On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 5:17 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 10:49 AM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 7:06 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:34 AM, Richard Biener
>>> wrote:
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Bin Cheng wrote:
> Hi,
On Thu, 4 May 2017, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 05/04/2017 10:00 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> > Hi,
> > As mentioned in PR, the issue is that cddce1 marks the call to
> > __builtin_strdup as necessary:
> > marking necessary through .MEM_6 stmt p_7 = __builtin_strdup (&d);
> >
> > and since p_7 doesn
On Thu, 4 May 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 06:21:17PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > >the
> > >only other user after all calls free_node in a loop, so it is highly
> > >unlikely it would do anything there.
> > >
> > >If you mean the INTEGER_TYPE handling, then yes, I gues
On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 06:27:00PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 06:21:17PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > >the
> > >only other user after all calls free_node in a loop, so it is highly
> > >unlikely it would do anything there.
> > >
> > >If you mean the INTEGER_TYPE handl
On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 07:58:41PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> > Done. Are bugs of this type candidates for backporting to release
> > branches?
> Generally not since they are not regressions. They could also cause cause
> false positives warnings which in turn could cause code that was previously
>
101 - 105 of 105 matches
Mail list logo