On 4/1/23 09:39, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 01:28:35PM +0200, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
Ok for trunk if this passes bootstrap/regtest?
LGTM
Unfortunately I ran into 4 tests where we run into the known bug
where if ranger finds out a range of some floating point operation
it
On Mar 30, 2023, at 6:51 AM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
> On Mar 30, 2023, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
>> If we're dropping the renaming, I suppose we could also revert Jakub's
>> change. I suppose this patch will take care of it, pending testing...
>
> Regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu and also
On Wed, 29 Mar 2023, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 3/17/23 11:26, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > Here we're crashing during satisfaction for the NTTP 'C auto' from
> > do_auto_deduction ultimately because convert_template_argument / unify
> > don't pass all outer template arguments to do_auto_deduction,
Hi Frederik!
Thanks for including a good number of test cases with your code changes!
This new test case:
On 2023-03-24T16:30:39+0100, Frederik Harwath wrote:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/loop-transforms/unroll-1.f90
> @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
> +! { dg-additional-options
Hi Steve,
Hi Andrew,
"long long". This was just an oversight and a missing check.
Committed as obvious after a bootstrap/test on x86_64-linux-gnu.
Thanks!
I think this one is obvious enough that it deserves a backport.
I've cherry-picked this for gcc12, will do gcc11 tomorrow.
The
On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 01:28:35PM +0200, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> > Ok for trunk if this passes bootstrap/regtest?
>
> LGTM
Unfortunately I ran into 4 tests where we run into the known bug
where if ranger finds out a range of some floating point operation
it folds it and throws away the trapping
Hi!
This PR got fixed with r13-137.
Add a testcase to make sure it doesn't reappear.
Regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, committed to trunk as obvious.
2023-04-01 Jakub Jelinek
PR tree-optimization/109362
* gcc.target/i386/pr109362.c: New test.
---
