On Wed, 9 Mar 2022, Jiufu Guo wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> Richard Biener writes:
>
> > On Tue, 8 Mar 2022, Jiufu Guo wrote:
> >
> >> Jiufu Guo writes:
> >>
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> > Hi Sehger,
> >> >
> >> > Segher Boessenkool writes:
> >> >
> >> >> On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 10:28:57PM +0800, Jiufu Guo wro
On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 12:51 PM Roger Sayle wrote:
>
>
> Hi Uros,
>
> > Is there a reason that only inserts to DImode registers are implemented?
> > IMO, these peepholes should also handle inserts to SImode.
>
> I wasn't able to construct a test case that produced a byte or word insert
> into an S
Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Have you tested this in 32-bit mode? It does not look correct based
> on the glibc definitions. Looking at glibc it seems that it ought to
> be
As stated in the commit message, I have only tested this on Alpine Linux
ppc64le (which uses musl libc). Unfortunately, I don
On Tue, 8 Mar 2022, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 9:35 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 08:09:25AM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > > > Ok. So, what do you think about replacing the libgcc/ part of your
> > > > patch
> > > > with that
> > > > /* __builtin_eh_return can
On Tue, 8 Mar 2022, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The following testcase is miscompiled on powerpc64le-linux at -O1 and higher
> (except for -Og). The bug was introduced in r12-3252-gcad36f38576a6a7
> which for SIGN_EXTEND from SUBREG_PROMOTED_SIGNED_P SUBREG used
> SUBREG_PROMOTED_SET (temp, 1
Hi!
Richard Biener writes:
> On Tue, 8 Mar 2022, Jiufu Guo wrote:
>
>> Jiufu Guo writes:
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> > Hi Sehger,
>> >
>> > Segher Boessenkool writes:
>> >
>> >> On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 10:28:57PM +0800, Jiufu Guo wrote:
>> >>> Segher Boessenkool writes:
>> >>> > No. insn_cost is onl
This should be obvious, OK for trunk?
-- >8 --
Calling VECTOR_MODE_P with MAX_MACHINE_MODE has caused out-of-bound
access.
gcc/
PR tree-optimization/104851
* optabs-query.cc (supports_vec_convert_optab_p): Fix off-by-one
error.
---
gcc/optabs-query.cc | 2 +-
1 file cha
Hi Harald,
On 08.03.22 22:44, Harald Anlauf wrote:
Am 07.03.22 um 15:16 schrieb Tobias Burnus:
Pre-remark: Related NULL, there some accepts-invalid issues, not
addressed in this
patch. See https://gcc.gnu.org/PR104819
This patch fixes an ICE (12 regression) with NULL() that has no MOLD
argumen
On 3/2/22 05:22, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
As mentioned in the PR, different standards have different definition
on what is an UB left shift. They all agree on out of bounds (including
negative) shift count.
The rules used by ubsan are:
C99-C2x ((unsigned) x >> (uprecm1 - y)) != 0 then UB
C++11-
On 3/2/22 14:32, Patrick Palka wrote:
In order to be able to perform CTAD for a dependently-scoped template
such as A::B in the testcase below, we need to permit a
typename-specifier to resolve to a template as per [dcl.type.simple]/2,
at least when it appears in a CTAD-enabled context.
This pat
On 3/8/22 17:17, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Tue, 8 Mar 2022, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 3/8/22 14:38, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Tue, 8 Mar 2022, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 3/8/22 11:36, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Mon, 7 Mar 2022, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 3/7/22 10:47, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Fri, 4 Mar
On 3/8/22 17:14, Marek Polacek wrote:
In r10-6329 I tried to optimize the number of calls to v_d_e_p in
convert_nontype_argument by remembering whether the expression was
value-dependent in a bool flag. I did that wrongly assuming that its
value-dependence will not be changed by build_converted_
On 3/8/22 16:57, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Tue, 8 Mar 2022, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 3/8/22 12:54, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Mon, 7 Mar 2022, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 3/7/22 14:41, Patrick Palka wrote:
instantiate_non_dependent_expr_sfinae instantiates only potentially
constant expressions
Hm
On 3/3/22 16:06, Patrick Palka wrote:
We currently merge default template arguments for class templates, but
not for function templates. This patch fixes this by splitting out the
argument merging logic in redeclare_class_template into a separate
function and using it in duplicate_decls as well.
Hi Tobias,
Am 08.03.22 um 21:19 schrieb Tobias Burnus:
PS: Can I make you review my two pending patches? (NULL and SIZEOF) ;-)
I just approved the former one, but rather hope that Paul or Mikael
or somebody else would jump in on the other one.
PPS: I lost a bit track working on other things
This patch to the Go frontend ignores the function type result name
when producing export data. This change ensures that we never output
a result name in the export data if there is only a single result.
Previously we would output a ? if the single result had a name. That
made the output unstable
Hi,
when writing the patch that downgrades address-taken references to
load references when IPA-CP can prove that all uses of the taken
address ends up in loads, I unfortunately did not take into account
that find_more_scalar_values_for_callers_subset now happily adds
self-recursive edges to the s
Hi Tobias,
Am 07.03.22 um 15:16 schrieb Tobias Burnus:
Pre-remark: Related NULL, there some accepts-invalid issues, not
addressed in this
patch. See https://gcc.gnu.org/PR104819
This patch fixes an ICE (12 regression) with NULL() that has no MOLD
argument.
the patch does fix the ICE. But giv
On Tue, 8 Mar 2022, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 3/8/22 14:38, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > On Tue, 8 Mar 2022, Jason Merrill wrote:
> >
> > > On 3/8/22 11:36, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 7 Mar 2022, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On 3/7/22 10:47, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > > > > > On Fr
In r10-6329 I tried to optimize the number of calls to v_d_e_p in
convert_nontype_argument by remembering whether the expression was
value-dependent in a bool flag. I did that wrongly assuming that its
value-dependence will not be changed by build_converted_constant_expr.
This testcase shows that
On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 11:28:03AM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 12:53:07PM -0500, Michael Meissner wrote:
> > Ping patch for PR target/102059 to ignore implicit -mpower8-fusion that
> > prevents a function targeting power9 or power10 from inlining a function
> > that
Dear all,
frontend-optimization of MINLOC/MAXLOC tries to generate code for rank-1
arrays that may be expanded inline later and optimzed. Except when the
argument is a character array...
As there is even a comment in trans-intrinsic.cc that we will call a
library function for character arguments
On Tue, 8 Mar 2022, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 3/8/22 12:54, Patrick Palka wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 7 Mar 2022, Jason Merrill wrote:
> >
> > > On 3/7/22 14:41, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > > > instantiate_non_dependent_expr_sfinae instantiates only potentially
> > > > constant expressions
> > >
>
Hi Harald,
On 07.03.22 20:58, Harald Anlauf wrote:
I think there are other PRs which profit from this fix.
Can you please have a look at PR99585, and in particular
the link in comment#0? ;-)
Good pointer – the testcase looks nearly identical and it is indeed fixed.
I included it in addition
On 3/8/22 14:38, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Tue, 8 Mar 2022, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 3/8/22 11:36, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Mon, 7 Mar 2022, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 3/7/22 10:47, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Fri, 4 Mar 2022, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 3/4/22 14:24, Patrick Palka wrote:
Here we're fa
Fix SIZEOF handling.
I have to admit that I do understand what the current code does,
but do not understand what the previous code did. However, it
still passes the testsuite - and also some code which did ICE
now compiles :-)
While writing the testcase, I did find two issues:
* Passing a CLASS
Gentle ping. I am grateful for the initial review, but seek closure on the
final couple of discussion items. Thanks!
PC
On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 07:56:40PM -0600, Paul A. Clarke via Gcc-patches wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 06:41:45PM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at
Ping.
On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 03:17:47PM -0600, Paul A. Clarke via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Also adjust DejaGnu directives, as specifically requiring "powerpc*-*-*" is no
> longer required.
>
> 2021-02-21 Paul A. Clarke
>
> gcc/testsuite
> * g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/const2.C: Move to g++.target/
Xi Ruoyao via Gcc-patches writes:
> On Fri, 2022-03-04 at 15:17 +0800, xucheng...@loongson.cn wrote:
>
>> The binutils has been merged into trunk:
>> https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=560b3fe208255ae909b4b1c88ba9c28b09043307
>>
>> Note: We split -mabi= into -mabi=lp64d/f/s
xucheng...@loongson.cn writes:
> From: chenglulu
>
> 2022-03-04 Chenghua Xu
> Lulu Cheng
>
> * contrib/config-list.mk: Add LoongArch triplet.
> * gcc/doc/install.texi: Add LoongArch options section.
> * gcc/doc/invoke.texi: Add LoongArch options section.
> *
On 3/2/22 14:31, Marek Polacek wrote:
Attributes deprecated and unavailable are largely the same, except
that the former produces a warning whereas the latter produces an error.
So is_late_template_attribute should treat them the same. Confirmed by
Iain that this divergence is not intentional:
<
On 3/2/22 14:31, Marek Polacek wrote:
104752 points out that
template
concept C = true;
auto y = C auto(1);
is ill-formed as per [dcl.type.auto.deduct]: "For an explicit type conversion,
T is the specified type, which shall be auto." which doesn't allow
type-constraint auto.
Bootstrap
On Mär 08 2022, Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> +
>> +.section .init,"ax",@progbits
>> +.globl _init
>> +.type _init,@function
>> +_init:
>> +addi.d $r3,$r3,-16
>> +st.d $r1,$r3,8
>> +addi.d $r3,$r3,16
>> +jirl$r0,$r1,0
>> +
>> +.section
This amends an error message to correct punctuation and a little
better wording.
bootstrapped on x86_64-darwin18, pushed to master,
thanks, Iain
Signed-off-by: Iain Sandoe
PR translation/104552
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/host-darwin.cc (darwin_gt_pch_get_address): Amend
t
Successfully tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
Pushed to trunk as r12-7541-gb7175f36812b32d3de242f15c065b9cb68e957a9.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR analyzer/99771
* gcc.dg/analyzer/leak-4.c: New test.
Signed-off-by: David Malcolm
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/leak-4.c | 103 +
xucheng...@loongson.cn writes:
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
> b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
> index 737e1a8913b..843b508b010 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
> @@ -286,6 +286,10 @@ proc check_config
xucheng...@loongson.cn writes:
> diff --git a/libgcc/config/loongarch/crti.S b/libgcc/config/loongarch/crti.S
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..27b7eab3626
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/libgcc/config/loongarch/crti.S
> @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
> +/* Copyright (C) 2021-2022 Free Software Foundation, Inc
xucheng...@loongson.cn writes:
> +#ifndef _GCC_LOONGARCH_BASE_INTRIN_H
> +#define _GCC_LOONGARCH_BASE_INTRIN_H
> +
> +#ifdef __cplusplus
> +extern "C" {
> +#endif
> +
> +typedef struct drdtime
> +{
> + unsigned long dvalue;
> + unsigned long dtimeid;
> +} __drdtime_t;
> +
> +typedef struct rdtime
On Tue, 8 Mar 2022, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 3/8/22 11:36, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > On Mon, 7 Mar 2022, Jason Merrill wrote:
> >
> > > On 3/7/22 10:47, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 4 Mar 2022, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On 3/4/22 14:24, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > > > > > Here
On 3/8/22 12:54, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Mon, 7 Mar 2022, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 3/7/22 14:41, Patrick Palka wrote:
instantiate_non_dependent_expr_sfinae instantiates only potentially
constant expressions
Hmm, that now strikes me as a problematic interface, as we don't know whether
what w
On 3/8/22 05:32, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 10:23:28AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 8:27 AM Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches
On the following testcase, we emit "did you mean '__dt '?" in the error
message. "__dt " shows there because it is dtor_identifier,
Xi Ruoyao writes:
> I think this one obvious. Ok for trunk?
OK, thanks.
Richard
>
> gcc/
>
> PR target/104842
> * config/mips/mips.h (LUI_OPERAND): Cast the input to an unsigned
> value before adding an offset.
> ---
> gcc/config/mips/mips.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 inser
On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 05:58:34PM +, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches wrote:
> This now works with Solaris /usr/xpg4/bin/sed and should work with BSD
> sed too.
>
> OK for trunk?
>
> -- >8 --
>
> POSIX sed does not support \? or \+ in its Basic Regular Expression
> grammar. Replace the \(tag
This now works with Solaris /usr/xpg4/bin/sed and should work with BSD
sed too.
OK for trunk?
-- >8 --
POSIX sed does not support \? or \+ in its Basic Regular Expression
grammar. Replace the \(tags/\)\? part of the pattern with a substitution
to remove ^tags/ before other substitutions. Replace
Richard Biener writes:
> This adds a --param to allow disabling of vectorization of
> floating point inductions. Ontop of -Ofast this should allow
> 549.fotonik3d_r to not miscompare.
>
> While I thought of a more elaborate way of disabling certain
> vectorization kinds (reductions also came to m
On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 9:35 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 08:09:25AM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > > Ok. So, what do you think about replacing the libgcc/ part of your patch
> > > with that
> > > /* __builtin_eh_return can't handle stack realignment, so disable SSE in
> > >3
On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 9:35 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 08:09:25AM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > > Ok. So, what do you think about replacing the libgcc/ part of your patch
> > > with that
> > > /* __builtin_eh_return can't handle stack realignment, so disable SSE in
> > >3
Disallow stack realignment and regparm nested function with EH return
since they don't work together.
gcc/
PR target/104781
* config/i386/i386.cc (ix86_expand_epilogue): Sorry if there is
stack realignment or regparm nested function with EH return.
gcc/testsuite/
On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 08:09:25AM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > Ok. So, what do you think about replacing the libgcc/ part of your patch
> > with that
> > /* __builtin_eh_return can't handle stack realignment, so disable SSE in
> >32-bit libgcc functions that call it. */
> > #ifndef __x86_64__
>
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 12:53:07PM -0500, Michael Meissner wrote:
> Ping patch for PR target/102059 to ignore implicit -mpower8-fusion that
> prevents a function targeting power9 or power10 from inlining a function that
> declared it needed power8 via attribute/pragma target.
Can we just disable a
I think this one obvious. Ok for trunk?
gcc/
PR target/104842
* config/mips/mips.h (LUI_OPERAND): Cast the input to an unsigned
value before adding an offset.
---
gcc/config/mips/mips.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/config/mips/m
On Mon, 7 Mar 2022, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 3/7/22 14:41, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > instantiate_non_dependent_expr_sfinae instantiates only potentially
> > constant expressions
>
> Hmm, that now strikes me as a problematic interface, as we don't know whether
> what we get back is template or
Pushed to trunk.
-- >8 --
POSIX expr does not support the 'match' keyword, so the git-descr.sh
scripts should use ':' instead.
contrib/ChangeLog:
PR other/102664
* git-descr.sh: Use portable form of expr match.
---
contrib/git-descr.sh | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1
> -Original Message-
> From: Andre Vieira (lists)
> Sent: Tuesday, March 8, 2022 3:20 PM
> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Cc: Richard Sandiford ; Kyrylo Tkachov
>
> Subject: [aarch64] Enable FP16 feature by default for Armv9
>
> Hi all,
>
> This patch adds the feature bit for FP16 to t
On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 11:33:59AM -0500, Marek Polacek wrote:
> PR rtl-optimization/104777
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> * rtl.cc (classify_insn): For ASM_OPERANDS, return JUMP_INSN only if
> ASM_OPERANDS_LABEL_VEC has at least one element.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> * g
On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 10:24:50AM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 05:12:43PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 09:49:15AM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > > > But like I said above, even if we didn't copy these XVECLEN 0 rtvecs,
> > > > the cras
On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 05:12:43PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 09:49:15AM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > > But like I said above, even if we didn't copy these XVECLEN 0 rtvecs,
> > > the crash would not go away.
> >
> > An rtvec should never have length 0. Look at
On 3/8/22 11:36, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Mon, 7 Mar 2022, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 3/7/22 10:47, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Fri, 4 Mar 2022, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 3/4/22 14:24, Patrick Palka wrote:
Here we're failing to communicate to cp_finish_decl from tsubst_expr
that we're in a copy-initi
On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 05:12:43PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 09:49:15AM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > > But like I said above, even if we didn't copy these XVECLEN 0 rtvecs,
> > > the crash would not go away.
> >
> > An rtvec should never have length 0. Look at
On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 09:49:15AM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > But like I said above, even if we didn't copy these XVECLEN 0 rtvecs,
> > the crash would not go away.
>
> An rtvec should never have length 0. Look at gen_rtvec for another
> example.
That is not true. In case of ASM_OPERA
On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 7:46 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 07:37:17AM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > > Though, perhaps it should be
> > > #ifndef __x86_64__
> > > #define LIBGCC2_UNWIND_ATTRIBUTE __attribute__((target ("no-sse")))
> > > #endif
> > > or something similar, on x86-64
On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 09:49:15AM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 10:25:45AM -0500, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 09:14:56AM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 10:08:25AM -0500, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > > > ...I don't see th
On 2/4/22 14:40, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 1/31/22 15:06, Martin Liška wrote:
Hello.
It's about 5 months since the last project status update:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-August/577108.html
Now it's pretty clear that it won't be merged before GCC 12.1 gets released.
So where
Hi!
The following testcase is miscompiled on powerpc64le-linux at -O1 and higher
(except for -Og). The bug was introduced in r12-3252-gcad36f38576a6a7
which for SIGN_EXTEND from SUBREG_PROMOTED_SIGNED_P SUBREG used
SUBREG_PROMOTED_SET (temp, 1) (but that makes temp
SUBREG_PROMOTED_UNSIGNED_P beca
On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 10:25:45AM -0500, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 09:14:56AM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 10:08:25AM -0500, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > > ...I don't see that. In fact copy_rtx does the same thing as
> > > copy_insn:
> > >
> > >
On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 07:37:17AM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > Though, perhaps it should be
> > #ifndef __x86_64__
> > #define LIBGCC2_UNWIND_ATTRIBUTE __attribute__((target ("no-sse")))
> > #endif
> > or something similar, on x86-64 one at least normally doesn't use lower
> > stack realignment unles
On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 5:45 AM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 10:18 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 09:51:26AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 11:41 PM H.J. Lu via Gcc-patches
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Add TARGET_FOLD_MEMCPY_MAX fo
On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 4:29 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 12:15:15PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > > --- gcc/config/i386/i386.h.jj 2022-02-25 12:06:45.535493490 +0100
> > > +++ gcc/config/i386/i386.h 2022-03-08 11:20:43.207043370 +0100
> > > @@ -2848,
On Mon, 7 Mar 2022, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 3/7/22 10:47, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > On Fri, 4 Mar 2022, Jason Merrill wrote:
> >
> > > On 3/4/22 14:24, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > > > Here we're failing to communicate to cp_finish_decl from tsubst_expr
> > > > that we're in a copy-initialization co
On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 09:14:56AM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 10:08:25AM -0500, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 07:19:09PM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 07:03:17PM -0500, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches
> > >
Hi all,
This patch adds the feature bit for FP16 to the feature set for Armv9
since Armv9 requires SVE to be implemented and SVE requires FP16 to be
implemented.
2022-03-04 Andre Vieira
* config/aarch64/aarch64.h (AARCH64_FL_FOR_ARCH9): Add FP16
feature bit.
diff --git a/gcc/conf
Hi,
This patch adds predicate move costs to several SVE enabled cores.
2022-02-25 Tamar Christina
Andre Vieira
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/aarch64/aarch64-protos.h (struct cpu_regmove_cost):
Add PR2PR member.
* config/aarch64/aarch64.cc (aarch64_registe
Hi!
On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 10:08:25AM -0500, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 07:19:09PM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 07:03:17PM -0500, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches
> > wrote:
> > > In r270550, Jakub fixed classify_insn to handle asm goto: if the as
On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 07:19:09PM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 07:03:17PM -0500, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > In r270550, Jakub fixed classify_insn to handle asm goto: if the asm can
> > jump to a label, the insn should be a JUMP_INSN.
> >
> > However, as
On Tue, 8 Mar 2022, Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
> On 3/8/2022 5:56 AM, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > This adds a --param to allow disabling of vectorization of
> > floating point inductions. Ontop of -Ofast this should allow
> > 549.fotonik3d_r to not miscompare.
> >
> > While I thought of
On 3/8/2022 3:10 AM, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches wrote:
On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 11:04 AM Roger Sayle wrote:
This patch is the main middle-end piece of a fix for PR tree-opt/98335,
which is a code-quality regression affecting mainline. The issue occurs
in DSE's (dead store elimination's)
On 3/8/2022 5:56 AM, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches wrote:
This adds a --param to allow disabling of vectorization of
floating point inductions. Ontop of -Ofast this should allow
549.fotonik3d_r to not miscompare.
While I thought of a more elaborate way of disabling certain
vectorization kin
Hi Thomas & Jakub,
found when working on the deep-mapping patch* with OpenMP code
(and part of that patch) but it already shows up in an existing
OpenACC testcase. I think it makes sense to fix it already for GCC 12.
Problem: Also for unallocated allocatables, their size was
calculated - the 'if
Hi,
On 3/4/22 15:39, Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches wrote:
From: Christophe Lyon
I went ahead and committed this patch after fixing my committer address
(above); I hope this is obvious enough.
Christophe
Commits r12-7342 and r12-7344 made some cleanup, leaving
arm_binop_none_none_unone_
On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 02:59:02PM -0800, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 6, 2022 at 11:11 PM wrote:
> >
> > +#ifdef __PPC64__
> > + ret.sigpc = ((ucontext_t*)(context))->uc_mcontext.gp_regs[32];
> > +#else
> > + ret.sigpc = ((ucontext_t*)(context))->uc_mcontext.gregs[32];
> > +#
This adds a --param to allow disabling of vectorization of
floating point inductions. Ontop of -Ofast this should allow
549.fotonik3d_r to not miscompare.
While I thought of a more elaborate way of disabling certain
vectorization kinds (reductions also came to my mind) this
for now simply uses a
Tested powerpc64le-linux, pushed to trunk. Backport to gcc-11 to follow.
-- >8 --
This file has the SGI copyright notice, but contains no code from
the SGI STL. It was entirely written by me in 2019, originally as part
of the header. When I extracted it into a new header I
accidentally copied ac
> Disabling sse/sse2 might be a problem especially on mingw where we need to
> restore SSE registers in the EH return, no?
Not in 32-bit mode I think, all XMM registers are call used.
--
Eric Botcazou
On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 12:15:15PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > --- gcc/config/i386/i386.h.jj 2022-02-25 12:06:45.535493490 +0100
> > +++ gcc/config/i386/i386.h 2022-03-08 11:20:43.207043370 +0100
> > @@ -2848,6 +2848,10 @@ extern enum attr_cpu ix86_schedule;
> > #define
On Tue, 8 Mar 2022, Jiufu Guo wrote:
> Jiufu Guo writes:
>
> Hi!
>
> > Hi Sehger,
> >
> > Segher Boessenkool writes:
> >
> >> On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 10:28:57PM +0800, Jiufu Guo wrote:
> >>> Segher Boessenkool writes:
> >>> > No. insn_cost is only for correct, existing instructions, not for
From: Andrew Stubbs
Implement the -foffload-memory=pinned option such that libgomp is
instructed to enable fully-pinned memory at start-up. The option is
intended to provide a performance boost to certain offload programs without
modifying the code.
This feature only works on Linux, at present,
This patches changes calls to malloc/free/calloc/realloc and operator new to
memory allocation functions in libgomp with
allocator=ompx_unified_shared_mem_alloc. This helps existing code to benefit
from the unified shared memory. The libgomp does the correct thing with all
the mapping constructs
From: Andrew Stubbs
This adds support for using Cuda Managed Memory with omp_alloc. It will be
used as the underpinnings for "requires unified_shared_memory" in a later
patch.
There are two new predefined allocators, ompx_unified_shared_mem_alloc and
ompx_host_mem_alloc, plus corresponding memo
From: Andrew Stubbs
This is the front-end portion of the Unified Shared Memory implementation.
It removes the "sorry, unimplemented message" in C, C++, and Fortran, and sets
flag_offload_memory, but is otherwise inactive, for now.
It also checks that -foffload-memory isn't set to an incompatible
From: Andrew Stubbs
Add a new option. It will be used in follow-up patches.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* common.opt: Add -foffload-memory and its enum values.
* coretypes.h (enum offload_memory): New.
* doc/invoke.texi: Document -foffload-memory.
---
gcc/common.opt | 16 +
This patch series add support for unified shared memory (USM) and pinned
memory. The support in libgomp is for nvptx offloading only. A new
command line option -foffload-memory allows user to choose either USM
or pinned memory. The USM can also be enabled using requires construct.
When USM us in
Hi All,
These testcases declare requiring vect_int which sparc declares as well however
sparc doesn't have an optab to vectorize comparisons so these testcases fail to
vectorize and so the tests fail.
As such best coure of action is to just skip them on sparc as comparisons are
somewhat expected
Jiufu Guo writes:
Hi!
> Hi Sehger,
>
> Segher Boessenkool writes:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 10:28:57PM +0800, Jiufu Guo wrote:
>>> Segher Boessenkool writes:
>>> > No. insn_cost is only for correct, existing instructions, not for
>>> > made-up nonsense. I created insn_cost precisely to ge
On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 11:23:51AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 07:06:28AM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > Since eh_return doesn't work with stack realignment, disable SSE on
> > unwind-c.c and unwind-dw2.c to avoid stack realignment with the 4-byte
> > incoming s
Hi,
One of the mistakes reported in PR 104552 is repeated "that" in
description of ipa-cp-recursive-freq-factor which I introduced. This
patch removes one of them.
Added to a bootstrap and testing on x86_64-linux, which passed,
committed as obvious.
Thanks,
Martin
gcc/ChangeLog:
2022-03-07
On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 11:10 AM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 11:04 AM Roger Sayle
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > This patch is the main middle-end piece of a fix for PR tree-opt/98335,
> > which is a code-quality regression affecting mainline. The issue occurs
> > in DSE's (dead store
Hi Jakub,
diff --git a/libgomp/libgomp.map b/libgomp/libgomp.map
index 2ac5809..00a4858 100644
--- a/libgomp/libgomp.map
+++ b/libgomp/libgomp.map
@@ -224,6 +224,7 @@ OMP_5.1 {
omp_set_teams_thread_limit_8_;
omp_get_teams_thread_limit;
omp_get_teams_thread_limit_;
+omp_get_map
On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 07:06:28AM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> Since eh_return doesn't work with stack realignment, disable SSE on
> unwind-c.c and unwind-dw2.c to avoid stack realignment with the 4-byte
> incoming stack to avoid SSE usage which is caused by
>
> commit 609e8c492d62d92465460eae3d43dfc4
On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 11:04 AM Roger Sayle wrote:
>
>
> This patch is the main middle-end piece of a fix for PR tree-opt/98335,
> which is a code-quality regression affecting mainline. The issue occurs
> in DSE's (dead store elimination's) compute_trims function that determines
> where a store t
On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 10:23:28AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 8:27 AM Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches
> > On the following testcase, we emit "did you mean '__dt '?" in the error
> > message. "__dt " shows there because it is dtor_identifier, but we
> > shouldn't suggest th
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
