Re: [PATCH] aix: handle 64bit inodes for include directories

+DavidMalcolm Can you review this patch when you have a moment? Thanks, David On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 3:05 PM David Edelsohn wrote: > > The aix.h change is okay with me, but you need to get approval for the > incpath.c and cpplib.h parts of the patch from the appropriate > maintainers. > >

[_GLIBCXX_DEBUG] Enhance rendering of assert message

Here is the part of the libbacktrace patch with the enhancement to the rendering of assert message. It only contains one real fix, the rendering of address. In 2 places it was done with "0x%p", so resulting in something like: 0x0x012345678 Otherwise it is just enhancements, mostly avoiding

Re: [Ping^2, Patch, Fortran] PR98301 Re: RANDOM_INIT() and coarray Fortran

On 5/22/21 1:39 PM, Andre Vehreschild via Gcc-patches wrote: Hi Steve and Jerry, thanks for the ok'ing. Committed as https://gcc.gnu.org/g:26ca6dbda23bc6dfab96ce07afa70ebacedfaf9c and https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c4771b3438a8cd9afcef1762957b763f8df3fa6e (for the missing changelog entries). Hello.

Re: [PATCH] Hashtable PR96088

This was indeed the right approach.     The only minor drawback is that __is_noexcept_invocable<> combines noexcept qualification of the conversion and of the hash functor. So if the hash functor is not noexcept we could end up creating temporaries for nothing.     So I've eventually used

Re: RFA: avoid infinite lra loop for constant addresses

On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 11:52:27AM -0600, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches wrote: > On 5/18/2021 2:56 AM, Joern Rennecke wrote: > >I find that when compiling some files, lra goes into an infinite loop > >reloading constant > >addresses. This patch allows them to just be recognized as matching >

[PATCH] Pass the number of bytes to push to PUSH_ARGS

1. Update PUSH_ARGS to accept an argument. When the PUSH instruction usage is optional, pass the number of bytes to push to PUSH_ARGS so that the backend can decide if PUSH instructions should be generated. 2. Change x86 PUSH_ARGS to return 0 when number of bytes to push is more than a word to

Re: [Ping^2, Patch, Fortran] PR98301 Re: RANDOM_INIT() and coarray Fortran

Hi Steve and Jerry, thanks for the ok'ing. Committed as https://gcc.gnu.org/g:26ca6dbda23bc6dfab96ce07afa70ebacedfaf9c and https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c4771b3438a8cd9afcef1762957b763f8df3fa6e (for the missing changelog entries). - Andre On Fri, 21 May 2021 19:38:00 -0700 Jerry D wrote: > yes,

Re: [r12-989 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.oacc-fortran/privatized-ref-2.f90 -DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable -Os (test for warnings, line 98) on Linux/x86_64

Hi! First: many thanks for running this automated regression testing machinery! On 2021-05-21T18:40:55-0700, "sunil.k.pandey via Gcc-patches" wrote: > On Linux/x86_64, > > 325aa13996bafce0c4927876c315d1fa706d9881 is the first bad commit > commit 325aa13996bafce0c4927876c315d1fa706d9881 >