Hi Dave,
based on our earlier e-mail, I understand we don't support hppa*-hp-hpux10
any longer, so let's remove them from the installation docs.
On the way remove references to GCC 2.95 and 3.0 from hppa*-hp-hpux11.
Okay?
(I believe it would be great if you could have a look at that part of
On Sat, 16 Dec 2023, John David Anglin wrote:
> I have one comment. The only target currently supported is
> hppa64-hp-hpux11*. While gas is required, only the HP ld works.
>
> Otherwise, the change looks fine.
Thank you, Dave!
I updated the patch accordingly, referring to gas (not
So mcore-elf is the slowest target to test with a simulator. Not
because it's simulator is particularly bad, but because some tests
timeout as they've gotten into infinite loops. This causes the
mcore-elf port to take about 2X longer than most other gdbsim ports.
I tracked this down to
在 2023/12/15 下午3:56, chenglulu 写道:
在 2023/12/14 上午9:16, chenglulu 写道:
在 2023/12/13 下午9:20, Xi Ruoyao 写道:
On Wed, 2023-12-13 at 20:22 +0800, chenglulu wrote:
在 2023/12/10 上午1:03, Xi Ruoyao 写道:
Replace the instruction costs in loongarch_rtx_cost_data constructor
based on micro-benchmark
Hi Gerald,
I have one comment. The only target currently supported is hppa64-hp-hpux11*.
While gas is required, only the HP ld works.
Otherwise, the change looks fine.
Dave
On 2023-12-16 8:35 p.m., Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
John, Jeff,
I suggest to streamline the hppa*-hp-hpux* installation
John, Jeff,
I suggest to streamline the hppa*-hp-hpux* installation instructions as
follows. Okay?
In fact in the following sections there is even more, and more specific
material, which would be great could you have a look at and help trim.
Gerald
>From
After addressing the references to the stale information Thomas pointed
out on our web pages, this addresses our documentation.
(I can't believe we still had a reference to SuSE, more than twenty years
after the name changed to SUSE.)
Gerald
gcc:
PR other/69374
*
On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 7:04 PM Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Dec 2023 at 00:02, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 16 Dec 2023 at 23:06, David Edelsohn wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 4:44 PM Jakub Jelinek
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 04:24:13PM -0500,
On Sun, 17 Dec 2023 at 00:02, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> On Sat, 16 Dec 2023 at 23:06, David Edelsohn wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 4:44 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 04:24:13PM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
> >> > AIX stdio.h defines fileno as a macro
Tested x86_64-linux (and built on AIX). Pushed to trunk.
-- >8 --
On AIX fileno is a function-like macro, so enclose the name in
parentheses to ensure we use the real function.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* src/c++23/print.cc (__open_terminal(FILE*)): Avoid fileno
macro.
---
On Sat, 16 Dec 2023 at 23:06, David Edelsohn wrote:
>
> On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 4:44 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 04:24:13PM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
>> > AIX stdio.h defines fileno as a macro although there is a symbol in libc.
>> >
>> > I think that print.cc at
On 12/16/23 05:31, Nathaniel Shead wrote:
Ping for https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-November/636159.html
ok
On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 12:59:36PM +1100, Nathaniel Shead wrote:
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. I don't have write
access.
-- >8 --
Currently the
On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 4:44 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 04:24:13PM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
> > AIX stdio.h defines fileno as a macro although there is a symbol in libc.
> >
> > I think that print.cc at least needs to
> >
> >
> > #undef fileno
> >
> >
> > before the
Pushed to wwwdocs.
-- >8 --
---
htdocs/gcc-14/porting_to.html | 6 +-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/htdocs/gcc-14/porting_to.html b/htdocs/gcc-14/porting_to.html
index dea9ac80..3e4cedc3 100644
--- a/htdocs/gcc-14/porting_to.html
+++
Pushed to wwwdocs.
-- >8 --
---
htdocs/gcc-14/changes.html | 12 +---
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/htdocs/gcc-14/changes.html b/htdocs/gcc-14/changes.html
index 346785a0..eb14e09d 100644
--- a/htdocs/gcc-14/changes.html
+++ b/htdocs/gcc-14/changes.html
On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 04:24:13PM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
> AIX stdio.h defines fileno as a macro although there is a symbol in libc.
>
> I think that print.cc at least needs to
>
>
> #undef fileno
>
>
> before the usage.
Or (::fileno)(f) ?
Jakub
Hi, Jonathan
Unfortunately this patch broke bootstrap on AIX.
In file included from /tmp/GCC/gcc/include-fixed/wchar.h:64,
from
/tmp/GCC/powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0/libstdc++-v3/include/cwchar:44,
from
As a followup to r14-6057-g12b67d1e13b3cf, add SARIF property bags
for -Wanalyzer-out-of-bounds, to help with debugging these warnings.
This was very helpful with PR analyzer/112792.
Successfully bootstrapped & regrtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
Successful run of analyzer integration tests on
Successfully bootstrapped & regrtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
Successful run of analyzer integration tests on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
Pushed to trunk as r14-6634-g30d9a3a69841b1.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* json.cc (print_escaped_json_string): New, taken from
string::print.
A few places in bits/basic_string.h use `traits_type::copy` to copy
`__str.length() + 1` bytes.
Despite the knowledge that `__str.length()` is not greater than 15 the
compiler emits (and sometimes inlines) a `memcpy` call. That results
in a quite big set of instructions
On 12/15/23 17:14, Andrew Waterman wrote:
On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 1:38 PM Jeff Law wrote:
On 12/12/23 20:54, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
I can't actually find anything in the ISA manual that makes Ztso imply
A. In theory the memory ordering is just a different thing that the set
of
* config/abi/post/x86_64-linux-gnu/x32/baseline_symbols.txt:
Updated.
---
.../x86_64-linux-gnu/x32/baseline_symbols.txt | 111 +-
1 file changed, 110 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
a/libstdc++-v3/config/abi/post/x86_64-linux-gnu/x32/baseline_symbols.txt
Dear all,
the attached simple patch fixes a (9+) regression for passing
to a CONTIGUOUS,TARGET dummy an *effective argument* that is
contiguous, although the actual argument is not simply-contiguous
(it is a pointer without the CONTIGOUS attribute in the PR).
Since a previous attempt for a patch
On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 8:40 AM Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> On Sun, 10 Dec 2023 at 18:19, Jason Merrill wrote:
> >
> > On 12/7/23 00:11, Ken Matsui wrote:
> > > This patch series optimizes type traits compilation performance by
> > > implementing built-in type traits and using them in libstdc++.
>
On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 8:41 AM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
>
>
> > Am 16.12.2023 um 16:56 schrieb H.J. Lu :
> >
> > Linux CET kernel places a restore token on shadow stack followed by
> > optional additional information for signal handler to enhance security.
> > The restore token is the previous
> Am 16.12.2023 um 16:56 schrieb H.J. Lu :
>
> Linux CET kernel places a restore token on shadow stack followed by
> optional additional information for signal handler to enhance security.
> The restore token is the previous shadow stack pointer with bit 63 set.
> It is usually transparent to
On Sun, 10 Dec 2023 at 18:19, Jason Merrill wrote:
>
> On 12/7/23 00:11, Ken Matsui wrote:
> > This patch series optimizes type traits compilation performance by
> > implementing built-in type traits and using them in libstdc++.
> >
> > Changes in v26:
> >
> > * Rebased on top of trunk.
> >
On Sat, 16 Dec 2023 at 16:26, Patrick Palka wrote:
>
> On Sat, 16 Dec 2023, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 16 Dec 2023 at 09:14, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, 16 Dec 2023 at 00:27, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 6 Dec 2023, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
On Sat, 16 Dec 2023, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Dec 2023 at 09:14, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 16 Dec 2023 at 00:27, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 6 Dec 2023, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > >
> > > > Any comments on this approach?
> > > >
> > > > -- >8 --
> > > >
> > >
Linux CET kernel places a restore token on shadow stack followed by
optional additional information for signal handler to enhance security.
The restore token is the previous shadow stack pointer with bit 63 set.
It is usually transparent to user programs since kernel will pop the
restore token and
PR analyzer/112792 reports false positives from -fanalyzer's
bounds-checking on certain packed structs containing bitfields e.g.
in the Linux kernel's drivers/dma/idxd/device.c:
union msix_perm {
struct {
u32 rsvd2 : 8;
u32 pasid : 20;
};
u32 bits;
} __attribute__((__packed__));
On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 15:47:51 -0700
Julian Brown wrote:
> This patch has been separated out from the C++ "declare mapper"
> support patch. It contains just the gimplify.cc rearrangement
> work, mostly moving gimplification from gimplify_scan_omp_clauses
> to gimplify_adjust_omp_clauses for map
Ping for https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-November/638089.html
On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 10:32:13PM +1100, Nathaniel Shead wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 12:11:58PM -0500, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> > On 11/14/23 01:24, Nathaniel Shead wrote:
> > > I'll also note that the comments
Ping for https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-November/637768.html.
(I've changed the summary message a little from that email but the patch
is otherwise unchanged.)
On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 10:33:15PM +1100, Nathaniel Shead wrote:
> Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. I
Ping for https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-November/636159.html
On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 12:59:36PM +1100, Nathaniel Shead wrote:
> Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. I don't have write
> access.
>
> -- >8 --
>
> Currently the first depset for an EK_BINDING is not
On Sat, 16 Dec 2023 at 09:14, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> On Sat, 16 Dec 2023 at 00:27, Patrick Palka wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 6 Dec 2023, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >
> > > Any comments on this approach?
> > >
> > > -- >8 --
> > >
> > > This makes constexpr std::vector (mostly) work in Debug Mode. All
On Sat, 16 Dec 2023 at 00:27, Patrick Palka wrote:
>
> On Wed, 6 Dec 2023, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> > Any comments on this approach?
> >
> > -- >8 --
> >
> > This makes constexpr std::vector (mostly) work in Debug Mode. All safe
> > iterator instrumentation and checking is disabled during
On Fri, 15 Dec 2023 at 14:49, Tim Song wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 4:43 AM Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 15 Dec 2023 at 01:17, Tim Song wrote:
>> >
>> > On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 6:05 PM Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> >> + inline void
>> >> + vprint_unicode(ostream& __os,
On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 09:51:10PM -0800, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> I was looking into improving __builtin_popcountg for __int128 on
> aarch64 (when CSSC is not implemented which right now is almost all
> cores) but this patch forces __builtin_popcountg to expand into 2
> __builtin_popcountll (and
39 matches
Mail list logo
