On 15/01/15 04:26 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>>
>> Stage3 is closing rapidly. I've drained my queue of patches I was tracking
>> for gcc-5.However, note that I don't track everything. If it's a patch
>> for a backend, language other than C or seemin
On 11/01/15 06:37 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 1:05 AM, Daniel Micay wrote:
>> On 11/01/15 03:52 AM, Daniel Micay wrote:
>>> This branch works well for me. It doesn't automatically turn off the
>>> linker flag when -fno-PIE or -fno-PIC are pas
On 11/01/15 03:52 AM, Daniel Micay wrote:
> This branch works well for me. It doesn't automatically turn off the
> linker flag when -fno-PIE or -fno-PIC are passed like most of the
> wrapper scripts / downstream patches do, but that might not be a problem
> in practice.
Er,
This branch works well for me. It doesn't automatically turn off the
linker flag when -fno-PIE or -fno-PIC are passed like most of the
wrapper scripts / downstream patches do, but that might not be a problem
in practice.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 09/01/15 12:49 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Jan 2015, Daniel Micay wrote:
>
>>> --with-specs="%{pie|fpic|fPIC|fpie|fPIE|fno-pic|fno-PIC|fno-pie|fno-PIE|shared|static|nostdlib|nodefaultlibs|nostartfiles:;:-fPIE
>>> -pie}"
>>>
>>> at co
On 09/01/15 07:58 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> Looking at the actual implementation I wonder why it's not similar
> to how darwin gets at it default (not sure how it does). Also
> looking at how DRIVER_SELF_SPECS is used I wonder if the
> functionality can be enabled with a simple
>
> --with-sp
