fault - invalid memory reference.
Dominique
> Le 9 avr. 2017 à 16:41, Dominique d'Humières a écrit :
>
> Dear Paul,
>
> Your patch fixes the tests in pr34640 comments 20
Dear Paul,
Your patch fixes the tests in pr34640 comments 20 and 28 (I didn’t test the
variants in comment 27) and in pr57733.
The tests in pr34640 in comments 0, 3, and 5, as well in all the other
duplicates still fail.
Thanks for working on the issue,
Dominique
Hi Janus,
The patch is OK for trunk.
Thanks
Paul
On 7 April 2017 at 17:51, Janus Weil wrote:
> ping!
>
> 2017-03-29 22:25 GMT+02:00 Janus Weil :
>> Hi all,
>>
>> here is a patch that enhances the diagnostics for procedure-pointer
>> assignments, so that procedure-pointer components that need
10 matches
Mail list logo
