: Sonntag, 14. April 2019 20:16
> An: Thomas Koenig
> Cc: Gilles Gouaillardet ; Bader, Reinhold
> ; fort...@gcc.gnu.org; gcc-patches patc...@gcc.gnu.org>
> Betreff: Re: [Patch, fortran] PRs 89843 and 90022 - C Fortran Interop fixes.
>
> Hi Thomas,
>
> Thanks a lot.
Dear Gilles,
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Gilles Gouaillardet
> Gesendet: Freitag, 12. April 2019 02:25
> An: Bader, Reinhold ; Paul Richard Thomas
> ; fort...@gcc.gnu.org; gcc-patches patc...@gcc.gnu.org>
> Betreff: Re: AW: [Patch, fortran] PRs 89843
Hi Gilles,
>
> I also found an other potential issue with copy-in.
>
> If in Fortran, we
>
> call foo(buf(0,0))
>
> then the C subroutine can only access buf(0,0), and other elements such
> as buf(1025,1025) cannot be accessed.
>
> Such elements are valid in buf, but out of bounds in the copy
Dear Paul,
Here are further bug reports, mostly on the various functions for manipulating
descriptors:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89841
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89842
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89843
these in the queue for now.
Regards
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Bader, Reinhold
> Gesendet: Freitag, 15. Februar 2019 16:24
> An: 'Paul Richard Thomas'
> Cc: fort...@gcc.gnu.org; gcc-patches
> Betreff: Bugs in extended C interop
>
> Dear Paul,
>
> I'
Dear Paul,
I've started putting together my observations on the current status of the
F2018 C interop extensions in gfortran 9.0. See the PRs
89363, 89364, 89365, 89366:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89363
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89364
given for
F08/128, by Daniel Chen from IBM.
And indeed this seems to have caused some grief to other implementors.
Cheers
Reinhold
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Paul Richard Thomas [mailto:paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 11. August 2015 12:28
An: Bader, Reinhold
Hello Toon, all else,
a bit unfortunate, in my opinion (I was present at the discussion).
I've in the meantime taken some effort to implement what the design pattern
experts might call an abstract factory with full dependency inversion as
a bare-bones framework and have attached an archive
to 11.2.3, para 2 of the Fortran 2008 standard. So
I think the error message is spurious.
Cheers
Reinhold
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Paul Richard Thomas [mailto:paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. Juli 2015 13:10
An: Bader, Reinhold; fort...@gcc.gnu.org; gcc
: Paul Richard Thomas [mailto:paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 25. Juni 2015 17:16
An: fort...@gcc.gnu.org; gcc-patches
Cc: Damian Rouson; Tobias Burnus; salvatore.filipp...@uniroma2.it; Bader,
Reinhold
Betreff: Re: [Patch, fortran] PR52846 - [F2008] Support submodules
Dear
10 matches
Mail list logo
