Dwarf2 only works with an ancient GDB. VMS style was useful because it
implemented enough to get a trace back.
But as you say it’s dead, so no basis for objection.
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 6:47 AM Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
> On 9/10/2021 12:52 AM, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > This changes
On 3/12/2012 4:48 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
Hi,
Now that '#pragma pointer_size' is supported by GCC for VMS, we can add the
'-mpointer-size' switch (modeled on /POINTER_SIZE=xx DEC-C qualifier) to set
the default pointer size. This also makes alpha64-dec-*vms* target obsolete
(but still sup
On 3/5/2012 9:28 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 03/05/2012 09:14 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
* In the alpha backend, there are a couple of cases that might be
osf-specific, but I cannot tell for certain:
macro osf5.halpha.h
TARGET_AS_CAN_SUBTRACT_L
On 1/22/2012 4:41 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 01/01/2012 10:01 PM, Douglas Rupp wrote:
-i[[34567]]86-*-interix3*)
+i[[34567]]86-*-interix[[3-9]]*)
# Interix 3.x gcc -fpic/-fPIC options generate broken code.
# Instead, we relocate shared libraries at runtime.
;;
Is
Ping.
Patch retested with 1/18/2012 sources.
On 1/1/2012 1:01 PM, Douglas Rupp wrote:
This is for 32bit, "C" language only.
Tested by cross and then cross-native from x86_64 Linux
--Doug
This is for 32bit, "C" language only.
Tested by cross and then cross-native from x86_64 Linux
--Doug
2012-01-01 Douglas B Rupp
/config/mh-interix: Remove as unneeded.
/config/picflag.m4 (i[[34567]]86-*-interix3*):
Change triplet to i[[34567]]86-*-interix[[3-9]]*.
On 10/3/2011 8:35 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
"unnamed variadic functions" sounds as if the function itself is
unnamed, so not good.
-funnamed-variadic-parameter
How about
-fvariadic-parameters-unnamed
there's already a -fvariadic-macros, so maybe putting variadic first is
more consistent?
On 10/3/2011 1:23 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
The language accepted by the compiler in the user's source code (as
opposed to in system headers) shouldn't depend on the target except for
certain well-defined areas such as target attributes and built-in
functions; behaving the same across different
On 9/30/2011 8:19 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Fri, 30 Sep 2011, Tristan Gingold wrote:
If you prefer a target hook, I'm fine with that. I will write such a patch.
I don't think it must be restricted to system headers, as it is possible
that the user 'imports' such a function (and define it
An update to the IA-32/x86-64 section seems the right place.
I confess to being ignorant about how to update this html page. Please
advise.
--Doug
On 12 Jun 2011, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
And I assume you'll be updating the release notes at
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.7/changes.html . ;-)
10 matches
Mail list logo
