Hi,
When porting/testing the D front-end to FreeBSD, I noticed that
backtrace supported returned false during the configuration of
libphobos.
The use of += assignment in the configure test was the reason why, and
now that's been corrected.
Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64-linux-gnu a
On 4/15/19, Simon Marchi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is a patch that adds a mention of the 2019 Cauldron, similar to the
> entries for the previous editions.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Simon
>
>
> Index: index.html
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/h
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'gcc' has been submitted
by the French team of translators. The file is available at:
https://translationproject.org/latest/gcc/fr.po
(This file, 'gcc-9.1-b20190414.fr.po',
microblaze testing in my tester has occasionally been failing
Warray-bounds-40 and Wstringop-overflow-9. I finally took a little peek
because these occasional failures show up as a regression against the
prior run.
It looks like the microblaze backend is trying to inline a move of
SIZE_MAX bytes.
As pointed out in the PR, the test is failing because a store->load dependency
is reporting zero cost. Fixed by leaving existing costs as is (i.e. cost for
update forms), and just adding a simple bypass for store->load dependencies.
Bootstrap/regtest on powerpc64le (Power9) with no new regressio
Hi,
This patch merges the libdruntime library with upstream druntime 70b9fea6.
Backports fixes in the extern(C) bindings for the Solaris/SPARC port.
Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64-linux-gnu and i386-pc-solaris2.11.
Committed to trunk as r270372.
--
Iain
---
diff --git a/libphobo
Hi,
On 12/04/19 20:29, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 4/11/19 11:20 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
over the last few days I spent some time on this regression, which at
first seemed just a minor error-recovery issue, but then I noticed
that very slightly tweeking the original testcase uncovered a pre
On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 01:54:11PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Richard Biener:
>
> > Of course adding sth like a .robss section would be nice.
>
> I think this is strictly a link editor issue because a read-only PT_LOAD
> directive with a memory size larger than the file size already produce
On 2019-04-15 12:42 p.m., Simon Marchi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is a patch that adds a mention of the 2019 Cauldron, similar to the
> entries
> for the previous editions.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Simon
>
>
> Index: index.html
> ===
> RCS fil
On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 11:50 PM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 12:34 AM Jeff Law wrote:
> >
> > On 4/12/19 3:24 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > If a noexcept function calls a function that might throw, doing the tail
> > > call optimization means that an exception thrown in the
Hi,
Here is a patch that adds a mention of the 2019 Cauldron, similar to the entries
for the previous editions.
Thanks,
Simon
Index: index.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/index.html,v
retrieving revision 1.1125
diff -u
On 4/12/19 1:19 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 4/11/19 11:18 AM, Joao Moreira wrote:
When -fpatchable-relocation-entry is used, gcc places nops on the
prologue of each compiled function and creates a section named
__patchable_function_entries which holds relocation entries for the
positions in which
Here's my attempt to fix the movk regression on bz 87763.
I still wonder if addressing some of these issues in combine is a better
long term solution, but in the immediate term I think backend patterns
are going to have to be the way to go.
This introduces a new insn_and_split that matches a mov
On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 12:26 AM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 4/12/19 4:12 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 4:41 AM Martin Liška wrote:
> >>
> >> On 4/11/19 6:30 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 1:38 AM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> The patch is
On 4/15/19 7:12 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Apr 2019 at 00:38, Martin Sebor wrote:
>>
>> On 4/12/19 3:42 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 10:45:25AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> PR c/89797
> * targhooks.c (default_vector_alignm
It turns out solving this long-standing optimization regression
is now easy by exploiting implmenetation details in how we
canonicalize refs in LIM. This allows us to properly identifying
MEM[(integer(kind=4)[64] *)&a][0] and MEM[(c_char * {ref-all})&a]
the same, applying store-motion to an init
On Sat, 13 Apr 2019 at 00:38, Martin Sebor wrote:
>
> On 4/12/19 3:42 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 10:45:25AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> >>> gcc/ChangeLog:
> >>>
> >>> PR c/89797
> >>> * targhooks.c (default_vector_alignment): Avoid assuming
> >>> argument fits in
Hi,
On Fri, 12 Apr 2019, Jeff Law wrote:
> > I don't think this follows. Imagine a pure foo tailcalling a pure bar.
> > To make the tailcall, foo may need to change some of its argument slots
> > to pass new arguments to bar.
> I'd claim that a pure/const call can't tail call another function as
On 4/12/19 4:12 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 4:41 AM Martin Liška wrote:
>>
>> On 4/11/19 6:30 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 1:38 AM Martin Liška wrote:
Hi.
The patch is adding missing AVX512 ISAs for target and target_clone
attributes.
>>
Dear Dominique, Gilles and Reinhold,
Thank you for your rapid feedback. We might even get a reasonably
functional ISO Fortran binding in place for 9-branch release :-) On
your remaining nits:
(i) ISO_Fortran_binding_4.f90 -m32 -O1/Os looks awful. I will take a
look, though.
(ii) pr89844 being f
On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 10:59 PM Jan Hubicka wrote:
>
> Hi,
> this patch fixes false warning that is output when different -std
> settings are used. In this case C++ FE produces same declaration in
> different representations which differ by 0 sized fileds only.
> The patch makes them to be ignore
* Richard Biener:
> Of course adding sth like a .robss section would be nice.
I think this is strictly a link editor issue because a read-only PT_LOAD
directive with a memory size larger than the file size already produces
read-only zero pages, without requiring a file allocation.
Thanks,
Floria
>
> This won't work with LTO. Note we have the issue in the middle-end as well
> since we promote variables we see are not written to to TREE_READONLY.
> This can be seen with (the somewhat artificial...):
>
> int a[1024*1024] = { 0 };
>
> int __attribute__((noinline)) foo() { return *(volatile
On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 09:51:39AM +, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> The code that checks if an auto-increment from i0 or i1 is not lost is
> a bit shaky. The code to check the same for i2 is non-existent, and
> cannot be implemented in a similar way at all. So, this patch counts
> all auto-incr
On 12/04/2019 02:42, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
The test fell back to long long and long when __int128 is not
available, but it assumed sizeof(long) < sizeof(long long) because of
a shift count that would be out of range for a long long if their
widths are the same. Fixed by splitting it up into two
On 4/15/19 12:23 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 9:46 AM Martin Liška wrote:
>>
>> Hi.
>>
>> The patch is fixing bootstrap-lto-lean.mk where with PGO LTO was
>> wrongly used in STAGEtrain.
>>
>> Tested on openSUSE gcc9 package, I'm attaching build log.
>>
>> Ready to be install
On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 9:46 AM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> The patch is fixing bootstrap-lto-lean.mk where with PGO LTO was
> wrongly used in STAGEtrain.
>
> Tested on openSUSE gcc9 package, I'm attaching build log.
>
> Ready to be installed?
I wonder why 'override' is necessary given before
On Fri, 12 Apr 2019, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Apr 2019, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 12 Apr 2019, Michael Matz wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Fri, 12 Apr 2019, Richard Biener wrote:
> > >
> > > > > You miss PARM_DECLs and RESULT_DECLs, i.e. it's probably better to
> > >
The following fixes reassoc leaking abnormals into rewritten
conditon chains.
Bootstrap / regtest running on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Richard.
2019-04-15 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/90071
* tree-ssa-reassoc.c (init_range_entry): Do not pick up
abnormal oper
I am testing the following patch to fix wrong-debug creatd by
loop-distribution simply dropping debug stmts on the floor
making earlier ones with bogus value live.
Bootstrap & regtest running on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Richard.
2019-04-15 Richard Biener
PR debug/90074
* t
Dear Paul,
mostly looks good. Apart from a regression with optional arguments reported as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90093
all other test cases I have now execute correctly.
Cheers
Reinhold
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Paul Richard Thomas
> Gesendet: Sonntag,
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'gcc' has been submitted
by the Spanish team of translators. The file is available at:
https://translationproject.org/latest/gcc/es.po
(This file, 'gcc-9.1-b20190414.es.po',
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot. (If you have
any questions, send them to .)
A new POT file for textual domain 'gcc' has been made available
to the language teams for translation. It is archived as:
https://translationproject.org/POT-files/gcc
Hi Paul,
I have found another glitch with -m32 and -O1 or -Os, but not with other values:
% gfc /opt/gcc/_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/ISO_Fortran_binding_4.f90 -m32
-O
% ./a.out
FAIL
Note: The following floating-point exceptions are signalling: IEEE_DENORMAL
STOP 1
This looks tricky: if I
Author: dominiq
Date: Mon Apr 15 07:56:43 2019
New Revision: 270360
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270360&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-04-15 Dominique d'Humieres
PR tree-optimization/90020
* gcc.dg/torture/pr90020.c: Add linker options for darwin.
--- trunk/gcc/testsuite/gc
On 4/15/19 9:27 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 8:48 AM Martin Liška wrote:
>>
>> Hi.
>>
>> Apparently, there's one another PR:
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90083
>>
>> May I backport the patch to GCC-8 branch?
>
> Hmm, it isn't a regression, right? But it
Hi.
The patch is fixing bootstrap-lto-lean.mk where with PGO LTO was
wrongly used in STAGEtrain.
Tested on openSUSE gcc9 package, I'm attaching build log:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/17sxGf_x_VaUekPk2SHI9joIXg1BR5-dY/view?usp=sharing
Ready to be installed?
Thanks,
Martin
config/ChangeLog:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 8:48 AM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> Apparently, there's one another PR:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90083
>
> May I backport the patch to GCC-8 branch?
Hmm, it isn't a regression, right? But it only
affects multi-versioning, so yes, go ahead.
Might
On 4/12/19 4:12 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 4:41 AM Martin Liška wrote:
>>
>> On 4/11/19 6:30 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 1:38 AM Martin Liška wrote:
Hi.
The patch is adding missing AVX512 ISAs for target and target_clone
attributes.
>>
On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 8:48 PM Thomas Koenig wrote:
>
> Hello world,
>
> the attached patch fixes a 8/9 regression where _def_init, an internal
> Fortran variable containing only zeros, was placed into the .rodata
> section. This led to a large increase in executable size.
>
> There should be no
40 matches
Mail list logo
