On 3/18/20 10:05 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 3/17/20 7:43 PM, Egeyar Bagcioglu wrote:
Hi Martin,
I like the patch. It definitely serves our purposes at Oracle and
provides another way to do what my previous patches did as well.
1) It keeps the backwards compatibility regarding
-frecord
Hi Martin,
I like the patch. It definitely serves our purposes at Oracle and
provides another way to do what my previous patches did as well.
1) It keeps the backwards compatibility regarding -frecord-gcc-switches;
therefore, removes my related doubts about your previous patch.
2) It still
On 3/5/20 8:36 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 5:28 PM Egeyar Bagcioglu
wrote:
On 3/4/20 1:18 AM, Fangrui Song wrote:
On 2020-03-03, Joseph Myers wrote:
On Tue, 3 Mar 2020, Egeyar Bagcioglu wrote:
Although we discussed after the submission of the first version
I'm sending the updated patch based on Egeyar's work.
It utilizes a new environmental variable and uses the currently
existing -frecord-gcc-switches option.
Thoughts?
I am leaving it to the more experienced to comment on redefining the
functionality of -frecord-gcc-switches.
The code
On 3/4/20 6:33 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 06:23:10PM +0100, Martin Liška wrote:
On 3/4/20 4:25 PM, Egeyar Bagcioglu wrote:
Thanks Richard.
I do not have write-access to the GCC repo. I'd be glad if someone commits it
for me.
Can we please wait? I'm really convinced
On 3/4/20 6:23 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 3/4/20 4:25 PM, Egeyar Bagcioglu wrote:
Thanks Richard.
I do not have write-access to the GCC repo. I'd be glad if someone
commits it for me.
Can we please wait? I'm really convinced we do not want one another
very similar
functionality.
I am
On 3/4/20 5:28 PM, Egeyar Bagcioglu wrote:
On 3/4/20 1:18 AM, Fangrui Song wrote:
On 2020-03-03, Joseph Myers wrote:
On Tue, 3 Mar 2020, Egeyar Bagcioglu wrote:
Although we discussed after the submission of the first version that
there are several other options performing similar tasks
On 3/4/20 1:18 AM, Fangrui Song wrote:
On 2020-03-03, Joseph Myers wrote:
On Tue, 3 Mar 2020, Egeyar Bagcioglu wrote:
Although we discussed after the submission of the first version that
there are several other options performing similar tasks, I believe we
established that there is still
On 3/4/20 4:34 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
On Mär 04 2020, Richard Biener wrote:
--record-gcc-command-line is not a FSF GCC option, there's
-frecord-gcc-switches though which
--record-gcc-command-line is translated to -frecord-gcc-switches by the
driver. That happens for all double-dash
On 3/4/20 10:00 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 5:41 PM Egeyar Bagcioglu
wrote:
This patch is for .GCC.command.line sections in LTO objects to be copied
into the final objects as in the following example:
[egeyar@localhost lto]$ gcc -flto -O3 demo.c -c -g --record-gcc
On 3/3/20 3:44 PM, Egeyar Bagcioglu wrote:
In addition to the new test case, I built binutils as my test case after
passing this option to CFLAGS. The added .GCC.command.line section of ld.bfd
listed many compile commands as expected. Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
As mentioned above, I
gcc/testsuite/:
2020-02-27 Egeyar Bagcioglu
* lib/target-supports-dg.exp (dg-require-target-object-format): New.
---
gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports-dg.exp | 11 +++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports-dg.exp
b/gcc/testsuite/lib
gcc:
2020-02-27 Egeyar Bagcioglu
* common.opt (--record-gcc-command-line): New option.
* config/elfos.h (TARGET_ASM_RECORD_GCC_COMMAND_LINE): Define as
elf_record_gcc_command_line.
* doc/tm.texi: Regenerate.
* doc/tm.texi.in
.GCC.command.line section of ld.bfd
listed many compile commands as expected. Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
Please review the patches, let me know what you think and apply if appropriate.
Regards
Egeyar
Egeyar Bagcioglu (3):
Introduce dg-require-target-object-format
Introduce the gcc
) : gcc -flto -O2 demo2.c -c -g
--record-gcc-command-line -DFORTIFY=2
Regards
Egeyar
libiberty:
2020-02-27 Egeyar Bagcioglu
* simple-object.c (handle_lto_debug_sections): Name
".GCC.command.line" among debug sections to be copied over
from lto objects.
---
libibe
On 11/14/19 3:51 AM, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
On Thu, 7 Nov 2019, Egeyar Bagcioglu wrote:
On 11/7/19 8:47 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 06:21:33PM +0100, Egeyar Bagcioglu wrote:
+proc dg-require-target-object-format { args } {
+if { [gcc_target_object_format
On 11/13/19 10:37 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 11/7/19 3:50 PM, Egeyar Bagcioglu wrote:
On 11/7/19 10:24 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 11/6/19 6:21 PM, Egeyar Bagcioglu wrote:
Hello,
Hello.
Thanks for your detailed reply Martin. You'll find my reply inline.
Since you added Nick Clifton
On 11/7/19 7:57 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
Hi!
On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 06:44:17PM +0100, Egeyar Bagcioglu wrote:
On 11/7/19 9:03 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
+ ASM_OUTPUT_ASCII(asm_out_file, cmdline, cmdline_length);
+}
+ cmdline[0] = 0;
+ ASM_OUTPUT_ASCII(asm_out_file
Hello again Segher!
On 11/7/19 9:03 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
Hi!
On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 06:21:34PM +0100, Egeyar Bagcioglu wrote:
+static const char *
+record_gcc_command_line_spec_function(int argc ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED, const char
**argv)
+{
+ const char *filename = argv[0];
+ FILE *out
On 11/7/19 6:17 PM, jose.march...@oracle.com wrote:
On 11/7/19 8:47 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 06:21:33PM +0100, Egeyar Bagcioglu wrote:
>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>> 2019-11
Hi Segher!
On 11/7/19 8:47 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
Hi!
On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 06:21:33PM +0100, Egeyar Bagcioglu wrote:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2019-11-06 Egeyar Bagcioglu
* lib/target-supports-dg.exp: Define dg-require-target-object-format.
* lib/target-supports-dg.exp
On 11/7/19 4:13 PM, Nick Clifton wrote:
Hi Egeyar,
Thanks for including me in this discussion.
This option is similar to -frecord-gcc-switches.
For the record I will also note that there is -fverbose-asm which
does almost the same thing, but only records the options as comments
in the
On 11/7/19 10:24 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 11/6/19 6:21 PM, Egeyar Bagcioglu wrote:
Hello,
Hello.
Thanks for your detailed reply Martin. You'll find my reply inline.
Since you added Nick Clifton to your following reply, I am adding him to
this email too. He is not only the author
gcc/ChangeLog:
2019-10-21 Egeyar Bagcioglu
* common.opt (--record-gcc-command-line): New option.
* config/elfos.h (TARGET_ASM_RECORD_GCC_COMMAND_LINE): Define
as elf_record_gcc_command_line.
* doc/tm.texi: Regenerate.
* doc/tm.texi.in
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2019-11-06 Egeyar Bagcioglu
* lib/target-supports-dg.exp: Define dg-require-target-object-format.
---
gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports-dg.exp | 11 +++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports-dg.exp
b/gcc
compile commands as expected. Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
Please review the patches, let me know what you think and apply if appropriate.
Regards
Egeyar
Egeyar Bagcioglu (2):
Introduce dg-require-target-object-format
Introduce the gcc option --record-gcc-command-line
gcc/common.opt
On 10/26/2017 05:03 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 10/18/2017 10:59 AM, Egeyar Bagcioglu wrote:
Hello,
Test case "guality.exp=nrv-1.c" fails on aarch64. Optimizations reorder
the instructions and cause the value of a variable to be checked before
its first assignment. The following patch
On 10/20/2017 03:13 PM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
On 19/10/17 09:14, Richard Biener wrote:
I guess Alex work on stmt frontiers will fix this instance?
Thank you all for the reviews.
I fetched Alex's branches in gcc (aoliva/SFN) and in binutils
(users/aoliva/SFN). Using gcc and binutils
reak point is reached after the assignment instruction is executed.
Please review the patch and apply if legitimate.
Egeyar
>From a11fe0b1fcf1867a0fa8c4627e347bda07a4c61b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Egeyar Bagcioglu <egeyar.bagcio...@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 06:16:30 -0700
S
29 matches
Mail list logo
