On Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 7:15 AM Eduard-Mihai Burtescu wrote:
>
> 2019-06-01 Eduard-Mihai Burtescu
> include/ChangeLog:
> * demangle.h (rust_is_mangled): Move to libiberty/rust-demangle.h.
> (rust_demangle_sym): Move to libiberty/rust-demangle.h.
> libiberty/ChangeLog:
>
Hi Richard,
Thanks for the review,
On Fri, 31 May 2019 at 19:43, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Kugan Vivekanandarajah writes:
> > @@ -609,8 +615,14 @@ vect_set_loop_masks_directly (struct loop *loop,
> > loop_vec_info loop_vinfo,
> >
> >/* Get the mask value for the next iteration of
On Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 6:08 AM Jeff Law wrote:
>
> On 5/30/19 2:53 AM, Hongtao Liu wrote:
> > On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 3:23 AM Jeff Law wrote:
> >> On 5/9/19 10:54 PM, Hongtao Liu wrote:
> >>> On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 3:55 AM Jeff Law wrote:
> On 5/6/19 11:38 PM, Hongtao Liu wrote:
> >
Hi,
This patch implements a new opportunity of jump threading for PR77820.
In this optimization, conditional jumps are merged with unconditional
jump. And then moving CMP result to GPR is eliminated.
This version is based on the proposal of Richard, Jeff and Andrew on
previous versions, and
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 12:05:41AM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Wed, 29 May 2019, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>
> > On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 12:53:30AM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> > > On Fri, 24 May 2019, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > >
> > > > IMO the best we can do is use what we already
Most I/O in the kernel is done using the kernel offset mapping. However, there
is one API that uses aliased kernel address ranges:
> The final category of APIs is for I/O to deliberately aliased address
> ranges inside the kernel. Such aliases are set up by use of the
> vmap/vmalloc API. Since
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 12:01:45PM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 03:26:27PM -0500, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> > On 5/29/19 8:16 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > >> +/* ISA masks setting fusion options. */
> > >> +#define OTHER_FUSION_MASKS (OPTION_MASK_P8_FUSION
Jonathan Wakely writes:
> On 31/05/19 17:15 -0700, Thomas Rodgers wrote:
>>
>>Revising previous version of this patch to pick another missed
>>uglification.
>
> OK for trunk, thanks.
>
> I also see this one:
>
> include/pstl/parallel_backend_tbb.h:__buffer(std::size_t n) :
>
On Sun, Jun 02, 2019 at 10:12:37PM +0900, Oleg Endo wrote:
> On Sun, 2019-06-02 at 20:26 +0900, Yoshinori Sato wrote:
> > On Fri, 31 May 2019 09:16:18 +0900,
> > Jeff Law wrote:
> > >
> > > On 5/29/19 12:27 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> > > > On 5/23/19 6:05 AM, Yoshinori Sato wrote:
> > > > > I ported
Hi Thomas,
It looks good to me. OK for trunk.
Thanks
Paul
On Sun, 2 Jun 2019 at 14:34, Thomas Koenig wrote:
>
> Hello world,
>
> this patch adds two tweaks to the argument repacking.
>
> First, when the size of an argument is known to be one, as in a(n1:n1),
> we can directly pass a pointer -
Hello world,
this patch adds two tweaks to the argument repacking.
First, when the size of an argument is known to be one, as in a(n1:n1),
we can directly pass a pointer - the stride may not be one, but it
does not matter.
Second, the case where the array passed is actually contiguous is
more
On Sun, 2019-06-02 at 20:26 +0900, Yoshinori Sato wrote:
> On Fri, 31 May 2019 09:16:18 +0900,
> Jeff Law wrote:
> >
> > On 5/29/19 12:27 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> > > On 5/23/19 6:05 AM, Yoshinori Sato wrote:
> > > > I ported linux kernel to Renesas RX.
> > > >
> > > > rx-*-elf target output a
On Fri, 31 May 2019 09:16:18 +0900,
Jeff Law wrote:
>
> On 5/29/19 12:27 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> > On 5/23/19 6:05 AM, Yoshinori Sato wrote:
> >> I ported linux kernel to Renesas RX.
> >>
> >> rx-*-elf target output a binary different from the standard ELF.
> >> It has the same format as the
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'gcc' has been submitted
by the Swedish team of translators. The file is available at:
https://translationproject.org/latest/gcc/sv.po
(This file, 'gcc-9.1.0.sv.po', has
14 matches
Mail list logo
